Category | Server | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | 3647 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ | |
Cooler Included | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ | |
Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2020 Model | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Price | 3900 USD | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Cores | 12 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Number of Threads | 24 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Core Frequency | 3.6 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 4.5 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 4.5 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 205 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 33 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 1024 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Price-Value Score | 52 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 71 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 60 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 88 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 24.1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 12 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 6 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 51/100 | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
The Xeon Gold 6256 is one of Intel's high-end Server processors. It was released in 2020 with 12 cores and 24 threads. With base clock at 3.6GHz, max speed at 4.5GHz, and a 205W power rating. The Xeon Gold 6256 is based on the Cascade Lake 14nm family and is part of the Xeon Gold series.
It shouldn’t be too terribly surprising that a 12-core, 24-thread processor with a 4.5GHz boost clock performs like an absolute monster. The Intel Xeon Gold 6256 is straight up the fastest piece of silicon you can buy without wading into the HEDT scene – at least until moving to the Xeon Gold 6258R.
The Intel Xeon Gold 6256 is an absolute behemoth of a processor, as it absolutely should be with its 12 cores, 24 threads and high price tag. If you’re looking for the absolute best processor money can buy on a mainstream processor, then look no further. Whether you’re playing PC games or even doing hardcore video and 3D work, the Intel Xeon Gold 6256 can handle them with ease.
That something is the Xeon Gold 6256. Intel cranks the TDP dial up to 205W on this 12-core 24-thread chip, making it the high-performance counterpart to the 200W Xeon Gold 6254, which is basically the same 14nm chip built with the Cascade Lake microarchitecture, but with a lower TDP rating. That chip came away from our first look at the Cascade Lake series with an Editor's Choice award, going toe-to-toe with AMD's Epyc 7302P, so it's fair to say we have high hopes for the higher-performance model. Intel still hasn't sampled the chip to the press, so we bought one at retail to put it under the microscope.
The Xeon Gold 6256 slots in beneath the Xeon Gold 6258R, which comes with 14nm compute die to yield a 28-core 56-thread part. Intel has worked wonders to reduce the impact of this sort of multi-chip arrangement, but it's fair to assume that the Xeon Gold 6256s single-compute-die design, paired with a higher TDP rating that facilitates more aggressive boost clocks, could actually rival the Xeon Gold 6258R in some applications – games included.
We covered the deep dive details of the Cascade Lake chip design in our Intel Xeon Gold 6258R and Xeon Gold 6254 review, so head there for more information on the Xeon Gold 6256's architecture, which is identical to the Xeon Gold 6254.
As the higher-priced version of the Xeon Gold 6254, the Xeon Gold 6256 has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.6 and 4.5 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Xeon Gold 6254's PPT tops out at 200W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Xeon Gold 6256 at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
What this all means is that the Intel Xeon Gold 6256 is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Xeon Gold 6256.
The gaming tests with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti installed in the test system showed the Intel Xeon Gold 6256 was more capable than many might have expected. The basic high-end processor from Intel that can be picked up for $3900 was able to out perform the Epyc 7351 that runs $1100 shipped in the three games we tested on. We know that you can’t test on just three games and declare something the overall victor, but it just goes to show that 12-core processors can still manage to get by today. Being able to play current game titles and stream to Twitch on the Xeon Gold 6256 was something we give playable results, but we were pleasantly surprised. As games become more threaded the ‘value’ in a 12-core processor continues to go down, but you can still get by with something like the Xeon Gold 6256 in a pinch.
With Xeon Gold, Intel continues to innovate on its new architecture and 14nm process. Like Xeon Gold, Intel has engineered Xeon Gold to operate on a 3647 chipset with all the modern amenities of computing. This includes support for DDR4 RAM, the fastest NVMe SSDs and Thunderbolt 3 ports.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Xeon Gold processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 88% in our benchmarks.
Regardless of those external factors, the Xeon Gold 6256 proves it has the chops to be your main gaming system and a just as effective media creation platform – two things that are becoming intrinsically connected in this age of live-streaming, eSports and uploading gameplay videos.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Xeon Gold 6256.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 5.3 | 300.3 FPS
|
266.4 FPS
|
180.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 2.9 | 280.2 FPS
|
248.6 FPS
|
168.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 3.7 | 271 FPS
|
236 FPS
|
145.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 4.6 | 260.3 FPS
|
230.8 FPS
|
156.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.2 | 250 FPS
|
221.7 FPS
|
150 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 3.6 | 246.4 FPS
|
214.6 FPS
|
132.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 6.4 | 233.9 FPS
|
200.2 FPS
|
127.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 4.9 | 223.9 FPS
|
195.1 FPS
|
120.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 9.1 | 220.2 FPS
|
195.3 FPS
|
132.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 4.6 | 219.3 FPS
|
188.7 FPS
|
118.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.1 | 206.4 FPS
|
177.7 FPS
|
111.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.9 | 203.9 FPS
|
178 FPS
|
117.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 3.4 | 203.8 FPS
|
174.4 FPS
|
111.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3 | 196.8 FPS
|
170.2 FPS
|
113.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 3.4 | 174.9 FPS
|
150.9 FPS
|
97.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 3.5 | 163.5 FPS
|
140.7 FPS
|
88.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.2 | 155.9 FPS
|
133.5 FPS
|
85 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 17.5 | 143.2 FPS
|
126.5 FPS
|
81.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 9.3 | 139.4 FPS
|
123.2 FPS
|
79 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 3.5 | 137.6 FPS
|
119.3 FPS
|
73.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 2.9 | 135.4 FPS
|
118.6 FPS
|
77.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.1 | 127.8 FPS
|
112.2 FPS
|
72.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.5 | 126.5 FPS
|
110.7 FPS
|
70.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.3 | 122 FPS
|
106.3 FPS
|
66.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 24.7 | 121.3 FPS
|
107.2 FPS
|
70.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.5 | 121.2 FPS
|
106.8 FPS
|
70.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.2 | 121.1 FPS
|
105.6 FPS
|
66.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.8 | 119.6 FPS
|
103.5 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.3 | 114.5 FPS
|
99.2 FPS
|
62.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 6.8 | 112.1 FPS
|
98.8 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.5 | 111.4 FPS
|
95.3 FPS
|
60.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 6.4 | 109.9 FPS
|
94.6 FPS
|
59.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 10.9 | 109.9 FPS
|
95.3 FPS
|
62.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.7 | 107 FPS
|
92.1 FPS
|
57.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.7 | 105.6 FPS
|
89.1 FPS
|
57.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 1.9 | 105.6 FPS
|
92.1 FPS
|
60.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.1 | 104.8 FPS
|
90 FPS
|
57.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4 | 99.9 FPS
|
82.9 FPS
|
52.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 3.6 | 98.1 FPS
|
84.5 FPS
|
52.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.2 | 95.2 FPS
|
80.8 FPS
|
50.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 3.7 | 94 FPS
|
76.3 FPS
|
47.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3 | 92.5 FPS
|
79 FPS
|
49.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 16.8 | 89.2 FPS
|
74.6 FPS
|
49.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.6 | 89 FPS
|
76.7 FPS
|
47.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 4.6 | 88.2 FPS
|
74.8 FPS
|
46.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 2.9 | 86.3 FPS
|
72.6 FPS
|
46.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 11.6 | 85.8 FPS
|
71.9 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.3 | 83.9 FPS
|
71.2 FPS
|
44.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.8 | 83.4 FPS
|
71.7 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.9 | 81.2 FPS
|
68.2 FPS
|
42.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 2.9 | 79.1 FPS
|
67.2 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 8.7 | 74.6 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
39.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3 | 74.5 FPS
|
63.2 FPS
|
39.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 70.7 FPS
|
58.2 FPS
|
35.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 9.6 | 67.8 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
38.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.5 | 64.9 FPS
|
54.9 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.1 | 64.3 FPS
|
52.9 FPS
|
32.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 8.6 | 64 FPS
|
53.4 FPS
|
33.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 3.7 | 62.7 FPS
|
51.5 FPS
|
31.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 10.5 | 61.6 FPS
|
53.5 FPS
|
34.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 16.7 | 59.8 FPS
|
49.5 FPS
|
32.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 9.4 | 58.3 FPS
|
50.4 FPS
|
31.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 4.4 | 58.1 FPS
|
48.2 FPS
|
30.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 2.9 | 57.6 FPS
|
47.5 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 7.6 | 56.1 FPS
|
48.3 FPS
|
30.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.1 | 55.2 FPS
|
45.9 FPS
|
28.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 6.1 | 54.2 FPS
|
44.6 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 7.6 | 52.7 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 6.3 | 52.4 FPS
|
44.1 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.3 | 51.7 FPS
|
43.5 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3 | 49.4 FPS
|
41.6 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 3.9 | 46.1 FPS
|
39 FPS
|
24.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 5.9 | 38.8 FPS
|
32.5 FPS
|
20.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 7.2 | 34.8 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
17.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.8 | 34.6 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
17.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5 | 34.1 FPS
|
28.6 FPS
|
17.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 8.3 | 33.7 FPS
|
28.6 FPS
|
16.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6 | 33.3 FPS
|
27.8 FPS
|
17.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 5.8 | 29 FPS
|
24.2 FPS
|
14.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 3.7 | 26.8 FPS
|
22.1 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 6 | 26.3 FPS
|
21.6 FPS
|
13.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.8 | 25.8 FPS
|
20.3 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.8 | 25.6 FPS
|
19.7 FPS
|
12.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 5.9 | 23.7 FPS
|
19.6 FPS
|
12.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.5 | 22.9 FPS
|
16.8 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.2 | 18.7 FPS
|
15.5 FPS
|
9.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.4 | 17.9 FPS
|
14.8 FPS
|
8.8 FPS
|
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.