Category | Server | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | FCLGA1151 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ | |
Cooler Included | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ | |
Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2019 Model | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Price | 255 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Number of Cores | 6 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 6 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 4.7 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Boost Frequency | 4.7 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 4.7 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 80 W | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 12 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 128 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Price-Value Score | 74 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 70 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 47 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 89 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 22.2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 11.1 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 5.5 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 52/100 | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
The Xeon E-2226G is one of Intel's high-end Server processors. It was released in 2019 with 6 cores and 6 threads. With base clock at 4.7GHz, max speed at 4.7GHz, and a 80W power rating. The Xeon E-2226G is based on the Coffee Lake 14nm family and is part of the Xeon E series.
In our mind, the best processors are the ones that deliver outstanding performance at a reasonable price point. And, the Xeon E-2226G absolutely nails this concept.
Speaking of which, if you want a high-end desktop (HEDT) 8-core processor that can compete with the Intel Xeon E-2226G, you’re going to have to drop quite a bit more cash and get something like the $574 AMD Epyc 7251. And, even if you do go with this AMD chip, you won’t necessarily end up with the same level of performance.
That something is the Xeon E-2226G. Intel cranks the TDP dial up to 80W on this 6-core 6-thread chip, making it the high-performance counterpart to the 71W Xeon E-2224, which is basically the same 14nm chip built with the Coffee Lake microarchitecture, but with a lower TDP rating. That chip came away from our first look at the Coffee Lake series with an Editor's Choice award, going toe-to-toe with AMD's Epyc 7232P, so it's fair to say we have high hopes for the higher-performance model. Intel still hasn't sampled the chip to the press, so we bought one at retail to put it under the microscope.
We covered the deep dive details of the Coffee Lake chip design in our Intel Xeon E-2276M and Xeon E-2224 review, so head there for more information on the Xeon E-2226G's architecture, which is identical to the Xeon E-2224.
As the higher-priced version of the Xeon E-2224, the Xeon E-2226G has higher base and Boost frequencies of 4.7 and 4.7 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Xeon E-2224's PPT tops out at 71W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Xeon E-2226G at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
The gaming tests with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti installed in the test system showed the Intel Xeon E-2226G was more capable than many might have expected. The basic high-end processor from Intel that can be picked up for $255 was able to out perform the Epyc 7251 that runs $574 shipped in the three games we tested on. We know that you can’t test on just three games and declare something the overall victor, but it just goes to show that 6-core processors can still manage to get by today. Being able to play current game titles and stream to Twitch on the Xeon E-2226G was something we give playable results, but we were pleasantly surprised. As games become more threaded the ‘value’ in a 6-core processor continues to go down, but you can still get by with something like the Xeon E-2226G in a pinch.
For a 6-core processor, Intel’s $255 flagship Xeon E-2226G processor seems downright cheap. On paper, the cost of those -2 extra cores is almost an afterthought when you stack it up against its direct competitor, the $790 8-core AMD Epyc 7232P.
With Xeon E, Intel continues to innovate on its new architecture and 14nm process. Like Xeon E, Intel has engineered Xeon E to operate on a FCLGA1151 chipset with all the modern amenities of computing. This includes support for DDR4 RAM, the fastest NVMe SSDs and Thunderbolt 3 ports.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Xeon E processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 89% in our benchmarks.
While the 6-core and high-price of the Intel Xeon E-2276M seemed like overkill in certain respects, the Intel Xeon E-2226G feels like a no brainer for everyone from enthusiasts to artists and regular users who look for an extra bit of power. It’s an affordable and powerful chip for everything the modern gamer and creative needs, with extra headroom to grow.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Xeon E CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the high-end with its Xeon E-2226G processors, which the company is making available as of 27 May 2019.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Xeon E-2226G.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 5.2 | 307.8 FPS
|
269.2 FPS
|
181.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 2.8 | 287.3 FPS
|
251.2 FPS
|
169.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 3.6 | 277.8 FPS
|
238.4 FPS
|
146.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 4.5 | 266.8 FPS
|
233.1 FPS
|
157.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.1 | 256.3 FPS
|
223.9 FPS
|
150.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 3.6 | 252.6 FPS
|
216.8 FPS
|
132.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 6.3 | 239.8 FPS
|
202.2 FPS
|
128.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 4.8 | 229.5 FPS
|
197.1 FPS
|
120.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 8.9 | 225.7 FPS
|
197.3 FPS
|
132.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 4.4 | 224.8 FPS
|
190.6 FPS
|
118.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.1 | 211.6 FPS
|
179.5 FPS
|
111.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.8 | 209 FPS
|
179.8 FPS
|
118.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 3.3 | 208.9 FPS
|
176.2 FPS
|
111.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3 | 201.8 FPS
|
172 FPS
|
114.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 3.3 | 179.3 FPS
|
152.4 FPS
|
98.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 3.5 | 167.6 FPS
|
142.1 FPS
|
88.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.1 | 159.8 FPS
|
134.8 FPS
|
85.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 17 | 146.8 FPS
|
127.8 FPS
|
81.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 9.1 | 142.9 FPS
|
124.5 FPS
|
79.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 3.4 | 141.1 FPS
|
120.5 FPS
|
74.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 2.9 | 138.7 FPS
|
119.8 FPS
|
78.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3 | 131 FPS
|
113.4 FPS
|
73.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.4 | 129.7 FPS
|
111.8 FPS
|
71 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.2 | 125.1 FPS
|
107.4 FPS
|
67.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 24.1 | 124.3 FPS
|
108.3 FPS
|
70.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.4 | 124.2 FPS
|
107.9 FPS
|
70.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.2 | 124.1 FPS
|
106.7 FPS
|
66.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.7 | 122.6 FPS
|
104.6 FPS
|
65.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.2 | 117.4 FPS
|
100.3 FPS
|
62.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 6.6 | 114.9 FPS
|
99.8 FPS
|
63.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.4 | 114.2 FPS
|
96.3 FPS
|
61 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 10.6 | 112.6 FPS
|
96.3 FPS
|
62.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 6.2 | 112.6 FPS
|
95.6 FPS
|
59.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.6 | 109.7 FPS
|
93 FPS
|
58 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.6 | 108.2 FPS
|
90 FPS
|
57.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 1.8 | 108.2 FPS
|
93 FPS
|
60.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.1 | 107.5 FPS
|
90.9 FPS
|
58.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 3.9 | 102.4 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
52.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 3.5 | 100.5 FPS
|
85.3 FPS
|
53.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.1 | 97.6 FPS
|
81.6 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 3.6 | 96.4 FPS
|
77 FPS
|
47.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 2.9 | 94.8 FPS
|
79.8 FPS
|
49.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 16.4 | 91.5 FPS
|
75.4 FPS
|
50.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 91.2 FPS
|
77.4 FPS
|
48.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 4.5 | 90.4 FPS
|
75.6 FPS
|
47 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 2.8 | 88.4 FPS
|
73.4 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 11.4 | 87.9 FPS
|
72.6 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.2 | 86 FPS
|
71.9 FPS
|
44.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.7 | 85.5 FPS
|
72.4 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.8 | 83.2 FPS
|
68.9 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 2.8 | 81.1 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 8.5 | 76.5 FPS
|
63.6 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 2.9 | 76.3 FPS
|
63.8 FPS
|
39.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 72.4 FPS
|
58.8 FPS
|
35.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 9.3 | 69.5 FPS
|
60.5 FPS
|
38.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.4 | 66.5 FPS
|
55.4 FPS
|
34.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3 | 65.9 FPS
|
53.4 FPS
|
32.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 8.4 | 65.6 FPS
|
53.9 FPS
|
33.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 3.6 | 64.2 FPS
|
52.1 FPS
|
31.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 10.3 | 63.2 FPS
|
54 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 16.3 | 61.3 FPS
|
50 FPS
|
32.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 9.2 | 59.7 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 4.3 | 59.6 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
30.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 2.9 | 59 FPS
|
48 FPS
|
29.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 7.5 | 57.5 FPS
|
48.8 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3 | 56.5 FPS
|
46.3 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 5.9 | 55.6 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 7.4 | 54 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 6.1 | 53.7 FPS
|
44.5 FPS
|
26.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.2 | 53 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
26.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 2.9 | 50.7 FPS
|
42 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 3.8 | 47.3 FPS
|
39.4 FPS
|
24.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 5.8 | 39.8 FPS
|
32.8 FPS
|
20.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 7 | 35.7 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
17.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.6 | 35.4 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
17.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.8 | 34.9 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
18 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 8.1 | 34.6 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.8 | 34.1 FPS
|
28.1 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 5.7 | 29.7 FPS
|
24.4 FPS
|
14.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 3.6 | 27.5 FPS
|
22.3 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 5.9 | 27 FPS
|
21.8 FPS
|
13.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.6 | 26.5 FPS
|
20.5 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.7 | 26.3 FPS
|
19.9 FPS
|
12.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 5.8 | 24.3 FPS
|
19.8 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.4 | 23.4 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.1 | 19.2 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
9.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.3 | 18.3 FPS
|
14.9 FPS
|
8.8 FPS
|
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.