Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | entry-level | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | LGA1150 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2013 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Price | 116 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Number of Cores | 2 Cores | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 2 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 3.3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 3.3 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 3.3 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 54 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 22 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 3 MB | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Price-Value Score | 69 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 43 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 24 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 67 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 62 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 31 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 15.5 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 25/100 | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Pentium G3430 is one of Intel's entry-level Desktop processors. It was released in 2013 with 2 cores and 2 threads. With base clock at 3.3GHz, max speed at 3.3GHz, and a 54W power rating. The Pentium G3430 is based on the Haswell 22nm family and is part of the Pentium series.
As the higher-priced version of the Pentium G3420, the Pentium G3430 has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.3 and 3.3 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Pentium G3420's PPT tops out at 54W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Pentium G3430 at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
The Intel Pentium G3430 has a 54W TDP, and with that fairly low amount of power, it's able to deliver quite a lot. This processor can keep up with even the AMD A8-6600K, a processor that considerably costs more and consumes more power, with its TDP of 100W.
So which should you buy? Let's get that out of the way. Before this comparison review we updated our Best CPU feature and we said you should go with the A8-6500 as it comes with a better stock cooler, can be overclocked, and the FM2 platform offers a significantly better upgrade path.
When it comes to gaming it’s fair to say there’s no wrong option here and the A8-6500 and Pentium G3430 are evenly matched. The Pentium G3430 is at times faster thanks to better game support and lower latencies, but the A8-6500 is often able to ensure smoother frame rates thanks to its support for twice as many threads.
If you're mostly playing games on your PC, you will be happy buying either processor. Both proved to be solid options and are evenly matched with a slight advantage to the AMD chip if you don't tune up the A8 processor. The base performance we showed for the Pentium G3430 can be achieved with $90 memory, while the A8-6500 will require $110 - $120 memory in order to enable the frame rates shown here. It’s not a big cost difference and right now with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 you’ll more than likely become GPU limited.
Moving beyond games, it’s an easy win for the A8-6500. The A8 upgrade path on A55, A75, A85X motherboards, all support upcoming Piledriver processors. So if you buy a nice A55, A75, A85X board now with the A8-6500, you’ll be able to slap a Haswell processor on there later in the year, or whenever you deem it necessary.
One of the nice things about the Intel Pentium G3430 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the Intel Pentium G3430 up for $116 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The Intel Pentium G3430 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 54W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
The Intel Pentium G3430 seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $116 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the A8-6500 4-Core unlocked desktop processor with Radeon HD 8570D graphics ($257.09 shipped).
That said, Intel still lags behind in frequency when the A8-6600K operates at 3.9GHz at any given moment and 4.2GHz when push comes to shove.
If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, Intel also offers the Pentium G3420 at $252. It’s still outfitted with 2-cores and 2-threads, but clocks in at a slower 3.2GHz and maxes out at only 3.2GHz.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent entry-level chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Q87, Z87, Z97 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Pentium CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the entry-level with its Pentium G3430 processors, which the company is making available as of Oct 2013.
Although there is an unlocked A8-6600K at the top of AMD's A8 family, it isn't particularly popular. The chip is relatively expensive, and it unfortunately requires a pricey motherboard for overclocking support. In comparison, Intel lets you overclock Pentium on cheaper platforms.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Pentium G3430.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 10.6 | 150.4 FPS
|
208.9 FPS
|
162.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.7 | 140.3 FPS
|
195 FPS
|
151.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 7.4 | 135.7 FPS
|
185.1 FPS
|
130.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 9.2 | 130.3 FPS
|
180.9 FPS
|
140.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 6.4 | 125.2 FPS
|
173.8 FPS
|
134.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 7.3 | 123.4 FPS
|
168.3 FPS
|
118.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 12.8 | 117.1 FPS
|
156.9 FPS
|
114.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 9.8 | 112.1 FPS
|
153 FPS
|
108 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 18.1 | 110.2 FPS
|
153.1 FPS
|
118.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 9.1 | 109.8 FPS
|
148 FPS
|
106.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 6.3 | 103.4 FPS
|
139.3 FPS
|
100.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 7.8 | 102.1 FPS
|
139.5 FPS
|
105.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 6.8 | 102.1 FPS
|
136.8 FPS
|
99.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 6.1 | 98.5 FPS
|
133.5 FPS
|
102.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 6.8 | 87.6 FPS
|
118.3 FPS
|
88 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 7.1 | 81.9 FPS
|
110.3 FPS
|
79.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.4 | 78.1 FPS
|
104.6 FPS
|
76.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 34.9 | 71.7 FPS
|
99.2 FPS
|
73 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 18.6 | 69.8 FPS
|
96.6 FPS
|
71 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 7 | 68.9 FPS
|
93.5 FPS
|
66.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.9 | 67.8 FPS
|
93 FPS
|
70 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.2 | 64 FPS
|
88 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 11 | 63.3 FPS
|
86.8 FPS
|
63.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.5 | 61.1 FPS
|
83.3 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 49.4 | 60.7 FPS
|
84 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 4.9 | 60.7 FPS
|
83.7 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 4.4 | 60.6 FPS
|
82.8 FPS
|
59.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 11.7 | 59.9 FPS
|
81.2 FPS
|
58.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 6.6 | 57.3 FPS
|
77.8 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 13.5 | 56.1 FPS
|
77.4 FPS
|
56.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.9 | 55.8 FPS
|
74.7 FPS
|
54.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 21.8 | 55 FPS
|
74.7 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 12.7 | 55 FPS
|
74.2 FPS
|
53.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.4 | 53.6 FPS
|
72.2 FPS
|
51.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.4 | 52.9 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
51.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 3.8 | 52.9 FPS
|
72.2 FPS
|
54.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 6.3 | 52.5 FPS
|
70.5 FPS
|
52 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8 | 50 FPS
|
65 FPS
|
47.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 7.1 | 49.1 FPS
|
66.2 FPS
|
47.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10.5 | 47.7 FPS
|
63.3 FPS
|
45.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 7.4 | 47.1 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6 | 46.3 FPS
|
61.9 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 33.5 | 44.7 FPS
|
58.5 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 11.2 | 44.5 FPS
|
60.1 FPS
|
43 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 9.3 | 44.2 FPS
|
58.6 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 5.8 | 43.2 FPS
|
57 FPS
|
41.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 23.3 | 42.9 FPS
|
56.3 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6.6 | 42 FPS
|
55.8 FPS
|
40 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.5 | 41.8 FPS
|
56.2 FPS
|
40.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.8 | 40.7 FPS
|
53.5 FPS
|
38.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 5.8 | 39.6 FPS
|
52.7 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 17.4 | 37.4 FPS
|
49.4 FPS
|
35.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 5.9 | 37.3 FPS
|
49.5 FPS
|
35.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 7.9 | 35.4 FPS
|
45.6 FPS
|
32 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 19.1 | 33.9 FPS
|
46.9 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 4.9 | 32.5 FPS
|
43 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 6.2 | 32.2 FPS
|
41.5 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 17.2 | 32 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
30.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 7.3 | 31.4 FPS
|
40.4 FPS
|
28.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 21 | 30.9 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
30.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 33.4 | 29.9 FPS
|
38.8 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 18.8 | 29.2 FPS
|
39.5 FPS
|
28.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 8.7 | 29.1 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
27.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.9 | 28.8 FPS
|
37.3 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 15.3 | 28.1 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 6.2 | 27.6 FPS
|
36 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 12.1 | 27.1 FPS
|
35 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 15.2 | 26.4 FPS
|
35.3 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 12.6 | 26.2 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
23.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.5 | 25.9 FPS
|
34.1 FPS
|
23.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 6 | 24.7 FPS
|
32.6 FPS
|
23.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 7.7 | 23.1 FPS
|
30.6 FPS
|
21.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 11.8 | 19.4 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
18.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 14.3 | 17.4 FPS
|
22.9 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.5 | 17.3 FPS
|
22.7 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 9.9 | 17.1 FPS
|
22.5 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 16.5 | 16.9 FPS
|
22.4 FPS
|
15.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.9 | 16.7 FPS
|
21.8 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 11.7 | 14.5 FPS
|
18.9 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 7.4 | 13.4 FPS
|
17.3 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 12 | 13.2 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.6 | 12.9 FPS
|
15.9 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.6 | 12.8 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
11.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 11.8 | 11.9 FPS
|
15.3 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 13.1 | 11.4 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
9.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.4 | 9.4 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
8.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.8 | 9 FPS
|
11.6 FPS
|
7.9 FPS
|
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.