Intel Pentium E6800 Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | entry-level | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA775 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2010 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 831 USD | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 2 Cores | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 2 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.333 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3.33 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 3.3 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 65 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 45 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 0 MB | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 16 GB | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 52 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 38 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 21 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 61 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 68.4 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 34.2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 17.1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 20/100 | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Pentium E6800 is one of Intel's entry-level Desktop processors. It was released in 2010 with 2 cores and 2 threads. With base clock at 3.333GHz, max speed at 3.33GHz, and a 65W power rating. The Pentium E6800 is based on the Wolfdale 45nm family and is part of the Pentium series.
As the higher-priced version of the Pentium E6700, the Pentium E6800 has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.333 and 3.33 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Pentium E6700's PPT tops out at 65W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Pentium E6800 at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
If you're mostly playing games on your PC, you will be happy buying either processor. Both proved to be solid options and are evenly matched with a slight advantage to the AMD chip if you don't tune up the Athlon II X2 processor. The base performance we showed for the Pentium E6800 can be achieved with $90 memory, while the Athlon II X2 270 will require $110 - $120 memory in order to enable the frame rates shown here. It’s not a big cost difference and right now with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 you’ll more than likely become GPU limited.
Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the Intel Pentium E6800 2-core desktop processor that was released in Oct 2010. Intel offers the Pentium E6800 without integrated graphics. It runs $831 shipped and is ideal for those that plan on using it a system with a dedicated graphics card.
One of the nice things about the Intel Pentium E6800 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the Intel Pentium E6800 up for $831 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The Intel Pentium E6800 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 65W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, Intel also offers the Pentium E6700 at $80. It’s still outfitted with 2-cores and 2-threads, but clocks in at a slower 3.2GHz and maxes out at only 3.2GHz.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent entry-level chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Q45, VIA P4M890, X38 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Pentium CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the entry-level with its Pentium E6800 processors, which the company is making available as of Oct 2010.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Pentium E6800
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Pentium E6800.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 12.8 | 125 FPS
|
199.2 FPS
|
159.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 6.8 | 116.7 FPS
|
185.9 FPS
|
148.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 8.9 | 112.8 FPS
|
176.5 FPS
|
128.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 11.1 | 108.4 FPS
|
172.5 FPS
|
137.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 7.7 | 104.1 FPS
|
165.7 FPS
|
132.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 8.8 | 102.6 FPS
|
160.5 FPS
|
116.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 15.4 | 97.4 FPS
|
149.7 FPS
|
112.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 11.8 | 93.2 FPS
|
145.9 FPS
|
105.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 21.8 | 91.7 FPS
|
146 FPS
|
116.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 10.9 | 91.3 FPS
|
141.1 FPS
|
104.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 7.5 | 86 FPS
|
132.8 FPS
|
98.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 9.4 | 84.9 FPS
|
133.1 FPS
|
103.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 8.2 | 84.9 FPS
|
130.4 FPS
|
98 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 7.3 | 81.9 FPS
|
127.3 FPS
|
100.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 8.2 | 72.8 FPS
|
112.8 FPS
|
86.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 8.5 | 68.1 FPS
|
105.2 FPS
|
77.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7.7 | 64.9 FPS
|
99.8 FPS
|
75 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 41.9 | 59.6 FPS
|
94.6 FPS
|
71.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 22.4 | 58 FPS
|
92.1 FPS
|
69.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 8.4 | 57.3 FPS
|
89.2 FPS
|
65 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.1 | 56.4 FPS
|
88.7 FPS
|
68.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.5 | 53.2 FPS
|
83.9 FPS
|
64.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 13.3 | 52.7 FPS
|
82.8 FPS
|
62.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.9 | 50.8 FPS
|
79.5 FPS
|
59 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 59.4 | 50.5 FPS
|
80.1 FPS
|
61.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 5.9 | 50.5 FPS
|
79.8 FPS
|
61.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 5.3 | 50.4 FPS
|
79 FPS
|
58.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 14 | 49.8 FPS
|
77.4 FPS
|
57.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 7.9 | 47.7 FPS
|
74.2 FPS
|
54.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 16.3 | 46.7 FPS
|
73.8 FPS
|
55.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10.8 | 46.4 FPS
|
71.3 FPS
|
53.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 15.3 | 45.7 FPS
|
70.8 FPS
|
52.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 26.2 | 45.7 FPS
|
71.3 FPS
|
54.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 8.9 | 44.6 FPS
|
68.9 FPS
|
50.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 11.3 | 44 FPS
|
66.6 FPS
|
50.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 4.5 | 44 FPS
|
68.9 FPS
|
53.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 7.5 | 43.6 FPS
|
67.3 FPS
|
51 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 9.6 | 41.6 FPS
|
62 FPS
|
46.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 8.6 | 40.8 FPS
|
63.2 FPS
|
46.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 12.6 | 39.6 FPS
|
60.4 FPS
|
44.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 9 | 39.1 FPS
|
57 FPS
|
41.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 7.2 | 38.5 FPS
|
59.1 FPS
|
43.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 40.4 | 37.1 FPS
|
55.8 FPS
|
43.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 13.5 | 37 FPS
|
57.3 FPS
|
42.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 11.1 | 36.7 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
41.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 6.9 | 35.9 FPS
|
54.3 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 28 | 35.7 FPS
|
53.7 FPS
|
39.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 8 | 34.9 FPS
|
53.2 FPS
|
39.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 11.5 | 34.7 FPS
|
53.6 FPS
|
39.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 11.8 | 33.8 FPS
|
51 FPS
|
37.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 7 | 32.9 FPS
|
50.2 FPS
|
37.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 20.9 | 31.1 FPS
|
47.1 FPS
|
34.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 7.1 | 31 FPS
|
47.2 FPS
|
34.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 9.5 | 29.4 FPS
|
43.5 FPS
|
31.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 23 | 28.2 FPS
|
44.7 FPS
|
33.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 5.9 | 27 FPS
|
41 FPS
|
30.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 7.4 | 26.8 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
28.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 20.6 | 26.6 FPS
|
39.9 FPS
|
29.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 8.8 | 26.1 FPS
|
38.5 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 25.3 | 25.7 FPS
|
40 FPS
|
30.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 40.1 | 24.9 FPS
|
37 FPS
|
28.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 22.6 | 24.3 FPS
|
37.7 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 10.5 | 24.2 FPS
|
36 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 7 | 24 FPS
|
35.5 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 18.4 | 23.3 FPS
|
36.1 FPS
|
27 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 7.4 | 23 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
25.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 14.6 | 22.6 FPS
|
33.3 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 18.3 | 21.9 FPS
|
33.6 FPS
|
25.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 15.1 | 21.8 FPS
|
33 FPS
|
23.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 7.9 | 21.5 FPS
|
32.5 FPS
|
23.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 7.2 | 20.6 FPS
|
31.1 FPS
|
22.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 9.3 | 19.2 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
21.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 14.1 | 16.2 FPS
|
24.3 FPS
|
18.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 17.2 | 14.5 FPS
|
21.9 FPS
|
15.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 13.8 | 14.4 FPS
|
21.6 FPS
|
15.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 11.9 | 14.2 FPS
|
21.4 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 19.9 | 14 FPS
|
21.3 FPS
|
14.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 14.3 | 13.9 FPS
|
20.8 FPS
|
15.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 14 | 12.1 FPS
|
18.1 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 8.8 | 11.2 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
12 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 14.5 | 11 FPS
|
16.2 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 13.9 | 10.7 FPS
|
15.2 FPS
|
11.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 13.9 | 10.7 FPS
|
14.7 FPS
|
11.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 14.1 | 9.9 FPS
|
14.6 FPS
|
10.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 15.7 | 9.5 FPS
|
12.6 FPS
|
9.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 10.1 | 7.8 FPS
|
11.6 FPS
|
8.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 10.7 | 7.4 FPS
|
11 FPS
|
7.7 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
firstly, what are you planning to use this build for and what is your budget? 3900x is a very high end chip mostly used for editing
Most amateur music production and some casual gaming. I'd like to run BF V with more than 20 fps.
However, professionally I have been running analyses using machine learning and natural language processing. I'd like to do some projects at home and would benefit with the extra processing power.
Budget is a soft $1,500.
It could just be my luck but I have had 2 cards from xfx one crapped out after 3 years the other one had numerous problems from the start.
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
First build in almost 16 years (last build used a GeForce 6800) Help!!
Haven't built a PC in almost 16 years. Last card I purchased was a GeForce 6800 to add some perspective. Need some oversight as I'm slightly out of touch. Here is the proposed build:
Ryzen 9 3900x Asus Strix B550-E XFX 5700XT G.Skill Aegis Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) x 2 Phanteks Enthoo Pro Full Tower Thermaltake Toughpower PF1 650W
Questions: Will this power supply be able to support both the 8-pin and 4-pin supplementary for the CPU? Is it enough to run everything? PC part picker said it was compatible.
Is XFX a good manufacturer for the 5700?
The CPU comes with a stock heatsink. Should I swap it for a liquid cooled? Other? If so, recommendations? I liked the CoolerMaster Master Liquid 240s. Any good?
Any other concerns or considerations?