Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | LGA1151 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2015 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Price | 339 USD | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 8 Threads | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 4 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 4.2 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 4.6 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 91 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 8 MB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Price-Value Score | 61 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 59 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 37 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 81 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 34.7 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 17.3 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 8.7 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 36/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i7-6700K is one of Intel's high-end Desktop processors. It was released in 2015 with 4 cores and 8 threads. With base clock at 4GHz, max speed at 4.2GHz, and a 91W power rating. The Core i7-6700K is based on the Skylake-S 14nm family and is part of the Core i7 series.
Core i7-6700K is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i7-4770K processor that was based on the Haswell and 22nm process and was released in 2013.
Intel Core i7 6th Generation, and the Skylake-S architecture itself, is notable because it leads 14nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But, there’s a lot more going on under the hood than just a smaller manufacturing node.
Intel Core i7 6 Generation is finally here, and the Intel Core i7-6700K might just be the poster child for what this generation of processors has in store for consumers. Sure, it might have stuck with the 4-core, 8-thread setup, which it inherited from its predecessor, the Core i7-4770K. However, with the new 14nm manufacturing process, it delivers a far better performance at lower power consumption.
This decision to 14nm has brought a beefy 15% boost to IPC (instructions per clock) performance. Effectively, compared to a Core i7 4-Generation processor at the same clock speed, you will get a straight 15% increase in performance. That’s not big enough to be evident in day-to-day workloads, but it does still mean something.
What this all means is that the Intel Core i7-6700K is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Core i7-6700K.
Our look today at the Intel Core i7-6700K showed that it is a very capable processor. A 4-core processor sounds like it would be really under-powered these days, but we were pleasantly surprised with a snappy and very capable system. Having just 4 cores had this processor coming in at the back of the pack for heavily threaded workloads, but it performed better than some of its more expensive siblings in lightly threaded workloads where it shined thanks to its high base clocks.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i7 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 81% in our benchmarks.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent high-end chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Z270, Z370, Z390 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i7 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the high-end with its Core i7-6700K processors, which the company is making available as of Jul 2015.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i7-6700K.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.2 | 258.4 FPS
|
250.4 FPS
|
175.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.3 | 241.1 FPS
|
233.7 FPS
|
163.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.3 | 233.2 FPS
|
221.8 FPS
|
141.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.4 | 223.9 FPS
|
216.9 FPS
|
151.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.7 | 215.1 FPS
|
208.3 FPS
|
145.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.2 | 212 FPS
|
201.7 FPS
|
128.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7.4 | 201.3 FPS
|
188.1 FPS
|
123.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 5.7 | 192.6 FPS
|
183.3 FPS
|
116.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 10.6 | 189.4 FPS
|
183.5 FPS
|
128.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.3 | 188.6 FPS
|
177.3 FPS
|
114.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.7 | 177.6 FPS
|
167 FPS
|
108.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.6 | 175.4 FPS
|
167.2 FPS
|
114.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4 | 175.4 FPS
|
163.9 FPS
|
107.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.5 | 169.3 FPS
|
160 FPS
|
110.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4 | 150.5 FPS
|
141.8 FPS
|
95.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.1 | 140.7 FPS
|
132.2 FPS
|
85.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.7 | 134.2 FPS
|
125.4 FPS
|
82.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 20.3 | 123.2 FPS
|
118.9 FPS
|
78.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 10.8 | 119.9 FPS
|
115.8 FPS
|
76.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4 | 118.4 FPS
|
112.1 FPS
|
71.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.4 | 116.5 FPS
|
111.5 FPS
|
75.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.6 | 109.9 FPS
|
105.5 FPS
|
70.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.4 | 108.8 FPS
|
104 FPS
|
68.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.8 | 105 FPS
|
99.9 FPS
|
65 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 28.8 | 104.3 FPS
|
100.7 FPS
|
68.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.9 | 104.3 FPS
|
100.3 FPS
|
68.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.6 | 104.2 FPS
|
99.2 FPS
|
64.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.8 | 102.9 FPS
|
97.3 FPS
|
63.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.8 | 98.5 FPS
|
93.3 FPS
|
60.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 7.9 | 96.4 FPS
|
92.8 FPS
|
61.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.2 | 95.8 FPS
|
89.6 FPS
|
58.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 12.7 | 94.5 FPS
|
89.6 FPS
|
60.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.4 | 94.5 FPS
|
88.9 FPS
|
57.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.3 | 92.1 FPS
|
86.6 FPS
|
56 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 90.8 FPS
|
83.7 FPS
|
55.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.2 | 90.8 FPS
|
86.6 FPS
|
58.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.6 | 90.2 FPS
|
84.5 FPS
|
56.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.7 | 86 FPS
|
77.9 FPS
|
51 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.1 | 84.4 FPS
|
79.4 FPS
|
51.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.1 | 81.9 FPS
|
75.9 FPS
|
49.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.3 | 80.9 FPS
|
71.7 FPS
|
46.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.5 | 79.6 FPS
|
74.2 FPS
|
47.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 19.5 | 76.8 FPS
|
70.1 FPS
|
48.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.5 | 76.5 FPS
|
72 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.4 | 75.9 FPS
|
70.3 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.4 | 74.2 FPS
|
68.3 FPS
|
44.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 13.5 | 73.8 FPS
|
67.5 FPS
|
43.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 72.2 FPS
|
66.9 FPS
|
43.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.6 | 71.8 FPS
|
67.4 FPS
|
43.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.7 | 69.9 FPS
|
64.1 FPS
|
41.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.4 | 68.1 FPS
|
63.1 FPS
|
40.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 10.1 | 64.2 FPS
|
59.2 FPS
|
38.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.4 | 64.1 FPS
|
59.4 FPS
|
38.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.6 | 60.8 FPS
|
54.7 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.1 | 58.3 FPS
|
56.2 FPS
|
37.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.9 | 55.8 FPS
|
51.5 FPS
|
33.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.6 | 55.3 FPS
|
49.7 FPS
|
31.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10 | 55.1 FPS
|
50.2 FPS
|
32.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.2 | 53.9 FPS
|
48.4 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 12.2 | 53 FPS
|
50.3 FPS
|
33.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 19.4 | 51.4 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
31.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11 | 50.1 FPS
|
47.3 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.1 | 50 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
29.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.4 | 49.6 FPS
|
44.7 FPS
|
28.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 8.9 | 48.2 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
29.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.6 | 47.5 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7 | 46.7 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
28.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8.8 | 45.3 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.3 | 45.1 FPS
|
41.4 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.8 | 44.5 FPS
|
40.9 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.5 | 42.5 FPS
|
39.1 FPS
|
25.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.5 | 39.7 FPS
|
36.7 FPS
|
23.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 6.9 | 33.4 FPS
|
30.5 FPS
|
20.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8.3 | 30 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.7 | 29.7 FPS
|
27.2 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.8 | 29.3 FPS
|
26.9 FPS
|
17.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 9.6 | 29 FPS
|
26.8 FPS
|
16.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.9 | 28.7 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 6.8 | 25 FPS
|
22.7 FPS
|
14.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.3 | 23.1 FPS
|
20.8 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7 | 22.6 FPS
|
20.3 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.7 | 22.2 FPS
|
19.1 FPS
|
12.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.7 | 22.1 FPS
|
18.5 FPS
|
12.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 6.9 | 20.4 FPS
|
18.4 FPS
|
11.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.6 | 19.7 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
10.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.9 | 16.1 FPS
|
14.6 FPS
|
9.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.1 | 15.4 FPS
|
13.9 FPS
|
8.5 FPS
|
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
The biggest draw of the Core i7-6700K, Intel's first sixth-generation CPU, isn't the performance. Rather, it's the extra PCIe lanes that come with the supporting Z170 chipset, which may mean ...
The all-new Intel Core i7-6700K – which pitches in at around $350 (about £225, or AU$475) – does not tear PC gaming a new one. It's not a render monster like none before. It doesn't take ...
Intel's platform flagship is the i7-6700K ($350), sticking to the well-known 4-core, 8-thread approach by way of matured hyperthreading technology. Prior to Skylake, Intel shipped its Devil's ...
Core i7 6700K Four CPU cores with Hyper-Threading, 4.0 GHz frequency, 4.20 GHz maximum Turbo Boost frequency, 8 MB last-level cache, dual-channel DDR3/DDR4 memory controller with 1600 MHz or 2133 ...
The Core i7-6700K will ship with a “recommended customer pricing” of $350, while the i5-6600K will ship at $243. That gives the i7-6700K the same initial MSRP as Devil’s Canyon, though the ...