Intel Core i7-5930K Review

High-end Desktop processor released in 2014 with 6 cores and 12 threads. With base clock at 3.5GHz, max speed at 3.7GHz, and a 140W power rating. Core i7-5930K is based on the Haswell-E 22nm family and part of the Core i7 series.
Price 56%
Speed 52%
Productivity 38%
Gaming 79%
Category Desktop
Target high-end
Socket Compatibility LGA2011
Integrated Graphics None
Cooler Included No
Overclock Potential 10 %
Year 2014 Model
Price 613 USD
Number of Cores 6 Cores
Number of Threads 12 Threads
Core Frequency 3.5 GHz
Boost Frequency 3.7 GHz
Max Stable Overclock 4.1 GHz
Power Consumption 140 W
Manufacturing Process 22 nm
L3 Cache 15 MB
Maximum Supported Memory 64 GB
Price-Value Score 56 %
Speed Score 52 %
Productivity Score 38 %
Gaming Score 79 %
Max 1080p Bottleneck 36.7 %
Max 1440p Bottleneck 18.4 %
Max 4K Bottleneck 9.2 %
Overall Score 30/100

The Core i7-5930K is one of Intel's high-end Desktop processors. It was released in 2014 with 6 cores and 12 threads. With base clock at 3.5GHz, max speed at 3.7GHz, and a 140W power rating. The Core i7-5930K is based on the Haswell-E 22nm family and is part of the Core i7 series.

Core i7-5930K is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i7-4930K processor that was based on the Ivy Bridge E and 22nm process and was released in 2013.

Now, we're asking ourselves whether or not the Intel Core i7-5930K finally dethrones the FX-9590 as the de facto ruler of the mainstream processors. Ultimately, it depends: the Core i7-5930K doesn't reach the same single-core performance as AMD, but we're starting to see more games adopt multi-threaded CPUs, so that doesn't matter as much.

The Intel Core i7-5930K is an absolute behemoth of a processor, as it absolutely should be with its 6 cores, 12 threads and high price tag. If you’re looking for the absolute best processor money can buy on a mainstream processor, then look no further. Whether you’re playing PC games or even doing hardcore video and 3D work, the Intel Core i7-5930K can handle them with ease.

But we've also found that, after simple push-button overclocking, the Core i7-5820K offers similar performance to the Core i7-5930K, even when it is also overclocked. But for $70 less. The Core i7-5930K is an impressive chip and offers a better mixture of performance than AMD's FX-9590, no doubt, but in this case, value seekers might opt for its less expensive sibling.

As the higher-priced version of the Core i7-5820K, the Core i7-5930K has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.5 and 3.7 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Core i7-5820K's PPT tops out at 140W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Core i7-5930K at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.

The Intel Core i7-5930K was rolled out on Aug 2014 for $613, which puts it in the same general price range as the last-generation Core i7-4930K. This means that at least we're not seeing any considerable price jumps from generation to generation.

What this all means is that the Intel Core i7-5930K is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Core i7-5930K.

The Intel Graphics have been disabled and therefore the Core i7-5930K has no form of integrated graphics -- just like the FX-9590. This is meant to make the Core i7-5930K cheaper than the Core i7-4930K, even though AMD's list pricing doesn't make this apparent, in practice the Core i7-5930K can be had for $613 while the Core i7-4930K is still $670, making the newer chip 9% cheaper. It also means it’s cheaper than the FX-9590 which is currently retailing for $495.92.

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the Intel Core i7-5930K 6-core desktop processor that was released in Aug 2014. Intel offers the Core i7-5930K without integrated graphics. It runs $613 shipped and is ideal for those that plan on using it a system with a dedicated graphics card.

If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, Intel also offers the Core i7-5820K at $410. It’s still outfitted with 6-cores and 12-threads, but clocks in at a slower 3.3GHz and maxes out at only 3.6GHz.

Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i7 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 79% in our benchmarks.

Regardless of those external factors, the Core i7-5930K proves it has the chops to be your main gaming system and a just as effective media creation platform – two things that are becoming intrinsically connected in this age of live-streaming, eSports and uploading gameplay videos.

That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent high-end chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade C602J, C606, X79 motherboard.

Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i7 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the high-end with its Core i7-5930K processors, which the company is making available as of Aug 2014.

Which GPU to Pick for Intel Core i7-5930K

Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i7-5930K.

Graphics Card Price Cost Per Frame Avg 1080p Avg 1440p Avg 4K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB $ 1,599 $ 6.4 250.5 FPS
247.1 FPS
174.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB $ 799 $ 3.4 233.7 FPS
230.6 FPS
162.6 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB $ 999 $ 4.4 226.1 FPS
218.9 FPS
140.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB $ 1,199 $ 5.5 217 FPS
214 FPS
150.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB $ 799 $ 3.8 208.5 FPS
205.5 FPS
144.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB $ 899 $ 4.4 205.5 FPS
199 FPS
127.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB $ 1,499 $ 7.7 195.1 FPS
185.6 FPS
123.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB $ 1,099 $ 5.9 186.7 FPS
180.9 FPS
116 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB $ 1,999 $ 10.9 183.6 FPS
181.1 FPS
127.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB $ 999 $ 5.5 182.9 FPS
175 FPS
114.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB $ 649 $ 3.8 172.2 FPS
164.7 FPS
107.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB $ 799 $ 4.7 170.1 FPS
165 FPS
113.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB $ 699 $ 4.1 170 FPS
161.7 FPS
107.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB $ 599 $ 3.6 164.2 FPS
157.9 FPS
110 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB $ 599 $ 4.1 145.9 FPS
139.9 FPS
94.5 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB $ 579 $ 4.2 136.4 FPS
130.5 FPS
85.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB $ 499 $ 3.8 130 FPS
123.8 FPS
82.1 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB $ 2,499 $ 20.9 119.4 FPS
117.3 FPS
78.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB $ 1,299 $ 11.2 116.3 FPS
114.2 FPS
76.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB $ 479 $ 4.2 114.8 FPS
110.6 FPS
71.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB $ 399 $ 3.5 112.9 FPS
110 FPS
75.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB $ 399 $ 3.7 106.6 FPS
104.1 FPS
70.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB $ 699 $ 6.6 105.5 FPS
102.6 FPS
68.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB $ 399 $ 3.9 101.8 FPS
98.6 FPS
64.7 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB $ 2,999 $ 29.7 101.1 FPS
99.4 FPS
67.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB $ 299 $ 3 101.1 FPS
99 FPS
67.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB $ 269 $ 2.7 101 FPS
97.9 FPS
64.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB $ 699 $ 7 99.7 FPS
96 FPS
63.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB $ 379 $ 4 95.5 FPS
92 FPS
60 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB $ 759 $ 8.1 93.5 FPS
91.6 FPS
60.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB $ 499 $ 5.4 92.9 FPS
88.4 FPS
58.6 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB $ 1,199 $ 13.1 91.6 FPS
88.4 FPS
60 FPS
AMD Radeon VII 16GB $ 699 $ 7.6 91.6 FPS
87.8 FPS
57.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB $ 399 $ 4.5 89.3 FPS
85.4 FPS
55.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB $ 499 $ 5.7 88.1 FPS
82.6 FPS
55.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB $ 200 $ 2.3 88.1 FPS
85.4 FPS
58.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB $ 329 $ 3.8 87.4 FPS
83.4 FPS
55.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB $ 400 $ 4.8 83.3 FPS
76.9 FPS
50.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB $ 349 $ 4.3 81.8 FPS
78.3 FPS
51 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB $ 499 $ 6.3 79.4 FPS
74.9 FPS
48.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB $ 350 $ 4.5 78.4 FPS
70.7 FPS
45.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB $ 279 $ 3.6 77.2 FPS
73.3 FPS
47.6 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB $ 1,499 $ 20.1 74.4 FPS
69.2 FPS
48.1 FPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB $ 499 $ 6.7 74.2 FPS
71.1 FPS
46.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB $ 409 $ 5.6 73.6 FPS
69.4 FPS
45.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB $ 249 $ 3.5 72 FPS
67.4 FPS
44.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB $ 999 $ 14 71.5 FPS
66.6 FPS
43.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB $ 279 $ 4 70 FPS
66 FPS
43 FPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB $ 399 $ 5.7 69.6 FPS
66.5 FPS
43.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB $ 399 $ 5.9 67.7 FPS
63.3 FPS
41 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB $ 229 $ 3.5 66 FPS
62.3 FPS
40.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB $ 649 $ 10.4 62.2 FPS
58.4 FPS
38 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB $ 220 $ 3.5 62.1 FPS
58.6 FPS
38.1 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB $ 279 $ 4.7 58.9 FPS
53.9 FPS
34.4 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB $ 649 $ 11.5 56.5 FPS
55.5 FPS
37.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB $ 160 $ 3 54.1 FPS
50.9 FPS
33.1 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB $ 199 $ 3.7 53.6 FPS
49.1 FPS
31.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB $ 549 $ 10.3 53.4 FPS
49.5 FPS
32.5 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB $ 229 $ 4.4 52.3 FPS
47.8 FPS
30.3 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB $ 649 $ 12.6 51.4 FPS
49.6 FPS
33 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB $ 999 $ 20 49.9 FPS
45.9 FPS
31.4 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB $ 549 $ 11.3 48.6 FPS
46.7 FPS
30.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB $ 254 $ 5.2 48.5 FPS
44.7 FPS
29.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB $ 169 $ 3.5 48 FPS
44.1 FPS
27.9 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB $ 429 $ 9.2 46.8 FPS
44.8 FPS
29.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB $ 170 $ 3.7 46 FPS
42.5 FPS
27.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB $ 329 $ 7.3 45.2 FPS
41.3 FPS
28 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB $ 400 $ 9.1 44 FPS
41.7 FPS
27.8 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB $ 329 $ 7.5 43.7 FPS
40.9 FPS
25.4 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB $ 169 $ 3.9 43.1 FPS
40.3 FPS
25.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB $ 149 $ 3.6 41.2 FPS
38.5 FPS
25 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB $ 179 $ 4.6 38.5 FPS
36.2 FPS
23.5 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB $ 229 $ 7.1 32.4 FPS
30.1 FPS
20 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB $ 249 $ 8.6 29 FPS
27.1 FPS
16.9 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB $ 199 $ 6.9 28.8 FPS
26.8 FPS
16.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB $ 169 $ 6 28.4 FPS
26.6 FPS
17.3 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB $ 279 $ 9.9 28.1 FPS
26.5 FPS
16.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB $ 199 $ 7.2 27.8 FPS
25.7 FPS
16.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB $ 169 $ 7 24.2 FPS
22.4 FPS
14.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB $ 99 $ 4.4 22.4 FPS
20.5 FPS
13.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB $ 159 $ 7.3 21.9 FPS
20 FPS
13.3 FPS
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB $ 149 $ 6.9 21.5 FPS
18.9 FPS
12.6 FPS
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB $ 149 $ 7 21.4 FPS
18.2 FPS
12.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB $ 140 $ 7.1 19.8 FPS
18.1 FPS
11.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB $ 149 $ 7.8 19.1 FPS
15.6 FPS
10.5 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB $ 79 $ 5.1 15.6 FPS
14.4 FPS
9.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB $ 79 $ 5.3 14.9 FPS
13.7 FPS
8.5 FPS

Related Discussions and Issues

D
DrexelDragon93 September 05, 2015

[Build Help] My CPU heatsink is stuck to my 5930k

As the title states.

Currently freaking out. I do not know what to do. I have a Cooler Master hyper 212 on it currently it is is freaking stuck.

Tried letting the computer run to heat up the paste but it is not budging.

D
DrexelDragon93 August 16, 2015

Okay I finally managed to get it off but the thermal paste is like literally baked on, I can't get it off using rubbing alcohol. Any ideas?

T
TheKeeperOfPie September 15, 2015

What thermal paste did you use on it? Are you sure it wasn't thermal glue or some kind of liquid metal that bonded the surfaces?

I
intark September 10, 2015

Oh man, this is sad and funny. I'm sorry that happened to you but shit, thermal adhesive? :P

D
DrexelDragon93 September 05, 2015

I don't even.. I have no words. I've been building computers for 8ish years and never done something so stupid

D
DrexelDragon93 August 26, 2015

Update: it finally came off after hours of pulling and twisting. After being unable to remove the adhesive I took it to microcenter and they were kind enough to exchange it.

Crisis averted.

B
bigj231 August 11, 2015

I probably would've lapped it, but at least this way you have a warranty.

L
Lukeee- August 11, 2019

CPU help- i5 8600k vs i7 5930k/6800k vs ryzen 3 3600

- all are the same price for me when considering cpu + mobo = all are £250 for cpu + a board

- will be used mainly for gaming (I play R6 siege competitively so fps is must)


Thanks, feel free to add experiences, recommendations etc!

I
ireallylikevideogame August 13, 2019

obligatory wait for benchmarks comment number two

A
ameoba August 15, 2019

At least on the Intel side, the 8600k gives you the fastest single core speeds but it lags behind just a hair on multi-core benchmarks.

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/Intel-i5-8600K-vs-Intel-i7-5930K-vs-Intel-i7-6800K/3100vs2336vs2785

A
arcticfrostburn August 10, 2019

Some benchmark leaks have shown that 3600 can match or come close to single thread performance of the 9th gen series so yeah please wait 3 days for ryzen

Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?

Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?

Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks

Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.

Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?

Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.

Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?

Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.

Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?

Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.

How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU

Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.

RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison

Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?

10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs

May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.

10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.

13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.

2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?

May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.

Critics Reviews

The Core i7-5930K is priced at $583, potentially "saving" you more than $400. If that’s still a little rich, the Core i7-5820K lands at a palatable $389. It too is a six-core chip with 15 MB of ...
Intel Core i7-5930K Review – The CPU. Shown above is the 140w Intel Core i7-5930K which looks identical to the other models in the family. Flipping the CPU over we see the socket 2011-3 layout (which isn’t compatible with 2011/X79 boards) and in terms of the base design we have a 22nm Haswell family chip, just like the latest i7 CPUs on Z97 ...
Such are the questions we intend to answer today by conducting an incredibly thorough review of the Haswell-E Intel Core i7-5820K, Intel Core i7-5930K, and Intel Core i7-5960X in a gladiator-like showdown of massive proportions.
For example, the i7-990X and the i7-5930K are both six-core, 3.5 GHz base frequency models, but the i7-5930K has 3MB more L3 cache. Similarly with the i7-980X and the i7-3960X. Nehalem
The i7-5930K is what most people will go for just to future-proof their purchase more than the Intel Core-i7 5820K with its higher base speeds and x16/x16 SLI capability would. I also highly recommend the Intel Core i7-5930K to those who are into CPU-intensive tasks and need that extra minute advantage with 3D rendering programs/media applications.
The obvious elephant in the Core i7-5930K's living room is the Core i7-5820K. Substantially cheaper but only marginally slower - both share the six-core, 12-thread, 15MB LLC design - Intel also ...