Intel Core i7-4930K Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA2011 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 10 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2013 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 670 USD | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 6 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 12 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.4 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3.9 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 130 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 22 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 56 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 53 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 38 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 79 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 35.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 18 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 9 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 29/100 | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i7-4930K is one of Intel's high-end Desktop processors. It was released in 2013 with 6 cores and 12 threads. With base clock at 3.4GHz, max speed at 3.9GHz, and a 130W power rating. The Core i7-4930K is based on the Ivy Bridge E 22nm family and is part of the Core i7 series.
Core i7-4930K is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i7-3930K processor that was based on the Sandy Bridge-E and 32nm process and was released in 2011.
Now, we're asking ourselves whether or not the Intel Core i7-4930K finally dethrones the FX-9590 as the de facto ruler of the mainstream processors. Ultimately, it depends: the Core i7-4930K doesn't reach the same single-core performance as AMD, but we're starting to see more games adopt multi-threaded CPUs, so that doesn't matter as much.
Intel Core i7 4th Generation, and the Ivy Bridge E architecture itself, is notable because it leads 22nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But, there’s a lot more going on under the hood than just a smaller manufacturing node.
The Intel Core i7-4930K is an absolute behemoth of a processor, as it absolutely should be with its 6 cores, 12 threads and high price tag. If you’re looking for the absolute best processor money can buy on a mainstream processor, then look no further. Whether you’re playing PC games or even doing hardcore video and 3D work, the Intel Core i7-4930K can handle them with ease.
But we've also found that, after simple push-button overclocking, the Core i7-4820K offers similar performance to the Core i7-4930K, even when it is also overclocked. But for $70 less. The Core i7-4930K is an impressive chip and offers a better mixture of performance than AMD's FX-9590, no doubt, but in this case, value seekers might opt for its less expensive sibling.
Intel Core i7 4 Generation is finally here, and the Intel Core i7-4930K might just be the poster child for what this generation of processors has in store for consumers. Sure, it might have stuck with the 6-core, 12-thread setup, which it inherited from its predecessor, the Core i7-3930K. However, with the new 22nm manufacturing process, it delivers a far better performance at lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i7-4930K was rolled out on Jan 2013 for $670, which puts it in the same general price range as the last-generation Core i7-3930K. This means that at least we're not seeing any considerable price jumps from generation to generation.
This decision to 22nm has brought a beefy 15% boost to IPC (instructions per clock) performance. Effectively, compared to a Core i7 3-Generation processor at the same clock speed, you will get a straight 15% increase in performance. That’s not big enough to be evident in day-to-day workloads, but it does still mean something.
What this all means is that the Intel Core i7-4930K is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Core i7-4930K.
Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the Core i7-3930K, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.
Intel has been having some trouble as of late which has made it even harder to compete with the incoming wave of FX processors. That has forced the chip maker to be a little more creative and make do with their current product lines. Today we have the Intel Core i7-4930K on hand, which in itself isn’t anything new. It’s basically a refreshed Core i7-3930K with a clock speed boost. We say basically because it’s not a straight refresh however, there’s another change.
The Intel Graphics have been disabled and therefore the Core i7-4930K has no form of integrated graphics -- just like the FX-9590. This is meant to make the Core i7-4930K cheaper than the Core i7-3930K, even though AMD's list pricing doesn't make this apparent, in practice the Core i7-4930K can be had for $670 while the Core i7-3930K is still $611, making the newer chip -9% cheaper. It also means it’s cheaper than the FX-9590 which is currently retailing for $495.92.
Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the Intel Core i7-4930K 6-core desktop processor that was released in Jan 2013. Intel offers the Core i7-4930K without integrated graphics. It runs $670 shipped and is ideal for those that plan on using it a system with a dedicated graphics card.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i7 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 79% in our benchmarks.
Regardless of those external factors, the Core i7-4930K proves it has the chops to be your main gaming system and a just as effective media creation platform – two things that are becoming intrinsically connected in this age of live-streaming, eSports and uploading gameplay videos.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent high-end chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade C602J, C606, X79 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i7 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the high-end with its Core i7-4930K processors, which the company is making available as of Jan 2013.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Core i7-4930K
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i7-4930K.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.3 | 253.6 FPS
|
248.3 FPS
|
174.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.4 | 236.7 FPS
|
231.7 FPS
|
163 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.4 | 228.9 FPS
|
219.9 FPS
|
140.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.5 | 219.8 FPS
|
215 FPS
|
151.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.8 | 211.2 FPS
|
206.5 FPS
|
145.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.3 | 208.1 FPS
|
200 FPS
|
127.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7.6 | 197.6 FPS
|
186.5 FPS
|
123.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 5.8 | 189.1 FPS
|
181.8 FPS
|
116.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 10.7 | 186 FPS
|
181.9 FPS
|
128 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.4 | 185.2 FPS
|
175.8 FPS
|
114.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.7 | 174.4 FPS
|
165.5 FPS
|
107.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.6 | 172.2 FPS
|
165.8 FPS
|
113.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.1 | 172.1 FPS
|
162.5 FPS
|
107.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.6 | 166.2 FPS
|
158.6 FPS
|
110.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.1 | 147.7 FPS
|
140.6 FPS
|
94.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.2 | 138.1 FPS
|
131.1 FPS
|
85.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.8 | 131.7 FPS
|
124.4 FPS
|
82.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 20.7 | 120.9 FPS
|
117.9 FPS
|
78.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 11 | 117.7 FPS
|
114.8 FPS
|
76.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.1 | 116.2 FPS
|
111.2 FPS
|
71.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.5 | 114.3 FPS
|
110.5 FPS
|
75.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.7 | 107.9 FPS
|
104.6 FPS
|
70.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.5 | 106.8 FPS
|
103.1 FPS
|
68.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.9 | 103.1 FPS
|
99 FPS
|
64.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 29.3 | 102.4 FPS
|
99.9 FPS
|
67.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.9 | 102.3 FPS
|
99.5 FPS
|
67.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.6 | 102.3 FPS
|
98.4 FPS
|
64.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.9 | 101 FPS
|
96.5 FPS
|
63.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.9 | 96.7 FPS
|
92.5 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 8 | 94.7 FPS
|
92 FPS
|
61 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.3 | 94.1 FPS
|
88.8 FPS
|
58.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 12.9 | 92.8 FPS
|
88.8 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.5 | 92.8 FPS
|
88.2 FPS
|
57.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.4 | 90.4 FPS
|
85.8 FPS
|
55.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.6 | 89.2 FPS
|
83 FPS
|
55.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.2 | 89.2 FPS
|
85.8 FPS
|
58.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.7 | 88.5 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
56 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.7 | 84.4 FPS
|
77.3 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.2 | 82.8 FPS
|
78.7 FPS
|
51.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.2 | 80.4 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
49 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.4 | 79.4 FPS
|
71.1 FPS
|
45.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.6 | 78.1 FPS
|
73.6 FPS
|
47.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 19.9 | 75.4 FPS
|
69.5 FPS
|
48.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.6 | 75.1 FPS
|
71.4 FPS
|
46.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.5 | 74.5 FPS
|
69.7 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.4 | 72.9 FPS
|
67.7 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 13.8 | 72.4 FPS
|
67 FPS
|
43.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 70.9 FPS
|
66.3 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.7 | 70.4 FPS
|
66.8 FPS
|
43.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.8 | 68.6 FPS
|
63.6 FPS
|
41.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.4 | 66.8 FPS
|
62.6 FPS
|
40.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 10.3 | 63 FPS
|
58.7 FPS
|
38.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.5 | 62.9 FPS
|
58.9 FPS
|
38.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.7 | 59.7 FPS
|
54.2 FPS
|
34.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.3 | 57.3 FPS
|
55.8 FPS
|
37.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.9 | 54.8 FPS
|
51.1 FPS
|
33.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.7 | 54.3 FPS
|
49.3 FPS
|
31.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.1 | 54.1 FPS
|
49.7 FPS
|
32.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.3 | 52.9 FPS
|
48 FPS
|
30.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 12.5 | 52.1 FPS
|
49.8 FPS
|
33.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 19.8 | 50.5 FPS
|
46.1 FPS
|
31.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11.2 | 49.2 FPS
|
46.9 FPS
|
30.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.2 | 49.1 FPS
|
44.9 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.5 | 48.6 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 9.1 | 47.4 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
29.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.6 | 46.6 FPS
|
42.7 FPS
|
27.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7.2 | 45.8 FPS
|
41.5 FPS
|
28.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 9 | 44.5 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.4 | 44.2 FPS
|
41.1 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.9 | 43.7 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.6 | 41.7 FPS
|
38.7 FPS
|
25.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.6 | 39 FPS
|
36.4 FPS
|
23.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 7 | 32.8 FPS
|
30.2 FPS
|
20 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8.5 | 29.4 FPS
|
27.2 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.8 | 29.2 FPS
|
27 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.9 | 28.8 FPS
|
26.7 FPS
|
17.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 9.8 | 28.5 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
16.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.1 | 28.1 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 6.9 | 24.5 FPS
|
22.5 FPS
|
14.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.4 | 22.6 FPS
|
20.6 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7.2 | 22.2 FPS
|
20.1 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.8 | 21.8 FPS
|
19 FPS
|
12.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.9 | 21.7 FPS
|
18.3 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 7 | 20 FPS
|
18.2 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.7 | 19.3 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
10.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5 | 15.8 FPS
|
14.5 FPS
|
9.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.2 | 15.1 FPS
|
13.8 FPS
|
8.5 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
There's no doubting the 4930k is a more powerful CPU. With a 780ti, and a second one, 2-3 years from now, this build will still be a monster. BUT, the motherboards for the 4930k cost a little more than a regular socket 1150 board. So it comes at that extra cost. Also you may have to flash update your BIOS from a USB depending on the board and bios driver. So there's potential hassle.
The i7, with a 780ti now, and another 2-3 years from now, will be just as powerful as that 4930k.
Personally I'd just roll with the 4770k with the MSI Z87 GD65 board. I love it's bios, it's a very high quality and efficient board. Plus I love the red/black.
Hmm I'll have to check that out, I kinda wanted to stay away from MSI I had a bad experience with a board I bought for my Current X58 platform. GD45 - I had an Intel board that fried out last year so this is the only one I found new, for under $100 and I still have issues. I wanted to go with Asus or possibly Asrock (ive been hearing great things about Asrock). I'll definitely check out the MSI GD65 though.
EDIT: I don't want to sound high and mighty, but Cost isn't a HUGE deal if its worth it. I mean, it its DRASTICALLY more, thats one thing, but a hundred or 2 more isn't a deal breaker if its really worth it.
Intel's retailer's edge huh? Lol got me a 4770k!
HAHA Yep, I got both the 4770k and a 4930k lets just say friends weren't using theirs so I got their processors. I'm contemplating buying another 4770k
but I will be getting a sound card since I have my PC hooked up to a 5.1 receiver with home theater speakers and I need DTS / Dolby Digital.
You don't need a sound card for that. The HDMI output from your GPU will do all that and more (meaning uncompressed 6-channel or 8-channel PCM, DTS-HD, Dolby TrueHD, etc), as long as your receiver supports it.
I don't know about that, are you sure? I know it can do audio, but does it do DTS, Dolby Digital? I NEED that to get surround sound for games.
[Build Help] Should I get a x99 and a 5930k instead of a x79 and a 4930k?
I'm about to build a desktop and I need help to decide if i get a x99 mobo or a x79 mobo PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant
Type Item Price CPU Intel Core i7-5930K 3.5GHz 6-Core Processor $579.99 @ TigerDirect CPU Cooler Corsair H80i 77.0 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler $84.99 @ TigerDirect Motherboard ASRock X99 Extreme4 ATX LGA2011-3 Motherboard $237.99 @ SuperBiiz Memory G.Skill Ripjaws Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) DDR4-2133 Memory $249.99 @ Newegg Storage Toshiba Q Series Pro 256GB 2.5" Solid State Drive $129.99 @ Newegg Storage Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive $56.98 @ OutletPC Video Card EVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3GB Superclocked ACX Video Card $598.80 @ Newegg Case Apevia X-HERMES-GN ATX Mid Tower Case $59.99 @ Amazon Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 1000G2 1000W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply $164.95 @ Amazon Optical Drive LG GH24NSB0 DVD/CD Writer $13.99 @ Newegg Monitor BenQ GL2760H 60Hz 27.0" Monitor $188.92 @ TigerDirect Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014 Wired Gaming Keyboard $124.99 @ NCIX US Mouse Razer Taipan Wired Laser Mouse $52.99 @ Amazon Total Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available $2544.56 Generated by PCPartPicker 2014-09-10 06:53 EDT-0400This are the parts that I will use if I end up not purchasing a x99 and the 5930k, also needed to change the RAM because of the compatibility
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/asrock-motherboard-x79extreme6
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/intel-cpu-bx80633i74930k
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gskill-memory-f32666c12d16gtxd
Edit: If you see people using x97 here they actually meant z97 =)
How can I overclock my CPU ? Alienware Aurora R4 i7-4930k - Please help!!
HeY GuYs,
Aurora R4 ALX Owner' please don't flame me! I'm really happy with my System, but I would like to know more.
My PC: Alienware Aurora R4 i7-4930k 6 Core CPU (Default @ Max Turbo 4.1Ghz) 32 GB 1600Mhz Memory (4x8GB) GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition Audigy 2 Soundcard
just would like to ask if someone could help me or knows how to overclock the CPU on this Rig. He would do me a great Favor it we can reach 4.4 - 4.5Ghz ( if possible ).
At the Moment I just pushed the 6 Core's Ratio in Power Management to 42 and I've got all Cores now @ 4.2Ghz.
Inspiration was this Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBfaOcKFy50
If I'm going to 43 , I get a BSOD before Log-In Screen or short time after it. Only if I tune 4 Cores to 42 and leave last 2 Cores @ 41 everything is still stable. I think for going higher I need more Voltage, but where can I set it? Is it even possible?? I've got the latest A11 BIOS.
Here are the most important pictures of my BIOS:
Global Advanced Settings: http://imgur.com/DcLFIqI
CPU Power Management Configuration: http://imgur.com/ewmeM8i
Overvoltage Configuration: http://imgur.com/adQfr8n
I would be very very really thankful of any tip, because I read that this CPU normally or with other boards can handle 4.4Ghz without Problems easily.
Read the ivy bridge guide in the sidebar.
Simply locking voltage and raising clock is most of it. Know your voltage and watch your temps.
Thank for your help,
but I don't understand which Options in my BIOS changes the VCORE. I don't know this BIOS. Do you mean "Dynamic CPU VCORE Offset (20h Out1)" in the Overvoltage Configuration? That was my nearest conclusion. There are such Values for example: http://cdn.overclock.net/e/ef/600x382px-LL-efbe5ab8_01.jpeg
I would lovely trying to go higher and testing/watching on my temps, but which Option in this BIOS change/increase the Voltage?
Accepting every test,linked every Option I can change manually in this Alienware BIOS!
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
[Build Help] Gaming PC, i7 4770k OR i7 4930k: Which to use, which to sell
Hai guys! Ok, so I'm getting ready to build my new gaming pc, woo! I'm somewhat torn as far as which way I should go. I always go all out when building my PC's because they last me a good 4+ years. I got extremely good deal on these 2 processors mentioned above. So yes I actually have both a 4770k and a 4930k. I will be building a pretty sick gaming and multimedia PC and at some point will be getting a 1440p monitor. I will probably be going with a 780 Ti so I probably won't be doing SLI any time soon, but I will be getting a sound card since I have my PC hooked up to a 5.1 receiver with home theater speakers and I need DTS / Dolby Digital.
Basically Should I use the 4770k and sell the 4930k or use the 4930k and sell the 4770k. I keep hearing different opinions but no real justification on why I should. I've noticed the 4770k (socket 1150) has a lot more motherboards out there compared to the 4930 (socket 2011).
I will probably be building this mid January or so. I just want to get my Processor decided so I can start looking at Mobos.
Thanks everyone! Looking forward to the responses.
EDIT: Also one question I forgot to mention - IF I end up going SLI, will I notice much of a performance increase from Dual 16x (from the 4930k Mobos) compared to the dual 8x (from the 4770k Mobos). - For what its worth, If I stick with the 4930k I was Thinking of going with the Asus Rampage IV Extreme - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131802