Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | LGA1150 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2014 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Price | 339 USD | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 8 Threads | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 4 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 4.4 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 4.8 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 88 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 22 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 8 MB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Price-Value Score | 62 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 57 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 35 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 81 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 32.3 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 16.1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 8.1 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 34/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i7-4790K is one of Intel's high-end Desktop processors. It was released in 2014 with 4 cores and 8 threads. With base clock at 4GHz, max speed at 4.4GHz, and a 88W power rating. The Core i7-4790K is based on the Haswell Refresh 22nm family and is part of the Core i7 series.
Core i7-4790K is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i7-3770K processor that was based on the Ivy Bridge and 22nm process and was released in 2012.
What this all means is that the Intel Core i7-4790K is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Core i7-4790K.
One of the nice things about the Intel Core i7-4790K processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the Intel Core i7-4790K up for $339 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The Intel Core i7-4790K retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 88W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
Our look today at the Intel Core i7-4790K showed that it is a very capable processor. A 4-core processor sounds like it would be really under-powered these days, but we were pleasantly surprised with a snappy and very capable system. Having just 4 cores had this processor coming in at the back of the pack for heavily threaded workloads, but it performed better than some of its more expensive siblings in lightly threaded workloads where it shined thanks to its high base clocks.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i7 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 81% in our benchmarks.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent high-end chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Q87, Z87, Z97 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i7 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the high-end with its Core i7-4790K processors, which the company is making available as of Jun 2014.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i7-4790K.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6 | 267.9 FPS
|
254 FPS
|
176.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.2 | 250 FPS
|
237.1 FPS
|
164.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.1 | 241.8 FPS
|
225 FPS
|
142.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.2 | 232.1 FPS
|
220 FPS
|
152.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.6 | 223 FPS
|
211.3 FPS
|
146.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.1 | 219.8 FPS
|
204.6 FPS
|
129.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7.2 | 208.7 FPS
|
190.8 FPS
|
124.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 5.5 | 199.7 FPS
|
186 FPS
|
117.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 10.2 | 196.4 FPS
|
186.2 FPS
|
129.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.1 | 195.6 FPS
|
179.9 FPS
|
115.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.5 | 184.1 FPS
|
169.4 FPS
|
108.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.4 | 181.9 FPS
|
169.7 FPS
|
115 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 3.8 | 181.8 FPS
|
166.3 FPS
|
108.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.4 | 175.6 FPS
|
162.3 FPS
|
111.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 3.8 | 156 FPS
|
143.8 FPS
|
95.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4 | 145.9 FPS
|
134.1 FPS
|
86.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.6 | 139.1 FPS
|
127.2 FPS
|
83.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 19.6 | 127.7 FPS
|
120.6 FPS
|
79.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 10.5 | 124.3 FPS
|
117.5 FPS
|
77.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 3.9 | 122.8 FPS
|
113.7 FPS
|
72.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.3 | 120.7 FPS
|
113.1 FPS
|
76.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.5 | 114 FPS
|
107 FPS
|
71.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.2 | 112.8 FPS
|
105.5 FPS
|
69 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.7 | 108.8 FPS
|
101.3 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 27.7 | 108.2 FPS
|
102.2 FPS
|
68.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.8 | 108.1 FPS
|
101.8 FPS
|
68.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.5 | 108 FPS
|
100.7 FPS
|
64.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.6 | 106.7 FPS
|
98.7 FPS
|
64 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.7 | 102.2 FPS
|
94.6 FPS
|
60.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 7.6 | 100 FPS
|
94.2 FPS
|
61.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5 | 99.4 FPS
|
90.9 FPS
|
59.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 12.2 | 98 FPS
|
90.9 FPS
|
60.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.1 | 98 FPS
|
90.2 FPS
|
58 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.2 | 95.5 FPS
|
87.8 FPS
|
56.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.3 | 94.2 FPS
|
84.9 FPS
|
56.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.1 | 94.2 FPS
|
87.8 FPS
|
59.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.5 | 93.5 FPS
|
85.8 FPS
|
56.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.5 | 89.1 FPS
|
79.1 FPS
|
51.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4 | 87.5 FPS
|
80.5 FPS
|
51.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.9 | 84.9 FPS
|
77 FPS
|
49.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.2 | 83.9 FPS
|
72.7 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.4 | 82.5 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
48.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 18.8 | 79.6 FPS
|
71.1 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.3 | 79.4 FPS
|
73.1 FPS
|
46.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.2 | 78.7 FPS
|
71.3 FPS
|
45.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.2 | 77 FPS
|
69.3 FPS
|
45.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 13.1 | 76.5 FPS
|
68.5 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.7 | 74.8 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
43.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.4 | 74.4 FPS
|
68.3 FPS
|
43.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.5 | 72.4 FPS
|
65.1 FPS
|
41.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.2 | 70.6 FPS
|
64 FPS
|
41.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 9.7 | 66.6 FPS
|
60 FPS
|
38.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.3 | 66.4 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
38.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.4 | 63 FPS
|
55.5 FPS
|
34.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 10.7 | 60.5 FPS
|
57.1 FPS
|
37.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.8 | 57.8 FPS
|
52.3 FPS
|
33.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.5 | 57.3 FPS
|
50.4 FPS
|
31.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 9.6 | 57.1 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
32.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.1 | 55.9 FPS
|
49.1 FPS
|
30.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.8 | 55 FPS
|
51 FPS
|
33.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 18.7 | 53.3 FPS
|
47.2 FPS
|
31.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.6 | 52 FPS
|
48 FPS
|
31 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 4.9 | 51.8 FPS
|
46 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.3 | 51.4 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
28.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 8.6 | 50 FPS
|
46.1 FPS
|
29.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.5 | 49.2 FPS
|
43.7 FPS
|
28.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 6.8 | 48.4 FPS
|
42.5 FPS
|
28.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8.5 | 47 FPS
|
42.9 FPS
|
28.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7 | 46.7 FPS
|
42 FPS
|
25.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.7 | 46.1 FPS
|
41.5 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.4 | 44.1 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
25.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.4 | 41.1 FPS
|
37.2 FPS
|
23.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 6.6 | 34.6 FPS
|
30.9 FPS
|
20.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8 | 31.1 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.5 | 30.8 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.6 | 30.4 FPS
|
27.3 FPS
|
17.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 9.3 | 30.1 FPS
|
27.2 FPS
|
16.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.7 | 29.7 FPS
|
26.5 FPS
|
16.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 6.5 | 25.9 FPS
|
23 FPS
|
14.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.1 | 23.9 FPS
|
21.1 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 6.8 | 23.5 FPS
|
20.6 FPS
|
13.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.5 | 23 FPS
|
19.4 FPS
|
12.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.5 | 22.9 FPS
|
18.7 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 6.6 | 21.1 FPS
|
18.6 FPS
|
11.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.3 | 20.4 FPS
|
16 FPS
|
10.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.7 | 16.7 FPS
|
14.8 FPS
|
9.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5 | 15.9 FPS
|
14.1 FPS
|
8.6 FPS
|
Get 3600 non X. It's basically the same and extra price for 3600x is not worth it for 2% performance difference if both are ran stock. If you OC then both OC exactly the same. Money you don't spend on 3700x you can use towards upgrading your GPU. Much better performance gain if you go this route. 3700x has just extra 2 cores.
Can you still OC to 3600x performance with the 3600 stock cooler ?
Watch the Digital Foundry 'Future proofing you PC for next Gen gaming'. They talk through both of those ultimately saying 3600 is good for 3 years with 3700X possibly having a longer life span.
Are they close in gaming? At the moment, yes, very. But two extra cores are still two extra cores. Just seems like a much better long term investment. 3700X will likely have a much better resale value when you decide to upgrade.
Also, do you really want to risk feeling the pain of regret due to being behind consoles because you went for a six core when you could have gone with the 3700X for a peanuts $65 premium?
In long run he can put saved money now for swap to 4000 series. I bought 3700X only cause I wanted to, but 3600 is way better price/performance balanced. There is no point gettin basically the same performance for more money only for future, cause in future he would have better option to swap and he will save money now. That's my opinion.
If only gaming, buy 3600 without X. You will have more money on something else.
If you are coming from an i7 4790k:
I would only upgrade now if the i7 is currently a bottleneck after overclocking. Otherwise wait more time.
I'd jump to the 3700X you will probably stick with this CPU minimum 4 years and games (I hope) will adapt better to more cores in the future.
In my opinion it's worth spending the extra money.
Hey, pretty much the same dilemma I had, just with a non-k 4790.
I went for the 3700x in the end. But I frequently move my pc's between my own use and home server tasks (that's where the 4790 is moving to), and for that I can take advantage of the extra cores to handle additional VM's. You have to think on what you are going to do with it, if your use case is "gaming and nothing but gaming", I'd save my money and pick the 3600 instead. Otherwise I say go for the extra cores.
It would literally just be for pure gaming at 1080p at 144hz maybe some streaming here and there
Something to consider is that the new consoles coming out will both have 8 core cpus. So most games will be made to be played with an 8-core cpu for the foreseeable future. Will it make a difference to have only 6 cores? I have no idea. Maybe at some point? Probably not. But possibly?
That is totally not true. The ps3 also used an 8 core cpu and that was 10 years ago. For gaming on a pc you still only need a quad core processor. The 3700x will net you the best performance but it's only going to be a 5-10% improvement over a 3600 non x. So it the extra 100$ is worth 5-10 % to you go for it. But I would rather get a better graphics card or better memory.
What resolution are you going to be using.
That's another reason why I'm tied between them, although current gen consoles too have 8 cores but yet we don't really see game go to use 8 cores fully still.
Can anyone give me some tips when it comes to overclocking? I have an i7 4790k which is cooled by coolermaster 240l. My motherboard is GA-H81M-HD3. I dont even know if this mobo is sufficient for a stable overclock but any advice would be helpful. I tried this on myself but one of the cores was 20 degrees higher than all others under load. This worried me a bit as core 0 is usually 5 - 10 degrees warmer than the rest but the difference isnt usually that large! Thanks in advance
You can only overclock the CPU with a Z motherboard
I was considering delid in order to try and sort out the temp difference with that one core. But is it worth it or would I be better off buying a new cpu
My gtx 980 died recently, and I've been forced to use integrated graphics. I can only play 1 game now with 60+ FPS(Starcraft 2, but it sometimes drops to 1fps, I'm guess when it runs out of dedicated memory), and even in that game with the lowest possible settings it shows an error message warning me that
"This warning displays if you don't have enough available memory on your system to use your current settings. This includes physical memory, video memory, and virtual memory. You can continue to run the game at higher settings, but this may lead to performance issues and instability.
If your graphics card doesn’t have enough video RAM, or you’re using integrated graphics, you should reduce the texture quality."
I cannot figure out how to in bios overclock or overvolt the HD 4600(Asus Z97-AR motherboard). I looked up guides and youtube videos on how to dedicate more RAM(I think) as VRAM for the integrated graphics, but it did not work. And, I've heard that you shouldn't use Intel Xtreme Tuning to do it(and should use bios).
Looking for help on identifying in Bios what to change. All that I've seen that seems relevant is "GPU Cache Multiple", and it seems editing it with XMP on is impossible, as it's greyed out unless I turn XMP off. And the number there doesn't seem to represent frequency, as it's way too high by default to be a multiple of the frequency of the HD 4600.
If anyone can help me OC and Over Volt my integrated graphics( and dedicate more memory to it), it'd be awesome. I plan to get a new dedicated GPU in the coming weeks when I see a good deal, but this will at least help me play one game in the meantime.
Hey Guys,
A few days ago I turned on the PC and immediately it crashed. Blue screen-->Bios reset to default. I'm assuming it was an overclocking problem so I restored my pre-crash BIOS profile and synced all cores one notch lower. I also went to all modified voltages and etc and turned those down a tad bit as well. If you've read this far you've probably realized I have no idea what I'm doing . I'm purely going off youtube videos with system specs similar to mine. Anyways, any help would be awesome.
My specs:
ASUS Z87-PRO
I7 4790K 4.3 (Originally 4.4)
GTX 980 TI
DDR3-1600 4X4 16GB
CX 600
Cooler Master Hyper 212
Any input would be amazing. The tutorial I was following for my initial BIOS mod is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-oAf2tVDcg
Thanks!
What's your input voltage/vcore, and also temps under full prime95 small FFT non avx load? If you have stability issues, you can try higher input voltage. My old 4690k needed about 0.7v higher input voltage than vcore for the best stability FYI. And also don't use high LLC for input voltage. Typically the low-mid setting is optimal (but it's difficult to tell).
https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/41234-intel-haswell-4670k-4770k-overclocking-guide/ The guide I recommend, scroll past the videos for a quicker guide.
The thing that was making my 4790k unstable when I overclocked it was leaving my uncore ratio on auto. It will try to match it to your CPU's ratio in that case, causing instability. Set uncore to somthing like 39x or 41x and leave it there.
This is the guide that I followed:
https://www.overclock.net/forum/5-intel-cpus/1411077-haswell-overclocking-guide-statistics.html
Got my 4790k to 4.7GHz using this.
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
The Bottom Line. Intel's Core i7-4790K is the high-end Haswell-based processor for enthusiasts who liked last year's 4770K CPU, but weren't satisfied with its modest performance improvements.
Core i7-4790K operates at a base 4 GHz, though, and, in stock form, accelerates up to 4.4 GHz through Turbo Boost technology. This pushes the processor’s thermal ceiling up to 88 W (from 84).
Core i7-4790K Adds Enthusiast Appeal To Haswell Page 1: Intel Core i7-4790K: Devil's Canyon Is For Enthusiasts Page 2: Overclocking Core i7-4790K And TIM Performance Page 3: How We Tested Core i7 ...
Intel's Core i7-4790K is the high-end Haswell-based processor for enthusiasts who liked last year's 4770K CPU, but weren't satisfied with its modest performance improvements.
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i7 4790K. Much better 3DMark06 CPU score. 79
გამოიყენეთ სწრაფი tbc ონლაინ განვადება———————————----- ვმუშაობთ ...
The Haswell refresh from Intel, code name Devil’s Canyon is now available on the market and Intel has highlighted the features of the new i7 4790K, featuring Next-Generation Polymer Thermal Interface Material (NGPTIM) which Intel boasted to be able to cool the die better. Additional capacitors are also added for smoother power delivery to the die.
Although not the unlocked chip most of us are waiting for, the Intel Core i7-4790 is the new kid on the block, sporting a fancy 4.0 GHz boost clock right out of the box. I put it through the paces to see what's what only to come to the same conclusions as most other sites. But here's my take on the Intel Core i7-4790 anyway.
Need help in choosing between the 3600x or the 3700x (upgrading from I7-4790k
Looking to upgrade my current CPU (I7-4790k) to either 3600x or 3700x. The 3600x right now is £200 ($251) or I can get the 3700x for £252 ($316) just wondering if the extra £52 ($65) is worth it to get the 3700x over the 3600x. The GPU I'll be pairing it with is the 1070. Thanks!