Intel Core i7-3770K Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA1155 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 16 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2012 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 294 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 8 Threads | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.5 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3.9 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.5 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 77 W | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 22 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 62 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 47 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 31 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 77 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 38.3 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 19.1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 9.6 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 33/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i7-3770K is one of Intel's high-end Desktop processors. It was released in 2012 with 4 cores and 8 threads. With base clock at 3.5GHz, max speed at 3.9GHz, and a 77W power rating. The Core i7-3770K is based on the Ivy Bridge 22nm family and is part of the Core i7 series.
Core i7-3770K is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i7-2600K processor that was based on the Sandy Bridge and 32nm process and was released in 2010.
Intel Core i7 3rd Generation, and the Ivy Bridge architecture itself, is notable because it leads 22nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But, there’s a lot more going on under the hood than just a smaller manufacturing node.
The Core i7-3770K takes the basic ingredients of the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture, which brings an average of 15% more instructions per cycle (IPC) throughput, and 22nm process and melds them into a high-performance chip that is impressive across our test suite, especially when we factor in the competitive pricing, backward compatibility with most LGA1155 socket motherboards, unlocked overclocking features, and bundled cooler.
Intel Core i7 3 Generation is finally here, and the Intel Core i7-3770K might just be the poster child for what this generation of processors has in store for consumers. Sure, it might have stuck with the 4-core, 8-thread setup, which it inherited from its predecessor, the Core i7-2600K. However, with the new 22nm manufacturing process, it delivers a far better performance at lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i7-3770K was rolled out on Apr 2012 for $294, which puts it in the same general price range as the last-generation Core i7-2600K. This means that at least we're not seeing any considerable price jumps from generation to generation.
This decision to 22nm has brought a beefy 15% boost to IPC (instructions per clock) performance. Effectively, compared to a Core i7 2-Generation processor at the same clock speed, you will get a straight 15% increase in performance. That’s not big enough to be evident in day-to-day workloads, but it does still mean something.
What this all means is that the Intel Core i7-3770K is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Core i7-3770K.
The Intel Core i7-3770K is another impressive release from Intel and its 3 Generation of Core i7 chips. With it, you’re getting 4-cores and 8-threads, with a boost clock of 3.9GHz. It may not be the strongest contender ever made on paper, but when you see and feel the actual performance gains it offers, you’re certainly getting a lot of bang for your $294 buck.
Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the Core i7-2600K, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.
Intel has been having some trouble as of late which has made it even harder to compete with the incoming wave of FX processors. That has forced the chip maker to be a little more creative and make do with their current product lines. Today we have the Intel Core i7-3770K on hand, which in itself isn’t anything new. It’s basically a refreshed Core i7-2600K with a clock speed boost. We say basically because it’s not a straight refresh however, there’s another change.
One of the nice things about the Intel Core i7-3770K processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the Intel Core i7-3770K up for $294 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The Intel Core i7-3770K retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 77W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i7 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 77% in our benchmarks.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent high-end chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Z68, Z75, Z77 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i7 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the high-end with its Core i7-3770K processors, which the company is making available as of Apr 2012.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Core i7-3770K
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i7-3770K.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.6 | 244.1 FPS
|
244.9 FPS
|
173.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.5 | 227.8 FPS
|
228.6 FPS
|
161.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.5 | 220.3 FPS
|
217 FPS
|
139.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.7 | 211.6 FPS
|
212.1 FPS
|
150.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.9 | 203.3 FPS
|
203.8 FPS
|
144.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.5 | 200.3 FPS
|
197.3 FPS
|
127.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7.9 | 190.2 FPS
|
184 FPS
|
122.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 6 | 182 FPS
|
179.3 FPS
|
115.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 11.2 | 179 FPS
|
179.5 FPS
|
127.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.6 | 178.2 FPS
|
173.5 FPS
|
113.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.9 | 167.8 FPS
|
163.3 FPS
|
107.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.8 | 165.8 FPS
|
163.6 FPS
|
113.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.2 | 165.7 FPS
|
160.4 FPS
|
106.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.7 | 160 FPS
|
156.5 FPS
|
109.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.2 | 142.2 FPS
|
138.7 FPS
|
94.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.4 | 132.9 FPS
|
129.4 FPS
|
84.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.9 | 126.8 FPS
|
122.7 FPS
|
81.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 21.5 | 116.4 FPS
|
116.3 FPS
|
78 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 11.5 | 113.3 FPS
|
113.3 FPS
|
75.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.3 | 111.9 FPS
|
109.7 FPS
|
70.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.6 | 110 FPS
|
109 FPS
|
74.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.8 | 103.9 FPS
|
103.2 FPS
|
70.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.8 | 102.8 FPS
|
101.8 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4 | 99.2 FPS
|
97.7 FPS
|
64.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 30.4 | 98.6 FPS
|
98.5 FPS
|
67.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 3 | 98.5 FPS
|
98.2 FPS
|
67.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.7 | 98.4 FPS
|
97.1 FPS
|
63.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.2 | 97.2 FPS
|
95.2 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 4.1 | 93.1 FPS
|
91.2 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 8.3 | 91.1 FPS
|
90.8 FPS
|
60.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 90.6 FPS
|
87.6 FPS
|
58.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 13.4 | 89.3 FPS
|
87.6 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.8 | 89.3 FPS
|
87 FPS
|
57.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.6 | 87 FPS
|
84.7 FPS
|
55.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.8 | 85.8 FPS
|
81.9 FPS
|
55.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.3 | 85.8 FPS
|
84.7 FPS
|
58.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.9 | 85.2 FPS
|
82.7 FPS
|
55.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.9 | 81.2 FPS
|
76.2 FPS
|
50.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.4 | 79.7 FPS
|
77.7 FPS
|
50.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.4 | 77.4 FPS
|
74.2 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.6 | 76.4 FPS
|
70.1 FPS
|
45.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.7 | 75.2 FPS
|
72.6 FPS
|
47.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 20.7 | 72.5 FPS
|
68.6 FPS
|
47.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.9 | 72.3 FPS
|
70.5 FPS
|
46 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.7 | 71.7 FPS
|
68.8 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.6 | 70.1 FPS
|
66.8 FPS
|
44.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 14.3 | 69.7 FPS
|
66.1 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.1 | 68.2 FPS
|
65.4 FPS
|
42.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.9 | 67.8 FPS
|
65.9 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6 | 66 FPS
|
62.7 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.6 | 64.3 FPS
|
61.8 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 10.7 | 60.7 FPS
|
57.9 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.6 | 60.5 FPS
|
58.1 FPS
|
38 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.9 | 57.4 FPS
|
53.5 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.8 | 55.1 FPS
|
55 FPS
|
37 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 3 | 52.7 FPS
|
50.4 FPS
|
32.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.8 | 52.2 FPS
|
48.6 FPS
|
31 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.6 | 52 FPS
|
49.1 FPS
|
32.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.5 | 50.9 FPS
|
47.4 FPS
|
30.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 13 | 50.1 FPS
|
49.2 FPS
|
32.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 20.6 | 48.6 FPS
|
45.5 FPS
|
31.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11.6 | 47.4 FPS
|
46.3 FPS
|
30.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.4 | 47.2 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.6 | 46.8 FPS
|
43.7 FPS
|
27.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 9.4 | 45.6 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
29.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.8 | 44.8 FPS
|
42.2 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7.5 | 44.1 FPS
|
41 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 9.3 | 42.8 FPS
|
41.3 FPS
|
27.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.7 | 42.6 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
25.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4 | 42 FPS
|
40 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.7 | 40.2 FPS
|
38.2 FPS
|
24.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.8 | 37.5 FPS
|
35.9 FPS
|
23.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 7.3 | 31.5 FPS
|
29.8 FPS
|
19.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8.8 | 28.3 FPS
|
26.9 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.1 | 28.1 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.1 | 27.7 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 10.2 | 27.4 FPS
|
26.2 FPS
|
16.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.3 | 27.1 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 7.2 | 23.6 FPS
|
22.2 FPS
|
14.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.5 | 21.8 FPS
|
20.3 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7.4 | 21.4 FPS
|
19.9 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.1 | 21 FPS
|
18.7 FPS
|
12.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.2 | 20.8 FPS
|
18.1 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 7.3 | 19.3 FPS
|
18 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 8 | 18.6 FPS
|
15.5 FPS
|
10.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.2 | 15.2 FPS
|
14.3 FPS
|
9.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.4 | 14.5 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
8.4 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
CPU: Considering you will be editing, I suggest a ryzen 7 2700x as it has 8 cores instead and it costs only around 20$ more, you want more cores for editing.
GPU: Considering you have around 300$ left you can get a 1080 as you said, light gaming.
RAM: considering this is a ryzen build, you want something that is at least 3000mhz speed as ram is important for ryzen builds.
CASE: I'd choose the nzxt h510
thanks for the input. Interesting about 2700x. I thought the higher number i.e <3600 is better?! Also seems like 2700x comes with the "better" HSF so no need there?
I didn't know about the RAM so thanks for that!
Thoughts on going RTX instead of GTX?
Disagree, get an RTX 2060 and a 3600. Use nvenc for encoding, you can't really tell the difference from most CPU encodes.
With the 3600 you can get 3600Mhz RAM.
This is actually my build right now, it's way too fast for anything I throw at it like DotA 2.
CPU: Go with a 3600x and use the stock cooler instead of an aftermarket one. The 3600's stealth cooler is not great, the 3600x's is considerably better, and you're not OC'ing so the slight clock boost is nice and you don't need a more expensive cooler.
Mobo: Ask microcenter to flash Ryzen 3000 BIOS if it's not on the B450 already.
RAM: Ryzen performs best with fast RAM, 2400MHz is too slow imo. 3600MHz is ideal, but 3200MHz isn't bad.
SSD: Samsung is the best, but not worth the premium. Go with something like a WD Blue and get twice the capacity or pay half the price.
GPU: Drivers have been an issue for a minority of Navi users. Mine has been great. I would go for the 5700 XT and exchange it if you have insurmountable issues. Microcenter is great.
Case: I have little experience with matx, there may be ramifications for my suggestions based on this. Like, I don't know if stock cooler will fit.
PSU: EVGA is good. Seems like you should be able to get a 600W for about $80.
if you get the 3600, get some 3200 or 3600 ram, the ryzen likes fast ram. On the motherboard most people here would say the MSI b450 Tomahawk Max, which is a good motherboard. i have the 3600 with a 5700XT on a Gigabyte Aorus Ultra Gaming and i'm very happy with the build.
edit: i didn't read the mATX part, the MSI is ATX. I'd say the Gigabyte B450 Aorus M is fine.
Take that g.skill neo 3600mhz should do hard difference in your gameplay.
I appreciate everyone input. Interesting to see lots of MSI in 450 tier ... https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/1137619-motherboard-tier-list-v2-currently-amd-only/
I am running a 3600x with a 2080, absolute maximum power draw from the wall has been 400 watts while pushing everything and overclocking. Normal gaming loads around 300 watts from the wall. A 550w psu is plenty for you system. Definitely go gold rated.
Ram, don't go that slow, really hurts cpu performance, 3000mhz minimum. Microcenter had some Crucial 3200 for ~70.
Go with a msi or asrock motherboard. Gigabyte seems to really be cheaping out, your board only has 3 total fan connections, the asrock b450m has 5. I have personally used the asrock motherboard for some budget builds amd I have been very happy. The price of a MSI Tomahawk probably won't help you in any way.
help for a simple overclock (i7 3770k). Unlucky chip or I'm doing something wrong?
Hi everyone! Can anyone help me with my chip? I want to clock my CPU a little (4.5GHz will be perfect) but I'm having some difficulties.
My setup is
Mobo & CPU: i7 3770k on a MSI GD65-Z77A, Bios updated to V25
RAM: 4 ram banks of different brands and different speed ( I know that's not optimal, but it's an old rig and it's what I have so I have to adapt). These are the specs , G.Skill on slots 1-3 and Corsair on slots 2-4.
Cooler and Case: Cooler Master Hyper 212X with 2 120mm Fans in push/pull configuration. The case is an HAF 922 with Front 200mm and down 120mm fans IN and 200m up and 120mm rear fans OUT. After 5 cycles of IBT at MAXIMUM i had 69 degrees in CoreTemp for the hottest core at standard frequency and voltage (3.5GHz).
PSU: Thortech Thunderbolt 1000w
It's a fresh windows installation (3 weeks).
First step i tested my memories and the log shows up NO ERRORS. So i set to manual the Core Voltage and i set that exactly at the same value it was before with the AUTO setting (1.08). I started going up slowly with the CPU Ratio, and up to 40x its stable with 2 cycles of IBT at MAXIMUM. At 41x i had to go up with the voltage (1.1) and it passed again the IBT cycles without problems. At 4.2 it starts to be a mess! under 1.3v i cannot even pass the POST phase. At 1.3 i got BSODs when windows starts and at 1.35v it crashes during IBT.
I'm not an expert, so I'm asking for help. I did not touch the RAM frequency, i don't know how to adjust them with the CPU. Also a have other voltages and other options that i don't know, like I/O voltage or the Vdroop Settings. I set Intel Turbo Boost to DISABLED according to THIS GUIDE .
I really want to learn something here about my rig so if you want you can also explain me WHY I have to change my settings, I will be happy to learn!
Thank you very much for the help guys!
Don't worry about memory right now but manually set VCCSA and VTT voltages as auto can't be trusted while overclocking. For now, setting them both to ~1.05V should be fine (Below ~1.15V is safe).
First off, I'm assuming the voltages you're referring to are what you set in BIOS. Monitor the Vcore reading being reported with a tool like HWinfo and CPU-Z. If HWInfo shows a reading called VR VOUT use that instead. Make note of this at idle after Windows has loaded AND then during a heavy test (such as Cinebench R15 or various stress tests).
You will likely observe the voltage drop quite a bit while under load. This load value is what you should mostly focus on. Let me know what you find.
this is what happened.
I Can't find the VR VOUT reading, i found a VCORE line instead. it's the right line? This test was done with ALL the settings in bios at AUTO, so with stock frequency and voltages.
I will do it again with fixed VCCSA and VTT as you suggested, but with which frequency? Stock or 4.2?
Thank you very much for your help, I really appreciate that! :D
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Upgrading from 8 year old build (i7 3770K) - Need Help!
Hello,
I've been out of the game with hardware for quite some time now thus asking for the advise. Looking for best build for the $ to replace my good old 3770K.
Long story short:
Since the beginning I've been with Intel but for this build I think I want to go team red (not only because performance wise they got better but $ also).
Budget is tight so I'm trying to squeeze most of out the buck. I don't really care much about i.e: 5 degrees Celsius difference or minor FPS improvement. Performance to $ ratio (ROI) needs to be there. But if I would have to give you the number we are looking $900 +-
Would like to reduce noise to the minimum since I'm planing to place the case on the table.
Currently using 34 inch LG monitor (3440x1440) just fyi.
Not really interested in OCing anymore and not interested much in RGB theme.
Use for this build is a mix of:
- " light" gaming i.e: csgo, gta5, witcher bf4 - nothing crazy
- work mostly email, ssh, visio, slack etc.. so nothing intense
- 1080/4K drone footage editing as a hobby(powerDirector) - I've done 4K footage editing on my current setup and I didn't really complain but thought I'll mention it.
So Far Build(as of 3/27/2020):
- CPU: Ryzen 5 3600 @ $160 (can't beat microcenter) - thoughts?
- HSF: Not sure if I should go with stock or beQuiet (Rock Slim) or Noctua (nh-u12a) so for the sake @ $65.I don't trust AIO since once I had a leak and it fried my GPU so... - Thoughts ?
- MOBO: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M @ $65 (microcenter) - I've also considered ASRock B450M PRO4 which would be $5 less than AORUS but my 8 year old rig is running on Gigabyte and I've never had issues with it. Also I don't see PCIE 4.0 to be huge at this point so I think B450 is solid - What do you think?
- MEM: Don't really care much since no OCing so i.e: Corsair Vengeance LPX 16 GB 2400 @ 68 (newegg). Any other company you would recommend?
- STORAGE: I've heard good reviews about Samsung 970 Evo 500 GB M.2-2280 NVME @ $100. Don't really need 500GB since 256 is plenty but $20 difference between 256<>500 is no brainier imho thoughts?! I have spare spinning for data so we good there.
- GPU: Tough one for me - undecided. Currently running on rx 480 and had nothing but problems (drivers etc). I don't know if I should just go back to team green on this one. Perhaps 2060S or 2070S? Need to do more research if 2070s is worth it that extra $100 +-
- CASE: I want to go mATX and I have two on my mind: Corsair Crystal 280X @ $95 (non RGB) or NZXT H510 @ 70 - Anyone with one of these cases that could share your opinion? I love the isolation for the PSU and cable management.
- PSU: Another tough one for me. Estimate Wattage with this setup is at around 321W (estimated with 2060S). Primarily it needs to be as quite at possible and would like it to be modular (less cable mess). Was looking at beQuiet PSUs but again I would love to hear your opinion on this one. For the sake I've looked at EVGA SuperNOVA @ $80 ($20 rebate).
That being said rough total so far: $608 (without GPU)?!
Trying to see how can this be optimized and of course your opinion matters!
Constructive criticism is welcomed.