Intel Core i5-8600K Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA1151 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 15.5 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2017 Model | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 257 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 6 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 6 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.6 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 4.3 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 5 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Power Consumption | 95 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 128 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price-Value Score | 68 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 68 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 44 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 88 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 22.8 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 11.4 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 5.7 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 43/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i5-8600K is one of Intel's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2017 with 6 cores and 6 threads. With base clock at 3.6GHz, max speed at 4.3GHz, and a 95W power rating. The Core i5-8600K is based on the Coffee Lake 14nm family and is part of the Core i5 series.
Core i5-8600K is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i5-7600K processor that was based on the Kaby Lake-S and 14nm process and was released in 2017.
In our mind, the best processors are the ones that deliver outstanding performance at a reasonable price point. And, the Core i5-8600K absolutely nails this concept.
Unfortunately, this doesn’t quite translate to as strong of a single-core performance, even if Intel is closer than it’s ever been to matching AMD core for core. In our single-core GeekBench and Cinebench tests, the Core i5-8600K scored a 4561 and 183, respectively. This is definitely a huge leap over the Core i5-7600K, but it’s slower than the Ryzen 5 2600X, which scored a 4823 and 176 in the same tests. But, that’s still not a huge difference, so the multi-core gains generally outweigh them.
That something is the Core i5-8600K. Intel cranks the TDP dial up to 95W on this 6-core 6-thread chip, making it the high-performance counterpart to the 65W Core i5-8500, which is basically the same 14nm chip built with the Coffee Lake microarchitecture, but with a lower TDP rating. That chip came away from our first look at the Coffee Lake series with an Editor's Choice award, going toe-to-toe with AMD's Ryzen 5 2600X, so it's fair to say we have high hopes for the higher-performance model. Intel still hasn't sampled the chip to the press, so we bought one at retail to put it under the microscope.
But we've also found that, after simple push-button overclocking, the Core i5-8500 offers similar performance to the Core i5-8600K, even when it is also overclocked. But for $70 less. The Core i5-8600K is an impressive chip and offers a better mixture of performance than AMD's Ryzen 5 2400G, no doubt, but in this case, value seekers might opt for its less expensive sibling.
As the higher-priced version of the Core i5-8500, the Core i5-8600K has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.6 and 4.3 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Core i5-8500's PPT tops out at 65W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Core i5-8600K at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
The Intel Core i5-8600K was rolled out on Oct 2017 for $257, which puts it in the same general price range as the last-generation Core i5-7600K. This means that at least we're not seeing any considerable price jumps from generation to generation.
The Intel Core i5-8600K is another impressive release from Intel and its 8 Generation of Core i5 chips. With it, you’re getting 6-cores and 6-threads, with a boost clock of 4.3GHz. It may not be the strongest contender ever made on paper, but when you see and feel the actual performance gains it offers, you’re certainly getting a lot of bang for your $257 buck.
Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the Core i5-7600K, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.
So which should you buy? Let's get that out of the way. Before this comparison review we updated our Best CPU feature and we said you should go with the Ryzen 5 2600X as it comes with a better stock cooler, can be overclocked, and the AM4 platform offers a significantly better upgrade path.
For general computing the Ryzen 5 2600X can take advantage of multi-threading capabilities and will be considerably faster than the Core i5-8600K on heavy application workloads. Remember the Core i5-8600K is only marginally faster than the Core i5-7600K, so you can safely use the older model as a measuring stick. For rendering and encoding workloads the Ryzen 5 2600X can up to 33% faster.
Moving beyond games, it’s an easy win for the Ryzen 5 2600X. The Ryzen 5 upgrade path on A320, B350, B450, X370, X470, X570 motherboards, all support upcoming Zen+ processors. So if you buy a nice A320, B350, B450, X370, X470, X570 board now with the Ryzen 5 2600X, you’ll be able to slap a Coffee Lake processor on there later in the year, or whenever you deem it necessary.
For a 6-core processor, Intel’s $257 flagship Core i5-8600K processor seems downright cheap. On paper, the cost of those 0 extra cores is almost an afterthought when you stack it up against its direct competitor, the $229 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 2600X.
If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, Intel also offers the Core i5-8500 at $202. It’s still outfitted with 6-cores and 6-threads, but clocks in at a slower 3GHz and maxes out at only 4.1GHz.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i5 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 88% in our benchmarks.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i5 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the mid-range with its Core i5-8600K processors, which the company is making available as of Oct 2017.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Core i5-8600K
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i5-8600K.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 5.2 | 305.5 FPS
|
268.3 FPS
|
181 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 2.8 | 285 FPS
|
250.3 FPS
|
168.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 3.6 | 275.7 FPS
|
237.6 FPS
|
146 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 4.5 | 264.7 FPS
|
232.3 FPS
|
156.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.1 | 254.3 FPS
|
223.2 FPS
|
150.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 3.6 | 250.6 FPS
|
216.1 FPS
|
132.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 6.3 | 237.9 FPS
|
201.5 FPS
|
127.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 4.8 | 227.7 FPS
|
196.4 FPS
|
120.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 8.9 | 224 FPS
|
196.6 FPS
|
132.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 4.5 | 223 FPS
|
190 FPS
|
118.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.1 | 210 FPS
|
178.9 FPS
|
111.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.9 | 207.4 FPS
|
179.2 FPS
|
118 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 3.4 | 207.3 FPS
|
175.6 FPS
|
111.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3 | 200.2 FPS
|
171.4 FPS
|
114.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 3.4 | 177.9 FPS
|
151.9 FPS
|
98.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 3.5 | 166.3 FPS
|
141.7 FPS
|
88.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.1 | 158.6 FPS
|
134.4 FPS
|
85.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 17.2 | 145.7 FPS
|
127.4 FPS
|
81.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 9.2 | 141.8 FPS
|
124 FPS
|
79.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 3.4 | 140 FPS
|
120.1 FPS
|
74 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 2.9 | 137.7 FPS
|
119.4 FPS
|
78.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.1 | 130 FPS
|
113 FPS
|
73.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.4 | 128.7 FPS
|
111.4 FPS
|
70.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.2 | 124.1 FPS
|
107 FPS
|
67.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 24.3 | 123.3 FPS
|
107.9 FPS
|
70.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.4 | 123.3 FPS
|
107.5 FPS
|
70.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.2 | 123.2 FPS
|
106.3 FPS
|
66.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.7 | 121.6 FPS
|
104.3 FPS
|
65.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.3 | 116.5 FPS
|
99.9 FPS
|
62.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 6.7 | 114 FPS
|
99.4 FPS
|
63.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.4 | 113.3 FPS
|
96 FPS
|
60.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 10.7 | 111.8 FPS
|
96 FPS
|
62.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 6.3 | 111.8 FPS
|
95.3 FPS
|
59.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.7 | 108.9 FPS
|
92.7 FPS
|
57.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.6 | 107.4 FPS
|
89.7 FPS
|
57.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 1.9 | 107.4 FPS
|
92.7 FPS
|
60.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.1 | 106.6 FPS
|
90.6 FPS
|
58 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 3.9 | 101.6 FPS
|
83.5 FPS
|
52.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 3.5 | 99.8 FPS
|
85.1 FPS
|
53 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.2 | 96.8 FPS
|
81.3 FPS
|
50.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 3.7 | 95.6 FPS
|
76.8 FPS
|
47.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3 | 94.1 FPS
|
79.5 FPS
|
49.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 16.5 | 90.8 FPS
|
75.1 FPS
|
50 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 90.5 FPS
|
77.2 FPS
|
48 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 4.6 | 89.7 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
46.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 2.8 | 87.8 FPS
|
73.1 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 11.5 | 87.2 FPS
|
72.4 FPS
|
45.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.3 | 85.3 FPS
|
71.7 FPS
|
44.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.7 | 84.8 FPS
|
72.2 FPS
|
44.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.8 | 82.6 FPS
|
68.7 FPS
|
42.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 2.8 | 80.5 FPS
|
67.6 FPS
|
42.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 8.6 | 75.9 FPS
|
63.4 FPS
|
39.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 2.9 | 75.7 FPS
|
63.6 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 71.9 FPS
|
58.6 FPS
|
35.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 9.4 | 69 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
38.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.4 | 66 FPS
|
55.2 FPS
|
34.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3 | 65.4 FPS
|
53.3 FPS
|
32.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 8.4 | 65.1 FPS
|
53.8 FPS
|
33.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 3.6 | 63.7 FPS
|
51.9 FPS
|
31.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 10.4 | 62.7 FPS
|
53.8 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 16.4 | 60.8 FPS
|
49.8 FPS
|
32.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 9.3 | 59.3 FPS
|
50.7 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 4.3 | 59.1 FPS
|
48.5 FPS
|
30.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 2.9 | 58.6 FPS
|
47.8 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 7.5 | 57 FPS
|
48.6 FPS
|
30.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3 | 56.1 FPS
|
46.2 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 6 | 55.2 FPS
|
44.9 FPS
|
29.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 7.5 | 53.6 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 6.2 | 53.3 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
26.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.2 | 52.6 FPS
|
43.8 FPS
|
26.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3 | 50.3 FPS
|
41.8 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 3.8 | 46.9 FPS
|
39.3 FPS
|
24.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 5.8 | 39.5 FPS
|
32.7 FPS
|
20.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 7 | 35.4 FPS
|
29.4 FPS
|
17.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.7 | 35.2 FPS
|
29.1 FPS
|
17.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.9 | 34.7 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
17.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 8.1 | 34.3 FPS
|
28.7 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.9 | 33.9 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 5.7 | 29.5 FPS
|
24.3 FPS
|
14.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 3.6 | 27.3 FPS
|
22.2 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 5.9 | 26.8 FPS
|
21.8 FPS
|
13.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.7 | 26.2 FPS
|
20.5 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.7 | 26.1 FPS
|
19.8 FPS
|
12.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 5.8 | 24.1 FPS
|
19.7 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.4 | 23.2 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.2 | 19 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
9.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.3 | 18.2 FPS
|
14.9 FPS
|
8.8 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
As of right now it sound likes the 3700X is the way to go. But I’d keep an eye out for the 4600 benchmarks. It might be better for you.
2060 gpu and a i5-8600k usage problem. Please help
Hey, I need big help. So basically, I have a rtx 2060 graphics card, an i5-8600k processor and 8g of ram. My problem is that my usage for the cpu is at 100 on most games, but the usage on my gpu was like 30% on the dot. I don't understand why because this shouldn't be a bottleneck. I've been having this problem ever since I got the graphics card. If anybody can help me that would be so great because when I was getting this gpu, I was so excited just to find out that my pc is under performing. I hope I can get help. Thank you.
That is quite weird, maybe the problem is the ram?
I don't really know. I was playing fortnite on like all low settings, my cpu was at 100%, gpu at 30% and my ram was around 60% to 70% and then on gta the only thing that was different was that my gpu was on 55% - 65%
first of all u need to confirm bottle necking by comparing ur fps or benchmarks online (shadow of the tomb raider benchmark or uni engine heaven benchmark) if the fps checks out dont worry. but 100% load on cpu and low load on gpu is indicative of bottlenecking but u havent given any context so do this:
benchmark using shadow of the tomb raider or uni engine benchmark if u dont have SOT.
U play at which resolution and what kind of gaming you do? ( high refresh rate , titles u play etc)
Do u run any kind of background processes while gaming?
The rest of your specs.
P.S Tht combo should not bottleneck
well I don't know too much about pcs but ill try to share as much info as possible. I play at 1920 x 1080 res, I'm usually on discord while im playing, and thats it, I play fortnite, gta, csgo, valorant, minecraft, and thats pretty much it. My max refresh rate is 144hz, and could you tell me which specs you want me to say and ill tell you. Thanks for the help, i really appreciate it.
Overclocking i5 8600k problems and help please?
Hi all,
I was overclocking my CPU yesterday and I was struggling to get stability when testing. I’ve got my chip at 4.8Ghz 1.33V as when I put it to 5ghz at 1.36 it still was blue screening and I didn’t want temps to go too high so I dialed back the clock speed. Now my question is when stressing with prime 95 after about 5 mins or so clock speed drops to 3.8ghz-4ghz but the stress still runs and all. Temps are sitting below 80C max after about 15 mins of testing. Hovering mid 75C most of the time.
Does this mean it’s still unstable?
What should I do to try get that 4.8GHz constant?
Or should I drop clockspeed
It really depends on the specific chip you got in the silicon lottery, to be honest I keep mine at a boring 4.7 at 1.285 stable and reasonably cold, and in happy with that.
Does the drop in GHz when stress testing mean it’s not stable though?
Help to i5-8600k @ 5ghz? :)
Hey! For the last days I've been using the quarantine to overclock my 8600k that I own for almost two years now! I am here asking for your guys opinion since right now, I'm running at 4.9ghz 1.285cv and it works like a charm. Now, I got it to work at 5.0ghz @ 1.355cv and in gaming sessions it worked fine but in prime 95 i got some super high temperatures, around 95°C. What is your opinion? Should I stick with the higher voltage for 0,1ghz or just run it lower? I also think prime95 is very unrealistic as aida64 at 5.0ghz @ 1.355cv ran fine under 70°C. I'm already happy with the 4.9 but I guess this is what overclocking is: push every tiny bit of performance... I am also using LLC4 in my msi motherboard.
Specs:
I5-8600k
MSI Z370 Tomahawk
Seasonic Focus GX850
Rtx 2070 super
Trident z rgb 3200 cl16
ML360R RGB
Thanks!
I'd much rather have 4,9 at the lower voltage. The increase in voltage to high to only gain 0,1ghz IMO.
Yeah, in real workloads I don't know if I would notice the impact of 0.1ghz...
If you’re willing, delid the CPU and put some LM in there. Should help temps considerably and you won’t have to worry about choosing between the lower or higher voltage
Yeah... I've been thinking about this, but I guess this is the next level
I was able to get 5ghz at 1.315v but tbh it doesn’t matter lol. Go with the 4.9, safe some electricity :)
I would stay at 5GHz as long as your temps are acceptable while gaming. Prime95 is a pretty unrealistic workload, you shouldn't care about the temps too much while running this. Just make sure your CPU isn't throttling while running prime95, otherwise you wouldn't test the CPU's stability at full clock speed.
5GHz is pretty rare for an 8600K, congrats for reaching this speed and keeping stable :)
Is it really that rare? I thought it was a very common speed for this cpu. Alright, I'll check for throttling then!
I5 8600k second hand for 650 euros or build new? Help!
Hi guys I need some help. I'm looking to upgrade my i5 760 @4ghz. Do you think this is a good build for the price and relatively future proof with a possible 9900k upgrade path in the future (also second hand when prices drop). I currently game on 1080p but would like to upgrade to 1440p in the near future. I can get this build for 650 euro and sell my own, or I could reuse some of my old build and upgrade ram/motherboard/CPU and maybe psu.
Second hand build: GPU: Gigabyte GTX1070 8GB GDDR5 CPU: Intel I5 8600K RAM: 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 Motherboard: ASRock Z370M-ITX Geheugen: 512GB SSD, 2TB HDD Cooler: Noctula Psu: Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series 550W Case: Cooler Master Elite 130
Or is it better to build a new PC with a Ryzen 5 3600 for example and keep the GPU and SSD and shitty case of my current build. If not I would sell it.
My current build is: I5 760 @4ghz P7p55d deluxe 16gb ddr3 ram Gtx 1060 6gb 500gb ssd 860 evo 750 watt psu
I think it's worth around 300 euros? So if I would take the secondhand and sell mine I would pay approximately 350 euros for an immense CPU upgrade, extra storage, better GPU and ram. Though I'm not sure if it's a wise upgrade looking for the coming years. As you can see by my build I don't upgrade a whole lot haha. Would love to hear your opinions! Thanks in advance.
tbh going from a i57600 to a 8700k is not a "immense" upgrade. SAme with a 1060 to a 1070. I would personally not bother and just try to sell and build a new. Possible save some parts idk. But if i would go from a 1060 i would atleast go for a 2060 super/5700xt. IF saving money for a couple of months is an option i would highly suggest it even tho you wouldnt pay that much.
Thanks for the advice! It's a i5 760 though, not a 7600. So it's very old.
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Critics Reviews
Core i5-8600K's unlocked multiplier fits well with the Z-series boards, which are needed in order to manipulate its ratio. Intel also added a few new overclocking knobs and dials, such as per-core ...
The Core i5-8600K is still a great CPU if you can find one on the cheap, but for those looking for the absolute best gaming CPU around the £250 / $250 mark, the i5-9600K should definitely be at the top of your list.
Intel's Core i5-8600K is priced $120 below the i7-8700K, making it an interesting option for the more value-oriented buyer. It features the same six-core design, but lacks HyperThreading and loses 3 MB of cache. Our testing shows that it still is a great CPU, especially when overclocked to almost 5 GHz.
The Intel Core i5 8600k overclocked, benchmarks and built on a Z370 Gigabyte Aorus Gaming 7, 16 GB of Team Group RGB Ram, M.2 and a good ol' 980 ti. Perfect gaming system in 2018. Thanks for ...
Upgrade Help: Looking to upgrade my 8600k to a Ryzen chip at the end of the year
I'm considering the higher end 3000 series Ryzen CPUs ( 3700x primarily ) since they'll likely be dropping further in price after the 4000 series hits the market in a few months and I'll have to shell out for a new mobo as well.
Primary use case is high resolution gaming - 1080ti and 3440x1440 120hz monitor. Trying to eek out every last frame from the CPU, if possible.
Secondary use case is creative work in InDesign, Photoshop, Illustrator , and occasionally Premier . I'd like to say it'll be used for Blender or Solidworks as well, but my education in those programs is kind of on-hold at the moment.
I'm aware that in terms of raw gaming performance, typically Intel is on top, as most games are single core or single thread dependent, but I can only seem to find benchmarks that focus on 1080p gaming, rather than UWQHD or even 1440p in most cases, so
(A) I'm not sure how those chips stack up at higher resolutions and (B) I've been looking to make the move to Ryzen for awhile and their chips are largely competitive with Intel at this point.
I initially considered the 3900x , but that chip gets little to no benefit in gaming scenarios over the 3700x and costs substantially more. My workload tasks are not substantially taxing enough to warrant the extra cost. I also looked at the 3600 , which is a competent gaming chip, but seems like more of a sidegrade (admittedly, with added threadcount). I know there are 'tweener skus (the 3800x and the 3600x ), but the price to performance ratio on those seems unjustifiable as well.
TL:DR - Which CPUs should I be considering for purchase near the end of the year for a high end gaming rig that I use secondarily for creative work? Is the 3700x a good choice, or should I be looking ahead to next generation's 4600 chip?