Intel Core i5-8400 Review

Mid-range desktop processor released in 2017 with 6 cores and 6 threads. With base clock at 2.8GHz, max speed at 3.8GHz, and a 65W power rating. Core i5-8400 is based on the Coffee Lake 14nm family and part of the Core i5 series.
Price 81.6%
Speed 71%
Productivity 66%
Gaming 89%
Category Desktop
Target mid-range
Socket Compatibility LGA1151
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630
Cooler Included Yes
Overclock Potential 0 %
Year 2017 Model
Price 182 USD
Number of Cores 6 Cores
Number of Threads 6 Threads
Core Frequency 2.8 GHz
Boost Frequency 3.8 GHz
Max Stable Overclock 3.8 GHz
Power Consumption 65 W
Manufacturing Process 14 nm
L3 Cache 9 MB
Maximum Supported Memory 128 GB
Price-Value Score 81.6 %
Speed Score 71 %
Productivity Score 66 %
Gaming Score 89 %
Max 1080p Bottleneck 28.1 %
Max 1440p Bottleneck 14 %
Max 4K Bottleneck 7 %
Overall Score 42/100

The Core i5-8400 is one of Intel's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2017 with 6 cores and 6 threads. With base clock at 2.8GHz, max speed at 3.8GHz, and a 65W power rating. The Core i5-8400 is based on the Coffee Lake 14nm family and is part of the Core i5 series.

Core i5-8400 is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i5-7400 processor that was based on the Kaby Lake-S and 14nm process and was released in 2017.

In our mind, the best processors are the ones that deliver outstanding performance at a reasonable price point. And, the Core i5-8400 absolutely nails this concept.

The Intel Core i5-8400 marks yet another blast from Team Intel, ramping up the intensity of the Intel vs AMD processor war. Still, though, there’s more than just core counts when it comes to a mainstream processor, as single-core performance needs to be on point, especially if you’re hoping to play the best PC games.

Unfortunately, this doesn’t quite translate to as strong of a single-core performance, even if Intel is closer than it’s ever been to matching AMD core for core. In our single-core GeekBench and Cinebench tests, the Core i5-8400 scored a 4020 and 161, respectively. This is definitely a huge leap over the Core i5-7400, but it’s slower than the Ryzen 5 2400G, which scored a 4295 and 155 in the same tests. But, that’s still not a huge difference, so the multi-core gains generally outweigh them.

The Intel Core i5-8400 was rolled out on Oct 2017 for $182, which puts it in the same general price range as the last-generation Core i5-7400. This means that at least we're not seeing any considerable price jumps from generation to generation.

Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the Core i5-7400, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.

So which should you buy? Let's get that out of the way. Before this comparison review we updated our Best CPU feature and we said you should go with the Ryzen 5 2400G as it comes with a better stock cooler, can be overclocked, and the AM4 platform offers a significantly better upgrade path.

One of the nice things about the Intel Core i5-8400 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the Intel Core i5-8400 up for $182 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.

The Intel Core i5-8400 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 65W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.

The Intel Core i5-8400 seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $182 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Ryzen 5 2400G 4-Core unlocked desktop processor with Radeon Vega 11 graphics ($169 shipped).

For a 6-core processor, Intel’s $182 flagship Core i5-8400 processor seems downright cheap. On paper, the cost of those 2 extra cores is almost an afterthought when you stack it up against its direct competitor, the $169 4-core AMD Ryzen 5 2400G.

Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i5 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 89% in our benchmarks.

There’s a saying that two heads are better than one and, well, 6-cores are better than 4. The extra processing power of the Core i5-8400 puts AMD’s processors to shame, including both its closest competitor and a much higher-spec part.

If you’ve been looking for an affordable, powerhouse CPU that both works and parties hard, this is it.

Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i5 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the mid-range with its Core i5-8400 processors, which the company is making available as of Oct 2017.

AMD's Ryzen 5s are a staple of the high-volume mainstream market. They make up the most popular brand for mid-range-oriented builds by far. Intel is looking to shake that up with true 6-core processors that sell for even less than 4 cores. As if a resource advantage wasn't already compelling enough, Core i5 also enables unlocked multipliers. AMD is ill-prepared to fend off such a combination.

Which GPU to Pick for Intel Core i5-8400

Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i5-8400.

GPU Price Cost/Frame Avg 1080p Avg 1440p Avg 4K
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB $2,499 $18.4 135.7 FPS
123.6 FPS
80.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB $1,299 $9.8 132.1 FPS
120.4 FPS
78.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB $699 $5.8 119.8 FPS
108.2 FPS
69.9 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB $2,999 $26.1 114.9 FPS
104.7 FPS
69.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB $699 $6.2 113.3 FPS
101.2 FPS
64.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB $759 $7.1 106.2 FPS
96.5 FPS
62.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB $499 $4.7 105.5 FPS
93.2 FPS
60 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB $1,199 $11.5 104.1 FPS
93.2 FPS
61.5 FPS
AMD Radeon VII 16GB $699 $6.7 104.1 FPS
92.5 FPS
58.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB $399 $3.9 101.4 FPS
90 FPS
57 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB $499 $5 100 FPS
87.1 FPS
56.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB $400 $4.2 94.7 FPS
81 FPS
52 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB $349 $3.8 92.9 FPS
82.6 FPS
52.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB $499 $5.5 90.2 FPS
78.9 FPS
50.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB $350 $3.9 89.1 FPS
74.5 FPS
46.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB $279 $3.2 87.6 FPS
77.2 FPS
48.8 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB $1,499 $17.7 84.5 FPS
72.9 FPS
49.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB $499 $5.9 84.3 FPS
74.9 FPS
47.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB $409 $4.9 83.6 FPS
73.1 FPS
46.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB $999 $12.3 81.2 FPS
70.2 FPS
44.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB $279 $3.5 79.5 FPS
69.6 FPS
44 FPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB $399 $5.1 79 FPS
70 FPS
44.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB $399 $5.2 76.9 FPS
66.7 FPS
42 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB $229 $3.1 74.9 FPS
65.6 FPS
41.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB $649 $9.2 70.7 FPS
61.5 FPS
39 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB $220 $3.1 70.5 FPS
61.7 FPS
39.1 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB $279 $4.2 66.9 FPS
56.9 FPS
35.2 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB $649 $10.1 64.2 FPS
58.5 FPS
38 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB $160 $2.6 61.4 FPS
53.6 FPS
33.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB $199 $3.3 60.9 FPS
51.7 FPS
31.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB $549 $9.1 60.6 FPS
52.2 FPS
33.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB $229 $3.9 59.4 FPS
50.4 FPS
31 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB $649 $11.1 58.4 FPS
52.3 FPS
33.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB $999 $17.7 56.6 FPS
48.4 FPS
32.1 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB $549 $9.9 55.2 FPS
49.2 FPS
31.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB $254 $4.6 55 FPS
47.1 FPS
29.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB $169 $3.1 54.6 FPS
46.4 FPS
28.6 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB $429 $8.1 53.1 FPS
47.2 FPS
30.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB $170 $3.3 52.2 FPS
44.8 FPS
28.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB $329 $6.4 51.4 FPS
43.6 FPS
28.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB $400 $8 49.9 FPS
44 FPS
28.5 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB $329 $6.6 49.6 FPS
43.1 FPS
26 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB $169 $3.4 49 FPS
42.5 FPS
26.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB $149 $3.2 46.8 FPS
40.6 FPS
25.6 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB $179 $4.1 43.7 FPS
38.1 FPS
24.1 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB $229 $6.2 36.7 FPS
31.7 FPS
20.5 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB $249 $7.5 33 FPS
28.6 FPS
17.4 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB $199 $6.1 32.8 FPS
28.3 FPS
17.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB $169 $5.2 32.3 FPS
28 FPS
17.7 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB $279 $8.7 32 FPS
27.9 FPS
16.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB $199 $6.3 31.6 FPS
27.1 FPS
16.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB $169 $6.1 27.5 FPS
23.6 FPS
14.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB $99 $3.9 25.4 FPS
21.6 FPS
13.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB $159 $6.4 24.9 FPS
21.1 FPS
13.6 FPS
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB $149 $6.1 24.4 FPS
19.9 FPS
12.9 FPS
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB $149 $6.1 24.3 FPS
19.2 FPS
12.5 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB $140 $6.3 22.4 FPS
19.1 FPS
12 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB $149 $6.9 21.6 FPS
16.4 FPS
10.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB $79 $4.5 17.7 FPS
15.2 FPS
9.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB $79 $4.7 16.9 FPS
14.4 FPS
8.7 FPS
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?

Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?

Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Performance

Jul 5, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.

Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?

Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.

Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?

Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.

How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU

Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.

10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs

May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.

10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.

10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.

2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?

May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.

Critics Reviews

The Core i5-8400 is a locked processor anyway, so the reason most enthusiasts would have had for spending extra (overclocking) doesn't apply here.
The Core i5-8400 sits in the middle of Intel's new stack of mainstream consumer CPUs, above a pair of four-core/four-thread Core i3 chips, and below a pair of six-core/12-thread Core i7 chips ...
The fantastic-value Core i5 8400 is the gamer’s chip from Intel’s 8th Gen Coffee Lake range, which is surprising considering the K-series i5 is capable of hitting 5.1GHz without issue.
- Intel Core i5-8400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Thank you for your support.
The Core i5-8400 is Intel's most affordable option to go beyond a quad-core setup on the desktop. With a price point of $190, it is only half the price of Core i7-8700K, but delivers nearly the same performance in games and can also compete with the Ryzen 6c12t processors thanks to its good single-threaded performance and high boost clock.
Intel Core i5-8400T ⭐ review. Discover the key facts and see how Intel Core i5-8400T performs in the CPU ranking.
Buy Intel Core i5-8400 BX80684I58400 Processor online at low price in India on Check out Intel Core i5-8400 BX80684I58400 Processor reviews, ratings, features, specifications and browse more Intel products online at best prices on
The Core i5-8400 we will have to file under also-ran. Despite its two additional cores it fails to best the Core i7-7700K and is around 16% slower than its main competitor, the Ryzen R5 1600. ...

Related Comments

Shital rajat July 26, 2020
cpu aio liquid cooler
I want to upgrade my CPU tower air cooler to aio liquid cooler
because my air cooler doesn't give me appropriate result CPU temperature raise to 69 to 70 degree on load . my PC specification are below :-
Motherboard ECS G31t-m9
processor:- core 2 quad 8400 2.66ghz
graphics card gt 1030
PSU :-450watt.
Only One cpu header and no SYS fan header on mother board

I searching online for
DEEPCOOL GAMMAXX L120T Blue LED Lighting AIO Cooler with “Anti-Leak Tech Inside” System,
But how i connect this to my motherboard please help me.
CompuTronix November 13, 2006
Shital rajat ,

As Lutfij has already pointed out, you do not need to improve cooling performance since 70°C is a very safe temperature.

Intel processors have two thermal specifications. The " Datasheets " show both , but the " Product Specifications " website only shows one . For Core i 6th generations and earlier, the website shows "Tcase". This includes your Core 2 Q8400, for which the website shows 71.4°C, and might be the reason why you're concerned.

This specification is highly misleading because Tcase is not Core temperature ; it's IHS temperature. Intel doesn't spell this out in plain language, which is why Tcase has been confusing users since 2006. Tcase is a factory only lab test using engineering samples with a "thermocouple" sensor embedded in the center of the Integrated Heat Spreader (IHS).

Intel's intended purpose for providing a specification for Tcase is primarily for developers of aftermarket cooling solutions. The CPUs in our computers don't have a sensor for IHS temperature, which is why there's no software utilities to monitor it, so Tcase is irrelevant .

The other specification, which is the one we need to pay attention to, is "Throttle" temperature. For the Q8400 it's 100 °C. This is the Core temperature limit at which the processor will reduce Core speed and Core voltage to safeguard against thermal damage. This specification is also called "Tj Max" which is shown in monitoring utilities such as " Core Temp ".

The consensus among well informed and highly experienced reviewers, system builders and expert overclockers, is that it's prudent to observe a reasonable thermal margin below Throttle temperature for ultimate stability, performance and longevity.

Here's the nominal operating range for Core temperature:

Core temperatures above 85 °C are not recommended .

Core temperatures below 80 °C are ideal .

Core temperatures increase and decrease with ambient (room) temperature , for which the International Standard for "normal" is 22°C or 72°F.

Your Core temperatures are safe, but if you want to learn more then click on the link in my signature.

Relax and enjoy your rig!

Shital rajat July 26, 2020
Warning Cpu is over spec.
I have upgrade my CPU from core 2 duo to core 2 quad 8400 2.66 GHz on motherboard ecs g31t-m9 but whenever I start my computer shows message (warning CPU is over spec!) But system runs properly. Does it cause any harm to my PC or reduced system performance .What should I do.?
my Motherboard ECS G31t-m9
PSU 450 watt.
CountMike October 31, 2015
There are 2 BIOS versions for that MB, right here -LL-V1-DO-0-RR-/Socket 775 -LL-Intel-RR-
Instructions should be in the manual here: -LL-V1-DO-0-RR-/Socket 775 -LL-Intel-RR-
Check which version is now, use under Motherboard tab.
TJS1986 July 22, 2020
What Can I Replace My GTX 1050TI With?
I want to replace My Nvidia GTX 1050TI with something Newer from Nvidia, but I don't want to have to change the power supply. What are my Options? I couldn't figure out how to upload a file on to here so I just copied and pasted. I am not a Seasoned PC expert at all, I do know the Basics though. From what I can understand replacing a Graphics Card mainly depends on the PC's Power Supply. I have no Idea what my power supply even is? The Information below is from a Diagnostic Program That Microsoft ran on my system awhile back to see if I qualified to be an Alpha Tester on an upcoming Simulation, I cannot find anything about power supply in it. Any help at all would be Greatly Appreciated !!!
The following is some of my system information.



<Time>6/8/2020, 11:28:51</Time>



<OperatingSystem>Windows 10 Home 64-bit (10.0, Build 18363) (18362.19h1_release.190318-1202)</OperatingSystem>

<Language>English (Regional Setting: English)</Language>


<SystemModel>Nitro N50-600</SystemModel>



<Processor>Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8400 CPU @ 2.80GHz (6 CPUs), ~2.8GHz</Processor>

<Memory>8192MB RAM</Memory>

<AvaliableOSMem>8118MB RAM</AvaliableOSMem>

<PageFile>5042MB used, 14563MB available</PageFile>


<DirectXVersion>DirectX 12</DirectXVersion>

<DXSetupParameters>Not found</DXSetupParameters>

<UserDPISettings>96 DPI (100 percent)</UserDPISettings>

<SystemDPISettings>96 DPI (100 percent)</SystemDPISettings>





<Miracast>Available, with HDCP</Miracast>

<MSHybrid>Not Supported</MSHybrid>



<CardName>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti</CardName>


<ChipType>GeForce GTX 1050 Ti</ChipType>

<DACType>Integrated RAMDAC</DACType>

<DeviceType>Full Device (POST)</DeviceType>



<DeviceProblemCode>No Problem</DeviceProblemCode>


<DisplayMemory>8088 MB</DisplayMemory>

<DedicatedMemory>4029 MB</DedicatedMemory>

<SharedMemory>4059 MB</SharedMemory>

<CurrentMode>1920 x 1080 (32 bit) (60Hz)</CurrentMode>
RTX 2080 June 08, 2020
I think that it's best to treat that list of compatible products as a list of stuff known to work by that particular website at the time of publication, rather than as a list of the only stuff that will work.

I find it to be basically pointless to compare clock speeds on different versions of the same GPU. Regardless of which GPU you are using, it'll boost up to a certain point and then throttle back as it needs to as the card heats up. Thus, the greatest difference in most cards will lie in the ability of the cooling system to remove heat and allow the card to boost higher. Overclocking makes the differences even less significant as it allows most cards to overclock to similar levels irregardless of the board partner being utilized. There are exceptions to this, but that's mostly for cards on the high end like the 2080 Ti.

To answer your question about cooling fans, there are three main ways of improving the cooling system on a GPU; make the cooler thicker (how many slots the GPU takes up), make the cooler longer (how long the GPU is front to back) and to increase the number of fans blowing air through the cooler (1, 2 and 3 fan designs). Everything else being the same, twin-fan GPUs cool better than single fan GPUs, which is good for keeping temperatures down (which keeps your boost clocks up) and allows the two fans to spin slower than a single fan would have to which reduces fan noise in your case when the GPU is under load.

If you have all the space in the world in your case, then the bigger the cooler the better, but most people don't have room for that, so if they are not choosing the card based on price, they look for the best cooler that will fit their system.

I watched a little bit of the video that describes your PC case and a few things stood out to me:

1.) The GPU shown in there has an 8-pin power cable plugged into it, which tells me that your PC does in fact have an 8-pin cable to plug into a RTX 2060 should you decide to buy one. A 500 watt power supply should be enough to power a RTX 2060.

2.) You have room for a 3-slot GPU in your tower (the one shown in the video is a two slot, but there is an unused slot underneath.)

3.) There is not a whole lot of space in the case as far as GPU length is concerned.

4.) The case does not seem to come with a fan that blows hot air out of the case (maybe yours does, but the one in the video doesn't).

All this leads me to think that the best version of the RTX 2060 for your purposes would be the EVGA Geforce RTX 2060 XC Gaming card, the one with a single fan that costs $319 on the Nvidia website. Allow me to explain why:

Your case doesn't seem to have room for long GPUs and its hard to tell exactly how long a GPU it will fit, so in your situation a shorter, single-fan GPU will ensure the best fit. The problem with that though is that single fan GPUs run hotter and thus slower than twin-fan GPUs. For that reason I would not recommend the ASUS Phoenix card as reading reviews confirmed to me that it runs hot.

The EVGA RTX 2060 XC Gaming card however has a 3-slot cooler, which means that even though its is a short, single fan card, it has a very thick cooler that makes up the difference in cooling capacity. Reviews for this card confirm that it runs cool and quiet with no disadvantage compared to longer, twin fan cards. Your case has room for a short, three-slot card, so it seems perfect for you.

One last thing I would recommend is that if your case did not come with a fan for blowing hot air outside the case, you should get one installed; you want to make sure that your GPU isn't trying to cool itself off with its own heat because hot air isn't getting out of the case.
Fiorezy July 03, 2020
Why does my x570 not detecting my M.2 NVMe drive?
First at all this is my drive
and this is my mobo

The drive was working fine on my old laptop then I built my first PC with B360M PRO-VH and I5 8400 and moved the drive and installed Windows on it. Life was easy for the past couple of years until I decided to upgrade the CPU to Ryzen 7 3700x and got the x570 with it. This mobo is not detecting my M.2 drive and always showing Not Present. I almost tried everything, updating BIOS, switching M.2 slots, unplugging other drives, played with BIOS settings, clearing CMOS, I even installed Windows on a SATA SSD and updated the chipset from AMD website. Btw the M.2 drive is still being detected in my old laptop so it's not faulty.

Beside all of this, the x570 post and Windows boot become super slow when the M.2 is installed like 80sec to boot and when I remove the drive it come back to 15sec.

So is there something I'm missing?
Fiorezy July 03, 2020
It seems like my NVMe is faulty as it was not working anymore even when I installed it into my old motherboard
wrathofliom63 June 26, 2020
Hello, everyone. My PC Boots in 30minutes, plus a Hard Drive Failure error. SEE below for more details (urgent)
So everyone, My PC boots in 30mins.
Process of boot:
I click start button on my Case, it starts. I see HP logo, And an error comes:
S.M.A.R.T. Hard Drive detects imminent failure.

Failing Drive: SATA1 (Light Blue)

Failing Attribute: #1


Theres that. i press f1 to boot, it now is on a blue windows logo booting screen. It takes approximately 15mins on that screen, the other 3mins on a black screen that appears after the blue logo screen goes away, and the password screen (or pin). I enter password and press enter, when im on desktop, i open one application such as my browser and everything gets unresponsive. Even the desktop, Microsoft windows isnt responding, End Process, clicking end process doesnt do anything. This goes on for another 10mins, while the computer becomes usable, and i start my work. (i have already backed up important data). This is the boot up process.

I used CrystalDiskMark and CrystalDIskInfo, Results are:


It is pretty clear my HDD is saying a goodbye, but i wanted to make sure, that it ACTUALLY is the HDD, and not something else right?
Why do i say not something else? It is because on the Smart hard drive detects imminent failure error, theres a number written: 8192MB, i got 8GB RAM and 500GB HDD. MY SPECS:

Core i5 2400 2nd Generation @ 3.10GHz
Windows 10 Pro (64 Bit)
Nvidia Geforce Gtx 750 (1GB VERSION)
ORIGINAL PC: HP Compaq 8400.

If you're sure its the hard drive, let me know what that "8192MB" is.


EDIT: Also let me know if there are anything i should worry about while buying an HDD or SSD, except the SIZE and SATA. (that it will fit on my PC or not)
anotherdrew December 27, 2017

The symptoms you describe are exactly what a failing hard drive looks like. Since the drive is throwing errors when it tries to read, it keeps reading the same sectors over and over again trying to get error free data and this causes the very slow boot. Anytime you try to access the hard drive, what you do will be very slow. If you do something that does not use the hard drive, the computer will act normal.

Could this be something else, like a failing SATA controller ... sure, but that's unlikely.

The 8192MB line at startup looks like the RAM check of POST (power on self test). 8192MB is 8GB (8192MB / 1024MB/GB = 8GB)
Issue Games June 23, 2020
RAM Slot won't work after cleaning PC
So I just cleaned my PC reapplied paste and stuff nothing out of the ordinary. Now I boot my PC and it won't give display with both RAMS installed.. When I remove the RAM from DIMM_a1 it boots just fine. My mobo is Asus H310m-k Prime it only has two RAM slots. I also tried all the over-the-counter solutions like exchange RAMS through both slots. Reset bios. Cmos reset all.
At the end of the day no matter what I do the pc won't boot until I remove ram from the slot/dimm_a1.
Both the rams work fine on slot B. But neither work on slot a.
So is the ram slot_a dead? If is pls suggest a decent budget mobo.
My specs are
i5 8400
Saphire RX 580 8gb
RAMS are corsair vengeance 2666mhz 8GiBx2
Mandark September 13, 2002
It should be ok. You just won’t be able to use that other slot
MagicTurtle998 June 20, 2020
Will i5 8400 stock cooler work with i7 8700k
I am upgrading from the i5 and wondering if I need to buy a cooler too
boju July 07, 2008
Yes, the i7 will need more cooling being a faster, higher thread processor. Would recommend Dark Rock Pro 4 or Noctua D15/15s. Tower coolers do need a back plate for support so you may need to remove the motherboard to install the bracket if can't access it from behind as is.

Check heatsink dimensions and make sure case can accommodate. Ram clearance may be an issue if populating the first dimm slot closest to cpu or on a mATX board. If have an ATX board and using two slots (2nd & 4th), clearance should be fine, without or with adjusting the fan clips a little.
Enceos June 14, 2020
My Samsung SSD 970 PRO is running at slow speeds
Hello guys, I've read a bunch of threads but I still can't figure out why my Samsung 970 PRO SSD runs two times slower than advertised. The temperature is at healthy 36 degrees, using a proper PCIe 3.0 x2 | x4 slot (M.2) in the middle of my motherboard. NVMe drivers from Samsung are installed.

Motherboard: Asus Prime Z370-A
CPU: Intel i5-8400
OS: Windows 10 Pro x64

The advertised speed should be above 3 GB/s for sequential read/write. What's happening?

Enceos June 14, 2020
Ok, I found the answer myself. Had two flick a switch in BIOS as well for the M.2 slot, changed from x2 to x4 and the speed doubled.
BananaMatt June 05, 2020
Constant high ram use
Hello everyone,
For the last few days I have been having significant issues with my PC's speed, and have been experiencing significant (often 5-15 second long) stutters randomly in games. I'm unsure whether these stutter occur at a consistent time or not, but it is possible. After messing with my ingame settings (I've been mainly playing "Escape from Tarkov", a very RAM and CPU heavy game), presuming that was the issue, despite the fact that I have 16gbs of ram, an i5-8400 and a GTX 1070; I had an instinct to check task manager. It showed me constant 85-98% memory usage, even with literally nothing but Chrome and a few background processes running. Checking resource monitor showed me similarly odd results. Nothing in particular using up ram, yet still somehow reaching 15gb at the lowest. I've tried all the usual "high ram usage" fixes, such as Windows defender's high use, disabling windows superfetch (though my OS is installed on an SSD, while other data such as games is on a 2tb HDD), and so on. Unfortunate the issue persists, and from my searching I am yet to locate anyone with the same problem.
Colif June 12, 2015
Sounds about right for a leak. Obvious first step is upgrade drivers - you don't have any of the obvious drivers on motherboard that I can point at and say that one... so its more a story of replace as many of you can. There are other steps but this is most obvious. (and easiest)

Go here and see if you have newest BIOs and Motherboard drivers -
you don't need VGA drivers

If you not sure what drivers are installed, download this -
all it does is shows what drivers are installed.
When you run it, go to View tab and set it to hide any Microsoft drivers

Now its either creation date or Creation date that should tell you the driver date. Compare against Asus website (they may not be exact). You can drag & drop the rows in there so I have moved creation date right next to Driver name (I had forgotten and couldn't figure out where it was)

if you want, take a screenshot showing from (and including driver name) to (and including) creation date and II see what I can find (upload to imgur again)

Many of the drivers on Asus website are from this year so its possible one of them will fix it.
Updating BIOS might fix it, depends which one you have now. See if drivers fix it first.

this could help with restarting thing -
right click start button
choose powershell (admin)
type SFC /scannow and press enter
once its completed, copy/paste this command into same window:
Repair-WindowsImage -Online -RestoreHealth and press enter
SFC fixes system files, second command cleans image files, re run SFC if it failed to fix all files and restart PC
maqi June 05, 2020
Ridiculously slow internet

Recently i've been having ridiculously slow loading times on almost anything I do in the browser, i just spent more than 1 MINUTE waiting for the Youtube landing page to load, thats where i decided to try and get help here, at certain times and activities this really can become incredibly frustrating and almost unusable especially if trying to work. The issue is not constant, however it is like this the majority of the time, and even at its best i can still feel some delay.

Considering the current global health crisis (around the time this started happening) i was okay with it, thinking it was probably some kind of an overload with a lot of people being home at once, however for quite a while now, things have been lifted in my country and the problem still persist.

I said in the browser, because i don't have any issues whatsoever in other internet related software like games, communication software or any others. I do some multiplayer gaming in my free time, and i've never had even a hick up in World of Warcraft, or any other game. That said the issue might not be browser related, i just don't have much to check apart from the games which work fine.

I'll try to provide as much information as i can and know, if you need something else to help me fix this issue, please post it in the comments and id be happy to add it.

- Im on a Desktop PC, not a laptop
Intel Core i5-8400 @2.80GHz
16 GB 2400Mhz T-Force Delta DDR4
EVGA 750W G3
Windows 10 Education 1809 Build 17763.1217

- Im on a wired connection using on board Ethernet connector, directly into the router/modem without any switches
While connecting to the routers page in order to get the model number i've also experienced this issue and waited quite a while, i don't know if that helps.

Model: EVW32C-0N

There are 2 PC's connected using wired connection at all times ( I don't use the other one personally, but i've been told that it doesn't have this issue), apart from that there are 1-6 Android/iPhone Smartphones that might be connected

ISP: Serbia BroadBand (SBB)
My internet speed (At the time of writing this, and also having said issues):

- I use Google Chrome exclusively and the issue is NOT tied to it, i tried Microsoft Edge and it was worse than ever.

Much thanks in advance, and please let me know if you need any further information.
ShwaBdudle June 04, 2020
is my pc good enough for an RTX 2060 OR GTX 1660 SUPER?
I still didn't decide on which GPU Upgrade should I go for. I want to go either for an RTX 2060 OR GTX 1660 SUPER. With this upgrade, I am also planning on getting a new Power Supply (500W-600W) & More Ram (16-32GB). I Mostly want to know if my MOTHERBOARD & My Cooling is suited for an RTX 2060 OR GTX 1660 SUPER. CURRENT SPECS: CPU: i5-8400 2.8Ghz, CURRENT GPU: GTX 1050 TI, COOLER: Arctic Freezer 13 CPU Cooler, MOTHERBOARD: Gigabyte H370 HD3 LGA1151v2, Intel H370, DDR4, 2xPCI-E, VGA, DVI, HDMI, CURRENT POWER SUPPLY: Antec 450W Active PFC VP450P PSU. again from these specs, I will be changing my Power Supply, Ram & GPU.
I have made some 3DMARK Stress Tests:
all of the stress tests had between 65-70 GPU TEMP, 35-40 CPU TEMP, 99-100% GPU LOAD & Between 98%-99% Success.
Time Spy Stress Test Had an AVG of 15-20 FPS. Sky Diver Had an AVG of 100-120 FPS. Fire Strike Had an AVG of 30-40 FPS.

EDIT: I've had this system for two years. so every component is 2 years old.
cdrkf March 18, 2013
I would say you should be fine with that motherboard - the main areas needing attention you are already looking at (specifically power supply and ram). A note on ram - I notice you currently only have a single ram module- this will really hurt performance as in modern machines ram can be run in dual channel mode, where the cpu can address two ram modules on separate channels resulting in twice the bandwidth. To enable dual channel you need to have a pair of matched modules, so make sure to buy either a 2 x 8gb kit or 2 x 16gb kit rather than a single larger module.

CPU wise, the 8400 should be fine for most games with a 2060 or 1660ti, especially if you are wanting to play at high settings. The only place where it might hold those cards back a little is if you are wanting to run e-sports type games (CS:GO, Fortnight etc) on low details to get very high frame rates, although even there the performance should still be decent.

Your current performance numbers are somewhat irrelevant as all that is showing you is the performance of your current 1050ti.
ShwaBdudle June 01, 2020
Should I Upgrade My 2 Year old GTX 1050 TI Now (2070/2080) or Wait For The New Upcoming (RTX 3080) Nvidia Ampere GPU?
Hey Guys, So I had a goal from Summer 2019 to save up for an upgrade (Currently I have a GTX 1050 TI and 8 GB ram) for my pc (RTX 2070/2080, Power supply, 16-32 GB ram). But today I found out that Nvidia is allegedly planning on releasing a new GPU called "RTX 3080" With New AMPERE Architecture. I have saved up 1,568 USD (To This Date that I am typing this question) and I am planning on ordering those components (Whether it'll be RTX 2070/2080 or RTX 3080) from NewEgg since it is SOOO MUCH cheaper than the country where I live. So My main question is: Should I Upgrade My 2-Year-old GTX 1050 TI to an RTX 2070/2080 or wait for an RTX 3080?
EDIT: CPU: i5-8400 2.8Ghz. COOLER: Arctic Freezer 13 CPU Cooler. Motherboard: Gigabyte H370 HD3 LGA1151v2, Intel H370, DDR4, 2xPCI-E, VGA, DVI, HDMI. MEMORY: G.Skill Value 8GB DDR4 2400Mhz CL15 Kit. GPU: Gigabyte GTX 1050 TI 4GB DVI HDMI DP PCI-E. HARD DISK: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB Sata III WD10EZEX. SSD: Kingston A400 SA400S37/120G 120GB SSD SATA III. POWER SUPPLY: Antec 450W Active PFC VP450P PSU. 1080P Monitor.

EDIT: So I have bought an RTX 2060 From NewEgg. Can't wait to play some games with it
Darkbreeze June 24, 2014
Personally, I think that the current gen AMD cards are a bad purchase decision. We've seen verified issues with them through many channels of community feedback now, and we have several members and moderators here who've had multiple serious issues with their Navi based graphics cards. I think Navi is flawed, as do others, and it's hard to argue against it when you see confirmed symptoms of electromigration on these cards, instability at stock voltages that go away (Temporarily at least, until the problem worsens) by increasing voltage. I think, in MY opinion, that avoiding Navi based cards is a good idea right now. Maybe entirely.

A 1660 Super or 2060 would give you anything you might need for 1080p gaming at whatever the desired level for the most part. Certainly with an RTX 2060 you'd get ~5 years of Ultra everything at 1080p, for the most part. And yes, it IS true that there are a number of games that tend to like the Nvidia drivers/cards better than they do AMD. But it's probably true conversely as well to some degree or other.

I believe Nvidia has cards and drivers that are both more stable and better developed.
Blank384 May 18, 2020
Random Fps drops in all games After restart
This problem started occurring about a week ago but it was random. Fps in games drop drastically sometimes after restart in all games. For instance in ac Odyssey where i was getting 65 fps with med to high setting i get 30fps..

In csgo where i was getting 200+ fps i get 60 fps with stuttering.

This problem is not fixed always by restarting but fixes itself randomly sometimes. My cpu and gpu temps don't exceed 70 C. I also cannot replicate the issue as it is random.

This did not happen to me before. This problem was seen in several games such as Hitman 2 and Rise of the Tomb raider

My specs:

GPU: Galax gtx 1070 ex(NOT overclocked)

Cpu: i5 8400

Ram: 8gb*2 (One at 2400mhz and other

at 3000mhz)

Storage: 128Gb ssd(Games are stored on 2tb hard disk)

What I tried:

Uninstalling the graphics driver using ddu and reinstalling

Resetting windows

Running a scan using malwareBytes and defender

Turning off xbox dvr

Turning off geforce overlay

Disabling xmp

Power options already set to performance

Turn off fast boot: This seemed to help but after a few days the problem returned so looked and it was enabled again so i disabled but this time it didn't fix it

Disabling all startup programs from task manager

In nvidia control panel turning on prefer max performance

I looked at many threads and tried the things mentioned there but none seem to permanently fix the problem. I don't know what to do now so any help would be appreciated.
Blank384 May 18, 2020
Update: I checked in gpuz and it showed that the GPU was running in PCIe x1 instead of x16 so I removed my GPU and found a dust on the pcie slot .. I cleaned that and now GPUs correctly shows that you is using pcie×16 so the problem seems to be fixed now!