Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | LGA1151 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2017 Model | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Price | 182 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Number of Cores | 6 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 6 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 2.8 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 3.8 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 3.8 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 65 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 9 MB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 128 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Price-Value Score | 78 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 58 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 42 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 85 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 31.7 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 15.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 7.9 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 38/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i5-8400 is one of Intel's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2017 with 6 cores and 6 threads. With base clock at 2.8GHz, max speed at 3.8GHz, and a 65W power rating. The Core i5-8400 is based on the Coffee Lake 14nm family and is part of the Core i5 series.
Core i5-8400 is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i5-7400 processor that was based on the Kaby Lake-S and 14nm process and was released in 2017.
In our mind, the best processors are the ones that deliver outstanding performance at a reasonable price point. And, the Core i5-8400 absolutely nails this concept.
The Intel Core i5-8400 marks yet another blast from Team Intel, ramping up the intensity of the Intel vs AMD processor war. Still, though, there’s more than just core counts when it comes to a mainstream processor, as single-core performance needs to be on point, especially if you’re hoping to play the best PC games.
Unfortunately, this doesn’t quite translate to as strong of a single-core performance, even if Intel is closer than it’s ever been to matching AMD core for core. In our single-core GeekBench and Cinebench tests, the Core i5-8400 scored a 4020 and 161, respectively. This is definitely a huge leap over the Core i5-7400, but it’s slower than the Ryzen 5 2400G, which scored a 4295 and 155 in the same tests. But, that’s still not a huge difference, so the multi-core gains generally outweigh them.
The Intel Core i5-8400 was rolled out on Oct 2017 for $182, which puts it in the same general price range as the last-generation Core i5-7400. This means that at least we're not seeing any considerable price jumps from generation to generation.
Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the Core i5-7400, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.
So which should you buy? Let's get that out of the way. Before this comparison review we updated our Best CPU feature and we said you should go with the Ryzen 5 2400G as it comes with a better stock cooler, can be overclocked, and the AM4 platform offers a significantly better upgrade path.
One of the nice things about the Intel Core i5-8400 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the Intel Core i5-8400 up for $182 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The Intel Core i5-8400 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 65W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
The Intel Core i5-8400 seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $182 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Ryzen 5 2400G 4-Core unlocked desktop processor with Radeon Vega 11 graphics ($169 shipped).
For a 6-core processor, Intel’s $182 flagship Core i5-8400 processor seems downright cheap. On paper, the cost of those 2 extra cores is almost an afterthought when you stack it up against its direct competitor, the $169 4-core AMD Ryzen 5 2400G.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i5 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 85% in our benchmarks.
There’s a saying that two heads are better than one and, well, 6-cores are better than 4. The extra processing power of the Core i5-8400 puts AMD’s processors to shame, including both its closest competitor and a much higher-spec part.
If you’ve been looking for an affordable, powerhouse CPU that both works and parties hard, this is it.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i5 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the mid-range with its Core i5-8400 processors, which the company is making available as of Oct 2017.
AMD's Ryzen 5s are a staple of the high-volume mainstream market. They make up the most popular brand for mid-range-oriented builds by far. Intel is looking to shake that up with true 6-core processors that sell for even less than 4 cores. As if a resource advantage wasn't already compelling enough, Core i5 also enables unlocked multipliers. AMD is ill-prepared to fend off such a combination.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i5-8400.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 5.9 | 270.2 FPS
|
254.6 FPS
|
176.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.2 | 252.2 FPS
|
237.6 FPS
|
165 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.1 | 243.9 FPS
|
225.6 FPS
|
142.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.1 | 234.2 FPS
|
220.5 FPS
|
153.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.6 | 225 FPS
|
211.8 FPS
|
147 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.1 | 221.7 FPS
|
205.1 FPS
|
129.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7.1 | 210.5 FPS
|
191.3 FPS
|
124.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 5.5 | 201.5 FPS
|
186.4 FPS
|
117.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 10.1 | 198.1 FPS
|
186.6 FPS
|
129.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.1 | 197.3 FPS
|
180.3 FPS
|
115.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.5 | 185.8 FPS
|
169.8 FPS
|
109.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.4 | 183.5 FPS
|
170.1 FPS
|
115.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 3.8 | 183.4 FPS
|
166.7 FPS
|
108.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.4 | 177.1 FPS
|
162.7 FPS
|
111.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 3.8 | 157.4 FPS
|
144.2 FPS
|
95.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 3.9 | 147.1 FPS
|
134.5 FPS
|
86.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.6 | 140.3 FPS
|
127.6 FPS
|
83.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 19.4 | 128.9 FPS
|
120.9 FPS
|
79.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 10.4 | 125.4 FPS
|
117.7 FPS
|
77.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 3.9 | 123.9 FPS
|
114 FPS
|
72.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.3 | 121.8 FPS
|
113.3 FPS
|
76.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.5 | 115 FPS
|
107.3 FPS
|
71.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.1 | 113.8 FPS
|
105.8 FPS
|
69.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.6 | 109.8 FPS
|
101.6 FPS
|
65.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 27.5 | 109.1 FPS
|
102.4 FPS
|
68.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.7 | 109.1 FPS
|
102 FPS
|
68.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.5 | 109 FPS
|
100.9 FPS
|
65 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.5 | 107.6 FPS
|
99 FPS
|
64.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.7 | 103.1 FPS
|
94.8 FPS
|
60.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 7.5 | 100.9 FPS
|
94.4 FPS
|
61.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5 | 100.2 FPS
|
91.1 FPS
|
59.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 12.1 | 98.9 FPS
|
91.1 FPS
|
60.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.1 | 98.9 FPS
|
90.5 FPS
|
58.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.1 | 96.3 FPS
|
88 FPS
|
56.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.3 | 95 FPS
|
85.1 FPS
|
56.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.1 | 95 FPS
|
88 FPS
|
59.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.5 | 94.3 FPS
|
86 FPS
|
56.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.4 | 89.9 FPS
|
79.2 FPS
|
51.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4 | 88.3 FPS
|
80.7 FPS
|
51.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.8 | 85.7 FPS
|
77.2 FPS
|
49.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.1 | 84.6 FPS
|
72.9 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.3 | 83.3 FPS
|
75.5 FPS
|
48.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 18.7 | 80.3 FPS
|
71.3 FPS
|
48.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.2 | 80.1 FPS
|
73.3 FPS
|
46.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.2 | 79.4 FPS
|
71.5 FPS
|
45.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.2 | 77.6 FPS
|
69.4 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 12.9 | 77.2 FPS
|
68.7 FPS
|
44.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.7 | 75.5 FPS
|
68 FPS
|
43.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.3 | 75.1 FPS
|
68.5 FPS
|
43.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.5 | 73.1 FPS
|
65.2 FPS
|
41.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.2 | 71.2 FPS
|
64.2 FPS
|
41.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 9.7 | 67.2 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
38.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.3 | 67 FPS
|
60.4 FPS
|
38.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.4 | 63.6 FPS
|
55.6 FPS
|
34.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 10.6 | 61 FPS
|
57.2 FPS
|
37.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.7 | 58.4 FPS
|
52.4 FPS
|
33.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.4 | 57.8 FPS
|
50.6 FPS
|
31.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 9.5 | 57.6 FPS
|
51 FPS
|
33 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.1 | 56.4 FPS
|
49.2 FPS
|
30.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.7 | 55.5 FPS
|
51.1 FPS
|
33.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 18.6 | 53.8 FPS
|
47.3 FPS
|
31.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.5 | 52.4 FPS
|
48.1 FPS
|
31.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 4.9 | 52.3 FPS
|
46.1 FPS
|
29.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.3 | 51.8 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
28.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 8.5 | 50.5 FPS
|
46.2 FPS
|
30 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.4 | 49.6 FPS
|
43.8 FPS
|
28.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 6.7 | 48.8 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
28.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8.4 | 47.4 FPS
|
43 FPS
|
28.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7 | 47.1 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.6 | 46.5 FPS
|
41.6 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.3 | 44.5 FPS
|
39.7 FPS
|
25.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.3 | 41.5 FPS
|
37.3 FPS
|
23.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 6.6 | 34.9 FPS
|
31 FPS
|
20.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8 | 31.3 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.4 | 31.1 FPS
|
27.7 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.5 | 30.7 FPS
|
27.4 FPS
|
17.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 9.2 | 30.4 FPS
|
27.3 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.6 | 30 FPS
|
26.5 FPS
|
16.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 6.5 | 26.1 FPS
|
23.1 FPS
|
14.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.1 | 24.1 FPS
|
21.1 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 6.7 | 23.7 FPS
|
20.7 FPS
|
13.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.4 | 23.2 FPS
|
19.4 FPS
|
12.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.5 | 23.1 FPS
|
18.8 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 6.6 | 21.3 FPS
|
18.7 FPS
|
11.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.2 | 20.6 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
10.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.7 | 16.8 FPS
|
14.9 FPS
|
9.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.9 | 16.1 FPS
|
14.1 FPS
|
8.6 FPS
|
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
The Core i5-8400 is a locked processor anyway, so the reason most enthusiasts would have had for spending extra (overclocking) doesn't apply here.
The Core i5-8400 sits in the middle of Intel's new stack of mainstream consumer CPUs, above a pair of four-core/four-thread Core i3 chips, and below a pair of six-core/12-thread Core i7 chips ...
The fantastic-value Core i5 8400 is the gamer’s chip from Intel’s 8th Gen Coffee Lake range, which is surprising considering the K-series i5 is capable of hitting 5.1GHz without issue.
- Intel Core i5-8400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Thank you for your support.
The Core i5-8400 is Intel's most affordable option to go beyond a quad-core setup on the desktop. With a price point of $190, it is only half the price of Core i7-8700K, but delivers nearly the same performance in games and can also compete with the Ryzen 6c12t processors thanks to its good single-threaded performance and high boost clock.
Intel Core i5-8400T ⭐ review. Discover the key facts and see how Intel Core i5-8400T performs in the CPU ranking.
Buy Intel Core i5-8400 BX80684I58400 Processor online at low price in India on Amazon.in. Check out Intel Core i5-8400 BX80684I58400 Processor reviews, ratings, features, specifications and browse more Intel products online at best prices on Amazon.in.
The Core i5-8400 we will have to file under also-ran. Despite its two additional cores it fails to best the Core i7-7700K and is around 16% slower than its main competitor, the Ryzen R5 1600. ...