Intel Core i5-4670K Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA1150 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 13 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2013 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 266 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.4 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3.8 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 84 W | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 22 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 63 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 51 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 31 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 78 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 39.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 19.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 10 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 29/100 | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i5-4670K is one of Intel's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2013 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.4GHz, max speed at 3.8GHz, and a 84W power rating. The Core i5-4670K is based on the Haswell 22nm family and is part of the Core i5 series.
Core i5-4670K is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i5-3570 processor that was based on the Ivy Bridge and 22nm process and was released in 2012.
But we've also found that, after simple push-button overclocking, the Core i5-4570 offers similar performance to the Core i5-4670K, even when it is also overclocked. But for $70 less. The Core i5-4670K is an impressive chip and offers a better mixture of performance than AMD's A10-6790B, no doubt, but in this case, value seekers might opt for its less expensive sibling.
As the higher-priced version of the Core i5-4570, the Core i5-4670K has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.4 and 3.8 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Core i5-4570's PPT tops out at 84W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Core i5-4670K at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
The Intel Core i5-4670K is another impressive release from Intel and its 4 Generation of Core i5 chips. With it, you’re getting 4-cores and 4-threads, with a boost clock of 3.8GHz. It may not be the strongest contender ever made on paper, but when you see and feel the actual performance gains it offers, you’re certainly getting a lot of bang for your $266 buck.
One of the nice things about the Intel Core i5-4670K processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the Intel Core i5-4670K up for $266 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The Intel Core i5-4670K retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 84W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
The gaming tests with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti installed in the test system showed the Intel Core i5-4670K was more capable than many might have expected. The basic mid-range processor from Intel that can be picked up for $266 was able to out perform the A10-6800B that runs $259.79 shipped in the three games we tested on. We know that you can’t test on just three games and declare something the overall victor, but it just goes to show that 4-core processors can still manage to get by today. Being able to play current game titles and stream to Twitch on the Core i5-4670K was something we give playable results, but we were pleasantly surprised. As games become more threaded the ‘value’ in a 4-core processor continues to go down, but you can still get by with something like the Core i5-4670K in a pinch.
The Intel Core i5-4670K seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $266 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the A10-6790K 4-Core unlocked desktop processor with Radeon HD 8670D graphics ($259.79 shipped).
That said, Intel still lags behind in frequency when the A10-6800B operates at 4.1GHz at any given moment and 4.4GHz when push comes to shove.
If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, Intel also offers the Core i5-4570 at $221. It’s still outfitted with 4-cores and 4-threads, but clocks in at a slower 3.2GHz and maxes out at only 3.6GHz.
When it comes to encoding, the Core i5-4670K shows off again by holding a frame rate that was twice higher than anything the A10-6800B could pull off. Surprisingly, this dramatic difference in performance didn’t carry over to the FryBench rendering test.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i5 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 78% in our benchmarks.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i5 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the mid-range with its Core i5-4670K processors, which the company is making available as of Jun 2013.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Core i5-4670K
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i5-4670K.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.7 | 237.8 FPS
|
242.5 FPS
|
172.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.6 | 221.9 FPS
|
226.3 FPS
|
161.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.7 | 214.6 FPS
|
214.8 FPS
|
139.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.8 | 206.1 FPS
|
210 FPS
|
149.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 4 | 198 FPS
|
201.8 FPS
|
143.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.6 | 195.1 FPS
|
195.4 FPS
|
126.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 8.1 | 185.2 FPS
|
182.2 FPS
|
122.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 6.2 | 177.3 FPS
|
177.6 FPS
|
115 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 11.5 | 174.4 FPS
|
177.7 FPS
|
126.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.8 | 173.6 FPS
|
171.8 FPS
|
113.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 4 | 163.5 FPS
|
161.7 FPS
|
106.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.9 | 161.5 FPS
|
162 FPS
|
112.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.3 | 161.4 FPS
|
158.8 FPS
|
106.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.8 | 155.9 FPS
|
154.9 FPS
|
109 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.3 | 138.5 FPS
|
137.3 FPS
|
93.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.5 | 129.5 FPS
|
128.1 FPS
|
84.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4 | 123.5 FPS
|
121.5 FPS
|
81.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 22 | 113.4 FPS
|
115.2 FPS
|
77.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 11.8 | 110.4 FPS
|
112.1 FPS
|
75.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.4 | 109 FPS
|
108.6 FPS
|
70.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.7 | 107.2 FPS
|
108 FPS
|
74.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.9 | 101.2 FPS
|
102.2 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7 | 100.2 FPS
|
100.7 FPS
|
67.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.1 | 96.6 FPS
|
96.7 FPS
|
64.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 31.2 | 96 FPS
|
97.5 FPS
|
67.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 3.1 | 96 FPS
|
97.2 FPS
|
67.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.8 | 95.9 FPS
|
96.1 FPS
|
63.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.4 | 94.7 FPS
|
94.3 FPS
|
62.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 4.2 | 90.7 FPS
|
90.3 FPS
|
59.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 8.6 | 88.7 FPS
|
89.9 FPS
|
60.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.7 | 88.2 FPS
|
86.8 FPS
|
58.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 13.8 | 87 FPS
|
86.8 FPS
|
59.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 8 | 87 FPS
|
86.2 FPS
|
56.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.7 | 84.7 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
55.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6 | 83.6 FPS
|
81.1 FPS
|
55 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.4 | 83.6 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
57.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 4 | 83 FPS
|
81.9 FPS
|
55.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 5.1 | 79.1 FPS
|
75.5 FPS
|
50.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.5 | 77.7 FPS
|
76.9 FPS
|
50.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.6 | 75.4 FPS
|
73.5 FPS
|
48.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.7 | 74.5 FPS
|
69.4 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.8 | 73.3 FPS
|
71.9 FPS
|
47.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 21.2 | 70.7 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
47.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7.1 | 70.5 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
45.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.9 | 69.8 FPS
|
68.1 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.6 | 68.3 FPS
|
66.1 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 14.7 | 67.9 FPS
|
65.4 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.2 | 66.4 FPS
|
64.8 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6 | 66 FPS
|
65.2 FPS
|
42.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.2 | 64.3 FPS
|
62.1 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.7 | 62.6 FPS
|
61.1 FPS
|
40.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 11 | 59.1 FPS
|
57.3 FPS
|
37.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.7 | 59 FPS
|
57.5 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 5 | 56 FPS
|
53 FPS
|
34.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 12.1 | 53.7 FPS
|
54.5 FPS
|
36.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 3.1 | 51.4 FPS
|
49.9 FPS
|
32.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.9 | 50.9 FPS
|
48.1 FPS
|
30.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.8 | 50.7 FPS
|
48.6 FPS
|
32.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.6 | 49.6 FPS
|
46.9 FPS
|
30 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 13.3 | 48.8 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
32.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 21.1 | 47.3 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
31.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11.9 | 46.1 FPS
|
45.8 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.5 | 46 FPS
|
43.9 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.7 | 45.6 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
27.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 9.7 | 44.4 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
29.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.9 | 43.7 FPS
|
41.7 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7.7 | 42.9 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
27.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 9.6 | 41.7 FPS
|
40.9 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.9 | 41.5 FPS
|
40.1 FPS
|
25.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.1 | 40.9 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.8 | 39.1 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
24.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.9 | 36.5 FPS
|
35.5 FPS
|
23.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 7.5 | 30.7 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
19.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 9 | 27.6 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
16.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.3 | 27.4 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
16.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.3 | 27 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
17.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 10.4 | 26.7 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.5 | 26.4 FPS
|
25.3 FPS
|
16.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 7.3 | 23 FPS
|
22 FPS
|
14.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.7 | 21.2 FPS
|
20.1 FPS
|
13 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7.6 | 20.8 FPS
|
19.7 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.3 | 20.4 FPS
|
18.5 FPS
|
12.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.3 | 20.3 FPS
|
17.9 FPS
|
12.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 7.4 | 18.8 FPS
|
17.8 FPS
|
11.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 8.2 | 18.1 FPS
|
15.3 FPS
|
10.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.3 | 14.8 FPS
|
14.2 FPS
|
9.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.6 | 14.2 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
8.4 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
Help me upgrade from 5ish year old i5 4670k!
Hey all I'm planning on replacing my old i5 4670k gaming PC. I play at 144hz @ 1440p. I mostly play overwatch and other competitive fps games so it's very important that I maintain that in my new build. If it matters id like to have something that could also stream. The only thing I plan to keep is my 1070 (will upgrade in the future) and my monitors so I'm looking for the latest and greatest stuff that I've missed out on these past few years. I realize I pretty much need a new everything so I'm looking to drop about $1200 USD. Thank you for your time!
I have a 2TB drive and a 128gbSSD that Im using. I'd like a new case. My psu is a 750 evga so I could reuse that too
Check out Partpicker.com you and can build your own setup there, but this is what i'd personally recommend
https://pcpartpicker.com/guide/gWv6Mp/excellent-amd-gamingstreaming-build
You definitely don't need to drop that much cash. If pure FPS is your priority, I would get a i5 10600K and a cheaper z490 motherboard. 16GB of 3600mhz memory and you'll be off to the races
Cheaper also works! I just figured if I'm upgrading I might as well go all out
hi, im making a low budget pc build, I need help between i5 4670k or i7 2600k
I have a h100 water cooler, so heat would not be much of a problem, should I get more cores for future gaming or a "newer" i5 for better overall performanc. If possible I would like to know what will bottleneck less for future cheap gpus( for now, im using a rx570 from aliexpress).
btw is my english good enough, im just 17 so critics are always welcome.
a used 1st generation ryzen 3 shouldn't be much more expensive, the Mainboard would perhaps be a few bucks more. last time I checked, DDR 3 wasn't that much cheaper
Definitely the 4670K, in most current games, including minimum framerates. Things can get different in the future though.
Neither. Get a low end Ryzen 3 CPU. It will be just about the same price or cheaper and will be significantly faster.
Just get a cheap first gen ryzen 3 and it will basically perform the same or better, btw your english is great
Neither, get an E5-1650 (this is an i7 3930k with ECC RAM support), a Chinese X79 motherboard, 16gb of Registered ECC 1866mhz RAM. You'll pay about the same as you will for 2600k or 4670k based systems but you'll have an unlocked 6 core 12 thread CPU and quad channel RAM. This will beat first gen Ryzen in single core and be slightly behind it in multi core. Your cooler will allow a decent overclock (4.1ghz on the Chinese X79 boards).
The E5-1650/3930k will be enough to push a GTX 1080 without bottlenecking.
All of the parts can be found on aliexpress separately but some.sellers offer bundles of motherboard, CPU and ram too.
Would a 1600 af + cheap b350/450 suffice without going thru hurdles? I'm an intel guy but I'll be damn d if I have to search the market for some obscure parts and no name motherboard. Maybe that's just me.
Damn that 1650 is going for 150. I'd definitely just do the 1600af
I'd say the i7 would probably have better 1% frames and less stutter and better multitasking
Help me out resist the urge to buy a new cpu - intel i5 4670k
I tried to stream lately, but my fps dropped a lot. I then tried to overclock using one of the guides, and got a blue screen right after booting up. Now i used the auto performance upgrade on my Bios, but i think this is not a good idea?
Can someone help me out to get some more performance?
What are your temps with the auto performance on your Bios? As long as you are below 80°C you should be fine, does that OC help enough?
Otherwise an upgrade may be in order either to a i5-9400F or a 3600X on the low end. More cores would surely help, I would recommend if you make that jump go to at least 8 cores on either the i7-9700F or the Ryzen 3700X
Temps are not high, i have a good dissipator! For the upgrade i'll look into ryzen 7, something pretty high end this time
Auto overclocking is not a good idea, uses too much voltage.
4670K is going to struggle with streaming, even with an overclock. Your best option is to do the stream encode on a GPU, preferably an Nvidia Turing card for minimal quality loss. 1650 Super or 1660 Super for example.
Haswell chips suffer from poor temperatures, so I would recommend delidding first to take 15-20C off the load temps.
Then start off at 1.3 core voltage, 1.75 input voltage (VCCIN), and 4.4GHz. That should be fully stable, verify it with stress tests.
Assuming it is, you can go up in frequency until it becomes unstable. Expect no more than 4.7GHz even on a good sample, and don't push more than 1.4 core voltage unless you are willing to risk the chip. Keep the input voltage at least 400mV higher than core voltage, 450-500mV can work slightly better when overclocking.
I have a noctua dh15 so i guess temps wont be a problem! I'll try do that, any chance i could chat with you while i do that? Lol
Yea not saying you should upgrade but I understand the urge. I just spent $700 to go from a GTX 1080 to a RTX 2080 Super. Getting better performance but not sure enough of a boost to justify the expense.
In your case you have a fairly inexpensive upgrade path if you are willing to go team red. They have bundles with Memory, Mobo and 2600X on Amazon for under $400 dollars right now and for around $500 you could put yourself into a brand new 3700X including a half decent new X570 Motherboard.
Yeah i know i'll have to at some point... I have a 1070 so the gpu can last a bit longer, the cpu is starting to struggle a lot
Just get a 2700x when they’re cheap again. Lol I paid $150 for mine. Or buy a 3600 for $175 or a 3700x for $300
4C4T will be very limiting for gaming and streaming at the same time. You could try to find a 4770/90K for a drop in replacement but those seem to sell for what a 2700 would go for new.
I think you are thread limited and an increase in clockspeed wont help a lot.
You could sell the 4670k and get the 4790k. Might be a $100 difference and you wouldn’t need to upgrade anything else
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
RX 580 4GB + i5 4670K | Need help overclocking and more information about this.
My specs:
CPU - i5 4670K 3.4Ghz
Motherboard - GA-B85M-D3H
RAM - 8 GB 1333Hz + (Planning on buying another 8 GB)
600 Watts Zebronics PSU
Had GTX 760 2GB but it stopped working
Planning on buying
RX 580 4GB or Should I go with the 8GB variant?
Am also planning on overclocking the CPU to 3.8Ghz maybe to 4.0Ghz , I don't have any fancy coolers
other than CPU stock cooler and a extra fan that came with the case.
So how do I proceed ?
BUDGET : $265 / Rs.20,000(India)