Intel Core i3-9100F Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | entry-level | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA1151 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2019 Model | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price | 74 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.6 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 4.2 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.2 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 65 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 100 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Speed Score | 63 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 38 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 85 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 30.4 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 15.2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 7.6 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 42/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i3-9100F is one of Intel's entry-level Desktop processors. It was released in 2019 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.6GHz, max speed at 4.2GHz, and a 65W power rating. The Core i3-9100F is based on the Coffee Lake Refresh 14nm family and is part of the Core i3 series.
Core i3-9100F is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i3-8100 processor that was based on the Coffee Lake and 14nm process and was released in 2017.
In our mind, the best processors are the ones that deliver outstanding performance at a reasonable price point. And, the Core i3-9100F absolutely nails this concept.
Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the Intel Core i3-9100F 4-core desktop processor that was released in May 2019. Intel offers the Core i3-9100F without integrated graphics. It runs $74 shipped and is ideal for those that plan on using it a system with a dedicated graphics card.
One of the nice things about the Intel Core i3-9100F processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the Intel Core i3-9100F up for $74 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The Intel Core i3-9100F retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 65W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
Our look today at the Intel Core i3-9100F showed that it is a very capable processor. A 4-core processor sounds like it would be really under-powered these days, but we were pleasantly surprised with a snappy and very capable system. Having just 4 cores had this processor coming in at the back of the pack for heavily threaded workloads, but it performed better than some of its more expensive siblings in lightly threaded workloads where it shined thanks to its high base clocks.
The Intel Core i3-9100F seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $74 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Ryzen 3 3200G 4-Core unlocked desktop processor with Radeon Vega 8 graphics ($89 shipped).
Bottom Line, the Intel Core i3-9100F does not get much media attention since it is entry-level 9 Gen Core Coffee Lake Refresh processor, but it is a very capable processor that still delivers a good computing experience for entry-level users.
With Core i3, Intel continues to innovate on its new architecture and 14nm process. Like Core i3, Intel has engineered Core i3 to operate on a LGA1151 chipset with all the modern amenities of computing. This includes support for DDR4 RAM, the fastest NVMe SSDs and Thunderbolt 3 ports.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i3 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 85% in our benchmarks.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent entry-level chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Z270, Z370, Z390 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i3 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the entry-level with its Core i3-9100F processors, which the company is making available as of May 2019.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Core i3-9100F
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i3-9100F.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 5.8 | 275.4 FPS
|
256.8 FPS
|
177.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.1 | 257 FPS
|
239.6 FPS
|
165.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4 | 248.5 FPS
|
227.5 FPS
|
143 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5 | 238.7 FPS
|
222.4 FPS
|
153.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.5 | 229.3 FPS
|
213.6 FPS
|
147.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4 | 226 FPS
|
206.8 FPS
|
129.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7 | 214.5 FPS
|
192.9 FPS
|
125.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 5.4 | 205.3 FPS
|
188 FPS
|
118.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 9.9 | 201.9 FPS
|
188.2 FPS
|
130 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5 | 201.1 FPS
|
181.8 FPS
|
116.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.4 | 189.3 FPS
|
171.2 FPS
|
109.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.3 | 187 FPS
|
171.5 FPS
|
115.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 3.7 | 186.9 FPS
|
168.1 FPS
|
109.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.3 | 180.5 FPS
|
164 FPS
|
111.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 3.7 | 160.4 FPS
|
145.4 FPS
|
96.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 3.9 | 149.9 FPS
|
135.6 FPS
|
86.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.5 | 143 FPS
|
128.6 FPS
|
83.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 19 | 131.3 FPS
|
121.9 FPS
|
79.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 10.2 | 127.8 FPS
|
118.7 FPS
|
77.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 3.8 | 126.2 FPS
|
115 FPS
|
72.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.2 | 124.1 FPS
|
114.3 FPS
|
76.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.4 | 117.2 FPS
|
108.2 FPS
|
71.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6 | 116 FPS
|
106.7 FPS
|
69.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.6 | 111.9 FPS
|
102.4 FPS
|
65.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 27 | 111.2 FPS
|
103.3 FPS
|
68.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.7 | 111.1 FPS
|
102.9 FPS
|
68.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.4 | 111.1 FPS
|
101.8 FPS
|
65.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.4 | 109.7 FPS
|
99.8 FPS
|
64.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.6 | 105 FPS
|
95.6 FPS
|
61.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 7.4 | 102.8 FPS
|
95.2 FPS
|
61.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.9 | 102.2 FPS
|
91.9 FPS
|
59.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 11.9 | 100.8 FPS
|
91.9 FPS
|
61.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 6.9 | 100.8 FPS
|
91.2 FPS
|
58.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.1 | 98.1 FPS
|
88.8 FPS
|
56.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.2 | 96.8 FPS
|
85.8 FPS
|
56.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.1 | 96.8 FPS
|
88.8 FPS
|
59.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.4 | 96.1 FPS
|
86.7 FPS
|
56.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.4 | 91.6 FPS
|
79.9 FPS
|
51.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 3.9 | 89.9 FPS
|
81.4 FPS
|
51.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.7 | 87.3 FPS
|
77.8 FPS
|
49.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.1 | 86.2 FPS
|
73.5 FPS
|
46.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.3 | 84.8 FPS
|
76.1 FPS
|
48.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 18.3 | 81.8 FPS
|
71.9 FPS
|
49 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.1 | 81.6 FPS
|
73.9 FPS
|
47 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.1 | 80.9 FPS
|
72.1 FPS
|
46 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.1 | 79.1 FPS
|
70 FPS
|
45.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 12.7 | 78.6 FPS
|
69.3 FPS
|
44.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.6 | 76.9 FPS
|
68.6 FPS
|
43.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.2 | 76.5 FPS
|
69.1 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.4 | 74.5 FPS
|
65.8 FPS
|
41.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.2 | 72.5 FPS
|
64.7 FPS
|
41.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 9.5 | 68.4 FPS
|
60.7 FPS
|
38.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.2 | 68.3 FPS
|
60.9 FPS
|
38.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.3 | 64.8 FPS
|
56.1 FPS
|
35 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 10.4 | 62.2 FPS
|
57.7 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.7 | 59.5 FPS
|
52.9 FPS
|
33.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.4 | 58.9 FPS
|
51 FPS
|
31.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 9.4 | 58.7 FPS
|
51.4 FPS
|
33.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4 | 57.5 FPS
|
49.7 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.5 | 56.5 FPS
|
51.5 FPS
|
33.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 18.2 | 54.8 FPS
|
47.7 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.3 | 53.4 FPS
|
48.5 FPS
|
31.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 4.8 | 53.3 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
29.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.2 | 52.8 FPS
|
45.8 FPS
|
28.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 8.3 | 51.4 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
30.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.4 | 50.6 FPS
|
44.2 FPS
|
28.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 6.6 | 49.7 FPS
|
43 FPS
|
28.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8.3 | 48.3 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
28.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 6.9 | 48 FPS
|
42.5 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.6 | 47.4 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
26.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.3 | 45.3 FPS
|
40 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.2 | 42.3 FPS
|
37.6 FPS
|
23.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 6.4 | 35.6 FPS
|
31.3 FPS
|
20.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 7.8 | 31.9 FPS
|
28.2 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.3 | 31.7 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.4 | 31.2 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
17.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 9 | 30.9 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.5 | 30.5 FPS
|
26.8 FPS
|
16.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 6.4 | 26.6 FPS
|
23.3 FPS
|
14.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4 | 24.6 FPS
|
21.3 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 6.6 | 24.1 FPS
|
20.8 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.3 | 23.7 FPS
|
19.6 FPS
|
12.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.3 | 23.5 FPS
|
18.9 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 6.5 | 21.7 FPS
|
18.8 FPS
|
11.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.1 | 21 FPS
|
16.2 FPS
|
10.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.6 | 17.2 FPS
|
15 FPS
|
9.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.8 | 16.4 FPS
|
14.2 FPS
|
8.6 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
Honestly, if you are getting such a low budget pc, going used will be the way to get a decent gaming experience
1650 will hit the wall before i3, it is reasonable pairing.
Help! 9100f with better GPU or 9400f with worse GPU?
Hello everyone,
I'm planning to build a PC that I will be gaming with, but my budget is very limited. I need to choose between these:
Using an i3 9100f with a GTX 1650 Super or 1660
Using an i5 9400f with a GTX 1650
I can't buy 10th gen Intel CPUs because they are not available in my country right now and when they arrive, they'll be illogically expensive.
Also, I want to know whether I can save on the motherboard by choosing the i3 9100f. The problem I'm afraid to have with the 9100f is the low core count. I currently have problems with running games like Battleflield 1, Planetside 2, and Apex Legends. Also I'm losing massive fps when talking on Discord while gaming. My current setup is an Asus FX553 laptop with i5 7300hq and GTX 1050 4GB.
Note: 9400f costs twice as 9100f here.
Thanks in advance.
Using an i3 9100f with a GTX 1650 Super or 1660
just saying but you rpobably will be cpu limited with the 4core before you will use that 1660 at full load (unless you're playing at 4k but that is not a card for 4k in general).
also you mentioned planetside 2? go for the 9400f, i had it before going for a 9600k and it was good for ps2 (max settings with shadows quality on low, normally 60+fps).
try also find some good ram kits tho? my guess you will use it with a 2666mhz ram max motherboard, so buy 3000-3200 sticks and work on the latency at 2666, help a lot with ps2 (i used a 3200 stick at 2666 cl 12-13-13-28)
so the 9400f 1650 is definitely more balanced.
Thanks a lot for your advice. I also think the same. I might go for 9400f 1650 since I only play on a 60hz monitor, and I can upgrade the GPU later.
I have this weird problem in ps2 on my laptop that CPU maxes out and my aim freezes. I don't want that again. 😬
I was only wondering if the much lower base frequency on 9400f is going to be a problem or not. Does it matter?
just saying but you rpobably will be cpu limited with the 4core before you will use that 1660 at full load (unless you're playing at 4k but that is not a card for 4k in general).
A 9100f can definitely push a 1660 to full utilization.
What's the used market like in your country? Could you get a 1060 6gb or rx 580 for less than the 1650 super? They perform similarly but might cost less.
I won't be going for used cards as it's very risky. High possiblity that they're mined.
Can you stretch your budget and get a 9400F with a 1650 Super? The Super should only cost a little bit more than the non-Super but give you a solid performance boost. Avoid the 1650 if you can as it isn't a great value.
And get the Super at a minimum if you want to do any streaming. The non-Super doesn't have Nvidia's Turing NVENC encoder.
Your biggest cost difference would (or should) be between the 9100F and 9400F.
The 9100F just isn't a great CPU for gaming. Locked RAM speeds and no hyperthreading means it won't do as well in those modern games you're looking to play. It also won't age well into the future at all.
The 9400f and 1650 Super was my perfect choice, but since we have lots of problems here in my country, the prices just don't stay the same. 1650 Super got about 50% more expensive in just a week. So.... Yeah 😕
The 9100f / better GPU route will give you better framerates overall.
Problem is that many recent titles are utilizing mutli-core CPUs, such as AC Odyssey which needs lots of cores for running those two DRMs. Also multiplayer games with lots of players (BF1 and PS2) will definitely use some extra core power.
1650 is a horrible card, 9100f will need to be upgraded soon too. In your not so great situation I would personally wait for prices to drop or until you can get more money.
BTW what country are you from?
Unfortunately there'll be no price drop here. My best choice would be pairing a 9600K with a 1650 Super, if I ever can.
Wouldn't you be better off with a 1600AF or a ryzen 3100?
I just checked and it seems that Ryzen 3100 is coming here and is cheaper than the 9400f. I might go with that then. It's a great CPU, honestly. Also the stock cooler seems to be sufficient for gaming (non OC), so I'll save a bit for that, too.
No, mate. I can't buy AMD parts as such. They're quite expensive here.
I need help to decide between a Intel Core i3-9100F and a AMD Ryzen 5 3600
It's the first time I try to buy a pc part so I don't know if this dilemma is stupid for some people.
I looked through UserBenchmark.com and it seems like those two CPU are as good but the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is much more expensive than the Intel Core i3-9100F.
So am I missing something or does this price difference is due to some obscure marketing reason?
R5 3600.
Userbenchmark is not a trustworthy source to determine the difference between 2 CPU's.
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Critics Reviews
The Core i3-9100F 3.6 GHz Quad-Core LGA 1151 Processor from Intel has a base clock speed of 3.6 GHz and comes with features such as Intel Optane Memory support, Intel VT-x virtualization technology, Intel VT-d virtualization technology for directed I/O, and Intel VT-X with EPT. This processor features a boost speed of up to 4.2 GHz. Additionally, there are 4 cores with 4 threads in an LGA 1151 ...
Intel Core I3 9100F UnixBench Dhrystone 2 Benchmark. Here are the whetstone results: Intel Core I3 9100F UnixBench Whetstone Benchmark. One of the simple items that the Core i3-9100F lacks is hyper-threading or SMT. It is a four-core, four-thread part. There are scenarios like these where simply not having more threads hurts the chips.
Amazon.in: Buy Intel Core i3-9100F 9th Gen Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W (Discrete Graphics Required) online at low price in India on Amazon.in. Check out Intel Core i3-9100F 9th Gen Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W (Discrete Graphics Required) reviews, ratings, features, specifications and more at Amazon.in
The Intel Core i3 9100f comes with a quad-core quad thread setup. It has a base clock of 3.6 GHz and a boost clock of 4.2 GHz. It doesn’t come with an integrated GPU which explains its cheaper pricing. It’s based on a 14nm process and is the part of Coffeelake refresh lineup. It supports up to 64 GB of DDR4 2400 MHz RAM.
The Core i3-9100F also lacks vPro support, TSX-NI, and Trusted Execution Technology. Overall, there are certain features that would make one purchase a Xeon, but we think a lot of our users are better off with a Core i3-9100F, especially for those who want to build something like a FreeNAS or Unraid box on the platform.
The base model is the Intel Core i3-9100F without graphics that runs $89.99 shipped and is ideal for those that plan on using it a system with a dedicated graphics card.
Core i3-9100F itu sendiri hadir dengan kekuatan 4 core dan 4 threads, clockspeed dasar sebesar 3.6Ghz dan kini memiliki boost clock maksimum hingga 4.2Ghz. Kalian bahkan akan merasakan bahwa CPU ini jauh lebih kencang dibanding dengan seri 8100, padahal sajian mungkin hampir serupa. Cache dan nilai TDP masih sama dengan 8100, yakni 6MB dan 65W.
Street pricing has the Intel Core i3-9100F down to just $89.99 shipped. Our look today at the Intel Core i3-9100 showed that it is a very capable processor. Our look today at the Intel Core i3 ...
Процессор Intel Core i3-9100F предоставлен интернет-магазином Telemart - https://telemart.ua. Где купить железо из этого видео ...
Im wondering if i3 9100F will bottleneck with gtx 1650 super.Hello Im buying a new pc im not sure for bottleneck if anyone can help me i will be so happy.
The pc that im buying has this specs I3 9100F Gtx 1650 super 16gb ram H310 motherboard Im wondering if i3 9100F will bottleneck with gtx 1650 super.