Intel Core i3-7350K Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | entry-level | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA1151 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2017 Model | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 179 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Cores | 2 Cores | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 4.2 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 4.2 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.2 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 60 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 65 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 58 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 32 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 80 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 39.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 19.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 10 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 37/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i3-7350K is one of Intel's entry-level Desktop processors. It was released in 2017 with 2 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 4.2GHz, max speed at 4.2GHz, and a 60W power rating. The Core i3-7350K is based on the Kaby Lake-S 14nm family and is part of the Core i3 series.
Core i3-7350K is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i3-6300 processor that was based on the Skylake-S and 14nm process and was released in 2015.
That something is the Core i3-7350K. Intel cranks the TDP dial up to 60W on this 2-core 4-thread chip, making it the high-performance counterpart to the 51W Core i3-7320, which is basically the same 14nm chip built with the Kaby Lake-S microarchitecture, but with a lower TDP rating. That chip came away from our first look at the Kaby Lake-S series with an Editor's Choice award, going toe-to-toe with AMD's Ryzen 3 1300X, so it's fair to say we have high hopes for the higher-performance model. Intel still hasn't sampled the chip to the press, so we bought one at retail to put it under the microscope.
But we've also found that, after simple push-button overclocking, the Core i3-7320 offers similar performance to the Core i3-7350K, even when it is also overclocked. But for $70 less. The Core i3-7350K is an impressive chip and offers a better mixture of performance than AMD's Ryzen 3 1300X, no doubt, but in this case, value seekers might opt for its less expensive sibling.
As the higher-priced version of the Core i3-7320, the Core i3-7350K has higher base and Boost frequencies of 4.2 and 4.2 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Core i3-7320's PPT tops out at 51W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Core i3-7350K at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the Core i3-6300, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.
Intel has been having some trouble as of late which has made it even harder to compete with the incoming wave of Ryzen 3 processors. That has forced the chip maker to be a little more creative and make do with their current product lines. Today we have the Intel Core i3-7350K on hand, which in itself isn’t anything new. It’s basically a refreshed Core i3-6300 with a clock speed boost. We say basically because it’s not a straight refresh however, there’s another change.
Bottom Line, the Intel Core i3-7350K does not get much media attention since it is entry-level 7 Gen Core Kaby Lake-S processor, but it is a very capable processor that still delivers a good computing experience for entry-level users.
If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, Intel also offers the Core i3-7320 at $157. It’s still outfitted with 2-cores and 4-threads, but clocks in at a slower 4.1GHz and maxes out at only 4.1GHz.
Now the biggest question is can Intel’s Core i3 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 80% in our benchmarks.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent entry-level chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Z270, Z370, Z390 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i3 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the entry-level with its Core i3-7350K processors, which the company is making available as of Jan 2017.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Core i3-7350K
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i3-7350K.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.7 | 237.8 FPS
|
242.5 FPS
|
172.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.6 | 221.9 FPS
|
226.3 FPS
|
161.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.7 | 214.6 FPS
|
214.8 FPS
|
139.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.8 | 206.1 FPS
|
210 FPS
|
149.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 4 | 198 FPS
|
201.8 FPS
|
143.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.6 | 195.1 FPS
|
195.4 FPS
|
126.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 8.1 | 185.2 FPS
|
182.2 FPS
|
122.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 6.2 | 177.3 FPS
|
177.6 FPS
|
115 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 11.5 | 174.4 FPS
|
177.7 FPS
|
126.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.8 | 173.6 FPS
|
171.8 FPS
|
113.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 4 | 163.5 FPS
|
161.7 FPS
|
106.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.9 | 161.5 FPS
|
162 FPS
|
112.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.3 | 161.4 FPS
|
158.8 FPS
|
106.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.8 | 155.9 FPS
|
154.9 FPS
|
109 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.3 | 138.5 FPS
|
137.3 FPS
|
93.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.5 | 129.5 FPS
|
128.1 FPS
|
84.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4 | 123.5 FPS
|
121.5 FPS
|
81.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 22 | 113.4 FPS
|
115.2 FPS
|
77.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 11.8 | 110.4 FPS
|
112.1 FPS
|
75.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.4 | 109 FPS
|
108.6 FPS
|
70.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.7 | 107.2 FPS
|
108 FPS
|
74.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.9 | 101.2 FPS
|
102.2 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7 | 100.2 FPS
|
100.7 FPS
|
67.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.1 | 96.6 FPS
|
96.7 FPS
|
64.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 31.2 | 96 FPS
|
97.5 FPS
|
67.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 3.1 | 96 FPS
|
97.2 FPS
|
67.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.8 | 95.9 FPS
|
96.1 FPS
|
63.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.4 | 94.7 FPS
|
94.3 FPS
|
62.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 4.2 | 90.7 FPS
|
90.3 FPS
|
59.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 8.6 | 88.7 FPS
|
89.9 FPS
|
60.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.7 | 88.2 FPS
|
86.8 FPS
|
58.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 13.8 | 87 FPS
|
86.8 FPS
|
59.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 8 | 87 FPS
|
86.2 FPS
|
56.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.7 | 84.7 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
55.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6 | 83.6 FPS
|
81.1 FPS
|
55 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.4 | 83.6 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
57.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 4 | 83 FPS
|
81.9 FPS
|
55.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 5.1 | 79.1 FPS
|
75.5 FPS
|
50.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.5 | 77.7 FPS
|
76.9 FPS
|
50.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.6 | 75.4 FPS
|
73.5 FPS
|
48.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.7 | 74.5 FPS
|
69.4 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.8 | 73.3 FPS
|
71.9 FPS
|
47.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 21.2 | 70.7 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
47.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7.1 | 70.5 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
45.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.9 | 69.8 FPS
|
68.1 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.6 | 68.3 FPS
|
66.1 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 14.7 | 67.9 FPS
|
65.4 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.2 | 66.4 FPS
|
64.8 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6 | 66 FPS
|
65.2 FPS
|
42.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.2 | 64.3 FPS
|
62.1 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.7 | 62.6 FPS
|
61.1 FPS
|
40.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 11 | 59.1 FPS
|
57.3 FPS
|
37.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.7 | 59 FPS
|
57.5 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 5 | 56 FPS
|
53 FPS
|
34.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 12.1 | 53.7 FPS
|
54.5 FPS
|
36.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 3.1 | 51.4 FPS
|
49.9 FPS
|
32.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.9 | 50.9 FPS
|
48.1 FPS
|
30.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.8 | 50.7 FPS
|
48.6 FPS
|
32.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.6 | 49.6 FPS
|
46.9 FPS
|
30 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 13.3 | 48.8 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
32.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 21.1 | 47.3 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
31.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11.9 | 46.1 FPS
|
45.8 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.5 | 46 FPS
|
43.9 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.7 | 45.6 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
27.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 9.7 | 44.4 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
29.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.9 | 43.7 FPS
|
41.7 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7.7 | 42.9 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
27.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 9.6 | 41.7 FPS
|
40.9 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.9 | 41.5 FPS
|
40.1 FPS
|
25.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.1 | 40.9 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.8 | 39.1 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
24.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.9 | 36.5 FPS
|
35.5 FPS
|
23.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 7.5 | 30.7 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
19.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 9 | 27.6 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
16.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.3 | 27.4 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
16.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.3 | 27 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
17.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 10.4 | 26.7 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.5 | 26.4 FPS
|
25.3 FPS
|
16.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 7.3 | 23 FPS
|
22 FPS
|
14.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.7 | 21.2 FPS
|
20.1 FPS
|
13 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7.6 | 20.8 FPS
|
19.7 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.3 | 20.4 FPS
|
18.5 FPS
|
12.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.3 | 20.3 FPS
|
17.9 FPS
|
12.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 7.4 | 18.8 FPS
|
17.8 FPS
|
11.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 8.2 | 18.1 FPS
|
15.3 FPS
|
10.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.3 | 14.8 FPS
|
14.2 FPS
|
9.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.6 | 14.2 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
8.4 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
I need help comparing CPUs for my first build. i3-7350K vs. i5-2320 (links in the description).
GPUBoss couldn't find the 7350K, so I have nothing to go on except for the GHz and cores.
i3
i5
I still haven't bought the motherboard, yet, so there aren't any compatibility issues to worry about yet. Thanks in advance. :)
Edit: I was requested to post my whole build and my budget, so I will do that below.
As of right now I have:
-
Thermaltake Smart Series 600W 80+ PSU
-
GTX 1050 GPU
-
Arctic Freezer i32 CPU fan
-
Tesseract case (can't find the specific model number)
-
1x CD/DVD drive
I am currently missing:
-
CPU
-
Motherboard
-
RAM
-
Storage
This list was made by a good friend and is what I'm going off of.
I should also probably add that the list a bit old, as I have been accumulating parts over the past year or so. I will eventually get it all built.
The 7350K runs at 4.2GHz and is a beast in single threaded applications. I think there are only about 3 or 4 that are faster. Most of what we do is single threaded. That makes the 7350K a particularly easy choice.
Despite only having 2 physical cores/4 virtual cores, the 7350k is superior to the 2320 across the board, according to UserBenchmark .
The dual-core throws me off. I'm not planning to play a lot of really intensive stuff except maybe Arma 3 and Ghost Recon Wildlands. Will those two cores be enough?
I'm not good at telling what is better than what and I assumed that all i5s were better than all i3s.
Wait for the H310 boards to come out and get an i3 8100, it's quad core
I looked on PC part picker and the 8100 was almost $60 cheaper than the 7350K? Is it much better?
Help me upgrade my "shitty" computer!
So i almost exclusivly play fighting games like Tekken 7, SFV etc. My current specs are fine for it but I enjoy watching streams on my secondary screen and im forced to lower the quality to 480p at times to get a smooth gaming experience, id like to have it at 1080p 60fps when watching twitch but then my game is not nearly as smooth
These are my specs, and im almost certain its the CPU holding me back, im not looking for a big upgrade, just want to make sure my mobo can handle a new, better CPU and perhaps 16gb ram instead of 8gb.
CPU: Core i3-7350K
GPU: 1060 6gb
RAM: 2x 4gb
Mobo: Gigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF
Not looking for a crazy upgrade just want to be able to play my games and watch the streams without any stutters or fps drops.
Per the supported CPU list below your mb will support an i7-7700k.
https://www.gigabyte.com/Ajax/SupportFunction/Getcpulist?Type=Product&Value=6095
His motherboard is definitely not capable of running an 8700k or 9900k. http://www.cpu-upgrade.com/CPUs/Intel/Core_i3/i3-7350K.html
Cheapest option: add 8 more GB of RAM. Hopefully your motherboard has two more slots. Even better add a new CPU and motherboard as well . 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen R5 2600 and a moderately priced mobo can be found for around $250
Yeah you should really buy a new cpu. Ur motherboard supports the newest cpus so up to the i9 9900k. And you should also put in two more 4gb stocks of ram. A i7 9700k or 8700k should be fine for what you’re doing
Update I’m stupid wrong chipset
Z270 does not support 8xxx or 9xxx intel cpus its 7700k max.
Is this build okay for 1080p gaming, any help with compatibility issues
I'm on quite a tight budget at the moment looking for some advice if this would be an okay build to play games on medium at 1080p some modern triple AAA titles and maybe some modded minecraft, thank you!
CPU: Intel Core i3-7350K 4.2 GHz Dual-Core Processor Motherboard: ASRock H110M-DGS Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 Memory HDD: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1 TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive SSD: Kingston A400 240 GB 2.5" Solid State Drive GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 960 4 GB Video Card CASE: Rosewill FBM-X2 MicroATX Mini Tower Case PSU: SeaSonic S12III 500 W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply
Edit: I dont know how to fix the format sorry!!!
For a lot of games, yes. However, you may need to lower down the settings for a demanding game.
Is the CPU compatible fine with the motherboard?
Upgraded CPU, PC won’t boot. HELP!
Upgraded from an i3-7350k to an i5-9600k, initially i just swapped them and tried turning on the PC, it turns on for about a second, the fans start spinning and LEDs turn on then they stop. After that I tried a CMOS clear, first by using a paper clip where you’d put the jumper, then by removing the CMOS battery. After that, i put the old CPU in and it worked fine, I updated the BIOS to the most recent version and then put the new CPU back in, and it still won’t boot. I have no idea what to do.
You cannot put a 9600K in to the same motherboard as the 7350k. The number of pins are the same, but the chipset requirement isn't so the the motherboard of the 7350k will not boot with a 9600K in it. Best you can do is the 7700k, that is the strongest possible chip you can fit on your 7350k motherboard.
god i fucking hate microcenter employees. guess i gotta go return it
Whoever told you they were compatible is an idiot
Might have fried a cpu i am not sure though pin outs might be power to data
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Critics Reviews
The Core i3-7350K's time is ahead of the previous-generation Core i3-6100, and a little better than the AMD chips. But the Core i7-7700K finished in less than half the Core i3-7350K's time. And ...
And whereas the locked Core i3s are rated at 35W and 51W, the Core i3-7350K is the lone 60W SKU. Intel also re-introduced TSX-NI support, which can boost multi-threaded performance, to the i3 series.
The Core i3-7350K is the odd member of the stack. It sits as the only processor with a TDP of 60W, and is priced very close to the Core i5-7400/7400T.
Core i3-7350K: Entry level overclocking at midrange pricing. The Core i3-7350K ends up as a bit of a perplexing chip. Performance is quite good for a dual-core processor, and in games it comes ...
Yay, Intel have extended their overclockable K-series chips down into the cheaper i3 end of the market. The Kaby Lake Core i3 7350K is the first fully unlocked i3 chip, offering seriously high ...
El procesador Intel Core i3 7350K ofrece unas razonables prestaciones para su precio, aunque por poco más de un 10% tenemos un muy superior Intel Core i5 6600 de mejores prestaciones, con 4 núcleos y también con el procesador desbloqueado, que se muestra como un procesador con mayor sentido que éste que hemos analizado.
The Core i3 7350K is a very fast processor, but even with an overclock in place it cannot maintain 60fps in Crysis 3’s jungle stage and it barely manages to sustain 60fps in Rise of the Tomb Raider’s Geothermal Valley, even at 4.8GHz. For the record, even the i5 at 4.8GHz has issues with Crysis 3 – though it proves perfectly capable in ...
How Fast is the Core i3 7350K? Is it an i5 Killer? - Duration: 12:31. Bitwit 384,071 views. 12:31. Core i7 7700K Review: Extreme Gaming CPU Power - Duration: 10:10.
Intel 7th Generation Core i3 7350K Introduction: There was a time in the not to distant past that Intel was looking to deliver an unlocked dual-core processor on the cheap for the enthusiast without the budget to hit the 1K price point of the Extreme series or even between the $3-$400 price points of the mainstream lineup.
i3 7350k vs ryzen 5 1400? help me choose O~O
As far as gaming and buying either of these cpus which one has the most value (including motherboard) per dollar?