Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | entry-level | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | LGA1151 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2017 Model | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Price | 117 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Number of Cores | 2 Cores | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 3.9 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 3.9 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 3.9 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 51 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 3 MB | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Price-Value Score | 78 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 54 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 31 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 78 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 43.7 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 21.8 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 10.9 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 33/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i3-7100 is one of Intel's entry-level Desktop processors. It was released in 2017 with 2 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.9GHz, max speed at 3.9GHz, and a 51W power rating. The Core i3-7100 is based on the Kaby Lake-S 14nm family and is part of the Core i3 series.
Core i3-7100 is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i3-6100 processor that was based on the Skylake-S and 14nm process and was released in 2015.
The Intel Core i3-7100 was rolled out on Jan 2017 for $117, which puts it in the same general price range as the last-generation Core i3-6100. This means that at least we're not seeing any considerable price jumps from generation to generation.
Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the Core i3-6100, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.
Intel has been having some trouble as of late which has made it even harder to compete with the incoming wave of Ryzen 3 processors. That has forced the chip maker to be a little more creative and make do with their current product lines. Today we have the Intel Core i3-7100 on hand, which in itself isn’t anything new. It’s basically a refreshed Core i3-6100 with a clock speed boost. We say basically because it’s not a straight refresh however, there’s another change.
If you're mostly playing games on your PC, you will be happy buying either processor. Both proved to be solid options and are evenly matched with a slight advantage to the AMD chip if you don't tune up the Ryzen 3 processor. The base performance we showed for the Core i3-7100 can be achieved with $90 memory, while the Ryzen 3 1200 will require $110 - $120 memory in order to enable the frame rates shown here. It’s not a big cost difference and right now with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 you’ll more than likely become GPU limited.
One of the nice things about the Intel Core i3-7100 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the Intel Core i3-7100 up for $117 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The Intel Core i3-7100 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 51W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
The gaming tests with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti installed in the test system showed the Intel Core i3-7100 was more capable than many might have expected. The basic entry-level processor from Intel that can be picked up for $117 was able to out perform the Ryzen 3 1300X that runs $129 shipped in the three games we tested on. We know that you can’t test on just three games and declare something the overall victor, but it just goes to show that 2-core processors can still manage to get by today. Being able to play current game titles and stream to Twitch on the Core i3-7100 was something we give playable results, but we were pleasantly surprised. As games become more threaded the ‘value’ in a 2-core processor continues to go down, but you can still get by with something like the Core i3-7100 in a pinch.
Bottom Line, the Intel Core i3-7100 does not get much media attention since it is entry-level 7 Gen Core Kaby Lake-S processor, but it is a very capable processor that still delivers a good computing experience for entry-level users.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent entry-level chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Z270, Z370, Z390 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i3 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the entry-level with its Core i3-7100 processors, which the company is making available as of Jan 2017.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i3-7100.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 7.2 | 222.8 FPS
|
236.8 FPS
|
171 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.8 | 207.9 FPS
|
221 FPS
|
159.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 5 | 201.1 FPS
|
209.7 FPS
|
137.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 6.2 | 193 FPS
|
205.1 FPS
|
148.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 4.3 | 185.5 FPS
|
197 FPS
|
142.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.9 | 182.8 FPS
|
190.7 FPS
|
125.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 8.6 | 173.5 FPS
|
177.9 FPS
|
120.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 6.6 | 166.1 FPS
|
173.3 FPS
|
113.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 12.2 | 163.3 FPS
|
173.5 FPS
|
125.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 6.1 | 162.6 FPS
|
167.7 FPS
|
112.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 4.2 | 153.1 FPS
|
157.9 FPS
|
105.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.3 | 151.3 FPS
|
158.1 FPS
|
111.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.6 | 151.2 FPS
|
155 FPS
|
105.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 4.1 | 146 FPS
|
151.3 FPS
|
107.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.6 | 129.7 FPS
|
134.1 FPS
|
92.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.8 | 121.3 FPS
|
125 FPS
|
83.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.3 | 115.7 FPS
|
118.6 FPS
|
80.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 23.5 | 106.2 FPS
|
112.4 FPS
|
76.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 12.6 | 103.4 FPS
|
109.5 FPS
|
74.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.7 | 102.1 FPS
|
106 FPS
|
69.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4 | 100.4 FPS
|
105.4 FPS
|
73.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.2 | 94.8 FPS
|
99.7 FPS
|
69.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.5 | 93.8 FPS
|
98.4 FPS
|
66.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.4 | 90.5 FPS
|
94.4 FPS
|
63.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 33.3 | 90 FPS
|
95.2 FPS
|
66.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 3.3 | 89.9 FPS
|
94.9 FPS
|
66.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 3 | 89.8 FPS
|
93.8 FPS
|
62.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.9 | 88.7 FPS
|
92 FPS
|
62.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 4.5 | 85 FPS
|
88.2 FPS
|
58.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 9.1 | 83.1 FPS
|
87.8 FPS
|
59.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6 | 82.6 FPS
|
84.7 FPS
|
57.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 14.7 | 81.5 FPS
|
84.7 FPS
|
58.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 8.6 | 81.5 FPS
|
84.1 FPS
|
56.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5 | 79.4 FPS
|
81.8 FPS
|
54.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.4 | 78.3 FPS
|
79.2 FPS
|
54.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.6 | 78.3 FPS
|
81.8 FPS
|
57.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 4.2 | 77.8 FPS
|
79.9 FPS
|
54.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 5.4 | 74.1 FPS
|
73.7 FPS
|
49.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.8 | 72.8 FPS
|
75.1 FPS
|
50.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7.1 | 70.6 FPS
|
71.8 FPS
|
48 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 5 | 69.7 FPS
|
67.8 FPS
|
44.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.1 | 68.6 FPS
|
70.2 FPS
|
46.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 22.6 | 66.2 FPS
|
66.3 FPS
|
47.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7.6 | 66 FPS
|
68.1 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 6.3 | 65.4 FPS
|
66.5 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.9 | 64 FPS
|
64.6 FPS
|
43.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 15.7 | 63.6 FPS
|
63.9 FPS
|
42.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.5 | 62.2 FPS
|
63.3 FPS
|
42.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.4 | 61.9 FPS
|
63.7 FPS
|
42.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.6 | 60.2 FPS
|
60.6 FPS
|
40.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.9 | 58.7 FPS
|
59.7 FPS
|
39.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 11.7 | 55.4 FPS
|
56 FPS
|
37.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 4 | 55.2 FPS
|
56.1 FPS
|
37.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 5.3 | 52.4 FPS
|
51.7 FPS
|
33.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 12.9 | 50.3 FPS
|
53.2 FPS
|
36.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 3.3 | 48.1 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
32.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 4.2 | 47.7 FPS
|
47 FPS
|
30.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11.6 | 47.5 FPS
|
47.4 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.9 | 46.5 FPS
|
45.8 FPS
|
29.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 14.2 | 45.7 FPS
|
47.5 FPS
|
32.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 22.5 | 44.4 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 12.7 | 43.2 FPS
|
44.7 FPS
|
30.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.9 | 43.1 FPS
|
42.8 FPS
|
28.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4 | 42.7 FPS
|
42.2 FPS
|
27.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 10.3 | 41.6 FPS
|
42.9 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 4.2 | 40.9 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
27.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 8.2 | 40.2 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 10.2 | 39.1 FPS
|
40 FPS
|
27.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 8.5 | 38.8 FPS
|
39.2 FPS
|
24.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.4 | 38.3 FPS
|
38.7 FPS
|
25.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 4.1 | 36.7 FPS
|
36.9 FPS
|
24.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 5.2 | 34.2 FPS
|
34.7 FPS
|
23.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 8 | 28.8 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
19.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 9.7 | 25.8 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.8 | 25.6 FPS
|
25.7 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.7 | 25.3 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 11.2 | 25 FPS
|
25.4 FPS
|
15.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 8.1 | 24.7 FPS
|
24.7 FPS
|
16.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 7.9 | 21.5 FPS
|
21.5 FPS
|
14.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 5 | 19.9 FPS
|
19.6 FPS
|
12.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 8.2 | 19.5 FPS
|
19.2 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.8 | 19.1 FPS
|
18.1 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.8 | 19 FPS
|
17.5 FPS
|
12 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 8 | 17.6 FPS
|
17.4 FPS
|
11.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 8.8 | 17 FPS
|
14.9 FPS
|
10.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.7 | 13.9 FPS
|
13.8 FPS
|
9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.9 | 13.3 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
8.3 FPS
|
easiest to upgrade is the gpu, try a 1660 but everything above that might be limited by the rest of your specs
Your graphics card seems fine. You might wanna upgrade your CPU and your Ram, if your motherboard allows it
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Intel Core i3-7100 ⭐ review. Discover the key facts and see how Intel Core i3-7100 performs in the CPU ranking.
The Core i3-7100 comes, of course, to replace the Core i3-6100 on the market, coming even with the same price tag. So, we will compare both CPUs. The direct competitor of the Core i3-7100 is the ...
Core i3 & Compatible Motherboards; Core i5 & Compatible Motherboards; Core i7 & Compatible Motherboards; Core i9 & Compatible Motherboards; GIGABYTE. Motherboard (Intel) PC Peripherals; Graphics Card (AMD) Graphics Card (Nvdia) Motherboard (AMD) View More; CORSAIR. CABINET; Hydro Cooler; Mouse Pad & Fan; Power Supply; RAM; View More;
Muy buen día, el día de hoy les vengo a hablar del pequeño gigante intel core i3 7100, donde analizamos su rendimiento y si conviene comprarlo en final de 2019. AL FIN TENEMOS REDES SOCIALES ...
The Core i3-7100U doesn't offer any significant advantage over last year's Skylake Core i3-6100U; our Lenovo ThinkPad 13 kept pace with its rivals in Cinebench R15 and R11.5. Interestingly, while ...
I need help to see of my computer needs an upgrade, i have gtx 1050 ti, i3 7100, 8 gb ram, bought my pc in 2017. I experience fps drops sometimes. I wanna play apex for smoothly.