Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | entry-level | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | LGA1151 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2015 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Price | 157 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Number of Cores | 2 Cores | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 3.9 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 3.9 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 3.9 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 51 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 4 MB | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Price-Value Score | 70 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 51 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 29 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 75 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 51.3 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 25.6 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 12.8 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 33/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i3-6320 is one of Intel's entry-level Desktop processors. It was released in 2015 with 2 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.9GHz, max speed at 3.9GHz, and a 51W power rating. The Core i3-6320 is based on the Skylake-S 14nm family and is part of the Core i3 series.
Core i3-6320 is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i3-4350 processor that was based on the Haswell Refresh and 22nm process and was released in 2014.
Now, we're asking ourselves whether or not the Intel Core i3-6320 finally dethrones the A6-7470K as the de facto ruler of the mainstream processors. Ultimately, it depends: the Core i3-6320 doesn't reach the same single-core performance as AMD, but we're starting to see more games adopt multi-threaded CPUs, so that doesn't matter as much.
Intel Core i3 6th Generation, and the Skylake-S architecture itself, is notable because it leads 14nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But, there’s a lot more going on under the hood than just a smaller manufacturing node.
But we've also found that, after simple push-button overclocking, the Core i3-6300 offers similar performance to the Core i3-6320, even when it is also overclocked. But for $70 less. The Core i3-6320 is an impressive chip and offers a better mixture of performance than AMD's A6-7470K, no doubt, but in this case, value seekers might opt for its less expensive sibling.
As the higher-priced version of the Core i3-6300, the Core i3-6320 has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.9 and 3.9 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Core i3-6300's PPT tops out at 51W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Core i3-6320 at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
But, like most humans, if you do things other than gaming, the Core i3-6320 offers a better mixture of performance in single- and multi-threaded applications. The Core i3-6320 offers twice the threads of the price-comparable A6-7470K, and it wields them to great effect in threaded workloads. As such, rendering and encoding remain a strong suit of the Core i3 chips, and Intel's improvements to AVX throughput have yielded impressive results.
Out of the box, the Core i3-6320 is a better all-arounder than the A6-7470K and offers incrementally higher performance than its downstream counterpart. The bundled cooler reduces platform costs, and a wide array of motherboards offers plenty of choices for builders.
Intel Core i3 6 Generation is finally here, and the Intel Core i3-6320 might just be the poster child for what this generation of processors has in store for consumers. Sure, it might have stuck with the 2-core, 4-thread setup, which it inherited from its predecessor, the Core i3-4350. However, with the new 14nm manufacturing process, it delivers a far better performance at lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i3-6320 was rolled out on Oct 2015 for $157, which puts it in the same general price range as the last-generation Core i3-4350. This means that at least we're not seeing any considerable price jumps from generation to generation.
This decision to 14nm has brought a beefy 15% boost to IPC (instructions per clock) performance. Effectively, compared to a Core i3 4-Generation processor at the same clock speed, you will get a straight 15% increase in performance. That’s not big enough to be evident in day-to-day workloads, but it does still mean something.
One of the nice things about the Intel Core i3-6320 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the Intel Core i3-6320 up for $157 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The Intel Core i3-6320 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 51W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
The Intel Core i3-6320 seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $157 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the A6-7470K 2-Core unlocked desktop processor with Radeon R5 (on die) graphics ($215.7 shipped).
Bottom Line, the Intel Core i3-6320 does not get much media attention since it is entry-level 6 Gen Core Skylake-S processor, but it is a very capable processor that still delivers a good computing experience for entry-level users.
If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, Intel also offers the Core i3-6300 at $147. It’s still outfitted with 2-cores and 4-threads, but clocks in at a slower 3.8GHz and maxes out at only 3.8GHz.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent entry-level chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Z270, Z370, Z390 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i3 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the entry-level with its Core i3-6320 processors, which the company is making available as of Oct 2015.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i3-6320.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 8.3 | 192.7 FPS
|
225.3 FPS
|
167.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.4 | 179.8 FPS
|
210.2 FPS
|
156.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 5.7 | 173.9 FPS
|
199.6 FPS
|
135 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 7.2 | 167 FPS
|
195.1 FPS
|
144.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 5 | 160.4 FPS
|
187.4 FPS
|
139.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 5.7 | 158.1 FPS
|
181.5 FPS
|
122.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 10 | 150.1 FPS
|
169.2 FPS
|
118.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 7.6 | 143.7 FPS
|
164.9 FPS
|
111.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 14.1 | 141.3 FPS
|
165.1 FPS
|
122.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 7.1 | 140.7 FPS
|
159.5 FPS
|
109.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 4.9 | 132.5 FPS
|
150.2 FPS
|
103.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 6.1 | 130.8 FPS
|
150.5 FPS
|
109.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 5.3 | 130.8 FPS
|
147.5 FPS
|
103.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 4.7 | 126.3 FPS
|
143.9 FPS
|
105.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 5.3 | 112.2 FPS
|
127.6 FPS
|
90.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 5.5 | 104.9 FPS
|
119 FPS
|
81.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5 | 100.1 FPS
|
112.8 FPS
|
78.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 27.2 | 91.9 FPS
|
107 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 14.5 | 89.4 FPS
|
104.2 FPS
|
73.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 5.4 | 88.3 FPS
|
100.9 FPS
|
68.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.6 | 86.8 FPS
|
100.3 FPS
|
72.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.9 | 82 FPS
|
94.9 FPS
|
67.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 8.6 | 81.2 FPS
|
93.6 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.1 | 78.3 FPS
|
89.9 FPS
|
62.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 38.5 | 77.8 FPS
|
90.6 FPS
|
65 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 3.8 | 77.8 FPS
|
90.3 FPS
|
65 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 3.5 | 77.7 FPS
|
89.3 FPS
|
61.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 9.1 | 76.7 FPS
|
87.5 FPS
|
60.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 5.2 | 73.5 FPS
|
83.9 FPS
|
57.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 10.6 | 71.9 FPS
|
83.5 FPS
|
58.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7 | 71.5 FPS
|
80.6 FPS
|
56.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 17 | 70.5 FPS
|
80.6 FPS
|
57.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 9.9 | 70.5 FPS
|
80 FPS
|
55 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.8 | 68.7 FPS
|
77.9 FPS
|
53.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7.4 | 67.7 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
53.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 3 | 67.7 FPS
|
77.9 FPS
|
56.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 4.9 | 67.3 FPS
|
76.1 FPS
|
53.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 6.2 | 64.1 FPS
|
70.1 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 5.5 | 62.9 FPS
|
71.4 FPS
|
49 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.2 | 61.1 FPS
|
68.3 FPS
|
47 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 5.8 | 60.3 FPS
|
64.5 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.7 | 59.4 FPS
|
66.8 FPS
|
45.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 26.2 | 57.2 FPS
|
63.1 FPS
|
46.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.7 | 57.1 FPS
|
64.8 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 7.2 | 56.6 FPS
|
63.2 FPS
|
43.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 4.5 | 55.4 FPS
|
61.4 FPS
|
42.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 18.2 | 55 FPS
|
60.8 FPS
|
41.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 5.2 | 53.8 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
41.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.5 | 53.5 FPS
|
60.6 FPS
|
41.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.7 | 52.1 FPS
|
57.7 FPS
|
39.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 4.5 | 50.8 FPS
|
56.8 FPS
|
39 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 13.5 | 47.9 FPS
|
53.2 FPS
|
36.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 4.6 | 47.8 FPS
|
53.4 FPS
|
36.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 6.2 | 45.3 FPS
|
49.2 FPS
|
33 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 14.9 | 43.5 FPS
|
50.6 FPS
|
35.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 3.8 | 41.6 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
31.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 4.8 | 41.2 FPS
|
44.7 FPS
|
29.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 13.4 | 41.1 FPS
|
45.1 FPS
|
31.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 5.7 | 40.2 FPS
|
43.6 FPS
|
29.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 16.4 | 39.6 FPS
|
45.2 FPS
|
31.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 26 | 38.4 FPS
|
41.8 FPS
|
30.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 14.7 | 37.4 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 6.8 | 37.3 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.6 | 37 FPS
|
40.2 FPS
|
26.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 11.9 | 36 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
28.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 4.8 | 35.4 FPS
|
38.8 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 9.5 | 34.8 FPS
|
37.7 FPS
|
26.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 11.8 | 33.8 FPS
|
38 FPS
|
26.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 9.8 | 33.6 FPS
|
37.3 FPS
|
24.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.1 | 33.2 FPS
|
36.8 FPS
|
24.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 4.7 | 31.7 FPS
|
35.1 FPS
|
24 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 6 | 29.6 FPS
|
33 FPS
|
22.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 9.2 | 24.9 FPS
|
27.4 FPS
|
19.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 11.2 | 22.3 FPS
|
24.7 FPS
|
16.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 9 | 22.2 FPS
|
24.5 FPS
|
16.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 7.7 | 21.9 FPS
|
24.2 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 12.9 | 21.6 FPS
|
24.1 FPS
|
15.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 9.3 | 21.4 FPS
|
23.5 FPS
|
15.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 9.1 | 18.6 FPS
|
20.4 FPS
|
13.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 5.8 | 17.2 FPS
|
18.7 FPS
|
12.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 9.4 | 16.9 FPS
|
18.3 FPS
|
12.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 9 | 16.6 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
12.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 9.1 | 16.4 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 9.2 | 15.2 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
11.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 10.1 | 14.7 FPS
|
14.2 FPS
|
10.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 6.6 | 12 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
8.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 6.9 | 11.5 FPS
|
12.5 FPS
|
8.1 FPS
|
The i5 is faster. Most applications today are capable of utilising more than two cores, so the four core i5 will have an advantage over the i3.
Yeah that's what I was thinking but when I saw the 3.9GHz vs 2.7GHz I was kinda surprised. Thanks for the info.
Definitely the i5, so if he wants to buy games like Overwatch or even Battlefield 1 he can run those without a hitch.
Yeah I suppose that's fine thanks for the info.
So one of my friends is doing a budget build, and he wants to keep the build at about 600 or so (including the OS), but he would like something a bit better than an i3 6100 or Pentium, but an i5 6500 or any K series cpu is a bit out of reach. So that leaves the i3 6300/6320 or i5 6400. The argument for the i3 is clock speed and cache per core advantage, and its also cheaper, but the i5 is a true quad core. Currently we're opting for the i5 but we'd also like to hear some input on this. Currently he's running on an Athlon X2 and GT 130 combo with 7 GB of DDR3-1333 RAM, so this will be quite an upgrade for him.
Here's the build for those curious:
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant
Type Item Price CPU Intel Core i5-6400 2.7GHz Quad-Core Processor $174.99 @ SuperBiiz Motherboard Gigabyte GA-H110M-A Micro ATX LGA1151 Motherboard $46.98 @ Newegg Memory Kingston HyperX Fury Black 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR4-2133 Memory $40.78 @ OutletPC Storage A-Data Premier SP550 120GB 2.5" Solid State Drive $37.99 @ NCIX US Video Card Asus Radeon RX 460 4GB STRIX OC Video Card $134.98 @ Newegg Case Deepcool TESSERACT SW ATX Mid Tower Case $39.99 @ SuperBiiz Power Supply EVGA 500W 80+ Bronze Certified ATX Power Supply $43.33 @ OutletPC Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 Home OEM 64-bit $84.88 @ OutletPC Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts Total (before mail-in rebates) $613.92 Mail-in rebates -$10.00 Total $603.92 Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-09-28 20:02 EDT-0400The RX 460 is there since we're interested in overclocking it, but not the CPU. Also the case is there since it just looks cool.
There are cheaper 4GB RX 460s, getting one of those should keep the build under budget and I Recommend the i5 6400.
I know, but this one has a a PCI-e power connector on it to sip the extra juice it needs right off the PSU once overclocking has been done.
Hello guys . I want to buy a second hand computer with the following specs :
Intel I3 skylake 6320
Gtx 580
Modular psu 550w
8gb corsair ram Ddr 4 2133mhz
Cooler master hyper 103 cooler
Do you think this PSU cand hold the GTX 580 along with all components ? I heard that gtx 580 is very greedy in power consumption.
What price?
Also GTX 580 was released in 2010, in terms of power to performance its really bad, also its very lucky to survive this long, alot of cards die in 4 to 5 years, so don't expect it to last long.
Price is between 300-400. Also i checked some sites like GPUBOSS or Game debate and i saw that GTX 580 is slightly better than gtx 750 and 660 that's why i am interested into it . Idk if he has this sysyem since 2010 .
I put the values and components in here: http://www.coolermaster.com/power-supply-calculator/
This is what the website gave me as a result. Including
1 x 7200rpm HDD
1 x SSD
Load Wattage: 358 W
Recommended PSU Wattage: 408 W
It should be fine. On the long run you might switch the GTX580 for a GTX 1050 or any other modern 'low to mid range' card to save some power.
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Moving from a Core i3 to a Core i5 for example, is a minimum $23 (from $158 for a boxed i3-6320 to $182 for the i5-6400) for more cache and more physical cores, albeit with the same number of ...
Intel Core i3-6320. Intel Core i3-6300. Intel Core i3-6100 (with lower L3 Cache) Nonetheless, the landscape for Core i3 should be very interesting. We put these CPUs through our long-form CPU 2015 tests, including our Real World, Office and Professional tests, while the 2016 suite is still being built.
This review tested the Core i3-6320, the i3-6300 and the i3-6100. All three differ in their base frequency in a regular fashion, going from 3.9 GHz to 3.8 GHz and 3.7 GHz respectively.
Both of the processors on test today are Core i3 models, and both are dual-core with hyperthreading. We have the i3-6300T, a very low power offering clocked at 3.3GHz, and the i3-6320 which is still frugal on our planets resources whilst being capable of a not-inconsiderable 3.9GHz.
These Intel Core i3s are both brilliant processors with plenty of performance at an affordable price, and both win our OC3D Value For Money awards. Thanks to Intel for enabling the Core i3 6300T and Core i3 6320 review. Discuss your thoughts in the OC3D Forums.
Benchmark comparison of Intel i3 6320 vs Intel i5 6600K vs Intel i5 4690K . Intel i3 6320 purchase link: http://unavailable/1N1G2dp Intel i5 6600K purchase...
[Build Help] i3-6320 or i5-6400
So basically I'm building my friend a budget PC for some light gaming like hearthstone and csgo mostly. Which CPU has better performance of these two? I see that the i3 has a very big clock speed while the i5 has a smaller clock speed. Which one should I pick?