Intel Core i3-4370 Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | entry-level | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA1150 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2014 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 242 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 2 Cores | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.8 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3.8 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 3.8 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 54 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 22 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 60 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 47 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 27 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 75 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 46.2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 23.1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 11.6 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 28/100 | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Core i3-4370 is one of Intel's entry-level Desktop processors. It was released in 2014 with 2 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.8GHz, max speed at 3.8GHz, and a 54W power rating. The Core i3-4370 is based on the Haswell Refresh 22nm family and is part of the Core i3 series.
Core i3-4370 is also the successor of Intel's last gen Core i3-3250 processor that was based on the Ivy Bridge and 22nm process and was released in 2013.
As the higher-priced version of the Core i3-4360, the Core i3-4370 has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.8 and 3.8 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Core i3-4360's PPT tops out at 54W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Core i3-4370 at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
The Intel Core i3-4370 is another impressive release from Intel and its 4 Generation of Core i3 chips. With it, you’re getting 2-cores and 4-threads, with a boost clock of 3.8GHz. It may not be the strongest contender ever made on paper, but when you see and feel the actual performance gains it offers, you’re certainly getting a lot of bang for your $242 buck.
Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the Core i3-3250, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.
Bottom Line, the Intel Core i3-4370 does not get much media attention since it is entry-level 4 Gen Core Haswell Refresh processor, but it is a very capable processor that still delivers a good computing experience for entry-level users.
If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, Intel also offers the Core i3-4360 at $352. It’s still outfitted with 2-cores and 4-threads, but clocks in at a slower 3.7GHz and maxes out at only 3.7GHz.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent entry-level chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Q87, Z87, Z97 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Core i3 CPUs, Intel's attack on AMD now extends down into the entry-level with its Core i3-4370 processors, which the company is making available as of Sep 2014.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Core i3-4370
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i3-4370.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 7.5 | 212.9 FPS
|
232.8 FPS
|
169.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4 | 198.6 FPS
|
217.3 FPS
|
158.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 5.2 | 192.1 FPS
|
206.3 FPS
|
136.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 6.5 | 184.5 FPS
|
201.6 FPS
|
146.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 4.5 | 177.2 FPS
|
193.7 FPS
|
141 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 5.1 | 174.7 FPS
|
187.6 FPS
|
124.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 9 | 165.8 FPS
|
174.9 FPS
|
119.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 6.9 | 158.7 FPS
|
170.5 FPS
|
113 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 12.8 | 156.1 FPS
|
170.6 FPS
|
124.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 6.4 | 155.4 FPS
|
164.9 FPS
|
111.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 4.4 | 146.3 FPS
|
155.3 FPS
|
104.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.5 | 144.5 FPS
|
155.5 FPS
|
110.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.8 | 144.5 FPS
|
152.4 FPS
|
104.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 4.3 | 139.5 FPS
|
148.8 FPS
|
107.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.8 | 124 FPS
|
131.8 FPS
|
92 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 5 | 115.9 FPS
|
123 FPS
|
82.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.5 | 110.5 FPS
|
116.6 FPS
|
80 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 24.6 | 101.5 FPS
|
110.6 FPS
|
76.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 13.1 | 98.8 FPS
|
107.7 FPS
|
74.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.9 | 97.6 FPS
|
104.2 FPS
|
69.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.2 | 95.9 FPS
|
103.6 FPS
|
73.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.4 | 90.6 FPS
|
98.1 FPS
|
68.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.8 | 89.7 FPS
|
96.7 FPS
|
66.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.6 | 86.5 FPS
|
92.9 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 34.9 | 86 FPS
|
93.6 FPS
|
65.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 3.5 | 85.9 FPS
|
93.3 FPS
|
65.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 3.1 | 85.8 FPS
|
92.3 FPS
|
62.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 8.2 | 84.8 FPS
|
90.5 FPS
|
61.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 4.7 | 81.2 FPS
|
86.7 FPS
|
58.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 9.6 | 79.4 FPS
|
86.3 FPS
|
59.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.3 | 79 FPS
|
83.3 FPS
|
57.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 15.4 | 77.9 FPS
|
83.3 FPS
|
58.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 9 | 77.9 FPS
|
82.7 FPS
|
55.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.3 | 75.9 FPS
|
80.5 FPS
|
54.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.7 | 74.8 FPS
|
77.8 FPS
|
54 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.7 | 74.8 FPS
|
80.5 FPS
|
56.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 4.4 | 74.3 FPS
|
78.6 FPS
|
54.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 5.6 | 70.8 FPS
|
72.5 FPS
|
49.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 5 | 69.5 FPS
|
73.8 FPS
|
49.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7.4 | 67.5 FPS
|
70.6 FPS
|
47.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 5.2 | 66.7 FPS
|
66.6 FPS
|
44.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.3 | 65.6 FPS
|
69 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 23.7 | 63.2 FPS
|
65.2 FPS
|
46.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7.9 | 63.1 FPS
|
67 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 6.5 | 62.5 FPS
|
65.4 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 4.1 | 61.2 FPS
|
63.5 FPS
|
43.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 16.4 | 60.8 FPS
|
62.8 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.7 | 59.5 FPS
|
62.2 FPS
|
41.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.8 | 59.1 FPS
|
62.6 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.9 | 57.6 FPS
|
59.6 FPS
|
39.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 4.1 | 56.1 FPS
|
58.7 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 12.3 | 52.9 FPS
|
55 FPS
|
37 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 4.2 | 52.8 FPS
|
55.2 FPS
|
37.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 5.6 | 50.1 FPS
|
50.8 FPS
|
33.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 13.5 | 48.1 FPS
|
52.3 FPS
|
36.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 3.5 | 46 FPS
|
47.9 FPS
|
32.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 4.4 | 45.6 FPS
|
46.2 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 12.1 | 45.4 FPS
|
46.7 FPS
|
31.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 5.2 | 44.4 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 14.9 | 43.7 FPS
|
46.7 FPS
|
32.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 23.6 | 42.4 FPS
|
43.2 FPS
|
30.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 13.3 | 41.3 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
29.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 6.2 | 41.2 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
28.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.1 | 40.8 FPS
|
41.5 FPS
|
27.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 10.8 | 39.8 FPS
|
42.2 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 4.3 | 39.1 FPS
|
40.1 FPS
|
27 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 8.6 | 38.4 FPS
|
39 FPS
|
27.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 10.7 | 37.4 FPS
|
39.3 FPS
|
27.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 8.9 | 37.1 FPS
|
38.5 FPS
|
24.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.6 | 36.6 FPS
|
38 FPS
|
25 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 4.3 | 35 FPS
|
36.3 FPS
|
24.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 5.5 | 32.7 FPS
|
34.1 FPS
|
22.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 8.3 | 27.5 FPS
|
28.4 FPS
|
19.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 10.1 | 24.7 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 8.1 | 24.5 FPS
|
25.3 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 7 | 24.2 FPS
|
25 FPS
|
16.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 11.7 | 23.9 FPS
|
24.9 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 8.4 | 23.6 FPS
|
24.3 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 8.2 | 20.6 FPS
|
21.1 FPS
|
13.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 5.2 | 19 FPS
|
19.3 FPS
|
12.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 8.5 | 18.7 FPS
|
18.9 FPS
|
13 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 8.1 | 18.3 FPS
|
17.8 FPS
|
12.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 8.2 | 18.2 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
11.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 8.3 | 16.8 FPS
|
17.1 FPS
|
11.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 9.2 | 16.2 FPS
|
14.7 FPS
|
10.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.9 | 13.3 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
8.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 6.2 | 12.7 FPS
|
12.9 FPS
|
8.3 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
Sandy/Ivy Bridge i5s > Haswell i3s.
The i5-2500 (and also 3570S) goes for $25 on AliExpress and will run circles around the piddly Haswell i3 you've mentioned, despite its age. $30 for i5-3570 or the unlocked 2500K.
Or just go with a top tier Ivy Bridge i3 for now ($12 shipped on AliExpress) and in future upgrade to an E3-1270, which is basically an i7-2600 (octa-thread) and can be had for $40 right now.
Considering what you've told me i have ammeded my list and this is what I've come to;
i5 2500k
8gb Corsair 1333Mhz
And some random Arctic cooler
This is definitely a better plan, I thought you had a good deal picked out based on your region (I dont know Euro prices for gear)
Thats almost 3 times the CPU power and double the RAM for a decent price. It will help you on Gmod and Skyrim (a bit) but the other games CPU and RAM dont really have much effect on the visuals.
Decent upgrade for the price. Save up for a better GPU in the future?
Thanks for the fast reply! Do you have any recomendations for a upgrade to the gpu? Im not sure what would be a good cost effective upgade option. Also taking into account bottlenecking which idk how much of an issue that would be here.
The main reason I came to this sub is to spread the good word of AMD, if you want to do this upgrade I can’t stop you, but if you save up and go a AMD for your CPU with the accompanying mother board, you could just transfer your graphics car over and ram is pretty cheap now anyway
Look for a used optiplex. I got an optiplex 7010 with an i5 3470, 8gb ram, and 500gb HDD for $50(less than you can get just the Mobo and CPU). But you can find similarly priced systems with i3-i7 or Xeon CPUs and varying HDD/SSD and RAM specs for $20-100. Then you could take the HDD, RAM, and motherboard/CPU and transplant it into your case with your GPU and power supply and have a decent upgrade for cheap. You could also just shop used motherboard/CPU combos on eBay, sometimes there are some really good last gen deals
What a coincidence! I was looking at my pile of computers in my shed and found myself an i5 3470 but i sadly cant use the board as it was made for a different type of ram! So im using the I5-3470 and im going to buy a board capable of ddr3 dual channel and 8gb of ram to accompany it! I will start ordering parts soon and if you would like I'll let you know how i get on! sadly only had a 320gb (i think??) hdd so I'll get an ssd at some point in the future too! I was putting off looking through my pile of stuff because I highly doubted I'd end up finding an I5 lol
Haswell is a much better platform to get onto than Sandy Bridge. The spectre / meltdown / zombieload mitigations are much more impactful on sandy bridge vs haswell.
Haswell xeons also have a much higher performance ceiling than your lga 1155 i5/i7.
Go haswell. The range of motherboards on average will be in much worse condition for lga 1155 vs haswell’s 1150.
I've recently found an I5-3470 in my shed which uses the 1155 socket and is Ivy bridge so im going to be buying parts surrounding that, just because of how tight my budget is!
Haswell is a much better platform to get onto than Sandy Bridge. The spectre / meltdown / zombieload mitigations are much more impactful on sandy bridge vs haswell.
Disable the patch, install an AV (Avast, in my case) and hopefully you'll be fine.
The range of motherboards on average will be in much worse condition for lga 1155 vs haswell’s 1150.
RIP C64 and IBM PC enthusiasts!
How have you been finding it? It's a great card for the money, picked mine up for about £25-30 and its served me very well over the past few months! Although I dont know how big a difference the 1gb makes!
if you can find some more memory that would perk up the machine considerably
windows seems to thrive with 8GB to 16GB
Maybe you can consider purchasing a used GTX 970 around the 70 to 100 dollars range to replace your GTX 650ti because the performance rating would go from 2540 to 9585 according to Passmark Software video card benchmarks. That jump in efficiency will more than double your overall quality of gaming or general video usage. The conditions you need to look out for is if the card is compatible with the hardware you current have or will acquire. Do you have enough space, enough power on the PSU, adequate cabling, heating issues, and you will need to alter or upgrade the video card software package on your computer. I find that many GTX cards are less likely to have compatibility problems compared to AMD RX cards in the used market.
In regards to DDR3 RAM memory, try to get up to 16 GB if you can find and/or afford it. The supplies of those memory types will dwindle over time and therefore in the retail and after market the prices will increase, so , you will have more incentive to look up better deals in the used parts segments of the industry.
I know you want to keep the GTX 650ti but replacing it with another card that has at least 4 GB of DDR5 memory makes a significant difference in what games you can actual be able to play because it may be the minimum setting to access a games software.
Good Luck.
When I have saved up a little more money I will look into getting a newer gpu and psu if its required. On the topic of memory the mobo I ordered has the capability of quad channel memory so in the future i can upgrade with 2 more 4gb sticks. for me 8gb is ~£20 so its not too much either. I'll look into the GTX 970 though for sure! Thanks.
Upgrade path help
Hi all, I have the following machine: i3 4370, 12GB ram, Vega 64, 4k monitor. I most it for:
linux, latex, firefox.
infrequent python simulations, very light mathematica for elementary computations.
patient gaming: witcher 3, doom 2016.
The only thing I need more performance for is gaming.
Here are my witcher 3 logs: 45-55fps, 70% cpu, 100% gpu at 4k, high settings. all 4 cpu logs , gpu , xls file .
Here are my doom 2016 on linux logs. radeontop cpuload .
The 2 cpus I am considering are:
ebay i7 4790k. ($100-140). Cheapest, best boost in gaming performance at my resolution.
New Ryzen 3600, 16GB Ram, B450 motherboard. ($150 + 100 + 100). Similar gaming performance.
By this logic, the i7 4790k seems to make the most sense since I dont really need the performance in productivity, and the gaming performances are identical at my resolution. Does this make sense? Am I overlooking something?
gpu, you are overlooking gpu, i would step down to a 4700 (or the k version) and a 1080 or a 1660/super
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Critics Reviews
Core i3-4370 processor released by Intel; release date: July 2014. At the time of release, the processor cost $242. The processor is designed for desktop-computers and based on Haswell microarchitecture. CPU is locked to prevent overclocking. Total number of cores - 2, threads - 4. Maximum CPU clock speed - 3.8 GHz.
Find out how your PC compares with the Intel Core i3-4370 Processor with 3DMark, the Gamer's Benchmark. Get it from Steam. Intel Core i3-4370 Processor Review Intel Core i3-4370 Processor review is temporarily unavailable. Sorry for the inconvenience. Home > ...
Im trying to upgrade my pc help me out!
My current specs are;
Intel e8400 @ 3.00Ghz
4gb ddr3 @ 1600Mhz (im unsure the exact frequency of the memory)
Gtx 650Ti 2gb
Im running games at an okay frame rate at 720-1080 most games in my steam library are playable at the low-medium graphics settings(playable for me = 30-40fps minimum) Note: I play games such a Gmod, Fallout NV, Stalker Shadow of Chernobyl and Skyrim.
Im looking to upgrade to this system;
i3 4370 @ 3.80Ghz
8gb ram @ 1600Mhz
Gtx 650 Ti 2gb (I'll likely keep the same gpu unless an upgrade is completely required as it has served me well up until now)
Im not looking for a huge upgrade just enough to make some of the games in my library a little more smooth and maybe higher graphics settings. Is this upgrade worth the ~£50 price of the upgrade?
Thanks for reading and i look forward to hopefuly seeing some insightful responses!
Also if any of you know of any games that would run well on the upgraded system I'd like to know aswell!