Intel Celeron G3950 Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | budget | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA1151 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 610 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2017 Model | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 52 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Cores | 2 Cores | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 2 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 3 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 51 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 72 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 44 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 26 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 65 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 69.6 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 34.8 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 17.4 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 30/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Celeron G3950 is one of Intel's budget Desktop processors. It was released in 2017 with 2 cores and 2 threads. With base clock at 3GHz, max speed at 3GHz, and a 51W power rating. The Celeron G3950 is based on the Kaby Lake-S 14nm family and is part of the Celeron series.
As the higher-priced version of the Celeron G3930, the Celeron G3950 has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3 and 3 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Celeron G3930's PPT tops out at 51W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Celeron G3950 at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, Intel also offers the Celeron G3930 at $42. It’s still outfitted with 2-cores and 2-threads, but clocks in at a slower 2.9GHz and maxes out at only 2.9GHz.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent budget chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade Z270, Z370, Z390 motherboard.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Celeron G3950
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Celeron G3950.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 13.3 | 120.3 FPS
|
197.4 FPS
|
158.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 7.1 | 112.2 FPS
|
184.2 FPS
|
147.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 9.2 | 108.6 FPS
|
174.9 FPS
|
127.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 11.5 | 104.2 FPS
|
171 FPS
|
137.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 8 | 100.2 FPS
|
164.2 FPS
|
131.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 9.1 | 98.7 FPS
|
159 FPS
|
116.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 16 | 93.7 FPS
|
148.3 FPS
|
112.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 12.3 | 89.7 FPS
|
144.5 FPS
|
105.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 22.7 | 88.2 FPS
|
144.7 FPS
|
116.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 11.4 | 87.8 FPS
|
139.8 FPS
|
103.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 7.8 | 82.7 FPS
|
131.6 FPS
|
97.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 9.8 | 81.7 FPS
|
131.8 FPS
|
103.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 8.6 | 81.6 FPS
|
129.2 FPS
|
97.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 7.6 | 78.8 FPS
|
126.1 FPS
|
100 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 8.5 | 70.1 FPS
|
111.8 FPS
|
86 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 8.8 | 65.5 FPS
|
104.2 FPS
|
77.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8 | 62.5 FPS
|
98.9 FPS
|
74.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 43.5 | 57.4 FPS
|
93.7 FPS
|
71.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 23.3 | 55.8 FPS
|
91.3 FPS
|
69.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 8.7 | 55.1 FPS
|
88.4 FPS
|
64.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.4 | 54.2 FPS
|
87.9 FPS
|
68.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.8 | 51.2 FPS
|
83.2 FPS
|
64.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 13.8 | 50.7 FPS
|
82 FPS
|
62 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 8.2 | 48.9 FPS
|
78.7 FPS
|
58.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 61.7 | 48.6 FPS
|
79.4 FPS
|
61.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 6.2 | 48.5 FPS
|
79.1 FPS
|
61.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 5.5 | 48.5 FPS
|
78.2 FPS
|
58.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 14.6 | 47.9 FPS
|
76.7 FPS
|
57.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 8.3 | 45.9 FPS
|
73.5 FPS
|
54.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 16.9 | 44.9 FPS
|
73.2 FPS
|
55.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 11.2 | 44.6 FPS
|
70.6 FPS
|
53.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 27.3 | 44 FPS
|
70.6 FPS
|
54.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 15.9 | 44 FPS
|
70.1 FPS
|
52.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.3 | 42.9 FPS
|
68.2 FPS
|
50.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 11.8 | 42.3 FPS
|
66 FPS
|
50.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 4.7 | 42.3 FPS
|
68.2 FPS
|
53.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 7.8 | 42 FPS
|
66.6 FPS
|
50.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 10 | 40 FPS
|
61.4 FPS
|
46.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 8.9 | 39.3 FPS
|
62.6 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 13.1 | 38.1 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
44.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 9.3 | 37.7 FPS
|
56.5 FPS
|
41.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 7.5 | 37.1 FPS
|
58.5 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 42 | 35.7 FPS
|
55.3 FPS
|
43.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 14 | 35.6 FPS
|
56.8 FPS
|
42 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 11.6 | 35.3 FPS
|
55.4 FPS
|
41.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 7.2 | 34.6 FPS
|
53.8 FPS
|
40.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 29 | 34.4 FPS
|
53.2 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 8.3 | 33.6 FPS
|
52.7 FPS
|
39.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 11.9 | 33.4 FPS
|
53.1 FPS
|
39.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 12.3 | 32.5 FPS
|
50.6 FPS
|
37.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 7.2 | 31.7 FPS
|
49.8 FPS
|
37 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 21.7 | 29.9 FPS
|
46.7 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 7.4 | 29.8 FPS
|
46.8 FPS
|
34.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 9.9 | 28.3 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
31.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 23.9 | 27.2 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
33.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 6.2 | 26 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
30.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 7.7 | 25.7 FPS
|
39.2 FPS
|
28.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 21.4 | 25.6 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
29.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 9.1 | 25.1 FPS
|
38.2 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 26.3 | 24.7 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
30 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 41.8 | 23.9 FPS
|
36.7 FPS
|
28.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 23.6 | 23.3 FPS
|
37.3 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 10.9 | 23.3 FPS
|
35.7 FPS
|
26.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 7.3 | 23.1 FPS
|
35.2 FPS
|
25.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 19.1 | 22.5 FPS
|
35.8 FPS
|
26.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 7.7 | 22.1 FPS
|
34 FPS
|
25.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 15.2 | 21.7 FPS
|
33 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 19 | 21.1 FPS
|
33.3 FPS
|
25.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 15.7 | 21 FPS
|
32.7 FPS
|
23.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 8.2 | 20.7 FPS
|
32.2 FPS
|
23.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 7.5 | 19.8 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
22.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 9.7 | 18.5 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
21.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 14.8 | 15.5 FPS
|
24.1 FPS
|
18.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 17.8 | 14 FPS
|
21.7 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 14.4 | 13.8 FPS
|
21.4 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 12.4 | 13.6 FPS
|
21.2 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 20.7 | 13.5 FPS
|
21.2 FPS
|
14.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 15 | 13.3 FPS
|
20.6 FPS
|
15.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 14.6 | 11.6 FPS
|
17.9 FPS
|
13 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 9.3 | 10.7 FPS
|
16.4 FPS
|
11.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 15.1 | 10.5 FPS
|
16 FPS
|
12.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 14.5 | 10.3 FPS
|
15.1 FPS
|
11.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 14.5 | 10.3 FPS
|
14.6 FPS
|
11.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 14.7 | 9.5 FPS
|
14.5 FPS
|
10.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 16.2 | 9.2 FPS
|
12.5 FPS
|
9.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 10.5 | 7.5 FPS
|
11.5 FPS
|
8.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 11 | 7.2 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
7.7 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
Actually, the way the Ryzen memory controller works it could even be difficult to hit 3200 at 64GB as Ryzen only supports those high speeds at one dimm per channel. I'm also wondering because the Corsair 64GB ddr4-3200 kit is listed on the crosshair viii qvl list. I'm buying my new build today and can report if it works as expected.
Thanks in advance for anything you can report back!
I wonder if I should buy one of those new 2x32GB kits instead, maybe that would have an easier time overclocking?
Edit: lol nevermind. Those kits are all very slow.
I'm running 64gb of Ballistix Sport at 3200 as we speak. My 1700x ran them just fine with tighter timings as well I believe it was c14 or whatever the ryzen calculator spat out. Currently with my 3900x I'm having other issues so I'm just running them at 3200 with stock timing but once again, no actual problem with the ram itself.
Please help me with my Ryzen 9 3950 Build for next week
*Budget:up to 2300-2500$
*I plan on gaming/3D model/Video/image Editing/Alot of multitasking/heavy usage for both work and entertainment for long hours/etc
*I already have a mouse/monitor/keyboard/and a 1060 6GB EVGA GPU I plan to move to my new build to save money
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/wvzGx6 This is the list I made so far based on a recommendation from a microcenter rep, I plan to get all my parts from microcenter since I'm in the area for another week.
I already got the Ryzen 9 3950x and this Taichi x570 motherboard but I'm not sure if it's that good I can still return it but it's not a very common name brand mobo so I'm still very nervous about what I want for this build but I'd really like to finish it up without worrying about if I got something wrong or something low quality. I can put a basic custom rig together but I've never installed the new type of SSDs but I would like to use the gen3 samsung or whichever ones are most recommended because I know there's not alot of good gen4s out atm. But yeah please treat this like as if it was your own build because this needs to last me for a LONG time since I'll be spending this much on it and I plan to upgrade the GPU in the future too.
The ASRock Taichi is good.
PCPartPicker Part List
Type Item Price CPU AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 3.5 GHz 16-Core Processor $749.00 @ Amazon CPU Cooler Corsair H150i PRO 47.3 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler $174.99 @ Amazon Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi ATX AM4 Motherboard $295.99 @ B&H Memory G.Skill Trident Z Neo 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3600 Memory $179.99 @ Newegg Storage Samsung 970 Evo 500 GB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive $87.99 @ Amazon Storage HP EX920 1 TB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive $119.99 @ Amazon Video Card EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6 GB SSC GAMING Video Card Purchased For $0.00 Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic ATX Full Tower Case $139.00 @ Adorama Power Supply Corsair RM (2019) 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply $119.99 @ Best Buy Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 Home OEM 64-bit $99.99 @ B&H Monitor Asus VG278Q 27.0" 1920x1080 144 Hz Monitor $0.00 Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB MK.2 Wired Gaming Keyboard $0.00 Mouse Razer DeathAdder Elite Wired Optical Mouse $0.00 Headphones Razer Kraken 7.1 V2 7.1 Channel Headset $0.00 Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts Total $1966.93 Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-01-19 04:09 EST-0500Your build looks good.
I will make just 2 change.
Upgrade ddr4 to 3600Mhz kit.
Since there are 3 m.2 slots on the motherboard, I would from the sata ssd and get cheap intel 660p or crucial p1.
Hey mate, nice build. If your using for hard usage your going to need something like an RTX 2070 super or 2080 super. For the 2070 I recommend the Gigiabyte wind force model (as it is £100 cheaper than an ASUs one)
The taichi is made by asrock who have been in the game for a long while, and they're known to be good boards. They're just not as big as asus or gigabyte. It's a keeper.
You'll need to buy at least 3 case fans, the O11 dynamic comes with precisely zero. There's 9 120mm fan slots total, but your aio will take 3 of them. You'll be fine with just 3 more, but if you really want to you can load the whole thing up.
With lots of work instead of the Samsung evo I'd go with a sabrent rocket or inland premium nvme drive. They perform better and have a higher rated lifetime writes than the evo. And they're cheaper. I have both - https://i.imgur.com/ZgVoVu6.png
Also buy a better quality psu. Now that the holiday sales are gone the Phanteks Amp is back to being one of the best psu's for the price. It's made by seasonic and has a 10 year warranty. Much higher quality than a cxm for $10 more.
Ryzen 9 3950 Machine Running Sub-Par? Need Advice / Help
New to the sub and looking for some help guys. I built this PC about a month ago and I am experiencing some issues. Please let me know your thoughts to see if these maybe Windows or hardware issues. I would like to think that a $3,000+ system should not be experiencing these issues.
Thank you for the help!
Issues:
- Occasionally extremely slow (15+ seconds) opening file manager
- Downloads from Chrome slow to show/don't show at all in file manager
- Horrible FPS drops while playing - Wolcen (COD is fine)
- 5 or 6 blue screen windows crashes (all different error codes)
Complete build: https://pcpartpicker.com/list/43Qn9G
Monitors (four of them): - https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00N2L5CXO/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o06_s00?ie=UTF8&th=1
Overclocking: 22% CPU overclocked using AMD software / RAM is running at 3600
CPU temperature? My first guess would be CPU throttling due to too much heat which shouldn’t be a problem if the AIO was installed correctly and with thermal paste.
Do these problems also occur when your processor runs at its stock speed?
My temps are always within range. I will keep an eye on it. Thank you for the input
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Critics Reviews
Intel Celeron G3950 ⭐ review. Discover the key facts and see how Intel Celeron G3950 performs in the CPU ranking.
Celeron G3950 processor released by Intel; release date: January 2017. At the time of release, the processor cost $126. The processor is designed for desktop-computers and based on Kaby Lake microarchitecture.
Intel Celeron G3950 3.0GHz Socket 1151 Box CPUs - showing user reviews.
Looking for help picking the right 64GB (4x16GB) memory kit for a Ryzen 3950 build
I'm looking to build a Ryzen 3950X based build in September when it comes out, most likely with the X570 Aorus Master.
So far, I'm leaning toward this kit - https://www.gskill.com/product/165/184/1536137188/F4-3200C14Q-64GVK-Overview
It's listed on the QVL on Gigabyte's website, likewise the Aorus Master is on the QVL on G.Skill's site. 3200MHz and CL14-14-14-34 so its pretty great right out of the gate. Plus it's only $529 on Newegg right now, where as most similar kits I'm seeing are in the $700-900 range, so not a bad price either.
Realistically I should be able to run this kit at 3200MHz CL14 with no issues, but I'm wondering if it's likely I'll be able to overclock to 3600MHz or 3733MHz, hitting that performance sweet spot for the Ryzen 3000 series, while still maintaining the tight timing and running stable... OR is there a better kit out there that I'm not finding that is similarly priced?
This build is going to be used for work (After Effects, Premiere, Cinema 4D) as well as gaming, so going down to 32GB just to hit my performance goals isn't something I want to do.