Category | Server | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | sTR4 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2018 Model | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Price | 1799 USD | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Cores | 32 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Number of Threads | 64 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Core Frequency | 3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 4.2 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 4.3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 250 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 12 nm | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 64 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 1024 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Price-Value Score | 56 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 66 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 78 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 83 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 35.4 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 17.7 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 8.9 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 44/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is one of AMD's high-end Server processors. It was released in 2018 with 32 cores and 64 threads. With base clock at 3GHz, max speed at 4.2GHz, and a 250W power rating. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is based on the Colfax 12nm family and is part of the Ryzen Threadripper series.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is also the successor of AMD's last gen Ryzen Threadripper 1950X processor that was based on the Zen and 14nm process and was released in 2017.
This processor packs 32-cores and 64-threads in a mainstream package for the first time, and does it at a similar price point as the Xeon Gold 6212U, a processor with just 24-cores and 48-threads.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX marks yet another blast from Team AMD, ramping up the intensity of the AMD vs Intel processor war. Still, though, there’s more than just core counts when it comes to a mainstream processor, as single-core performance needs to be on point, especially if you’re hoping to play the best PC games.
Now, we're asking ourselves whether or not the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX finally dethrones the Xeon Gold 6212U as the de facto ruler of the mainstream processors. Ultimately, it depends: the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't reach the same single-core performance as Intel, but we're starting to see more games adopt multi-threaded CPUs, so that doesn't matter as much.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2nd Generation, and the Zen+ architecture itself, is notable because it leads 12nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But, there’s a lot more going on under the hood than just a smaller manufacturing node.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is an absolute behemoth of a processor, as it absolutely should be with its 32 cores, 64 threads and high price tag. If you’re looking for the absolute best processor money can buy on a mainstream processor, then look no further. Whether you’re playing PC games or even doing hardcore video and 3D work, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX can handle them with ease.
However, you should be aware that there are some workloads where the Xeon Gold 6212U will still perform a little better. Old games that are completely single threaded, like World of Warcraft, will still run better on an Intel processor – but that gap is definitely starting to narrow.
Over the last couple years, AMD has been reaching for dominance in the desktop CPU world, and with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, it's finally there.
AMD's Zen+ series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.
As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.
Value seekers who aren't afraid to press the Precision Boost Overdrive button and have sufficient cooling should look to the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX for roughly equivalent performance to the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, particularly if gaming factors heavily into the buying decision. That could save you money, reinforcing our decision to give the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX an Editor's Choice award.
This decision to 12nm has brought a beefy 15% boost to IPC (instructions per clock) performance. Effectively, compared to a Ryzen Threadripper 1-Generation processor at the same clock speed, you will get a straight 15% increase in performance. That’s not big enough to be evident in day-to-day workloads, but it does still mean something.
What this all means is that the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
If you're mostly playing games on your PC, you will be happy buying either processor. Both proved to be solid options and are evenly matched with a slight advantage to the Intel chip if you don't tune up the Xeon Gold processor. The base performance we showed for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX can be achieved with $90 memory, while the Xeon Gold 6212U will require $110 - $120 memory in order to enable the frame rates shown here. It’s not a big cost difference and right now with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 you’ll more than likely become GPU limited.
Now the biggest question is can AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 83% in our benchmarks.
Regardless of those external factors, the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX proves it has the chops to be your main gaming system and a just as effective media creation platform – two things that are becoming intrinsically connected in this age of live-streaming, eSports and uploading gameplay videos.
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX clocks up to 4.2Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 4.3GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent high-end chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade X399 motherboard.
Like all other Colfax chips, the Ryzen Threadripper-series CPUs drop into any Socket sTR4 motherboard. But most will find a home on boards equipped with the X399 chipset, which has provisions for overclocking and offers plenty of connectivity options. Unlike Intel, AMD plans to utilize its current socket until 2023, so upgrading to future models shouldn't require a new motherboard.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.3 | 255.6 FPS
|
249.2 FPS
|
174.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.4 | 238.5 FPS
|
232.5 FPS
|
163.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.3 | 230.7 FPS
|
220.7 FPS
|
141 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.4 | 221.5 FPS
|
215.8 FPS
|
151.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.8 | 212.8 FPS
|
207.3 FPS
|
145.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.3 | 209.7 FPS
|
200.7 FPS
|
128 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7.5 | 199.1 FPS
|
187.2 FPS
|
123.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 5.8 | 190.6 FPS
|
182.4 FPS
|
116.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 10.7 | 187.4 FPS
|
182.6 FPS
|
128.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.4 | 186.6 FPS
|
176.5 FPS
|
114.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.7 | 175.7 FPS
|
166.2 FPS
|
107.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.6 | 173.6 FPS
|
166.4 FPS
|
114 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4 | 173.5 FPS
|
163.1 FPS
|
107.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.6 | 167.5 FPS
|
159.2 FPS
|
110.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4 | 148.9 FPS
|
141.1 FPS
|
94.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.2 | 139.2 FPS
|
131.6 FPS
|
85.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.8 | 132.7 FPS
|
124.8 FPS
|
82.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 20.5 | 121.9 FPS
|
118.3 FPS
|
78.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 11 | 118.6 FPS
|
115.2 FPS
|
76.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.1 | 117.1 FPS
|
111.6 FPS
|
71.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.5 | 115.2 FPS
|
110.9 FPS
|
75.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.7 | 108.7 FPS
|
105 FPS
|
70.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.5 | 107.7 FPS
|
103.5 FPS
|
68.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.8 | 103.9 FPS
|
99.4 FPS
|
64.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 29.1 | 103.2 FPS
|
100.2 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.9 | 103.1 FPS
|
99.9 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.6 | 103.1 FPS
|
98.8 FPS
|
64.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.9 | 101.8 FPS
|
96.8 FPS
|
63.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.9 | 97.5 FPS
|
92.8 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 8 | 95.4 FPS
|
92.4 FPS
|
61 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.3 | 94.8 FPS
|
89.2 FPS
|
58.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 12.8 | 93.5 FPS
|
89.2 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.5 | 93.5 FPS
|
88.5 FPS
|
57.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.4 | 91.1 FPS
|
86.1 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.6 | 89.9 FPS
|
83.3 FPS
|
55.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.2 | 89.9 FPS
|
86.1 FPS
|
58.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.7 | 89.2 FPS
|
84.1 FPS
|
56.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.7 | 85.1 FPS
|
77.5 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.2 | 83.5 FPS
|
79 FPS
|
51.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.2 | 81 FPS
|
75.5 FPS
|
49.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.4 | 80 FPS
|
71.3 FPS
|
46 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.5 | 78.7 FPS
|
73.9 FPS
|
47.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 19.7 | 75.9 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
48.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.6 | 75.7 FPS
|
71.7 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.4 | 75.1 FPS
|
70 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.4 | 73.4 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 13.7 | 73 FPS
|
67.2 FPS
|
43.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 71.4 FPS
|
66.6 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.6 | 71 FPS
|
67 FPS
|
43.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.8 | 69.1 FPS
|
63.8 FPS
|
41.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.4 | 67.3 FPS
|
62.8 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 10.2 | 63.5 FPS
|
58.9 FPS
|
38.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.5 | 63.4 FPS
|
59.1 FPS
|
38.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.6 | 60.1 FPS
|
54.4 FPS
|
34.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.2 | 57.7 FPS
|
56 FPS
|
37.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.9 | 55.2 FPS
|
51.3 FPS
|
33.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.6 | 54.7 FPS
|
49.5 FPS
|
31.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.1 | 54.5 FPS
|
49.9 FPS
|
32.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.3 | 53.3 FPS
|
48.2 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 12.4 | 52.5 FPS
|
50 FPS
|
33.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 19.6 | 50.9 FPS
|
46.3 FPS
|
31.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11.1 | 49.6 FPS
|
47.1 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.1 | 49.5 FPS
|
45.1 FPS
|
29.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.4 | 49 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 9 | 47.7 FPS
|
45.2 FPS
|
29.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.6 | 46.9 FPS
|
42.9 FPS
|
27.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7.1 | 46.2 FPS
|
41.7 FPS
|
28.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8.9 | 44.9 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.4 | 44.6 FPS
|
41.2 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.8 | 44 FPS
|
40.7 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.5 | 42.1 FPS
|
38.9 FPS
|
25.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.6 | 39.3 FPS
|
36.5 FPS
|
23.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 6.9 | 33 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
20 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8.4 | 29.6 FPS
|
27.3 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.8 | 29.4 FPS
|
27.1 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.8 | 29 FPS
|
26.8 FPS
|
17.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 9.7 | 28.7 FPS
|
26.7 FPS
|
16.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7 | 28.4 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 6.8 | 24.7 FPS
|
22.6 FPS
|
14.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.3 | 22.8 FPS
|
20.7 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7.1 | 22.4 FPS
|
20.2 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.8 | 22 FPS
|
19 FPS
|
12.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.8 | 21.8 FPS
|
18.4 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 6.9 | 20.2 FPS
|
18.3 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.6 | 19.5 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
10.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5 | 15.9 FPS
|
14.5 FPS
|
9.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.2 | 15.2 FPS
|
13.8 FPS
|
8.5 FPS
|
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.