AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Review

Enthusiast Desktop processor released in 2019 with 16 cores and 32 threads. With base clock at 3.5GHz, max speed at 4.7GHz, and a 105W power rating. Ryzen 9 3950X is based on the Matisse 7nm family and part of the Ryzen 9 series.
Price 71.5%
Speed 90%
Productivity 105%
Gaming 95%
Category Desktop
Target enthusiast
Socket Compatibility AM4
Integrated Graphics None
Cooler Included No
Overclock Potential 1 %
Year 2019 Model
Price 710 USD
Number of Cores 16 Cores
Number of Threads 32 Threads
Core Frequency 3.5 GHz
Boost Frequency 4.7 GHz
Max Stable Overclock 4.7 GHz
Power Consumption 105 W
Manufacturing Process 7 nm
L3 Cache 64 MB
Maximum Supported Memory 128 GB
Price-Value Score 71.5 %
Speed Score 90 %
Productivity Score 105 %
Gaming Score 95 %
Max 1080p Bottleneck 12 %
Max 1440p Bottleneck 6 %
Max 4K Bottleneck 3 %
Overall Score 59/100

The Ryzen 9 3950X is one of AMD's enthusiast Desktop processors. It was released in 2019 with 16 cores and 32 threads. With base clock at 3.5GHz, max speed at 4.7GHz, and a 105W power rating. The Ryzen 9 3950X is based on the Matisse 7nm family and is part of the Ryzen 9 series.

Ryzen 9 3950X is also the successor of AMD's last gen Ryzen 7 2700X processor that was based on the Zen+ and 12nm process and was released in 2018.

This processor packs 16-cores and 32-threads in a mainstream package for the first time, and does it at a similar price point as the Core i9-9900KS, a processor with just 8-cores and 16-threads.

The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X marks yet another blast from Team AMD, ramping up the intensity of the AMD vs Intel processor war. Still, though, there’s more than just core counts when it comes to a mainstream processor, as single-core performance needs to be on point, especially if you’re hoping to play the best PC games.

Now, we're asking ourselves whether or not the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X finally dethrones the Core i9-9900KS as the de facto ruler of the mainstream processors. Ultimately, it depends: the Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't reach the same single-core performance as Intel, but we're starting to see more games adopt multi-threaded CPUs, so that doesn't matter as much.

AMD Ryzen 9 3rd Generation, and the Zen 2 architecture itself, is notable because it leads 7nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But, there’s a lot more going on under the hood than just a smaller manufacturing node.

Increased IPC improvements, along with the massive turbo boost of 4.7GHz mean that even in single core performance – long a weak link of AMD’s processors – comes within reaching distance of rival chips.

One thing that the switch to 7nm silicon has allowed for however, is an increase in cache size. AMD is now describing its L3 and L2 cache in a combined spec of 16 x 512 kB and 64. But, because the 7nm CPU cores are contained within their own chiplets, AMD was able to pack much more in – with a whopping 16 x 512 kB and 64. This is a really big deal, as it allows for much faster performance, especially when you’re shooting for high framerates in 1080p games, and will be especially effective in old esports titles like Counter Strike: Global Offensive.

Finally, the shrink down to 7nm allows for much better energy efficiency. Because of the Zen 2 architecture, AMD Ryzen 9 3 Generation processors like the Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen 9 3900 should be up to 58% more efficient than comparable Intel processors. This isn’t the most noteworthy feature here, but, hey, it should translate to lower electricity bills, and in today’s economy every little bit helps, right?

The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is an absolute behemoth of a processor, as it absolutely should be with its 16 cores, 32 threads and high price tag. If you’re looking for the absolute best processor money can buy on a mainstream processor, then look no further. Whether you’re playing PC games or even doing hardcore video and 3D work, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X can handle them with ease.

However, you should be aware that there are some workloads where the Core i9-9900KS will still perform a little better. Old games that are completely single threaded, like World of Warcraft, will still run better on an Intel processor – but that gap is definitely starting to narrow.

Over the last couple years, AMD has been reaching for dominance in the desktop CPU world, and with the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, it's finally there.

AMD's Zen 2 series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.

That something is the Ryzen 9 3950X. AMD cranks the TDP dial up to 105W on this 16-core 32-thread chip, making it the high-performance counterpart to the 65W Ryzen 9 3900, which is basically the same 7nm chip built with the Zen 2 microarchitecture, but with a lower TDP rating. That chip came away from our first look at the Zen 2 series with an Editor's Choice award, going toe-to-toe with Intel's Core i9-9900KS, so it's fair to say we have high hopes for the higher-performance model. AMD still hasn't sampled the chip to the press, so we bought one at retail to put it under the microscope.

As the higher-priced version of the Ryzen 9 3900, the Ryzen 9 3950X has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.5 and 4.7 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Ryzen 9 3900's PPT tops out at 65W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Ryzen 9 3950X at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.

As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.

But, like most humans, if you do things other than gaming, the Ryzen 9 3950X offers a better mixture of performance in single- and multi-threaded applications. The Ryzen 9 3950X offers twice the threads of the price-comparable Core i9-9900KS, and it wields them to great effect in threaded workloads. As such, rendering and encoding remain a strong suit of the Ryzen 9 chips, and AMD's improvements to AVX throughput have yielded impressive results.

Value seekers who aren't afraid to press the Precision Boost Overdrive button and have sufficient cooling should look to the Ryzen 9 3900 for roughly equivalent performance to the Ryzen 9 3950X, particularly if gaming factors heavily into the buying decision. That could save you money, reinforcing our decision to give the Ryzen 9 3900 an Editor's Choice award.

The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, like the rest of AMD's Matisse processors, is built on a 7nm manufacturing node – the smallest in a commercially available CPU. What this means for most people is lower power consumption and much improved performance at the same time.

This decision to 7nm has brought a beefy 15% boost to IPC (instructions per clock) performance. Effectively, compared to a Ryzen 9 2-Generation processor at the same clock speed, you will get a straight 15% increase in performance. That’s not big enough to be evident in day-to-day workloads, but it does still mean something.

What this all means is that the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Ryzen 9 3950X.

Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the Ryzen 7 2700X, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.

If you're mostly playing games on your PC, you will be happy buying either processor. Both proved to be solid options and are evenly matched with a slight advantage to the Intel chip if you don't tune up the Core i9 processor. The base performance we showed for the Ryzen 9 3950X can be achieved with $90 memory, while the Core i9-9900KS will require $110 - $120 memory in order to enable the frame rates shown here. It’s not a big cost difference and right now with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 you’ll more than likely become GPU limited.

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-core desktop processor that was released in Nov 2019. AMD offers the Ryzen 9 3950X without integrated graphics. It runs $710 shipped and is ideal for those that plan on using it a system with a dedicated graphics card.

The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $710 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Core i9-9900KS 8-Core unlocked desktop processor with Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics ($1499 shipped).

Now the biggest question is can AMD’s Ryzen 9 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 95% in our benchmarks.

Regardless of those external factors, the Ryzen 9 3950X proves it has the chops to be your main gaming system and a just as effective media creation platform – two things that are becoming intrinsically connected in this age of live-streaming, eSports and uploading gameplay videos.

The Ryzen 9 3950X clocks up to 4.7Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 4.8GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.

That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent enthusiast chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade X370, X470, X570 motherboard.

Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Ryzen 9 CPUs, AMD's attack on Intel now extends down into the enthusiast with its Ryzen 9 3950X processors, which the company is making available as of Nov 2019.

Right out of the gate, Ryzen 9 should sell for $710, going up against Intel's almost-$1499 Core i9-9900KS. In threaded workloads, the 16-core Ryzen 9 should enjoy an advantage against Intel's 8-core models. Of course, AMD doesn't give you integrated graphics like Intel does, but for enthusiasts building cheap gaming PCs, it isn't much of a draw anyway.

Like all other Matisse chips, the Ryzen 9-series CPUs drop into any Socket AM4 motherboard. But most will find a home on boards equipped with the A320 chipset, which has provisions for overclocking and offers plenty of connectivity options. Unlike Intel, AMD plans to utilize its current socket until 2020, so upgrading to future models shouldn't require a new motherboard.

Which GPU to Pick for AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X.

Graphics Card Price Cost Per Frame Avg 1080p Avg 1440p Avg 4K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB $ 1,499 $ 5.5 271.2 FPS
213.8 FPS
131.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB $ 699 $ 3 236.3 FPS
186.3 FPS
114.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB $ 499 $ 2.8 180.8 FPS
142.6 FPS
87.7 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB $ 2,499 $ 15.1 166 FPS
135.2 FPS
83.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB $ 1,299 $ 8 161.6 FPS
131.6 FPS
81.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB $ 699 $ 4.8 146.7 FPS
118.2 FPS
72.9 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB $ 2,999 $ 21.3 140.6 FPS
114.5 FPS
72.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB $ 699 $ 5 138.6 FPS
110.6 FPS
67.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB $ 759 $ 5.8 129.9 FPS
105.5 FPS
65 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB $ 499 $ 3.9 129.2 FPS
101.8 FPS
62.6 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB $ 1,199 $ 9.4 127.4 FPS
101.8 FPS
64.1 FPS
AMD Radeon VII 16GB $ 699 $ 5.5 127.4 FPS
101.1 FPS
61.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB $ 399 $ 3.2 124.1 FPS
98.4 FPS
59.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB $ 499 $ 4.1 122.4 FPS
95.1 FPS
59.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB $ 400 $ 3.5 115.9 FPS
88.6 FPS
54.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB $ 349 $ 3.1 113.7 FPS
90.2 FPS
54.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB $ 499 $ 4.5 110.4 FPS
86.3 FPS
52.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB $ 350 $ 3.2 109 FPS
81.5 FPS
48.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB $ 279 $ 2.6 107.3 FPS
84.4 FPS
50.9 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB $ 1,499 $ 14.5 103.4 FPS
79.7 FPS
51.4 FPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB $ 499 $ 4.8 103.2 FPS
81.9 FPS
49.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB $ 409 $ 4 102.3 FPS
79.9 FPS
48.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB $ 999 $ 10.1 99.4 FPS
76.8 FPS
46.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB $ 279 $ 2.9 97.3 FPS
76 FPS
45.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB $ 399 $ 4.1 96.7 FPS
76.6 FPS
46.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB $ 399 $ 4.2 94.2 FPS
72.9 FPS
43.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB $ 229 $ 2.5 91.7 FPS
71.8 FPS
43.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB $ 649 $ 7.5 86.5 FPS
67.3 FPS
40.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB $ 220 $ 2.5 86.3 FPS
67.5 FPS
40.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB $ 279 $ 3.4 81.9 FPS
62.1 FPS
36.8 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB $ 649 $ 8.3 78.6 FPS
63.9 FPS
39.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB $ 160 $ 2.1 75.2 FPS
58.6 FPS
35.4 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB $ 199 $ 2.7 74.5 FPS
56.5 FPS
33.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB $ 549 $ 7.4 74.2 FPS
57 FPS
34.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB $ 229 $ 3.2 72.6 FPS
55 FPS
32.3 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB $ 649 $ 9.1 71.5 FPS
57.1 FPS
35.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB $ 999 $ 14.4 69.3 FPS
52.8 FPS
33.5 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB $ 549 $ 8.1 67.6 FPS
53.8 FPS
32.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB $ 254 $ 3.8 67.4 FPS
51.5 FPS
31.1 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB $ 169 $ 2.5 66.8 FPS
50.8 FPS
29.9 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB $ 429 $ 6.6 65 FPS
51.6 FPS
31.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB $ 170 $ 2.7 63.9 FPS
49 FPS
29.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB $ 329 $ 5.2 62.9 FPS
47.6 FPS
30 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB $ 400 $ 6.5 61.1 FPS
48 FPS
29.7 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB $ 329 $ 5.4 60.7 FPS
47.1 FPS
27.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB $ 169 $ 2.8 59.9 FPS
46.5 FPS
27.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB $ 149 $ 2.6 57.3 FPS
44.4 FPS
26.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB $ 179 $ 3.3 53.5 FPS
41.7 FPS
25.1 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB $ 229 $ 5.1 45 FPS
34.7 FPS
21.3 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB $ 249 $ 6.2 40.4 FPS
31.2 FPS
18.1 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB $ 199 $ 5 40.1 FPS
30.9 FPS
18.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB $ 169 $ 4.3 39.5 FPS
30.6 FPS
18.4 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB $ 279 $ 7.1 39.1 FPS
30.5 FPS
17.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB $ 199 $ 5.2 38.6 FPS
29.7 FPS
17.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB $ 169 $ 5 33.6 FPS
25.8 FPS
15.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB $ 99 $ 3.2 31.1 FPS
23.6 FPS
14 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB $ 159 $ 5.2 30.5 FPS
23.1 FPS
14.2 FPS
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB $ 149 $ 5 29.9 FPS
21.7 FPS
13.5 FPS
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB $ 149 $ 5 29.7 FPS
21 FPS
13 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB $ 140 $ 5.1 27.5 FPS
20.9 FPS
12.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB $ 149 $ 5.6 26.5 FPS
18 FPS
11.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB $ 79 $ 3.6 21.7 FPS
16.6 FPS
9.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB $ 79 $ 3.8 20.7 FPS
15.8 FPS
9.1 FPS

Related Discussions and Issues

T
tallstan12 June 26, 2020

Probably Controversial, but help me choose a Processor. Intel i9 10900k vs Ryzen 9 3950X

I am building a gaming PC and after reading a lot about the differences between Ryzen and Intel I’m pretty much stuck and honestly don’t know which to choose between the two. I know that Intel is better for gaming, but Ryzen is better at pretty much everything else. But is Intel THAT MUCH BETTER than Ryzen at gaming or is it barely even noticeable in terms of Frames per Second in High/Ultra Settings, Graphics and pretty much just overall performance. I am also concerned about the temperature of the Intel Processor as I heard that they have problems in terms of very high temperatures and what not. The build will be Liquid Cooled so should I even be worrying about that? I also plan on overclocking as well. I don’t plan on doing pretty much anything else on the PC besides Gaming, so I’d understand if anyone would say this is a stupid question, but I just thought it would be worth asking especially since Ryzen is better at everything else. Is the performance difference between the two CPUs in Gaming noticeable at all? Or is there anything else that I don’t know about or should consider when choosing between the two Processors? My GPU will be the Geforce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB and my System Memory will be 64GB

V
V0rt0s June 08, 2020

They’re only noticeable at very very high fps. This will depend on what resolution you’re going to be using. There really isn’t a gaming use case for a 3950x though. I’d recommend getting a 3900x. It’ll be cheaper than intel and perform similarly.

T
tallstan12 June 18, 2020

I plan on gaming on 200+ Frames on High/Ultra settings mainly for First Person Shooters like COD and should I worry about the temperatures for the Intel?

Z
zzTeebeutel June 18, 2020

Yeah, seems like you like wasting coney, cause a 3950x and 64GB of RAM surely won't make a Gaming PC run faster

P
Purgie June 16, 2020

Why even choose a 3950x for a gaming pc? What a waste. It's for workstation use cases..

64 GB of memory is also a waste for a gaming PC. As long as you aren't using all your RAM, it doesn't give you better performance.

T
tallstan12 June 22, 2020

Sorry I don’t know much about PC’s I’m pretty new to this, and I was just wondering which processor was better which is why I asked the question. What do you suggest though? In terms of ram and which processor if i plan on playing on 144 - 240hz

S
squidbrand June 16, 2020

Both are poor choices for gaming. These are 20-thread and 32-thread CPU’s, respectively. In the majority of games, most of those threads are just going to be chilling at 1-2% background load, basically doing nothing.

Also it’s not a great time to buy a 2080Ti. It’s going to be supplanted by the 3000 series this summer and its resale value will probably drop by a good $500, if the jump between generations is similar to the last few.

T
tallstan12 June 12, 2020

Okay I see so for now I should wait for a better GPU? And what processor do you recommend for the best gaming experience?

S
schizo_ghost June 20, 2020

You don't need a 3950x solely for gaming, but if you plan on streaming or anything why not. If you don't, don't bother and just get a 3900x or even a 3700x since they have identical fps performance. The 10900k has shown to have a 10-15% better fps in regards to gaming, you'll be spending about 25% more than if you bought a 3900x and around 50% more than a 3700x and at that point it's honestly a waste of money.

You don't need 32GB of ram, and you're better off getting a 16GB kit of 3600mhz CAS latency 14 RAM and adding more later on. You also don't need a 2080Ti right now. As mentioned in another comment it will be replaced and lose a ton of value. You're better off buying a 2070Super and selling it for a 3080Ti when that releases.

When building a PC it's easy to slap the highest end of everything part just to have the most powerful thing, but in my experience it's best to go high end on certain parts (PSU, Storage, aka cheaper stuff) and a place you're comfortable at for other things. There's a 50/50 chance you're gonna upgrade your parts regardless of where you bought in at in terms of performance in the near future, and like said previously buying a high end cards that's gonna be beat buy a midrange card in 4 months is a gigantic waste of money.

V
vagabond139 June 20, 2020

32GB of RAM will make a performance difference for Ryzen though given how RAM is important for its performance and 32GB of RAM being dual ranked.

W
Wide_Fan June 12, 2020

If you only care about gaming, 10700k. Keep in mind the 3900x/3950x is much superior in productivity tasks. But since you seem to be aiming for high refresh rate/resolution gaming considering the gpu choice, 110% Intel. But the 10900k is not worth the money imo considering how it's single digit differences between it and the 10700k which is much cheaper.

A good AIO will serve you fine; a really beefy air cooler is also an option.

Overclocking wise, comet lake doesn't leave to much room for it since it already has a pretty wicked turbo. But it's still doable.

Whichever you choose, you can't really go too wrong. Good luck.

Also you don't need 64GB of ram for gaming lol. 16 is perfectly fine and 32gb is probably the current luxury amount.

1
1Kien1 June 16, 2020

Honestly, you probably wouldn't even notice the gaming performance difference by that much, I would go for ryzen since games are going to use more cores and like you said BETTER at everything else. Both of the cpus are going to perform very well with your 2080 ti, If your main focus is gaming, go for the 10900k. If price is really a main factor as well, the 3950x is pretty expensive around $200 more than the 10900k. I recommend the 3900x

I
Impossible_Addition June 08, 2020

Buying the most expensive stuff won't give you the best gaming performance. Even if it does it will give you maybe 5% better for 100% more cost. 64GB ram???? 16 core CPU???? Bruh you playing games from the year 2030 or what?

I suggest you stick with 8 cores (r7 3700x) and get a 2080Super and 16GB of ram

L
LazyProspector June 18, 2020

Honestly, if you're already spending 2080 Ti money you might as well go all in on the 10900K.

For basically anything else go Ryzen

D
DrDray0 June 10, 2020

Wait until fall. 3080Ti (or AMD equivalent???) will likely be +50% performance for the same price with far better raytracing. Worst time to buy right before these consoles launch and PC equivalent GPUs launch.

T
tallstan12 June 24, 2020

Anything i could buy in the meantime and upgrade later?

A
Act_Consistent July 17, 2020

[HELP] I9 9900k or Ryzen 9 3950x

Hello! I will be building my first ever gaming PC here very shortly. On this pc I of course want to game but also record videos and stream with high quality! What CPU would you recommend.

K
kjm015 July 17, 2020

The 10900K is basically unobtainable right now.

-
-UserRemoved- July 17, 2020

10th gen Intel is better value, 10700k should cost less than 9900k.

On this pc I of course want to game but also record videos and stream with high quality!

What GPU are you going to use? If it's RTX, then encoding via NVENC is likely ideal.

I mean, if you're looking at the best Intel and AMD have to offer, your experience with either will be pretty darn similar. They're obviously both high end. You can look up benchmarks comparing the 2 for the specific games and programs you use. Then decide which one is more worth your money.

I
ImNotLikeYou July 17, 2020

If you're streaming, and more importantly editing your recorded videos, AMD is better in the long run

T
TeamWorkOPleaseNerf July 17, 2020

3700x, encoding is done by the gpu so get something like a 2070 super

A
alpharagesch July 17, 2020

i'd go for the 3950x tbh, bc if you're recording and editing videos you want that multithreaded performance that comes with ryzem, even if it's a tiny bit behind intel in singlethreaded tasks such as gaming

A
ArcticSrb July 17, 2020

I would go with amd here 9900ks seem have some heating problems personally and ryzen 9 muti thread is just better then i9 9k unless you want to try the new 10th gen Intel gpu. ( I haven't tried or seen the new 10th gen Intel, but seems pretty good a bit over priced, but it's a new product so what did I expect) anyways ryzen would be the go to here.

Edit: Forgot you can wait for the new ryzen XT cpu

K
kjm015 July 17, 2020

The i9-9900K is an obsolete processor that has been supplanted by the newer and cheaper i7-10700K.

The Ryzen 9 3950X is completely overkill if you only plan on gaming and streaming.

Honestly, you'd be better off going with something like a Ryzen 7 3700X or 3800X. It will give you almost identical gaming & streaming performance to the 9900K and 10700K for about $120 less. You can use that money towards a better GPU, which is what will affect your gaming performance more.

A
Act_Consistent July 17, 2020

Or should I wait for the new ryzen cpu coming out

E
elijuicyjones July 17, 2020

AMD by a million miles. You'd have to pay me to use Intel.

S
SterlingCasanova July 17, 2020

If a 10900k dropped in your lap for free I'm pretty sure you'd use it.

M
Moonfall1991 July 17, 2020

InTEl sO baD, i7 10700k CAnt eVeN REndEr a VIdeO.

H
Handelo July 19, 2020

3950X Overclocking help!

Hey guys, this is really my first foray into overclocking and I need some advice. I tried to include all the information I can but let me know if there's something missing.

I'm running a Ryzen 9 3950X on an Aorus X570 Master (BIOS ver. F20a). Cooling is an NZXT Kraken X62 as front intake in an NZXT H510 case with two additional 120mm exhaust fans in the top rear. Also running the CPU with a -50mV VCore offset.

So my temps are... worse than what I'd expected.

Ambient temp is 25°c.

Idle temperatures are around 45°c. They also tend to shoot up to 53-55°c for an instant occasionally and then drop back down, possibly because of PB2 doing its thing.

All-core Cinebench R20 load with all stock settings (except the undervolt) brings the temps to about 79°c after a few minutes. All-core frequency is 3950MHz.

Enabling PBO increases the max temp to 86°c. The all-core frequency is still at 3950MHz.

Manual all-core overclocking (through Ryzen Master) to 4150MHz @ 1.2875v further increases the temp to 88°c.

I could overclock up to 4200MHz but that would break the 90°c mark which I'm not really comfortable with.

As for single-core... with both all stock and PBO settings it only ever hits 4425MHz, a far cry from the advertised 4700MHz. It also only ever uses Cores 0 and 1 on CCD0 CCX0, despite the "golden" cores being Core0 and Core16.


So I have a few questions about this:

  • Does the Ryzen Master voltage setting override the VCore offset, or is it compounded with it? Does Ryzen Master display the correct voltage when there is an undervolt in the BIOS?

  • My AIO Liquid temp (according to NZXT CAM) never breaks 42°c, which is quite a big difference from the CPU temps. Is this because the sensors are found on the cooler side of the loop (before making contact with the copper plate), or is this an issue? Or is this just how Ryzen processors are due to 7nm being harder to cool?

  • Do the temps look right? I've remounted the AIO 3 separate times, the last time I also applied Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, but I've seen no significant change in temps.

  • The Kraken X62 uses the AMD clip mounting method. Would ordering a 4-point mounting AM4 bracket for the AIO possibly help reduce temps? I didn't really see an uneven spread while remounting the AIO but maybe?

  • What is going on with my single core frequency?! Why is it so much lower than spec?

  • Is there anything else I can do to reduce temps and possibly achieve higher clocks? Short of getting a bigger AIO and case or going with a custom loop, that is?

  • T
    ToreKjellow July 19, 2020

    I'm have to check the next time I'm at my desk, but my initial reaction is that liquid temps of 42c is a lot. What are your pump/fan settings on your AIO? I'm running my x52 at 100% pump speed and 4 fans in push/pull on my radiator in the front of a phanteks p400a case (high air flow mesh front). The fans run about 600rpm idle and 1000 rpm under load (controlled by liquid temps).

    My 3950x is running a per ccx OC set I bios. 1.206v idle, and 1.175V full load. 4325/4300/4175/4175 MHz.

    My temps are ~35c idle and up to 85c in extreme stress tests (y-cruncher etc). I don't think the cpu breaks 75c in cb20.

    H
    Handelo July 19, 2020

    I'm only using the included 2 fans in a push configuration. Can't do push-pull since then the GPU wouldn't fit (the H510 is a pretty snug case). Opening up both side panels of the case doesn't seem to make a difference so I don't think airflow is the problem here.

    I'm running the AIO at 100% pump speed, fans at 600 RPM in idle and 1300 RPM under load. Fan speed is tied to the liquid temp rather than CPU temp to avoid fan ramp ups because of PB2.

    So a liquid temp of 42°c is considered high? Even when the CPU is running close to 90°c? I would assume the liquid would heat up as it absorbs the heat from the CPU, I really expected a higher liquid temp and lower CPU temp. So is this just how it is with the 3950X?

    M
    malphadour July 19, 2020

    Change to a mesh case and you will take 10c off - the NXZT is known to be poor for CPU temps even when using an AIO - the airflow is just too restrictive. You can test this theory by running the system with the front panel of the 510 removed and see if your temps improve, which should also show higher all core boost performance if you are using PBO.

    The liquid temp sounds about right, high 30's, low 40's is where it should be at.


    Are you measuring the CPU temps with CAM or Ryzen Master? Cam can not be trusted for correct temps.

    The kraken X62 itself is a good cooler, and the clip mechanism is absolutely fine - this is nothing to do with the mounting ans going up to a 360 won't help with that case.

    H
    Handelo July 19, 2020

    Wait, if the liquid temp is right, then why would the CPU temp drop in a mesh case? isn't it directly linked to just that? Sure higher airflow would help lower the liquid temp, but you said it's about right, so...

    And yeah I'm measuring temps with Ryzen Master, I noticed CAM wasn't really displaying temperatures accurately.

    Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?

    Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?

    Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Performance

    Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.

    Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?

    Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.

    Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?

    Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.

    How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU

    Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.

    RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison

    Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?

    10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs

    May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.

    10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

    May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.

    10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

    May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.

    2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?

    May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.

    Critics Reviews

    The Ryzen 9 3950X comes with AMD's highest-binned silicon to enable a 4.7 GHz boost clock, but like other Ryzen 3000 processors, it comes with a mix of faster and slower cores.
    The Ryzen 9 3950X is built on AMD’s 7nm Zen 2 architecture, and is the highest tier in the Ryzen 3000 series. That naturally makes it the most expensive, but it also shows just how well AMD is ...
    The Ryzen 9 3950X shocked us by pulling out slightly ahead in Cinebench R20 using a single thread. We also looked at performance of the CPUs using an oldie but goodie, the POV Ray 3.7 benchmark.
    Ryzen 9 3950X Cinebench R20 single-thread performance. Antony Leather. The multi-threaded result is a triumph for AMD'snew flagship, clearly bettering the Core i9-9980XE and while Cinebench isn't ...
    In raw performance terms, the Ryzen 9 3900 and 3950X in the laptop are only separated by a few percentage points and by and large, it's up there with a desktop Ryzen 5 3600X running with 3600MHz DDR4.
    The Ryzen 9 3950X is more of what we loved, with just a little extra sprinkled on top. Where the Ryzen 9 3900X has "only" 12 cores and support for up to 24 concurrent processing threads, the Ryzen ...
    Ryzen 9 3950X is priced 50 percent higher than the 3900X, which might not seem like that big of a deal for 33 percent more cores, but like all of Intel's K-series and X-series CPUs it doesn't ...
    The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 3.5 GHz 16-Core AM4 Processor is a powerful 16-core processor with 32 threads, designed for socket AM4 motherboards. Built with Zen 2 architecture, the third-generation 7nm Ryzen processor offers increased performance compared to its predecessor. It has a base clock speed of 3.5 GHz and can reach a max boost clock speed of 4.7 GHz.

    Related Comments

    A
    aah1357 July 19, 2020
    Transferred the OS drive from Intel to an AMD system. System posts, but Windows doesn't load on cold boot.
    Built a new system based on AMD 3950x (Asus Crosshair VIII Hero mobo). Transferred my old SSD (Samsung 850 Pro) to the new system (SATA # 1 slot). System posts on cold boot, but I have to restart the computer for Windows 10 (1903) to run (every time). Mobo code is "AA." Any thought why this is? Many Thanks.
    Old System was running on ASUS Maximus VIII Formula and Intel 6600K cpu .
    D
    DSzymborski November 19, 2010
    The next step would be to properly install Windows rather than cutting corners. Unless you have a very specific Windows to Go install, which you would know if you did (you have to choose to install such a thing and it's found mainly on Enterprise versions), Windows is not meant to be modular in this way. Windows 10 tries it best to find the drivers because Microsoft knows that people like to take the lazy way, but it frequently doesn't work at all or simply leaves vague performance issues for months.
    A
    aah1357 July 14, 2020
    Help me choose between two used Corsair PSUs
    Hi all,,

    I'm putting a new system together (ASUS Cross Hair VIII + AMD 3950x + 32GB RAM + Corsair's H115i AIO). I also will use my current GC - an ASUS GTX1080.

    Now, in my old unit I have a Corsair AX1200i (which I bought in early 2016). That unit has been on about 40% of the days since installation, and sometimes has stayed on for a few days straight. I also have a regular Corsair RM850 (not an X or i) that I bought about a year later for a firewall project. This thing was on for about almost a year continuously. When I scrapped that project in 2018, I took the PSU out and shelved it since then.

    The question is, for the new system which one would you guys go with?
    H
    Hellfire13 April 20, 2016
    Of Course the AXi, period. Its top of the line premium quality and have the best capacitors, transistors, inductors, etc. It is a Tier A unit and best suited for your new machine...
    https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/1116640-psucultists-psu-tier-list/
    B
    barnyard80 July 13, 2020
    Noctua NF-A14 PWM Industrial or Noctua NF-A14 PWM for Meshify C Case?
    Which of these would be more suitable for an air cooled 3950x in a Fractal Meshify C case?

    - Noctua NF-A14 PWM Industrial
    - Noctua NF-A14 PWM

    I've read that the Industrial fan is not suitable for normal users as it is louder. However, can it be slowed down enough so that it is silent?

    Are there any articles showing whether or not the Industrial fan would lead to better cooling or not? I have done a Google but can't find any.
    P
    Phaaze88 December 30, 2016
    I've been there mate. Don't do it.
    I ran with the IPPCs for around a year... it's pointless. Sure, I set fan curves, running them just like they were the regular Noctua fans, only running them at max speed during stress tests, for obvious reasons.

    If one never, or seldom, runs them at max, then what's the point? None really. That extra horsepower is wasted, as well as your money.
    I was curious, so I don't regret that part.

    How'd it turn it out, you may wonder? Well, it was laughable. I did get lower thermals, at the cost of a crap-ton of more noise.
    1)The gains in gpu thermals were noteworthy, with an obvious caveat: Before I installed the Kraken G12 + Celsius S36 on it, I was already achieving thermals below 65C year-round, but I ran the gpu's fans at 100% when playing games or benchmarks, etc.
    When I ran those IPPC 3000s at 100% as well, I could get thermals into 50C, but then I was sitting next to a bloody jet. It was already running at a very cool 60-ishC, so what's 10C(give or take a few C) when I can't even hear the game?

    2)The gains in cpu thermals were horrible. I had mounted a couple of NF-A14 IPPC 3000s onto my NH-D15S heatsink.
    I think I had gotten a 2 - maybe 3C gain, MAX, with those things running at 100%, and I came to understand why:
    The heatsink/radiators are already designed with a particular fan in mind, and thus run best with the fan they came with - in most cases. The size of the gaps between the fins affect the airflow and how much pressure is needed.
    Take Thermalright's Le Grand Macho RT and their Silverarrow IB-E Extreme Rev. B as an example of 2 extremes. Note the size of the gaps in the finstack and the kind of fans they run with - both are rated for 320TDP too.
    Now, say you were to take their fans and swap them. Both will actually perform worse as a result.
    The gaps in the LGMRT already allow plenty of air through, so the Silverarrow's high rpm fans do very little in this case, except for adding more noise.
    The LGMRT's fan lacks 'umph' to push air easily though the Silverarrow's narrower finstack, so it performs worse thermally - it did become a little quieter though!
    NH-D15/S: Optimized for silence and performance at moderate fan speeds. The IPPCs at max speed created a backflow of air of sorts to occur, reducing the effectiveness of the faster fans.
    Also, the sides of the D15/S heatsink are sealed, not open, optimizing them for better front to back airflow - not to say that top exhaust fans don't help(they do), but they're less effective than with open heatsinks.

    That's my experience and testing with the IPPC 3000s - both 120 and 140mm models, in 3 different chassis.
    They are for EXACTLY what Noctua said they are for: Industrial applications. I would not recommend them for anything else.
    C
    connor.j2000 July 02, 2020
    Ryzen vs Intel
    Hi all,

    I'm putting together a high budget build for a friend and simply not make my mind up on the CPU. After doing some research, I am leaning towards AMD's Ryzen 9 3900x - this is partly due to reports that Intel's 1200 socket is only going to be used for two generations, meaning AMD may be a more future proof option. But also, price vs performance seems better with AMD.

    However, this is a gaming pc and from what I can tell, Intel is still king when it comes to gaming performance.

    Current prices are as follows:

    Ryzen 9 3900x - £433.98
    Ryzen 9 3950x - £689.99 (not ideal)

    Intel i9-9900k - £449.99
    Intel i9-10900k - £529.98

    These chips will be cooled by a Corsair H150i Pro XT and partnered with an ASUS RTX 2080 SUPER STRIX GAMING and 32GB of DDR4-3600MHz memory.

    The idea behind the build is to be as good as it can be right now, with the option to upgrade going forward.

    Yes, I know the new 3080 cards are coming out soon but my friend doesn't want to wait unfortunately.

    Any suggestions? Would be massively appreciated!
    R
    Rdslw August 01, 2017
    3900x will not be suported for very long, its platofrm that will be replaced in 2021 so you will get 1 or 2 more cpu gens that fits the socket and new board, and that's it. Then we will get am5 with ddr5 support.
    so if you would try go get on am4 3 years ago, it would still can take 3900x now, but soon support for this socket will end.

    its by few %. If all she want is pure gaming fps intel will be stronger.
    if you want either good price to performance or she will stream, amd will do better.

    going for ryzen9 for gaming is an overkill, very little games benefit from this.
    I would go for 3700x/3800x as its already plenty for games (unless she streams, then 3900x)
    and use cash for more storage.
    also ryzen really likes fast ram, so consider 4200 if they are not more than 25% pricier than 3600
    B
    barnyard80 June 19, 2020
    Does B550-PLUS Motherboard Have Fans
    Do B550-Plus motherboards have fans on them? I've recently noticed that X570 motherboards all have chipset fans.

    In particular, I am thinking of this one: ASUS® TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

    Would that be good enough to run a non-overclocked 3950x?
    D
    Darkbreeze June 24, 2014
    No, they do not come standard with chipset fans.

    Based on the Bit-tech review, it should be fine with a non-overclocked 3950x, but I'd plan to include a decent aftermarket cooler like the Thermalright True Spirit Direct 140 or something equivalent, because the stock cooler is not going to make you a happy person once you hear it droning along with it's up-down, up-down, monotonous humming at exactly the frequency that will annoy the bejesust out of you.
    J
    jfletcher94 June 15, 2020
    Cannot install Windows 10?
    I am trying to install Windows10 on a newly built computer, but it keeps failing. I get as far as selecting the disk, the installer loads the next page (showing progress of 0%), and then I immediately get the error:

    "Windows could not prepare the computer to boot into the next phase of installation. To install Windows, restart the installation."

    It seems that the error occurs right when the actual installation is about to start.

    I have updated the motherboard to the latest (non-beta) BIOS, removed all extra hardware, recreated the installation USB and attempted to use both GPT and MBR. Does anyone have anything that might help?

    Hardware
    • MSI MEG x570 Unify
    • Ryzen 9 3950X
    • Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1 TB
    Edit: Using Windows 10 version 2004
    J
    jfletcher94 June 11, 2020
    I managed to install Windows. The problem must have been something in the installation media. After carefully recreating it one more time, the installation was successful. I am not sure exactly what went wrong the first few times, but I suspect it's something to do with how the install.wim is split across multiple swm files.

    TLDR: if you are creating a Windows install USB on a mac, be super careful about following the instructions exactly: https://alexlubbock.com/bootable-windows-usb-on-mac
    T
    TheRat92 May 21, 2020
    Need help with multiple BSOD: all related with ntoskrnl.exe
    SOLVED: I ended up getting new RAM and not a single BSOD since then.

    Hello guys,

    First of all, thanks so much for the help.

    Since the last week, I've been getting BSODs, and I'm not sure what to do anymore. Usually of this kind:

    PAGE_FAULT_IN_NONPAGED_AREA
    Code: 0x00000050
    Caused by Driver: ntoskrnl.exe

    MEMORY_MANAGEMENT
    Code: 0x0000001a
    Caused by Driver: ntoskrnl.exe

    SYSTEM-SERVICE_EXCEPTION
    Code: 0x0000003b
    Caused by Driver: ntoskrnl.exe

    IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL
    Code: 0x0000000a
    Caused by Driver: ntoskrnl.exe

    What I've tried so far:
  • MemTest86: 6 runs overnight with no errors
  • Windows Memory Diagnostic tool: 2 runs, no errors
  • Windows 10 clean reinstall
  • sfc /scannow, etc
  • chkdsk /f, etc
  • Resetting BIOS to default/optimized settings (no overclock and nothing fancy activated that might cause system instability)
  • Disabling Windows pagefile (still got BSODs)
  • Any ideas? I'm desperated.

    Specs:
    • CPU: Ryzen 3950X (default clocks and voltages)
    • RAM: 32 GB DDR4 @3600 MHz (default timings, etc)
    • MOBO: MSI MEG X570 Unify
    • GPU: Nvidia 2070 Super (default clocks, etc)
    • HDD1: 1 TB Nvme PCIe 4.0 M.2 2280 (where Windows is installed and pagefile is located by default )
    • HDD2: 1 TB SSD SATA (downloads, other unimportant data, etc)
    • HDD3: 256 GB SSD SATA (had Ubuntu previously installed in it, but ended up formatting it, I might remove it later since I'm not using it)
    Thanks in advance for helping me!
    P
    Pijmzhchus May 19, 2020
    Will my B350 board support Zen 3?
    I´ve read that B450 and X470 boards will get Zen 3 support. I just wanna know if my board will support it. It´s MSI Gaming Pro Carbon B350. Right now I have R5 1600 (not AF) and it´s fine, but in the future I will upgrade it for sure. Since it seems I can´t upgrade to Zen 3 (please tell me of I´m wrong) I will upgrade to 3900X or 3950X. Can you also tell me if this motherboard can run 3950X? The motherboard has some really good VRMs for B350 board I read. It´s listed here: https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/support/B350-GAMING-PRO-CARBON#support-cpu but I´m not sure. Will 3900X or 3950X be able to keep up with next gen games? Games like AC:Odyssey already are very CPU hungry. Thanks to anyone who writes something
    S
    siaan312 June 15, 2017
    No, it won't support zen 3 (ryzen 4th gen)
    it does and will support the 3950X

    and yes, a high end zen 2 cpu will be good for quite a while unless amd or intel pull something out of a rabbit hat.
    T
    Tigerhawk30 May 14, 2020
    Cooling an R9 3950X with a single fan 120mm AIO...?
    Good day all,

    So, I'm toying with the idea of replacing my current 2700X with a 3950X and only making that change (no new case, which is a specific variable here). After searching Google results, I'm not finding much in the way of answers on this one.

    After looking at specifics and seeing the AMD recommendation of liquid cooling only on a 3950X, I've been comparing AIOs for use on this CPU. Specifically, I have a Corsair SPEC-02 case (mid tower) that specifies that, with an AIO, only a single 120mm fan will fit, either mounted in the rear exhaust or in the forward exhaust due to issues with RAM/CPU clearance.

    Is there any single fan 120mm AIO that would do at least an adequate job in cooling such a beast?

    Like I said, I'm only toying with the idea and haven't committed to it at all...in the research phase more than anything else.

    Thank you in advance!
    E
    EndEffeKt_24 March 27, 2019
    My answer to this has two parts. Like I tried to state earlier I want to make clear that I am absolutely not favour 120 mm AIOs at all, with the exception being SFF-cases with severe height restrictions for cpu coolers like < 55 mm. Your 120 mm AIO will get outperformed by any mediocre mid-sized Aircooler, costs more, is louder and on top of that has a shorter lifespan. Go Air in that case you got.

    Part two. If you want to absolutely use a 120 mm AIO I would not go with more than a R7 3700x unless you know what you are doing, absolutely need the extra cores and want to tinker with voltage, powertargets, boost behaviour. It is do-able with 16 cores, but the question is why would you do it?
    A
    AtotehZ April 30, 2020
    New Office workstation, built around 3950x
    Hello,

    I've been asked by my father to put together a PC for their coder at work. He uses:
    • Compiling(almost everything under the sun)
    • Multiple VMWare
    • Sometimes SQL Servers for testing
    • 4 Monitors
    The theme for the build is "as cheap as possible without bottlenecking the CPU".

    I was sent this list:
    PCPartPicker Part List

    CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 3.5 GHz 16-Core Processor (£679.99 @ Amazon UK)
    CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-L12S 55.44 CFM CPU Cooler (£44.08 @ Amazon UK)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 UD ATX AM4 Motherboard (£149.97 @ Amazon UK)
    Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3200 Memory (£160.91 @ Amazon UK)
    Storage: Samsung 970 Evo 500 GB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive (£100.04 @ BT Shop)
    Video Card: XFX Radeon RX 580 8 GB GTS XXX ED Video Card (£149.99 @ CCL Computers)
    Total: £1284.98
    Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
    Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-04-30 14:25 BST+0100

    I don't agree with the cooler at all and I'm not sure the VRM on the motherboard, is suitable for a 3950x. I'm looking for alternatives myself as well.

    Aside from that PSU and CASE is needed:
    The PSU does not need to leave a ton of headroom.
    The CASE has to be as small as possible for an ATX, discreet and grey or black, no side window.

    Any suggestions for optimization are welcome. I'm aware he may need to shell out a bit more on the motherboard and cooler, but try to keep the rest within the same price range.

    Hope you can help me out.
    M
    Mandark September 13, 2002
    Looks like a GREAT build! Just what he will need. I would not go below a 3950X for any professional work, despite what many others may say, especially when you need all that performance and IPC for many VMs like we do at work on a single workstation. That workload demands the best. You can get away with less but the 3950X is the shiz right now. best of the best.

    we have put many 3950X boxes to work here doing just that development and testing stuff. Those boxes rule

    Get a GOOD QUALITY PSU dude, don't be afraid to spend a bit on a good SeaSonic or EVGA or better unit. I recommend the Gold too for max efficiency.

    Lian-Li has some nice all aluminum cases that would be a perfect fit. Easy to work with, never cuts your hands, no tools required, lasts a lifetime and can be reused. I would not recommend too small a case as cooling could be an issue
    H
    Hakon909 April 22, 2020
    I need help asap
    Okey were to start, I just upgraded my PC I got a new MOBO and CPU and I'm in trouble with windows I can't boot into it after I created a boot drive on my m.2 NVMe drive,
    So I tried both m.2 slots same problem as soon as I create the windows boot drive and it restart and is about to load to windows the PC blue screens and when it turns on again its stuck in a loop of unexpected restart press ok to restart.
    It happens with both my m.2 drives and both my 240gb ssd's and yes I only have one m.2 in the PC when creating the boot drive and nothing else :/

    So I have tried a lot of things I have been trying to fix this for the past 24 hours, but no progress
    So now I need your help I don't know what to do.
    If you need more info please comment and just ask.

    CPU: ryzen 9 3950x
    MOBO: Asus TUF gaming x570-plus (wi-fi)
    Ram: 32gb from corsair
    GPU: 2080 ti strix from Asus
    Psu: gigabyte 1000w sumo
    Storage: 1x Samsung 970 evo plus 500gb(main one) 1x Samsung 970 evo plus 250gb 2x corsair force LE 240gb

    Sorry for bad English, from Iceland
    H
    Hakon909 April 22, 2020
    While windows was installing I got a blue screen and "BUGCODE_NDIS_Driver". I can't boot into windows. I have an Asus Tuf Gaming plus wifi x570 motherboard with a ryzen 3950x. After the blue screen appears I am given the standard "the computer restarted unexpectedly..." message while the Asus TUF logo is in the background.

    I have tried everything or at least I thought so,
    To fix it I went to bios and disabled the wifi and bluetooth and everything worked like a charm I'm posting this here so for who ever googles the problem can hopefully see this because I know I was not the only one with this problem.
    G
    gsaddler April 10, 2020
    Ask about a GPU advice for my bulid..
    So, I need advice that I’ve built a computer graphics, digital art, video game and multi-media workstation for programs like Maya, 3D studio Max, Krita, Medibang Paint, Adobe software, Corel painter and studying gaming engines (ex-unreal engine 4).. Help me make changes to make this PC more powerful

    Ryzen 9 3900x with a Ninja Scythe Cooler
    Gigabyte x570 arous elite mobo
    40GB Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 ram @ 3000mhz (16GB + 3 @ 8GB)
    XFX Radeon 7
    500GB 850 Evo SSD
    4TB WD Black Hard Drive
    850w Power Supply

    Thinking of getting a Nvidia RTX 2070 super, 2080 or 2080 super, adding a stick of 16GB ram (2 @ 16GB & 2 @ 8GB) and upgrade to a Ryzen 9 3950x cpu.
    C
    cryoburner October 08, 2011
    Are you saying you already own a Radeon VII, or do you mean some other card? On average, a 2070 SUPER should perform rather similar to that card in most games (though that can vary depending on the game engine), and the 2080 and 2080 SUPER won't be too much faster (not much more than 10 to 15% respectively), and they only have half the VRAM of a Radeon VII, which may or may not be relevant to your work. The RTX 20-series cards do provide some hardware acceleration for raytracing though, which you might want to experiment with.

    About the only significant upgrade from a Radeon VII at this time would be a 2080 Ti, but those are priced in the $1100+ range. If you already have a Radeon VII, it might be worth waiting until later in the year, when new high-end graphics cards from AMD and Nvidia are expected to launch.
    A
    AtotehZ March 23, 2020
    New system for Gaming+Streaming, max $5000
    Hey,
    I made a topic yesterday for a guy I'm putting a computer together for. He changed his mind about the budget, so I'm posting mostly the same topic, but with a very different budget.
    His own words about the requirements are now "RTX 2080ti, Ryzen 9 3950x, and whatever goes with that".

    Approximate Purchase Date: Within 2 months, possibly a few weeks.

    Budget Range: No real limit, but within reason. Let's say $5000 for now, but go less if there's no reason to go there.

    System Usage from Most to Least Important: Gaming+Streaming, primarily racing.

    Are you buying a monitor: No

    Your Monitor Resolution: 1400p, will go triple monitor for racing games in the future.

    Parts to Upgrade: All hardware except peripherals

    Do you need to buy OS: No

    Preferred Website(s) for Parts: It's bought in the UK

    Parts Preferences: It has to be AMD Ryzen 9 3950x and Nvidia RTX 2080ti. Some focus should also be on SSD speeds as he uses it to stream online and it'll decrease load times. Aside from that, pick the parts that are either necessary or compliment the 3950x and 2080ti.

    Overclocking: Not necessarily

    SLI or Crossfire: No

    Sorry for the inconvenience of posting 2 topics so similar after each other, but circumstances changed and mixing the 2 would've been a mess.

    Hope you can help me out.
    J
    jeremyj_83 August 23, 2017
    I don't think you need any extra case fans. https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fractal-design-define-7 They test things using stock fan configurations.

    I second getting a high end monitor. Have your friend look into ultrawide monitors for racing games. Samsung makes a 5120x1440 monitor that would be awesome for flight simulators or racing, heck even FPS' would have an awesome field of view.