Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | AM4 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 5 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2017 Model | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Price | 399 USD | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Cores | 8 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 16 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 3.4 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 3.8 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 4 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 95 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 16 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Price-Value Score | 65 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 58 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 48 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 82 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 35.8 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 17.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 8.9 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 38/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Ryzen 7 1700X is one of AMD's high-end Desktop processors. It was released in 2017 with 8 cores and 16 threads. With base clock at 3.4GHz, max speed at 3.8GHz, and a 95W power rating. The Ryzen 7 1700X is based on the Summit Ridge 14nm family and is part of the Ryzen 7 series.
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X marks yet another blast from Team AMD, ramping up the intensity of the AMD vs Intel processor war. Still, though, there’s more than just core counts when it comes to a mainstream processor, as single-core performance needs to be on point, especially if you’re hoping to play the best PC games.
Now, we're asking ourselves whether or not the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X finally dethrones the Core i7-7700K as the de facto ruler of the mainstream processors. Ultimately, it depends: the Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't reach the same single-core performance as Intel, but we're starting to see more games adopt multi-threaded CPUs, so that doesn't matter as much.
Over the last couple years, AMD has been reaching for dominance in the desktop CPU world, and with the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X, it's finally there.
AMD's Zen series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.
As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.
But, like most humans, if you do things other than gaming, the Ryzen 7 1700X offers a better mixture of performance in single- and multi-threaded applications. The Ryzen 7 1700X offers twice the threads of the price-comparable Core i7-7700K, and it wields them to great effect in threaded workloads. As such, rendering and encoding remain a strong suit of the Ryzen 7 chips, and AMD's improvements to AVX throughput have yielded impressive results.
What this all means is that the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Ryzen 7 1700X.
If you're mostly playing games on your PC, you will be happy buying either processor. Both proved to be solid options and are evenly matched with a slight advantage to the Intel chip if you don't tune up the Core i7 processor. The base performance we showed for the Ryzen 7 1700X can be achieved with $90 memory, while the Core i7-7700K will require $110 - $120 memory in order to enable the frame rates shown here. It’s not a big cost difference and right now with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 you’ll more than likely become GPU limited.
Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 8-core desktop processor that was released in Mar 2017. AMD offers the Ryzen 7 1700X without integrated graphics. It runs $399 shipped and is ideal for those that plan on using it a system with a dedicated graphics card.
One of the nice things about the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X up for $399 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 95W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $399 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Core i7-7700K 4-Core unlocked desktop processor with Intel HD Graphics 630 graphics ($339 shipped).
Ryzen 7 hasn’t had the smoothest entrance into the computing world with lackluster gaming and some CPU temperatures high enough to raise concerns. But after a month of optimizations plus new drivers and BIOS updates, Ryzen 7 seems to have bypassed those same growing pains.
Now the biggest question is can AMD’s Ryzen 7 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 82% in our benchmarks.
Regardless of those external factors, the Ryzen 7 1700X proves it has the chops to be your main gaming system and a just as effective media creation platform – two things that are becoming intrinsically connected in this age of live-streaming, eSports and uploading gameplay videos.
The Ryzen 7 1700X clocks up to 3.8Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 3.9GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent high-end chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade X370, X470, X570 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Ryzen 7 CPUs, AMD's attack on Intel now extends down into the high-end with its Ryzen 7 1700X processors, which the company is making available as of Mar 2017.
Right out of the gate, Ryzen 7 should sell for $399, going up against Intel's almost-$339 Core i7-7700K. In threaded workloads, the 8-core Ryzen 7 should enjoy an advantage against Intel's 4-core models. Of course, AMD doesn't give you integrated graphics like Intel does, but for enthusiasts building cheap gaming PCs, it isn't much of a draw anyway.
Like all other Summit Ridge chips, the Ryzen 7-series CPUs drop into any Socket AM4 motherboard. But most will find a home on boards equipped with the A320 chipset, which has provisions for overclocking and offers plenty of connectivity options. Unlike Intel, AMD plans to utilize its current socket until 2023, so upgrading to future models shouldn't require a new motherboard.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.3 | 254 FPS
|
248.6 FPS
|
174.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.4 | 237 FPS
|
232 FPS
|
163.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.4 | 229.3 FPS
|
220.2 FPS
|
141 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.4 | 220.1 FPS
|
215.3 FPS
|
151.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.8 | 211.5 FPS
|
206.8 FPS
|
145.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.3 | 208.4 FPS
|
200.2 FPS
|
128 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7.6 | 197.9 FPS
|
186.7 FPS
|
123.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 5.8 | 189.4 FPS
|
182 FPS
|
116.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 10.7 | 186.3 FPS
|
182.2 FPS
|
128.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.4 | 185.5 FPS
|
176.1 FPS
|
114.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.7 | 174.6 FPS
|
165.8 FPS
|
107.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.6 | 172.5 FPS
|
166 FPS
|
114 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.1 | 172.4 FPS
|
162.7 FPS
|
107.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.6 | 166.5 FPS
|
158.8 FPS
|
110.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.1 | 147.9 FPS
|
140.8 FPS
|
94.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.2 | 138.3 FPS
|
131.3 FPS
|
85.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.8 | 131.9 FPS
|
124.5 FPS
|
82.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 20.6 | 121.1 FPS
|
118 FPS
|
78.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 11 | 117.9 FPS
|
114.9 FPS
|
76.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.1 | 116.4 FPS
|
111.3 FPS
|
71.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.5 | 114.5 FPS
|
110.7 FPS
|
75.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.7 | 108.1 FPS
|
104.7 FPS
|
70.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.5 | 107 FPS
|
103.3 FPS
|
68.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.9 | 103.2 FPS
|
99.2 FPS
|
64.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 29.2 | 102.6 FPS
|
100 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.9 | 102.5 FPS
|
99.6 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.6 | 102.4 FPS
|
98.5 FPS
|
64.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.9 | 101.2 FPS
|
96.6 FPS
|
63.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.9 | 96.9 FPS
|
92.6 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 8 | 94.8 FPS
|
92.1 FPS
|
61 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.3 | 94.2 FPS
|
88.9 FPS
|
58.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 12.9 | 92.9 FPS
|
88.9 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.5 | 92.9 FPS
|
88.3 FPS
|
57.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.4 | 90.5 FPS
|
85.9 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.6 | 89.3 FPS
|
83.1 FPS
|
55.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.2 | 89.3 FPS
|
85.9 FPS
|
58.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.7 | 88.7 FPS
|
83.9 FPS
|
56.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.7 | 84.5 FPS
|
77.4 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.2 | 83 FPS
|
78.8 FPS
|
51.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.2 | 80.5 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
49.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.4 | 79.5 FPS
|
71.2 FPS
|
46 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.6 | 78.3 FPS
|
73.7 FPS
|
47.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 19.9 | 75.5 FPS
|
69.6 FPS
|
48.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.6 | 75.3 FPS
|
71.5 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.5 | 74.6 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.4 | 73 FPS
|
67.8 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 13.8 | 72.5 FPS
|
67 FPS
|
43.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 71 FPS
|
66.4 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.7 | 70.5 FPS
|
66.9 FPS
|
43.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.8 | 68.7 FPS
|
63.7 FPS
|
41.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.4 | 66.9 FPS
|
62.7 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 10.3 | 63.1 FPS
|
58.7 FPS
|
38.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.5 | 63 FPS
|
58.9 FPS
|
38.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.7 | 59.8 FPS
|
54.3 FPS
|
34.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.3 | 57.4 FPS
|
55.8 FPS
|
37.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.9 | 54.9 FPS
|
51.2 FPS
|
33.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.7 | 54.4 FPS
|
49.4 FPS
|
31.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.1 | 54.1 FPS
|
49.8 FPS
|
32.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.3 | 53 FPS
|
48.1 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 12.5 | 52.1 FPS
|
49.9 FPS
|
33.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 19.7 | 50.6 FPS
|
46.2 FPS
|
31.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11.1 | 49.3 FPS
|
47 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.2 | 49.1 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
29.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.5 | 48.7 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 9.1 | 47.4 FPS
|
45.1 FPS
|
29.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.6 | 46.7 FPS
|
42.8 FPS
|
27.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7.2 | 45.9 FPS
|
41.6 FPS
|
28.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 9 | 44.6 FPS
|
42 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.4 | 44.3 FPS
|
41.1 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.9 | 43.7 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.6 | 41.8 FPS
|
38.8 FPS
|
25.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.6 | 39 FPS
|
36.4 FPS
|
23.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 7 | 32.8 FPS
|
30.3 FPS
|
20 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8.4 | 29.5 FPS
|
27.3 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.8 | 29.2 FPS
|
27 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.9 | 28.8 FPS
|
26.7 FPS
|
17.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 9.8 | 28.5 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
16.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.1 | 28.2 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 6.9 | 24.5 FPS
|
22.5 FPS
|
14.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.4 | 22.7 FPS
|
20.6 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7.1 | 22.3 FPS
|
20.2 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.8 | 21.8 FPS
|
19 FPS
|
12.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.9 | 21.7 FPS
|
18.3 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 7 | 20 FPS
|
18.2 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.7 | 19.3 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
10.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5 | 15.8 FPS
|
14.5 FPS
|
9.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.2 | 15.1 FPS
|
13.8 FPS
|
8.5 FPS
|
Computer Type: desktop
GPU: gtx 750ti 2gb ddr5
CPU: ryzen 7 1700x
Motherboard: a320m-s2h gigabyte mobo
RAM: adata 16gb single 3000mhz
PSU: antech 450w
Case: antech
Operating System & Version: I.E. Windows 10 Pro Version 1909
GPU Drivers:idk
pleas help me undervolting my cpu help me
I don't know much about early versions of ryzen, but with my 3600x i can only apply -0.078V offset. Anything more than that and i lose stability.
Start with low decrements to voltage and always stress test your cpu. Also, do multiple benchmarks b to see if you are not losing too much performance.
I saw you have a A320 mobo. Check if your bios give you option to change voltage or apply negative offset.
Computer Type: Desktop (custom)
GPU: Sapphire RX 570 Nitro+
CPU: Ryzen 7 1700x (3.9GHz, 1.374V)
Motherboard: Gigabyte b350m ds3h
RAM: corsair vengeance lpx ddr4 2x8GB @ 2400Mhz (xmp)
PSU: Corsair vs550 (550w)
Case: Cheap unknown brand with 2 intakes and no exhaust
Operating System & Version: Arch Linux
GPU Drivers: Mesa 20.1.3-1
Chipset Drivers: amd-ucode 20200519.8ba6fa6-1
Background Applications: Blender
Description of Original Problem: It thermal throttles at 80 degrees Tdie and 100 Degrees Tctl when I want it to use Tdie to determine throttling levels
Troubleshooting: I've dived into the BIOS with the settings that I understand and can find no settings to change this.
Basically I wish for linux to use Tdie to throttle my CPU instead of TCtl but don't know how I'd go about doing that.
If I understand correctly, it's not the OS that does the throttling, but the CPU itself. So nothing you can do!
Current build:
PCPartPicker Part List
Type Item Price CPU AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4 GHz 8-Core Processor - CPU Cooler Noctua NH-D15 SE-AM4 82.52 CFM CPU Cooler - Motherboard Asus PRIME X370-PRO ATX AM4 Motherboard - Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3200 Memory - Storage Samsung 850 EVO-Series 500 GB 2.5" Solid State Drive - Video Card Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 XT 8 GB PULSE Video Card - Case Fractal Design Meshify C ATX Mid Tower Case - Power Supply EVGA BQ 750 W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-modular ATX Power Supply - Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts Total $0.00 Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-04-05 06:20 EDT-0400I've recently come across a need of more ram capacity, however I'm unsure whether I want to just buy 2 more sticks of 8Gb, or if I want to replace the RAM entirely. And if I'd be replacing it, I'm not sure whether to stick with the type and brand I have or try something else.
One thing that might be worth noting is that I haven't been able to get a stable overclock with the current setup. The max I can go is 3.8 which is the boost speed... Whether this is the problem of the RAM, or the CPU, or my lack of knowledge about OC is debatable.
So my question is, How should I go about gaining more capacity? Obviously buying 2 more 8GB sticks is the cheapest option, whether it's the most ideal though, I'm not sure
buy 2 more 8 sticks. ur original ram is fine i think
I've read that using all 4 slots can decrease speed and stability. Not sure how true is that, or to what degree it could affect my system
Hey guys im pretty noob when it comes to OC. I bought this pc couple years ago and back then OC'd my ryzen 7 1700 to 3.8ghz.
However I noticed through userbenchmark.com that my ram which is G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB is running at 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz which to me seems weird since shouldnt my ram be running at 3000mhz?
As you can see that im pretty noob when it comes to tech stuff. So after this I looked around and found this XMP profile stuff which apparently I should turn on in BIOS. I turned it on and dram frequency changed to 2933mhz but my PC wont boot with that, I tried to lowering it to 2800mhz but still got bluescreend.
SO im asking what should I do, I really havent had problems with my PC but now im bothered by this XMP / ram stuff.
Also if u need here is the userbenchmark where u can see my pc specs too https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/28800432
edit: another couple pictures from CPUZ
cpu: https://i.imgur.com/3oUZNMF.png memory: https://i.imgur.com/tGc1350.png
thanks for help
Are the RAM sticks in the correct slots? Most often it is slot 2 and 4, check mobo manual.
And it's a Ryzen 1700, non-X.
1.36 volts is quite high, I run mine at 1.34v for 3.8 Ghz. And mine is among the highest voltages I've seen and heard so probably crap silicon. Most get by with 1.33v or lower.
Ah okey. Im not sure what the correct slots are, found this on manual https://i.imgur.com/mk3Ncbo.png but idk what slots should I use A2 and B2? Also will try to lower the voltage.
does the picture mean my mobo doesnt support higher than 2667mhz memory ?
If the kit has one, try set the second XMP profile.
technically, the 3000 rated xmp profile is an overclock that the kit was guaranteed to hit, when using a certain configuration x alongside certain components y. First gen Ryzen is known to be picky with RAM speeds/timings, not to mention your mobo may not play nice with those configs, in which case a bios update may help.
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
The Ryzen 7 1700X offers a simple path to overclocked performance that matches its more expensive 1800X counterpart. The 1700X lags behind Intel's faster quad-cores in many gaming applications ...
The Ryzen 7 1700X is around $60 cheaper than its flagship Ryzen 7 1800X stablemate, yet offers achingly similar performance. So it ought to be the perfect example of AMD’s new Zen architecture ...
We tested the Flagship processor, now we review the Ryzen 7 1700X Processor that is a 100 bucks cheaper. The 8-core processor will be tested on an X370 motherboard. ... Overclocking With The Ryzen ...
The Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 7 1700 are identical to their big brother the Ryzen 7 1800X in every way aside from base clocks and boost speeds. The Ryzen 7 1700 is the only one of the three that doesn’t have the XFR (eXtended Frequency Range) technology which will raise the base and boost clocks by 100 MHz as long as your cooling is sufficient.
hey fellow redditors i need help in udervolting the ryzen 7 1700x help me out i am a noob
currently using it with a320m s2h gigabyte mobo and 16gb 3000mhz adata ram i know it doesn't have voltage control but we can do with ryzen master can you tell me best setting to do it