Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | AM4 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2019 Model | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Price | 167 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Number of Cores | 6 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 12 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 3.6 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 4.2 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 4.3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 65 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 7 nm | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
L3 Cache | 32 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 128 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Price-Value Score | 87 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Speed Score | 63 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 47 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 89 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 22.2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 11.1 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 5.5 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 50/100 | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
The Ryzen 5 3600 is one of AMD's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2019 with 6 cores and 12 threads. With base clock at 3.6GHz, max speed at 4.2GHz, and a 65W power rating. The Ryzen 5 3600 is based on the Matisse 7nm family and is part of the Ryzen 5 series.
Ryzen 5 3600 is also the successor of AMD's last gen Ryzen 5 2600 processor that was based on the Zen+ and 12nm process and was released in 2018.
In our mind, the best processors are the ones that deliver outstanding performance at a reasonable price point. And, the Ryzen 5 3600 absolutely nails this concept.
Now, we're asking ourselves whether or not the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 finally dethrones the Core i5-9600 as the de facto ruler of the mainstream processors. Ultimately, it depends: the Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't reach the same single-core performance as Intel, but we're starting to see more games adopt multi-threaded CPUs, so that doesn't matter as much.
AMD Ryzen 5 3rd Generation, and the Zen 2 architecture itself, is notable because it leads 7nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But, there’s a lot more going on under the hood than just a smaller manufacturing node.
One thing that the switch to 7nm silicon has allowed for however, is an increase in cache size. AMD is now describing its L3 and L2 cache in a combined spec of 6 x 512 kB and 32. But, because the 7nm CPU cores are contained within their own chiplets, AMD was able to pack much more in – with a whopping 6 x 512 kB and 32. This is a really big deal, as it allows for much faster performance, especially when you’re shooting for high framerates in 1080p games, and will be especially effective in old esports titles like Counter Strike: Global Offensive.
Finally, the shrink down to 7nm allows for much better energy efficiency. Because of the Zen 2 architecture, AMD Ryzen 5 3 Generation processors like the Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 3500 should be up to 58% more efficient than comparable Intel processors. This isn’t the most noteworthy feature here, but, hey, it should translate to lower electricity bills, and in today’s economy every little bit helps, right?
AMD's Zen 2 series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.
The Ryzen 5 3600 takes the basic ingredients of the Zen 2 microarchitecture, which brings an average of 15% more instructions per cycle (IPC) throughput, and 7nm process and melds them into a high-performance chip that is impressive across our test suite, especially when we factor in the competitive pricing, backward compatibility with most AM4 socket motherboards, unlocked overclocking features, and bundled cooler.
As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.
But, like most humans, if you do things other than gaming, the Ryzen 5 3600 offers a better mixture of performance in single- and multi-threaded applications. The Ryzen 5 3600 offers twice the threads of the price-comparable Core i5-9600, and it wields them to great effect in threaded workloads. As such, rendering and encoding remain a strong suit of the Ryzen 5 chips, and AMD's improvements to AVX throughput have yielded impressive results.
Value seekers who aren't afraid to press the Precision Boost Overdrive button and have sufficient cooling should look to the Ryzen 5 3500 for roughly equivalent performance to the Ryzen 5 3600, particularly if gaming factors heavily into the buying decision. That could save you money, reinforcing our decision to give the Ryzen 5 3500 an Editor's Choice award.
Out of the box, the Ryzen 5 3600 is a better all-arounder than the Core i5-9600 and offers incrementally higher performance than its downstream counterpart. The bundled cooler reduces platform costs, and a wide array of motherboards offers plenty of choices for builders.
AMD Ryzen 5 3 Generation is finally here, and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 might just be the poster child for what this generation of processors has in store for consumers. Sure, it might have stuck with the 6-core, 12-thread setup, which it inherited from its predecessor, the Ryzen 5 2600. However, with the new 7nm manufacturing process, it delivers a far better performance at lower power consumption.
It gets more interesting, however, when you compare the Ryzen 5 3600 to its main competitor. The Intel Core i5-9600 is available for $213, an 6-core processor with no hyperthreading, which means that the Ryzen 5 3600 offers twice the processing threads at a lower price tag. Intel is still king when it comes to single-core performance, but when it comes to multi-core ones, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is the absolute beast.
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600, like the rest of AMD's Matisse processors, is built on a 7nm manufacturing node – the smallest in a commercially available CPU. What this means for most people is lower power consumption and much improved performance at the same time.
This decision to 7nm has brought a beefy 15% boost to IPC (instructions per clock) performance. Effectively, compared to a Ryzen 5 2-Generation processor at the same clock speed, you will get a straight 15% increase in performance. That’s not big enough to be evident in day-to-day workloads, but it does still mean something.
What this all means is that the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Ryzen 5 3600.
Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the Ryzen 5 2600, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.
AMD has been having some trouble as of late which has made it even harder to compete with the incoming wave of Core i5 processors. That has forced the chip maker to be a little more creative and make do with their current product lines. Today we have the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on hand, which in itself isn’t anything new. It’s basically a refreshed Ryzen 5 2600 with a clock speed boost. We say basically because it’s not a straight refresh however, there’s another change.
If you're mostly playing games on your PC, you will be happy buying either processor. Both proved to be solid options and are evenly matched with a slight advantage to the Intel chip if you don't tune up the Core i5 processor. The base performance we showed for the Ryzen 5 3600 can be achieved with $90 memory, while the Core i5-9600 will require $110 - $120 memory in order to enable the frame rates shown here. It’s not a big cost difference and right now with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 you’ll more than likely become GPU limited.
Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core desktop processor that was released in Jun 2019. AMD offers the Ryzen 5 3600 without integrated graphics. It runs $167 shipped and is ideal for those that plan on using it a system with a dedicated graphics card.
One of the nice things about the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 up for $167 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 65W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $167 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Core i5-9600 6-Core unlocked desktop processor with Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics ($213 shipped).
For a 6-core processor, AMD’s $167 flagship Ryzen 5 3600 processor seems downright cheap. On paper, the cost of those 0 extra cores is almost an afterthought when you stack it up against its direct competitor, the $213 6-core Intel Core i5-9600.
Now the biggest question is can AMD’s Ryzen 5 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 89% in our benchmarks.
Regardless of those external factors, the Ryzen 5 3600 proves it has the chops to be your main gaming system and a just as effective media creation platform – two things that are becoming intrinsically connected in this age of live-streaming, eSports and uploading gameplay videos.
The Ryzen 5 3600 clocks up to 4.2Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 4.3GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
If you’ve been looking for an affordable, powerhouse CPU that both works and parties hard, this is it.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Ryzen 5 CPUs, AMD's attack on Intel now extends down into the mid-range with its Ryzen 5 3600 processors, which the company is making available as of Jun 2019.
Although the 65W-rated cooler doesn't feature a copper base or the LEDs found on AMD's higher-end thermal solutions, it does handle Ryzen 5's heat output deftly enough to facilitate XFR-triggered frequencies. This gives you an extra 200 MHz. We were even able to overclock the Ryzen 5 3600 to 4.4 GHz within a reasonable temperature range. The fan also blows down onto the motherboard, which provide additional cooling around the socket. If you need more bling, AMD recently announced that it now offers the LED-equipped cooler separately.
Like all other Matisse chips, the Ryzen 5-series CPUs drop into any Socket AM4 motherboard. But most will find a home on boards equipped with the A320 chipset, which has provisions for overclocking and offers plenty of connectivity options. Unlike Intel, AMD plans to utilize its current socket until 2023, so upgrading to future models shouldn't require a new motherboard.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD Ryzen 5 3600.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 5.2 | 307.8 FPS
|
269.2 FPS
|
181.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 2.8 | 287.3 FPS
|
251.2 FPS
|
169.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 3.6 | 277.8 FPS
|
238.4 FPS
|
146.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 4.5 | 266.8 FPS
|
233.1 FPS
|
157.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.1 | 256.3 FPS
|
223.9 FPS
|
150.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 3.6 | 252.6 FPS
|
216.8 FPS
|
132.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 6.3 | 239.8 FPS
|
202.2 FPS
|
128.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 4.8 | 229.5 FPS
|
197.1 FPS
|
120.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 8.9 | 225.7 FPS
|
197.3 FPS
|
132.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 4.4 | 224.8 FPS
|
190.6 FPS
|
118.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.1 | 211.6 FPS
|
179.5 FPS
|
111.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.8 | 209 FPS
|
179.8 FPS
|
118.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 3.3 | 208.9 FPS
|
176.2 FPS
|
111.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3 | 201.8 FPS
|
172 FPS
|
114.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 3.3 | 179.3 FPS
|
152.4 FPS
|
98.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 3.5 | 167.6 FPS
|
142.1 FPS
|
88.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.1 | 159.8 FPS
|
134.8 FPS
|
85.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 17 | 146.8 FPS
|
127.8 FPS
|
81.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 9.1 | 142.9 FPS
|
124.5 FPS
|
79.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 3.4 | 141.1 FPS
|
120.5 FPS
|
74.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 2.9 | 138.7 FPS
|
119.8 FPS
|
78.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3 | 131 FPS
|
113.4 FPS
|
73.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.4 | 129.7 FPS
|
111.8 FPS
|
71 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.2 | 125.1 FPS
|
107.4 FPS
|
67.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 24.1 | 124.3 FPS
|
108.3 FPS
|
70.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.4 | 124.2 FPS
|
107.9 FPS
|
70.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.2 | 124.1 FPS
|
106.7 FPS
|
66.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.7 | 122.6 FPS
|
104.6 FPS
|
65.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.2 | 117.4 FPS
|
100.3 FPS
|
62.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 6.6 | 114.9 FPS
|
99.8 FPS
|
63.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.4 | 114.2 FPS
|
96.3 FPS
|
61 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 10.6 | 112.6 FPS
|
96.3 FPS
|
62.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 6.2 | 112.6 FPS
|
95.6 FPS
|
59.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.6 | 109.7 FPS
|
93 FPS
|
58 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.6 | 108.2 FPS
|
90 FPS
|
57.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 1.8 | 108.2 FPS
|
93 FPS
|
60.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.1 | 107.5 FPS
|
90.9 FPS
|
58.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 3.9 | 102.4 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
52.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 3.5 | 100.5 FPS
|
85.3 FPS
|
53.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.1 | 97.6 FPS
|
81.6 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 3.6 | 96.4 FPS
|
77 FPS
|
47.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 2.9 | 94.8 FPS
|
79.8 FPS
|
49.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 16.4 | 91.5 FPS
|
75.4 FPS
|
50.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 91.2 FPS
|
77.4 FPS
|
48.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 4.5 | 90.4 FPS
|
75.6 FPS
|
47 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 2.8 | 88.4 FPS
|
73.4 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 11.4 | 87.9 FPS
|
72.6 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.2 | 86 FPS
|
71.9 FPS
|
44.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.7 | 85.5 FPS
|
72.4 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.8 | 83.2 FPS
|
68.9 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 2.8 | 81.1 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 8.5 | 76.5 FPS
|
63.6 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 2.9 | 76.3 FPS
|
63.8 FPS
|
39.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 72.4 FPS
|
58.8 FPS
|
35.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 9.3 | 69.5 FPS
|
60.5 FPS
|
38.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.4 | 66.5 FPS
|
55.4 FPS
|
34.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3 | 65.9 FPS
|
53.4 FPS
|
32.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 8.4 | 65.6 FPS
|
53.9 FPS
|
33.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 3.6 | 64.2 FPS
|
52.1 FPS
|
31.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 10.3 | 63.2 FPS
|
54 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 16.3 | 61.3 FPS
|
50 FPS
|
32.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 9.2 | 59.7 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 4.3 | 59.6 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
30.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 2.9 | 59 FPS
|
48 FPS
|
29.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 7.5 | 57.5 FPS
|
48.8 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3 | 56.5 FPS
|
46.3 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 5.9 | 55.6 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 7.4 | 54 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 6.1 | 53.7 FPS
|
44.5 FPS
|
26.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.2 | 53 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
26.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 2.9 | 50.7 FPS
|
42 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 3.8 | 47.3 FPS
|
39.4 FPS
|
24.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 5.8 | 39.8 FPS
|
32.8 FPS
|
20.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 7 | 35.7 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
17.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.6 | 35.4 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
17.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.8 | 34.9 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
18 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 8.1 | 34.6 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.8 | 34.1 FPS
|
28.1 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 5.7 | 29.7 FPS
|
24.4 FPS
|
14.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 3.6 | 27.5 FPS
|
22.3 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 5.9 | 27 FPS
|
21.8 FPS
|
13.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.6 | 26.5 FPS
|
20.5 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.7 | 26.3 FPS
|
19.9 FPS
|
12.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 5.8 | 24.3 FPS
|
19.8 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.4 | 23.4 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.1 | 19.2 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
9.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.3 | 18.3 FPS
|
14.9 FPS
|
8.8 FPS
|
None of those, the asrock B450M Pro4 is back in stock for a reasonable price.
Not that it really matters much, but wouldn’t the micro-atx motherboard look a little “off” in a mid tower case? Thinking about this motherboard but want to consider the aesthetics in my mid tower.
I got this board its fantastic for what I need it for
SOLVED! exchanged my b550 for an x570 and now temps are perfect.
edit I was using core check for my temps, i downloaded msi afterburner for games, and msi is saying that my temps are way lower than what core check said, 60°c while playing assassins creed oddesy. So which one is right? One says 90 the other 60?
I just bought a ryzen 5 3600, 4 days ago along with; b550 steel legend, 16gb of ddr4 memory, and a Stock wraith stealth cooler (All temps are with glass pannel off) (my intel build in the same case with a stock intel cooler never broke 61°c under heavy load I was previously using an intel build in this case fyi. So anyway, I bought the parts and took out the old system and put in the new parts into my rig. Everything went in no problem, it turns on no problem, boots no problme but I did see that the temp in the bios was around 75°c so I went into the os and my idle temp was around 43°-45° and I figured that was no big deal on the stock cooler. I went to put it under load and boom, in seconds it shot up to 93° then went uo to 97°c which is waaaayyyy to hot for just running cinnabech. I have tried almost everything to fix it including; 1.)I tried re-seeting the cooler.. 5 different times 2.)I tried 2 different thermal paste applications 3 if you count the stock cooler pre-applied paste 3.)adjusting the fan setting in the bios 4.)I made sure the cooler was connected and touching the cpu, I did this by leaving 2 small wake lines in the thermal paste and when attaching the cooler I would pull it back off to see if it smoothed out the wakes and it did, the screws were as tight as they would let me turn them. 5.) I went and warranty replaced the cpu and fan yesterday thinking it could be an issue with the cpu or fan itself.
So the only thing I havent done is exchange the mobo for a new one via warrany, and apparently I was told turn down the stock voltage the mobo provided to the cpu. It pisses me off that I would have to turn down the stock voltage just to get my ryzen cpu to work. I have not adjusted anything in the bios except turning on xmp. I have been using intel since 1999 and this the first amd cpu I have ever bought. The voltage is currently at 1.4blah blah blah. Thank you in advance if you read all this.
"just cinebench"
you do realise the point of cinebench is to stress your cpu as hard as it can right?
97 degrees on cinebench is extremely normal and most of what you're doing will not push your cpu anywhere as close to what cinebench will.
Yes I know that, 97° is very hot cinnabench or not it gets to 93° turning a game on and its getting that hot in seconds, almost instantly
97 is not normal, I peak out at 79 degrees on cinebench, and that’s with the stock cooler
97C in cinebench is normal? According to whom ? Who the fuck told you that?
How are you supposed to use a cpu that gets to 97 C during a 30 second video render?
Yeah, undervolting is usually the first stop to reducing temps once you’ve made sue your CPU cooler is fine.
What are you rooms ambient temps? What’s the airflow like in your PC? Is the PC properly exhausting the hot air?
And Cinebench is a CPU stress test . It’s used to push your CPU to the limit. It’s not a surprise the stock cooler would struggle. Intels stock cooler would struggle even more.
Temp is 67°F in my room ccase air flow is fine, my intel build never got past 61c with the glass on
Its summer and the enviroment can be a big problem for general electronics at all. How many fans do you have on your case? Does air flows as it should be?
I also recommend the same. Lowering voltage from bios should do the trick you are looking for. limiting cpu usage to calm its tits to slow down also should work.
Try to get a better cooler? Look for a beasty fan if you can afford.Or completely go for liquid.
I don't know much about new mobos for amd haven't tried any of them.If its available, mail to the producer of motherboard to get a clear information about situation.Maybe there is something happening with that heat as it should not to be there at the first place at all. Also consider to check some parts including your ports/rams. Hope you get it fixed soon.
Thanks for your advice, I have 3 front Intake fans 1 psu intake fan and 1 exit fan, I planned in getting an aio but I wanted to fix this problem before getting one. Its thermal throttling and has reduced power. Almost everyone I know who has the stock fan has no problems keeping idle at 35°c and keeping load between 65 and 75c idk why mine is so much higher.
Since I have a ryzen and have extensively played with thermals, I get 86° when I absolutely murder my CPU and GPU in parallel for 20 min of sustained load. Your Idle temps are perfect in range, so something in the cooling process seems fishy.
some ideas:
Do all fans spin under load?
CPU cooler - does the CPU fan speed up under load? What are max rpm's in under max load? Is it actually blowing in the CPU?
All fans spin under load, I went into the bios and turned the cpu fan to max and it made almost no difference a few degrees at most. This is with the glass pannel off, and like I said before with my i7 4770k with a stock intel crap cooler and the glass pannel on, it never broke 61°
What case do you have, and what is your fan setup like?
A sama TANK, mesh covered front instead of the stupid glass front that starve it from oxygen. With 3 120's in the front and one exhaust fan in the back plus the psu sucks in air from the botton
my 3600x with stock cooler and mid tower case was too hot around 90ºc
adding more fans or put them to max rpm the glass side panel was always hot and room temperature rise to uncomfortable temps after 10 minutes of gaming
solution for me was a full tower case and a noctua dh15
Hmm, interesting. So I said this before(and I know intel is different) but my intel build in the same case with the terrible stock cooler, never broke 61°c under the heaviest loads with the glass on. So idk it could still be the case but I just don't know anymore
So many different answers and theories that I jyst don't know what to do anymore or who is right or wrong.
Is the cooler fully mounted to the backplate and making full contact with the cpu? I had issues a few months ago mounting the stock cooler and had similar temps, I ended up getting a scythe fuma 2 cooler and that was much easier to mount and fixed all my temp issues.
Thank you for your insight, yes its mounted on there well, I used msi afterburner to track the temperatures and it says I'm at 60c while playing a game.. but core check says I'm at 90c so I don't know which one to belive
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Although the 10600K looks quite good compared to past Intel offerings, this new 6-core, 12-thread processor is coming up against the Ryzen 7 3700X, while AMD’s own 6-core CPU, the Ryzen 5 3600 ...
The Ryzen 5 3600, with its included Wraith Stealth cooler, will set you back $199 (£199, AU$315) if you don’t manage to snag it with any processor deals. But, that still makes it one of the ...
The Ryzen 5 3600 is a popular mid-range processor, meaning that it should be paired with a good mid-range motherboard. For the longest time, that was the B450 motherboard line, with an expectation ...
The Ryzen 5 3600 has slightly lower clock speeds than the 3600X, with its 3.6 GHz base and 4.2 GHz Precision Boost 2 frequencies, a difference of 200 MHz in both measurements.
Buy AMD RYZEN 5 3600 6-Core 3.6 GHz (4.2 GHz Max Boost) Socket AM4 65W 100-100000031BOX Desktop Processor with fast shipping and top-rated customer service.Once you know, you Newegg!
In this review of AMD's new Ryzen 5 3600 CPU, we look at the remainder of Intel's i5 lineup -- primarily composed of the i5-9600K -- and run generational benchmarks versus AMD's older R5 2600 ...
The Ryzen 5 3600XT ($249) is a midrange refresh of a winning desktop CPU that's just today reaching its one-year anniversary on shelves: the Ryzen 5 3600X.The lowest-end of AMD's new-for-2020 ...
The Ryzen 5 3600 performs very well in Rainbow Six Siege, particularly when looking at the 1% low result. Here it was 11% faster than the Core i5-10400 and 20% faster when comparing the Intel ...
We again review a six-core model Ryzen 5 3600 processor, you know, the one without an X. It's 200 Mhz slower on the base and turbo clocks, but a whopping 50 bucks cheaper. Worth it?...
AMD Socket AM4 (X570) Ryzen 7 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X, Ryzen 5 3600, Ryzen 7 2700X: MSI MEG X570 Godlike: 2x 8GB G.Skill Flare DDR4-3200
Need help to narrow down motherboard for ryzen 5 3600
Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE
ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F
ASUS PRIME X570-P