Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | AM4 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 11 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2019 Model | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Price | 160 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 8 Threads | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 3.7 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 3.9 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 3.9 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 65 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 12 nm | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 4 MB | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Price-Value Score | 78 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 57 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 40 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 80 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 41.1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 20.6 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 10.3 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 39/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Ryzen 5 3400G is one of AMD's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2019 with 4 cores and 8 threads. With base clock at 3.7GHz, max speed at 3.9GHz, and a 65W power rating. The Ryzen 5 3400G is based on the Picasso 12nm family and is part of the Ryzen 5 series.
Ryzen 5 3400G is also the successor of AMD's last gen Ryzen 5 2400G processor that was based on the Zen and 14nm process and was released in 2018.
Now, we're asking ourselves whether or not the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G finally dethrones the Core i3-9100 as the de facto ruler of the mainstream processors. Ultimately, it depends: the Ryzen 5 3400G doesn't reach the same single-core performance as Intel, but we're starting to see more games adopt multi-threaded CPUs, so that doesn't matter as much.
AMD Ryzen 5 3rd Generation, and the Zen+ architecture itself, is notable because it leads 12nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But, there’s a lot more going on under the hood than just a smaller manufacturing node.
AMD's Zen+ series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.
The Ryzen 5 3400G takes the basic ingredients of the Zen+ microarchitecture, which brings an average of 15% more instructions per cycle (IPC) throughput, and 12nm process and melds them into a high-performance chip that is impressive across our test suite, especially when we factor in the competitive pricing, backward compatibility with most AM4 socket motherboards, unlocked overclocking features, and bundled cooler.
As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.
But, like most humans, if you do things other than gaming, the Ryzen 5 3400G offers a better mixture of performance in single- and multi-threaded applications. The Ryzen 5 3400G offers twice the threads of the price-comparable Core i3-9100, and it wields them to great effect in threaded workloads. As such, rendering and encoding remain a strong suit of the Ryzen 5 chips, and AMD's improvements to AVX throughput have yielded impressive results.
AMD Ryzen 5 3 Generation is finally here, and the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G might just be the poster child for what this generation of processors has in store for consumers. Sure, it might have stuck with the 4-core, 8-thread setup, which it inherited from its predecessor, the Ryzen 5 2400G. However, with the new 12nm manufacturing process, it delivers a far better performance at lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G was rolled out on Jul 2019 for $160, which puts it in the same general price range as the last-generation Ryzen 5 2400G. This means that at least we're not seeing any considerable price jumps from generation to generation.
It gets more interesting, however, when you compare the Ryzen 5 3400G to its main competitor. The Intel Core i3-9100 is available for $122, an 4-core processor with no hyperthreading, which means that the Ryzen 5 3400G offers twice the processing threads at a lower price tag. Intel is still king when it comes to single-core performance, but when it comes to multi-core ones, the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G is the absolute beast.
This decision to 12nm has brought a beefy 15% boost to IPC (instructions per clock) performance. Effectively, compared to a Ryzen 5 2-Generation processor at the same clock speed, you will get a straight 15% increase in performance. That’s not big enough to be evident in day-to-day workloads, but it does still mean something.
What this all means is that the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Ryzen 5 3400G.
One of the nice things about the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G up for $160 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 65W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
Our look today at the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G showed that it is a very capable processor. A 4-core processor sounds like it would be really under-powered these days, but we were pleasantly surprised with a snappy and very capable system. Having just 4 cores had this processor coming in at the back of the pack for heavily threaded workloads, but it performed better than some of its more expensive siblings in lightly threaded workloads where it shined thanks to its high base clocks.
The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $160 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Core i3-9100 4-Core unlocked desktop processor with Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics ($122 shipped).
Now the biggest question is can AMD’s Ryzen 5 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 80% in our benchmarks.
The Ryzen 5 3400G clocks up to 3.9Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 4GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
If you’ve been looking for an affordable, powerhouse CPU that both works and parties hard, this is it.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Ryzen 5 CPUs, AMD's attack on Intel now extends down into the mid-range with its Ryzen 5 3400G processors, which the company is making available as of Jul 2019.
Although the 65W-rated cooler doesn't feature a copper base or the LEDs found on AMD's higher-end thermal solutions, it does handle Ryzen 5's heat output deftly enough to facilitate XFR-triggered frequencies. This gives you an extra 200 MHz. We were even able to overclock the Ryzen 5 3400G to 4.1 GHz within a reasonable temperature range. The fan also blows down onto the motherboard, which provide additional cooling around the socket. If you need more bling, AMD recently announced that it now offers the LED-equipped cooler separately.
Like all other Picasso chips, the Ryzen 5-series CPUs drop into any Socket AM4 motherboard. But most will find a home on boards equipped with the A320 chipset, which has provisions for overclocking and offers plenty of connectivity options. Unlike Intel, AMD plans to utilize its current socket until 2023, so upgrading to future models shouldn't require a new motherboard.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.9 | 233 FPS
|
240.4 FPS
|
172.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.7 | 217.5 FPS
|
224.3 FPS
|
160.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.8 | 210.3 FPS
|
213 FPS
|
138.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.9 | 202 FPS
|
208.2 FPS
|
149.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 4.1 | 194 FPS
|
200 FPS
|
143.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.7 | 191.2 FPS
|
193.6 FPS
|
126.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 8.3 | 181.5 FPS
|
180.6 FPS
|
121.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 6.3 | 173.8 FPS
|
176 FPS
|
114.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 11.7 | 170.9 FPS
|
176.2 FPS
|
126.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.9 | 170.2 FPS
|
170.3 FPS
|
112.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 4.1 | 160.2 FPS
|
160.3 FPS
|
106.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.1 | 158.2 FPS
|
160.6 FPS
|
112.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.4 | 158.2 FPS
|
157.4 FPS
|
106 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.9 | 152.7 FPS
|
153.6 FPS
|
108.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.4 | 135.7 FPS
|
136.1 FPS
|
93.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.6 | 126.9 FPS
|
127 FPS
|
84.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.1 | 121 FPS
|
120.4 FPS
|
81.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 22.5 | 111.1 FPS
|
114.2 FPS
|
77.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 12 | 108.2 FPS
|
111.2 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.5 | 106.8 FPS
|
107.6 FPS
|
70.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.8 | 105 FPS
|
107 FPS
|
74.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4 | 99.1 FPS
|
101.3 FPS
|
69.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.1 | 98.2 FPS
|
99.9 FPS
|
67.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.2 | 94.7 FPS
|
95.9 FPS
|
63.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 31.9 | 94.1 FPS
|
96.7 FPS
|
66.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 3.2 | 94 FPS
|
96.3 FPS
|
66.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.9 | 94 FPS
|
95.3 FPS
|
63.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.5 | 92.8 FPS
|
93.4 FPS
|
62.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 4.3 | 88.9 FPS
|
89.5 FPS
|
59.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 8.7 | 87 FPS
|
89.1 FPS
|
60.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.8 | 86.5 FPS
|
86 FPS
|
57.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 14.1 | 85.3 FPS
|
86 FPS
|
59.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 8.2 | 85.3 FPS
|
85.4 FPS
|
56.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.8 | 83 FPS
|
83.1 FPS
|
55 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.1 | 81.9 FPS
|
80.4 FPS
|
54.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.4 | 81.9 FPS
|
83.1 FPS
|
57.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 4 | 81.3 FPS
|
81.2 FPS
|
55.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 5.2 | 77.6 FPS
|
74.8 FPS
|
50.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.6 | 76.1 FPS
|
76.2 FPS
|
50.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.8 | 73.9 FPS
|
72.9 FPS
|
48.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.8 | 73 FPS
|
68.8 FPS
|
45.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 71.8 FPS
|
71.3 FPS
|
47 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 21.7 | 69.2 FPS
|
67.3 FPS
|
47.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7.2 | 69 FPS
|
69.2 FPS
|
45.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 6 | 68.5 FPS
|
67.5 FPS
|
44.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.7 | 66.9 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
44.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 15 | 66.6 FPS
|
64.8 FPS
|
43 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.3 | 65.1 FPS
|
64.2 FPS
|
42.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.2 | 64.7 FPS
|
64.7 FPS
|
42.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.3 | 63 FPS
|
61.6 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.7 | 61.4 FPS
|
60.6 FPS
|
40.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 11.2 | 57.9 FPS
|
56.8 FPS
|
37.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.8 | 57.8 FPS
|
57 FPS
|
37.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 5.1 | 54.8 FPS
|
52.5 FPS
|
34 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 12.3 | 52.6 FPS
|
54 FPS
|
36.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 3.2 | 50.3 FPS
|
49.5 FPS
|
32.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 4 | 49.9 FPS
|
47.7 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11 | 49.7 FPS
|
48.2 FPS
|
32.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.7 | 48.6 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
29.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 13.6 | 47.8 FPS
|
48.3 FPS
|
32.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 21.5 | 46.4 FPS
|
44.6 FPS
|
31 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 12.1 | 45.2 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
30.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.6 | 45.1 FPS
|
43.5 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.8 | 44.7 FPS
|
42.9 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 9.9 | 43.5 FPS
|
43.6 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 4 | 42.8 FPS
|
41.4 FPS
|
27.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7.8 | 42.1 FPS
|
40.2 FPS
|
27.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 9.8 | 40.9 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 8.1 | 40.6 FPS
|
39.8 FPS
|
25.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.2 | 40.1 FPS
|
39.3 FPS
|
25.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.9 | 38.4 FPS
|
37.5 FPS
|
24.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 5 | 35.8 FPS
|
35.2 FPS
|
23.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 7.6 | 30.1 FPS
|
29.3 FPS
|
19.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 9.2 | 27 FPS
|
26.4 FPS
|
16.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.4 | 26.8 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
16.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.4 | 26.4 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 10.6 | 26.2 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
16 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.7 | 25.9 FPS
|
25.1 FPS
|
16.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 7.5 | 22.5 FPS
|
21.8 FPS
|
14.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.8 | 20.8 FPS
|
19.9 FPS
|
13 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7.8 | 20.4 FPS
|
19.5 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.5 | 20 FPS
|
18.4 FPS
|
12.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.5 | 19.9 FPS
|
17.7 FPS
|
12.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 7.6 | 18.4 FPS
|
17.6 FPS
|
11.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 8.4 | 17.7 FPS
|
15.2 FPS
|
10.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.4 | 14.5 FPS
|
14 FPS
|
9.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.7 | 13.9 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
8.4 FPS
|
Get the 3400g. It's not worth sacrificing so much quality.
You can always upgrade later.
If you want to play near 1080p60 at AAA games, RX 570/580 is a must
No it's not really worth the sacrifice.
You can just stick a GPU in the second one at later point. Especially if you eventually grab a used 570/580.
Go for the 3400g. You can get a GPU later but with a bit of an overclock and some fast RAM the Vega 11 will perform near to a 1050 or even 1050ti. Not top of the line performance, but definitely enough to game on with reasonable expectations.
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
The Ryzen 5 3400G's $50 premium over the $99 Ryzen 3 3200G also gets you slightly higher clock speeds. The Ryzen 5 3400G runs at a base clock of 3.7GHz, versus 3.6GHz for the Ryzen 3 3200G.
The Ryzen 5 3400G comes with four cores and eight threads for $149, while stepping back to the four-core Ryzen 3 3200G trades simultaneous multithreading (SMT) and lower CPU and GPU clocks for a ...
The Ryzen 5 3400G is one of the former, it's one of AMD's APUs (Accelerated Processing Unit) which includes both Ryzen CPU cores and Vega GPU cores. The result is a quad-core processor with the ...
As part of the big Zen 2 Ryzen processor launch, AMD released two Ryzen 3000 parts that include a graphics component. The new Ryzen 3 3200G and Ryzen 5 3400G APUs are straightforward upgrades ...
The Ryzen 5 3400G comes with a built-in AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 GPU, with 11 graphics cores of its own running at up to a 1,400MHz clock speed. The RX Vega 11 is a step above the RX Vega 8 that's on ...
The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 3.7 GHz Quad-Core AM4 Processor is a quad-core processor with eight threads, designed for socket AM4 motherboards. The second-generation 12nm Ryzen G processor offers increased performance compared to its predecessor, with this model having a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz and a max boost clock speed of 4.2 GHz.
All third-gen Ryzen entries with "PBO" indicate an auto-overclocked configuration with DDR4-3600 memory, while the Ryzen 5 3400G has an 4.2 GHz all-core overclock paired with DDR4-3466 memory and ...
Ryzen 5 3400G Review, AMD's New $150 Flagship APU - Duration: 13:34. Hardware Unboxed 263,988 views. 13:34. RYZEN 5 3400G Emulation Test - The New APU In Town! - Duration: 10:12.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G with Radeon Vega 11 graphics. The APUs are thus Raven Ridge and have roughly 4.94 billion transistors. These are both quad-core processors, Ryzen 5 gets SMT (hyper-threading).
I need help deciding which i should go to? R3 1200 and RX 670 vs R5 3400G
https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/3sVyNq vs https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/vQLnV7
The RX 570 build has less storage,RAM,a worse CPU and Motherboard but is it worth sacrificing for?