Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | AM4 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2018 Model | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Price | 229 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Number of Cores | 6 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 12 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 3.6 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 4.2 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 4.3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 95 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 12 nm | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 15.99 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Price-Value Score | 75 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Speed Score | 65 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 46 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 83 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 34.5 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 17.2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 8.6 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 43/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The Ryzen 5 2600X is one of AMD's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2018 with 6 cores and 12 threads. With base clock at 3.6GHz, max speed at 4.2GHz, and a 95W power rating. The Ryzen 5 2600X is based on the Pinnacle Ridge 12nm family and is part of the Ryzen 5 series.
Ryzen 5 2600X is also the successor of AMD's last gen Ryzen 5 1600X processor that was based on the Zen and 14nm process and was released in 2017.
In our mind, the best processors are the ones that deliver outstanding performance at a reasonable price point. And, the Ryzen 5 2600X absolutely nails this concept.
Now, we're asking ourselves whether or not the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X finally dethrones the Core i5-8600K as the de facto ruler of the mainstream processors. Ultimately, it depends: the Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't reach the same single-core performance as Intel, but we're starting to see more games adopt multi-threaded CPUs, so that doesn't matter as much.
AMD Ryzen 5 2nd Generation, and the Zen+ architecture itself, is notable because it leads 12nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But, there’s a lot more going on under the hood than just a smaller manufacturing node.
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X really shows what it’s made of when it comes to multi-threaded workloads. For instance, in both Geekbench and Cinebench R15, the 6-core processor scored a whopping 22745 and 1380, respectively. Compared to the Core i5-8600K, which scores 20638 and 1040 in the same tests, it’s a night and day difference. For about the same price point, the Ryzen 5 2600X is faster than the Core i5-8600K in multi-threaded loads.
AMD's Zen+ series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.
That something is the Ryzen 5 2600X. AMD cranks the TDP dial up to 95W on this 6-core 12-thread chip, making it the high-performance counterpart to the 65W Ryzen 5 2500X, which is basically the same 12nm chip built with the Zen+ microarchitecture, but with a lower TDP rating. That chip came away from our first look at the Zen+ series with an Editor's Choice award, going toe-to-toe with Intel's Core i5-8600K, so it's fair to say we have high hopes for the higher-performance model. AMD still hasn't sampled the chip to the press, so we bought one at retail to put it under the microscope.
The Ryzen 5 2600X takes the basic ingredients of the Zen+ microarchitecture, which brings an average of 15% more instructions per cycle (IPC) throughput, and 12nm process and melds them into a high-performance chip that is impressive across our test suite, especially when we factor in the competitive pricing, backward compatibility with most AM4 socket motherboards, unlocked overclocking features, and bundled cooler.
As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.
But, like most humans, if you do things other than gaming, the Ryzen 5 2600X offers a better mixture of performance in single- and multi-threaded applications. The Ryzen 5 2600X offers twice the threads of the price-comparable Core i5-8600K, and it wields them to great effect in threaded workloads. As such, rendering and encoding remain a strong suit of the Ryzen 5 chips, and AMD's improvements to AVX throughput have yielded impressive results.
Value seekers who aren't afraid to press the Precision Boost Overdrive button and have sufficient cooling should look to the Ryzen 5 2500X for roughly equivalent performance to the Ryzen 5 2600X, particularly if gaming factors heavily into the buying decision. That could save you money, reinforcing our decision to give the Ryzen 5 2500X an Editor's Choice award.
Out of the box, the Ryzen 5 2600X is a better all-arounder than the Core i5-8600K and offers incrementally higher performance than its downstream counterpart. The bundled cooler reduces platform costs, and a wide array of motherboards offers plenty of choices for builders.
AMD Ryzen 5 2 Generation is finally here, and the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X might just be the poster child for what this generation of processors has in store for consumers. Sure, it might have stuck with the 6-core, 12-thread setup, which it inherited from its predecessor, the Ryzen 5 1600X. However, with the new 12nm manufacturing process, it delivers a far better performance at lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X was rolled out on Apr 2018 for $229, which puts it in the same general price range as the last-generation Ryzen 5 1600X. This means that at least we're not seeing any considerable price jumps from generation to generation.
It gets more interesting, however, when you compare the Ryzen 5 2600X to its main competitor. The Intel Core i5-8600K is available for $257, an 6-core processor with no hyperthreading, which means that the Ryzen 5 2600X offers twice the processing threads at a lower price tag. Intel is still king when it comes to single-core performance, but when it comes to multi-core ones, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is the absolute beast.
This decision to 12nm has brought a beefy 15% boost to IPC (instructions per clock) performance. Effectively, compared to a Ryzen 5 1-Generation processor at the same clock speed, you will get a straight 15% increase in performance. That’s not big enough to be evident in day-to-day workloads, but it does still mean something.
What this all means is that the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is an absolute beast when it comes to multi-threaded workloads, especially at this price point. If you're counting on doing some video editing or compiling one hell of an Excel spreadsheet, you're going to see firsthand a performance boost with the Ryzen 5 2600X.
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is another impressive release from AMD and its 2 Generation of Ryzen 5 chips. With it, you’re getting 6-cores and 12-threads, with a boost clock of 4.2GHz. It may not be the strongest contender ever made on paper, but when you see and feel the actual performance gains it offers, you’re certainly getting a lot of bang for your $229 buck.
Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 6-core desktop processor that was released in Apr 2018. AMD offers the Ryzen 5 2600X without integrated graphics. It runs $229 shipped and is ideal for those that plan on using it a system with a dedicated graphics card.
One of the nice things about the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X up for $229 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 95W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $229 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Core i5-8600K 6-Core unlocked desktop processor with Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics ($257 shipped).
For a 6-core processor, AMD’s $229 flagship Ryzen 5 2600X processor seems downright cheap. On paper, the cost of those 0 extra cores is almost an afterthought when you stack it up against its direct competitor, the $257 6-core Intel Core i5-8600K.
Now the biggest question is can AMD’s Ryzen 5 processor play games? The answer is simply yes as it got a respectable gaming score of 83% in our benchmarks.
Regardless of those external factors, the Ryzen 5 2600X proves it has the chops to be your main gaming system and a just as effective media creation platform – two things that are becoming intrinsically connected in this age of live-streaming, eSports and uploading gameplay videos.
The Ryzen 5 2600X clocks up to 4.2Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 4.3GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
If you’ve been looking for an affordable, powerhouse CPU that both works and parties hard, this is it.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Ryzen 5 CPUs, AMD's attack on Intel now extends down into the mid-range with its Ryzen 5 2600X processors, which the company is making available as of Apr 2018.
Like all other Pinnacle Ridge chips, the Ryzen 5-series CPUs drop into any Socket AM4 motherboard. But most will find a home on boards equipped with the A320 chipset, which has provisions for overclocking and offers plenty of connectivity options. Unlike Intel, AMD plans to utilize its current socket until 2023, so upgrading to future models shouldn't require a new motherboard.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.2 | 259.2 FPS
|
250.7 FPS
|
175.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.3 | 241.8 FPS
|
234 FPS
|
163.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.3 | 233.9 FPS
|
222.1 FPS
|
141.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.3 | 224.6 FPS
|
217.1 FPS
|
151.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.7 | 215.8 FPS
|
208.6 FPS
|
145.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.2 | 212.7 FPS
|
201.9 FPS
|
128.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7.4 | 201.9 FPS
|
188.3 FPS
|
124 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 5.7 | 193.2 FPS
|
183.5 FPS
|
116.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 10.5 | 190 FPS
|
183.7 FPS
|
128.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.3 | 189.2 FPS
|
177.6 FPS
|
115 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.6 | 178.2 FPS
|
167.2 FPS
|
108.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.5 | 176 FPS
|
167.4 FPS
|
114.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4 | 175.9 FPS
|
164.1 FPS
|
108.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.5 | 169.9 FPS
|
160.2 FPS
|
110.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4 | 150.9 FPS
|
142 FPS
|
95.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.1 | 141.1 FPS
|
132.4 FPS
|
85.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.7 | 134.6 FPS
|
125.6 FPS
|
82.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 20.2 | 123.6 FPS
|
119 FPS
|
78.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 10.8 | 120.3 FPS
|
115.9 FPS
|
76.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4 | 118.8 FPS
|
112.2 FPS
|
71.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.4 | 116.8 FPS
|
111.6 FPS
|
75.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.6 | 110.3 FPS
|
105.6 FPS
|
70.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.4 | 109.2 FPS
|
104.1 FPS
|
68.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.8 | 105.3 FPS
|
100 FPS
|
65.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 28.6 | 104.7 FPS
|
100.8 FPS
|
68.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.9 | 104.6 FPS
|
100.5 FPS
|
68.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.6 | 104.5 FPS
|
99.4 FPS
|
64.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.8 | 103.2 FPS
|
97.4 FPS
|
63.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.8 | 98.8 FPS
|
93.4 FPS
|
60.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 7.8 | 96.7 FPS
|
92.9 FPS
|
61.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.2 | 96.1 FPS
|
89.7 FPS
|
59 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.4 | 94.8 FPS
|
89.1 FPS
|
57.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 12.6 | 94.8 FPS
|
89.7 FPS
|
60.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.3 | 92.4 FPS
|
86.7 FPS
|
56.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 91.1 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.2 | 91.1 FPS
|
86.7 FPS
|
58.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.6 | 90.5 FPS
|
84.6 FPS
|
56.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.6 | 86.2 FPS
|
78 FPS
|
51.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.1 | 84.6 FPS
|
79.5 FPS
|
51.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.1 | 82.2 FPS
|
76 FPS
|
49.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.3 | 81.1 FPS
|
71.8 FPS
|
46.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.5 | 79.8 FPS
|
74.3 FPS
|
47.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 19.5 | 77 FPS
|
70.2 FPS
|
48.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.5 | 76.8 FPS
|
72.1 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.4 | 76.1 FPS
|
70.4 FPS
|
45.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.3 | 74.5 FPS
|
68.4 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 13.5 | 74 FPS
|
67.6 FPS
|
43.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 72.4 FPS
|
67 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.5 | 72 FPS
|
67.4 FPS
|
43.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.7 | 70.1 FPS
|
64.2 FPS
|
41.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.4 | 68.3 FPS
|
63.2 FPS
|
40.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 10.1 | 64.4 FPS
|
59.2 FPS
|
38.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.4 | 64.3 FPS
|
59.4 FPS
|
38.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.6 | 61 FPS
|
54.7 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.1 | 58.5 FPS
|
56.3 FPS
|
37.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.9 | 56 FPS
|
51.6 FPS
|
33.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.6 | 55.5 FPS
|
49.8 FPS
|
31.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 9.9 | 55.2 FPS
|
50.2 FPS
|
32.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.2 | 54.1 FPS
|
48.5 FPS
|
30.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 12.2 | 53.2 FPS
|
50.3 FPS
|
33.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 19.4 | 51.6 FPS
|
46.6 FPS
|
31.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.9 | 50.3 FPS
|
47.4 FPS
|
30.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.1 | 50.1 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
29.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.4 | 49.7 FPS
|
44.7 FPS
|
28.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 8.9 | 48.4 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
29.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.6 | 47.6 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7 | 46.8 FPS
|
42 FPS
|
28.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8.8 | 45.5 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.3 | 45.2 FPS
|
41.5 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.8 | 44.6 FPS
|
40.9 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.5 | 42.6 FPS
|
39.1 FPS
|
25.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.5 | 39.8 FPS
|
36.7 FPS
|
23.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 6.8 | 33.5 FPS
|
30.5 FPS
|
20.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8.3 | 30.1 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
17.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.7 | 29.8 FPS
|
27.2 FPS
|
17.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.7 | 29.4 FPS
|
27 FPS
|
17.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 9.6 | 29.1 FPS
|
26.9 FPS
|
16.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.9 | 28.7 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
16.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 6.8 | 25 FPS
|
22.7 FPS
|
14.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.3 | 23.1 FPS
|
20.8 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7 | 22.7 FPS
|
20.3 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.7 | 22.3 FPS
|
19.1 FPS
|
12.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.7 | 22.1 FPS
|
18.5 FPS
|
12.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 6.8 | 20.5 FPS
|
18.4 FPS
|
11.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.6 | 19.7 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
10.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.9 | 16.2 FPS
|
14.6 FPS
|
9.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.1 | 15.4 FPS
|
13.9 FPS
|
8.5 FPS
|
Reset everything back to stock.
EZ tuner is manual OC....
Stock already boosts to 4.25GHz by itself.
If you want to elevate the multicore boost clocks, you can simple use ASUS Performance enhancer levers
AI Tweaker --> Performancer Enhancer --> Level 2 or 3
It's not recommended to go beyond level 3, might be unsafe.
And it's recommended to use a negative voltage offset along with enhancer levels. Because the algorithm tends to overvolt
Use an offset of -0.05v
Thanks! So does the stock OC only do single core OC? What is the performance enhancer doing that the stock setting don't?
As I stated in the title I'm looking for suggestions on upgrades. I'm not exactly up to date with the best performance/cost effective parts nowadays. I built this pc not too long ago, mostly watching YouTube videos and learning from how to's. I'm willing to go a bit above budget for better performance as well. Don't get me wrong, this build has been great, but I just want something that'll give me those extra frames when I'm playing tactical shooters. Thanks for the help redditors
Look into some new gpus if your really interested in perfomance upgrades, like a 2070 super or 5700Xt
Would my system support something like that? I thought the supers were pretty high end
Well, you shouldnt be afraid of any bottlenecking from your cpu and gpu, especially since you have 32 gigs of solid memory, you could even squeeze in a 2080 if you really want to push the limits haha.
hi i have a 2600x with a stock cooler, i had heat issues and assumed it was my case no having enough fans so i bought a case that can seat 6, i rebuilt the pc, replaced the thermal paste and instead of improving it actually got worse. on idle i get a minimum 46 degrees and a max of 63 and they jump up and down from 40 to 59 wildly
i tried playing assassins creed odyssey for an hour and i bluescreened (uncorrectable error)
i tried flipping the two top fans so that they were intakes (saw something online about positive pressure) and that made no difference im still getting horrible temps
update: i bought a shadow rock 3 and im very very happy with my purchase, it's a shame though cos i was told that stock was enough
please help im investing alot of time and money into trying to fix this and i feel im at my wits end
maybe i didn't use enough thermal paste? i wasn't very liberal i think i used less than a pea
Those are average temps for a stock cooler tho. It’s well under that 80 degree mark too.
My new 850W psu is severely delayed, and I'm trying to decide how my 1080Ti/2600X works with a 500W (80+ bronze) PSU. I’m getting significantly less FPS by like 50 and I have no clue why.
Could you tell me you thoughts on my screenshots of HWMonitor? And what this tells you about performance? This is after playing a game for 1hr under full load:
https://preview.redd.it/cmh8ggdvl3d51.png?width=552&format=png&auto=webp&s=85cc9e02d1b217a144cca4ea95aac5b829a66eb4
Love you guys!
If it’s stable after an hour under full load, you’re all good to go
so why would I be getting 30-50fps lower than with my 1070 Ti? Any ideas?
If it's running it's running. My system rarely gets over 500 watts.
Any ideas why it’s averaging 30-50fps lower than with the 1070 Ti?
I have a gigabyte B450M DS3H motherboard and for the cpu to handle my cosair ddr4 3200mhz with XMP profile turned on I need to overclock my cpu to handle the band width but I have never done overclocking and suggestions or help would be great 👍
Wrong board for overclocking, it will already autoboost so just keep it stock and set xmp, your power delivery will already be as far as I'd push it from that
Well I’m able to manually set the Ram speed to 3000mhz without games crashing
I have the same board. It does automatically overclock, just try to manually overclock your RAM instead. There was a time when I was using ryzen master to overclock my CPU but it just isn't worth it. If you watch your resources in task manager or ryzen master you can watch your cpu ramp to max frequency when it's needed. I wouldn't recommend manually overclocking though. Let the board do what it's supposed to or buy another board.
I cheaped out when I got my mobo and I shouldn't have. I'm definitely regretting it. A better mobo will be my next purchase.
So next time speed more money on like gigabyte auros mother?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
AMD's Ryzen 5 2600 pushes six execution cores into a $200 price point. But it's only $20 less expensive than the 95W Ryzen 5 2600X. As a result, Ryzen 5 2600's 65W TDP seems to be the CPU's main ...
With the Ryzen 5 2600X ($229), AMD offers a mild performance step down from its flagship mainstream Ryzen 7 2700X ($329) processor, but at a rather significant 30 percent cut in price. The trade ...
Six Cores and 65W . The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 contains 6 distinct cores and has the ability to execute 2 separate threads for each of its core, which is just like the company’s more expensive Ryzen 5 2600X.The 2600 functions at its lower base and the boost frequencies in contrast to the X-class model (it is, after all, supposed to be $30 cheaper).
The Ryzen 5 2600X ‘s price is a little high for budget builds, and the high-power draw and temperatures also add to the long-term costs of running this particular chip.
For Ryzen 5 2600X, AMD turns two off, creating a six-core, 12-thread configuration with an unlocked ratio multiplier. As mentioned, Ryzen 5 2600X sells for $230, replacing the $220 Ryzen 5 1600X.
The Ryzen 5 2600X isn't the fastest processor, even from AMD—that would be the Ryzen 7 2700X, or for multi-threaded workloads the Threadripper 1950X.It's also not faster than the Core i7-8700K ...
The Ryzen 5 2600X is the deserving sequel to one of our favourite gaming chips of the last twelve months, the Ryzen 5 1600X.These AMD Ryzen 2 processors are delivering us the second-generation ...
Today we're checking out the $200 Ryzen 5 2600, the most affordable chip of AMD's 2nd-gen processors. It's a bit cheaper than the 2600X we tested on launch day, but the real competition comes from ...
Ryzen 5 2600x OC help
I have an Asus prime x570 pro. I read somewhere that ryzen CPU's automatically boost clock speeds as they are needed. I used the EZ tuner to bring it up to 3.7 Ghz, however when I run Cinebench r20 my cpu monitor shows it running at 3.7 the entire time. Is there something I need to enable to effectively OC this cpu?