AMD Phenom II X4 975 Review

High-end Desktop processor released in 2011 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.6GHz, max speed at 3.6GHz, and a 125W power rating. Phenom II X4 975 is based on the Deneb 45nm family and part of the Phenom II X4 series.
Price 56%
Speed 47%
Productivity 29%
Gaming 66%
Category Desktop
Target high-end
Socket Compatibility AM3
Integrated Graphics None
Cooler Included No
Overclock Potential 0 %
Year 2011 Model
Price 360.41 USD
Number of Cores 4 Cores
Number of Threads 4 Threads
Core Frequency 3.6 GHz
Boost Frequency 3.6 GHz
Max Stable Overclock 3.6 GHz
Power Consumption 125 W
Manufacturing Process 45 nm
L3 Cache 6 MB
Maximum Supported Memory 64 GB
Price-Value Score 56 %
Speed Score 47 %
Productivity Score 29 %
Gaming Score 66 %
Max 1080p Bottleneck 62 %
Max 1440p Bottleneck 31 %
Max 4K Bottleneck 15.5 %
Overall Score 25/100

The Phenom II X4 975 is one of AMD's high-end Desktop processors. It was released in 2011 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.6GHz, max speed at 3.6GHz, and a 125W power rating. The Phenom II X4 975 is based on the Deneb 45nm family and is part of the Phenom II X4 series.

AMD's K10 series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.

The Phenom II X4 975 slots in beneath the Phenom II X4 980, which comes with 45nm compute die to yield a 4-core 4-thread part. AMD has worked wonders to reduce the impact of this sort of multi-chip arrangement, but it's fair to assume that the Phenom II X4 975s single-compute-die design, paired with a higher TDP rating that facilitates more aggressive boost clocks, could actually rival the Phenom II X4 980 in some applications – games included.

But we've also found that, after simple push-button overclocking, the Phenom II X4 970 offers similar performance to the Phenom II X4 975, even when it is also overclocked. But for $70 less. The Phenom II X4 975 is an impressive chip and offers a better mixture of performance than Intel's Core i7-2700K, no doubt, but in this case, value seekers might opt for its less expensive sibling.

We covered the deep dive details of the K10 chip design in our AMD Phenom II X4 980 and Phenom II X4 970 review, so head there for more information on the Phenom II X4 975's architecture, which is identical to the Phenom II X4 970.

As the higher-priced version of the Phenom II X4 970, the Phenom II X4 975 has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.6 and 3.6 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The Phenom II X4 970's PPT tops out at 125W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the Phenom II X4 975 at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.

As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.

Value seekers who aren't afraid to press the Precision Boost Overdrive button and have sufficient cooling should look to the Phenom II X4 970 for roughly equivalent performance to the Phenom II X4 975, particularly if gaming factors heavily into the buying decision. That could save you money, reinforcing our decision to give the Phenom II X4 970 an Editor's Choice award.

Moving beyond games, it’s an easy win for the Core i7-3770T. The Core i7 upgrade path on B65, B75, C204, C206, H55, H61, H67, H77, P67, Q67, Q77, Z68, Z75, Z77 motherboards, all support upcoming Ivy Bridge processors. So if you buy a nice B65, B75, C204, C206, H55, H61, H67, H77, P67, Q67, Q77, Z68, Z75, Z77 board now with the Core i7-3770T, you’ll be able to slap a Deneb processor on there later in the year, or whenever you deem it necessary.

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the AMD Phenom II X4 975 4-core desktop processor that was released in Jan 2011. AMD offers the Phenom II X4 975 without integrated graphics. It runs $360.41 shipped and is ideal for those that plan on using it a system with a dedicated graphics card.

Our look today at the AMD Phenom II X4 975 showed that it is a very capable processor. A 4-core processor sounds like it would be really under-powered these days, but we were pleasantly surprised with a snappy and very capable system. Having just 4 cores had this processor coming in at the back of the pack for heavily threaded workloads, but it performed better than some of its more expensive siblings in lightly threaded workloads where it shined thanks to its high base clocks.

The AMD Phenom II X4 975 seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $360.41 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Core i7-3770T 4-Core unlocked desktop processor with Intel HD Graphics 4000 graphics ($330 shipped).

If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, AMD also offers the Phenom II X4 970 at $249.51. It’s still outfitted with 4-cores and 4-threads, but clocks in at a slower 3.5GHz and maxes out at only 3.5GHz.

The Phenom II X4 975 clocks up to 3.6Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 3.7GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.

That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent high-end chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade NVIDIA nForce 750a SLI, NVIDIA nForce 980a, NVIDIA nForce 980a SLI motherboard.

Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream Phenom II X4 CPUs, AMD's attack on Intel now extends down into the high-end with its Phenom II X4 975 processors, which the company is making available as of Jan 2011.

Which GPU to Pick for AMD Phenom II X4 975

Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD Phenom II X4 975.

Graphics Card Price Cost Per Frame Avg 1080p Avg 1440p Avg 4K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB $ 1,599 $ 10.6 150.4 FPS
208.9 FPS
162.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB $ 799 $ 5.7 140.3 FPS
195 FPS
151.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB $ 999 $ 7.4 135.7 FPS
185.1 FPS
130.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB $ 1,199 $ 9.2 130.3 FPS
180.9 FPS
140.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB $ 799 $ 6.4 125.2 FPS
173.8 FPS
134.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB $ 899 $ 7.3 123.4 FPS
168.3 FPS
118.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB $ 1,499 $ 12.8 117.1 FPS
156.9 FPS
114.6 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB $ 1,099 $ 9.8 112.1 FPS
153 FPS
108 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB $ 1,999 $ 18.1 110.2 FPS
153.1 FPS
118.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB $ 999 $ 9.1 109.8 FPS
148 FPS
106.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB $ 649 $ 6.3 103.4 FPS
139.3 FPS
100.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB $ 799 $ 7.8 102.1 FPS
139.5 FPS
105.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB $ 699 $ 6.8 102.1 FPS
136.8 FPS
99.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB $ 599 $ 6.1 98.5 FPS
133.5 FPS
102.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB $ 599 $ 6.8 87.6 FPS
118.3 FPS
88 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB $ 579 $ 7.1 81.9 FPS
110.3 FPS
79.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB $ 499 $ 6.4 78.1 FPS
104.6 FPS
76.4 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB $ 2,499 $ 34.9 71.7 FPS
99.2 FPS
73 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB $ 1,299 $ 18.6 69.8 FPS
96.6 FPS
71 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB $ 479 $ 7 68.9 FPS
93.5 FPS
66.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB $ 399 $ 5.9 67.8 FPS
93 FPS
70 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB $ 399 $ 6.2 64 FPS
88 FPS
65.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB $ 699 $ 11 63.3 FPS
86.8 FPS
63.5 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB $ 399 $ 6.5 61.1 FPS
83.3 FPS
60.2 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB $ 2,999 $ 49.4 60.7 FPS
84 FPS
63 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB $ 299 $ 4.9 60.7 FPS
83.7 FPS
63 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB $ 269 $ 4.4 60.6 FPS
82.8 FPS
59.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB $ 699 $ 11.7 59.9 FPS
81.2 FPS
58.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB $ 379 $ 6.6 57.3 FPS
77.8 FPS
55.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB $ 759 $ 13.5 56.1 FPS
77.4 FPS
56.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB $ 499 $ 8.9 55.8 FPS
74.7 FPS
54.5 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB $ 1,199 $ 21.8 55 FPS
74.7 FPS
55.9 FPS
AMD Radeon VII 16GB $ 699 $ 12.7 55 FPS
74.2 FPS
53.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB $ 399 $ 7.4 53.6 FPS
72.2 FPS
51.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB $ 499 $ 9.4 52.9 FPS
69.8 FPS
51.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB $ 200 $ 3.8 52.9 FPS
72.2 FPS
54.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB $ 329 $ 6.3 52.5 FPS
70.5 FPS
52 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB $ 400 $ 8 50 FPS
65 FPS
47.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB $ 349 $ 7.1 49.1 FPS
66.2 FPS
47.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB $ 499 $ 10.5 47.7 FPS
63.3 FPS
45.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB $ 350 $ 7.4 47.1 FPS
59.8 FPS
42.6 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB $ 279 $ 6 46.3 FPS
61.9 FPS
44.3 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB $ 1,499 $ 33.5 44.7 FPS
58.5 FPS
44.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB $ 499 $ 11.2 44.5 FPS
60.1 FPS
43 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB $ 409 $ 9.3 44.2 FPS
58.6 FPS
42.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB $ 249 $ 5.8 43.2 FPS
57 FPS
41.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB $ 999 $ 23.3 42.9 FPS
56.3 FPS
40.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB $ 279 $ 6.6 42 FPS
55.8 FPS
40 FPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB $ 399 $ 9.5 41.8 FPS
56.2 FPS
40.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB $ 399 $ 9.8 40.7 FPS
53.5 FPS
38.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB $ 229 $ 5.8 39.6 FPS
52.7 FPS
37.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB $ 649 $ 17.4 37.4 FPS
49.4 FPS
35.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB $ 220 $ 5.9 37.3 FPS
49.5 FPS
35.5 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB $ 279 $ 7.9 35.4 FPS
45.6 FPS
32 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB $ 649 $ 19.1 33.9 FPS
46.9 FPS
34.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB $ 160 $ 4.9 32.5 FPS
43 FPS
30.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB $ 199 $ 6.2 32.2 FPS
41.5 FPS
29 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB $ 549 $ 17.2 32 FPS
41.9 FPS
30.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB $ 229 $ 7.3 31.4 FPS
40.4 FPS
28.2 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB $ 649 $ 21 30.9 FPS
41.9 FPS
30.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB $ 999 $ 33.4 29.9 FPS
38.8 FPS
29.2 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB $ 549 $ 18.8 29.2 FPS
39.5 FPS
28.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB $ 254 $ 8.7 29.1 FPS
37.8 FPS
27.1 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB $ 169 $ 5.9 28.8 FPS
37.3 FPS
26 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB $ 429 $ 15.3 28.1 FPS
37.9 FPS
27.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB $ 170 $ 6.2 27.6 FPS
36 FPS
25.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB $ 329 $ 12.1 27.1 FPS
35 FPS
26.1 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB $ 400 $ 15.2 26.4 FPS
35.3 FPS
25.9 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB $ 329 $ 12.6 26.2 FPS
34.6 FPS
23.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB $ 169 $ 6.5 25.9 FPS
34.1 FPS
23.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB $ 149 $ 6 24.7 FPS
32.6 FPS
23.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB $ 179 $ 7.7 23.1 FPS
30.6 FPS
21.9 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB $ 229 $ 11.8 19.4 FPS
25.5 FPS
18.6 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB $ 249 $ 14.3 17.4 FPS
22.9 FPS
15.8 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB $ 199 $ 11.5 17.3 FPS
22.7 FPS
15.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB $ 169 $ 9.9 17.1 FPS
22.5 FPS
16.1 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB $ 279 $ 16.5 16.9 FPS
22.4 FPS
15.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB $ 199 $ 11.9 16.7 FPS
21.8 FPS
15.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB $ 169 $ 11.7 14.5 FPS
18.9 FPS
13.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB $ 99 $ 7.4 13.4 FPS
17.3 FPS
12.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB $ 159 $ 12 13.2 FPS
16.9 FPS
12.4 FPS
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB $ 149 $ 11.6 12.9 FPS
15.9 FPS
11.7 FPS
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB $ 149 $ 11.6 12.8 FPS
15.4 FPS
11.4 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB $ 140 $ 11.8 11.9 FPS
15.3 FPS
10.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB $ 149 $ 13.1 11.4 FPS
13.2 FPS
9.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB $ 79 $ 8.4 9.4 FPS
12.2 FPS
8.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB $ 79 $ 8.8 9 FPS
11.6 FPS
7.9 FPS
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?

Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?

Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks

Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.

Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?

Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.

Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?

Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.

Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?

Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.

How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU

Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.

RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison

Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?

10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs

May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.

10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.

13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.

2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?

May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.

Critics Reviews