AMD FX-9830P Review

High-end-low-power Laptop processor released in 2016 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.7GHz, max speed at 3.7GHz, and a 25W power rating. FX-9830P is based on the Bristol Ridge 28nm family and part of the FX series.
Price 60%
Speed 43%
Productivity 33%
Gaming 58%
Category Laptop
Target high-end-low-power
Socket Compatibility FP4
Integrated Graphics
Cooler Included Yes
Overclock Potential 7 %
Year 2016 Model
Price 284.42 USD
Number of Cores 4 Cores
Number of Threads 4 Threads
Core Frequency 3.7 GHz
Boost Frequency 3.7 GHz
Max Stable Overclock 4 GHz
Power Consumption 25 W
Manufacturing Process 28 nm
L3 Cache 0 MB
Maximum Supported Memory 64 GB
Price-Value Score 60 %
Speed Score 43 %
Productivity Score 33 %
Gaming Score 58 %
Max 1080p Bottleneck 76.6 %
Max 1440p Bottleneck 38.3 %
Max 4K Bottleneck 19.1 %
Overall Score 29/100

The FX-9830P is one of AMD's high-end-low-power Laptop processors. It was released in 2016 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.7GHz, max speed at 3.7GHz, and a 25W power rating. The FX-9830P is based on the Bristol Ridge 28nm family and is part of the FX series.

The AMD FX-9830P marks yet another blast from Team AMD, ramping up the intensity of the AMD vs Intel processor war. Still, though, there’s more than just core counts when it comes to a mainstream processor, as single-core performance needs to be on point, especially if you’re hoping to play the best PC games.

AMD's Excavator+ series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.

That something is the FX-9830P. AMD cranks the TDP dial up to 25W on this 4-core 4-thread chip, making it the high-performance counterpart to the 15W FX-9800P, which is basically the same 28nm chip built with the Excavator+ microarchitecture, but with a lower TDP rating. That chip came away from our first look at the Excavator+ series with an Editor's Choice award, going toe-to-toe with Intel's Core i7-7567U, so it's fair to say we have high hopes for the higher-performance model. AMD still hasn't sampled the chip to the press, so we bought one at retail to put it under the microscope.

As the higher-priced version of the FX-9800P, the FX-9830P has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.7 and 3.7 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The FX-9800P's PPT tops out at 15W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the FX-9830P at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.

As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.

Value seekers who aren't afraid to press the Precision Boost Overdrive button and have sufficient cooling should look to the FX-9800P for roughly equivalent performance to the FX-9830P, particularly if gaming factors heavily into the buying decision. That could save you money, reinforcing our decision to give the FX-9800P an Editor's Choice award.

One of the nice things about the AMD FX-9830P processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the AMD FX-9830P up for $284.42 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.

The AMD FX-9830P retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 25W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.

Our look today at the AMD FX-9830P showed that it is a very capable processor. A 4-core processor sounds like it would be really under-powered these days, but we were pleasantly surprised with a snappy and very capable system. Having just 4 cores had this processor coming in at the back of the pack for heavily threaded workloads, but it performed better than some of its more expensive siblings in lightly threaded workloads where it shined thanks to its high base clocks.

If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, AMD also offers the FX-9800P at $253.53. It’s still outfitted with 4-cores and 4-threads, but clocks in at a slower 3.6GHz and maxes out at only 3.6GHz.

The FX-9830P clocks up to 3.7Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 3.8GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.

There’s a saying that two heads are better than one and, well, 4-cores are better than 2. The extra processing power of the FX-9830P puts Intel’s processors to shame, including both its closest competitor and a much higher-spec part.

Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream FX CPUs, AMD's attack on Intel now extends down into the high-end-low-power with its FX-9830P processors, which the company is making available as of 1 June 2016.

The 4-core FX-9830P is AMD's first FX processor that doesn't feature simultaneous multi-threading, so it only schedules 4 threads at a time, like Core i7-7600U. Still, when it's up against Intel's 2 cores, the FX-9830P boasts a notable resource advantage.

Which GPU to Pick for AMD FX-9830P

Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD FX-9830P.

Graphics Card Price Cost Per Frame Avg 1080p Avg 1440p Avg 4K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB $ 1,599 $ 17.3 92.6 FPS
186.8 FPS
155.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB $ 799 $ 9.2 86.4 FPS
174.3 FPS
144.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB $ 999 $ 11.9 83.6 FPS
165.5 FPS
125.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB $ 1,199 $ 15 80.2 FPS
161.8 FPS
134.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB $ 799 $ 10.4 77.1 FPS
155.4 FPS
129.1 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB $ 899 $ 11.8 76 FPS
150.5 FPS
113.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB $ 1,499 $ 20.8 72.1 FPS
140.3 FPS
109.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB $ 1,099 $ 15.9 69 FPS
136.8 FPS
103.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB $ 1,999 $ 29.4 67.9 FPS
136.9 FPS
113.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB $ 999 $ 14.8 67.6 FPS
132.3 FPS
101.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB $ 649 $ 10.2 63.6 FPS
124.6 FPS
95.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB $ 799 $ 12.7 62.9 FPS
124.8 FPS
101.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB $ 699 $ 11.1 62.8 FPS
122.3 FPS
95.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB $ 599 $ 9.9 60.7 FPS
119.4 FPS
98 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB $ 599 $ 11.1 53.9 FPS
105.8 FPS
84.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB $ 579 $ 11.5 50.4 FPS
98.7 FPS
75.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB $ 499 $ 10.4 48.1 FPS
93.6 FPS
73.2 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB $ 2,499 $ 56.7 44.1 FPS
88.7 FPS
69.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB $ 1,299 $ 30.2 43 FPS
86.4 FPS
68 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB $ 479 $ 11.3 42.4 FPS
83.6 FPS
63.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB $ 399 $ 9.6 41.7 FPS
83.2 FPS
67.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB $ 399 $ 10.1 39.4 FPS
78.7 FPS
62.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB $ 699 $ 17.9 39 FPS
77.6 FPS
60.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB $ 399 $ 10.6 37.6 FPS
74.5 FPS
57.6 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB $ 2,999 $ 80.2 37.4 FPS
75.1 FPS
60.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB $ 299 $ 8 37.4 FPS
74.9 FPS
60.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB $ 269 $ 7.2 37.3 FPS
74 FPS
57.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB $ 699 $ 18.9 36.9 FPS
72.6 FPS
56.4 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB $ 379 $ 10.7 35.3 FPS
69.6 FPS
53.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB $ 759 $ 21.9 34.6 FPS
69.2 FPS
54.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB $ 499 $ 14.5 34.3 FPS
66.8 FPS
52.2 FPS
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB $ 1,199 $ 35.4 33.9 FPS
66.8 FPS
53.5 FPS
AMD Radeon VII 16GB $ 699 $ 20.6 33.9 FPS
66.4 FPS
51.1 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB $ 399 $ 12.1 33 FPS
64.6 FPS
49.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB $ 499 $ 15.3 32.6 FPS
62.5 FPS
49.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB $ 200 $ 6.1 32.6 FPS
64.6 FPS
52 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB $ 329 $ 10.2 32.3 FPS
63.1 FPS
49.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB $ 400 $ 13 30.8 FPS
58.1 FPS
45.2 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB $ 349 $ 11.6 30.2 FPS
59.2 FPS
45.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB $ 499 $ 17 29.4 FPS
56.6 FPS
43.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB $ 350 $ 12.1 29 FPS
53.5 FPS
40.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB $ 279 $ 9.8 28.5 FPS
55.4 FPS
42.4 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB $ 1,499 $ 54.5 27.5 FPS
52.3 FPS
42.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB $ 499 $ 18.2 27.4 FPS
53.7 FPS
41.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB $ 409 $ 15 27.2 FPS
52.4 FPS
40.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB $ 249 $ 9.4 26.6 FPS
50.9 FPS
39.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB $ 999 $ 37.8 26.4 FPS
50.4 FPS
38.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB $ 279 $ 10.8 25.9 FPS
49.9 FPS
38.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB $ 399 $ 15.5 25.7 FPS
50.3 FPS
38.6 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB $ 399 $ 16 25 FPS
47.9 FPS
36.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB $ 229 $ 9.4 24.4 FPS
47.1 FPS
36.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB $ 649 $ 28.2 23 FPS
44.1 FPS
33.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB $ 220 $ 9.6 23 FPS
44.3 FPS
34 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB $ 279 $ 12.8 21.8 FPS
40.8 FPS
30.7 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB $ 649 $ 31.1 20.9 FPS
42 FPS
33.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB $ 160 $ 8 20 FPS
38.5 FPS
29.5 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB $ 199 $ 10.1 19.8 FPS
37.1 FPS
27.8 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB $ 549 $ 27.9 19.7 FPS
37.4 FPS
28.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB $ 229 $ 11.9 19.3 FPS
36.1 FPS
27 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB $ 649 $ 34.2 19 FPS
37.5 FPS
29.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB $ 999 $ 54.3 18.4 FPS
34.7 FPS
28 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB $ 549 $ 30.5 18 FPS
35.3 FPS
27.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB $ 254 $ 14.2 17.9 FPS
33.8 FPS
26 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB $ 169 $ 9.5 17.8 FPS
33.3 FPS
24.9 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB $ 429 $ 24.8 17.3 FPS
33.9 FPS
26.3 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB $ 170 $ 10 17 FPS
32.2 FPS
24.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB $ 329 $ 19.7 16.7 FPS
31.3 FPS
25 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB $ 400 $ 24.5 16.3 FPS
31.5 FPS
24.8 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB $ 329 $ 20.4 16.1 FPS
30.9 FPS
22.7 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB $ 169 $ 10.6 15.9 FPS
30.5 FPS
22.9 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB $ 149 $ 9.8 15.2 FPS
29.1 FPS
22.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB $ 179 $ 12.6 14.2 FPS
27.4 FPS
20.9 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB $ 229 $ 19.1 12 FPS
22.8 FPS
17.8 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB $ 249 $ 23.3 10.7 FPS
20.5 FPS
15.1 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB $ 199 $ 18.6 10.7 FPS
20.3 FPS
15.1 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB $ 169 $ 16.1 10.5 FPS
20.1 FPS
15.4 FPS
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB $ 279 $ 26.8 10.4 FPS
20 FPS
14.5 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB $ 199 $ 19.3 10.3 FPS
19.5 FPS
14.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB $ 169 $ 19 8.9 FPS
16.9 FPS
12.8 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB $ 99 $ 11.9 8.3 FPS
15.5 FPS
11.7 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB $ 159 $ 19.6 8.1 FPS
15.2 FPS
11.9 FPS
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB $ 149 $ 18.6 8 FPS
14.3 FPS
11.2 FPS
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB $ 149 $ 18.9 7.9 FPS
13.8 FPS
10.9 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB $ 140 $ 19.2 7.3 FPS
13.7 FPS
10.4 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB $ 149 $ 21.3 7 FPS
11.8 FPS
9.3 FPS
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB $ 79 $ 13.6 5.8 FPS
10.9 FPS
8.2 FPS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB $ 79 $ 14.4 5.5 FPS
10.4 FPS
7.6 FPS
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?

Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?

Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks

Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.

Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?

Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.

Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?

Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.

Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?

Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.

How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU

Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.

RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison

Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?

10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs

May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.

10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.

13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.

2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?

May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.

Critics Reviews