AMD FX-4200 Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | AM3+ | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 12 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2012 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 433.2 USD | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3.3 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 3.7 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 125 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 32 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 56 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 44 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 28 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 69 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 57.6 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 28.8 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 14.4 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 23/100 | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The FX-4200 is one of AMD's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2012 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.3GHz, max speed at 3.3GHz, and a 125W power rating. The FX-4200 is based on the Zambezi 32nm family and is part of the FX series.
AMD's Bulldozer series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.
As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.
Value seekers who aren't afraid to press the Precision Boost Overdrive button and have sufficient cooling should look to the FX-4170 for roughly equivalent performance to the FX-4200, particularly if gaming factors heavily into the buying decision. That could save you money, reinforcing our decision to give the FX-4170 an Editor's Choice award.
The AMD FX-4200 seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $433.2 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Core i5-3570 4-Core unlocked desktop processor with Intel HD Graphics 2500 graphics ($231 shipped).
The FX-4200 clocks up to 3.3Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 3.4GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
Which GPU to Pick for AMD FX-4200
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD FX-4200.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 9.5 | 167.8 FPS
|
215.6 FPS
|
164.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.1 | 156.6 FPS
|
201.2 FPS
|
153.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 6.6 | 151.4 FPS
|
191 FPS
|
132.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 8.2 | 145.4 FPS
|
186.7 FPS
|
142.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 5.7 | 139.7 FPS
|
179.3 FPS
|
136.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 6.5 | 137.7 FPS
|
173.6 FPS
|
120.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 11.5 | 130.7 FPS
|
161.9 FPS
|
116.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 8.8 | 125.1 FPS
|
157.8 FPS
|
109.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 16.3 | 123 FPS
|
158 FPS
|
120.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 8.2 | 122.5 FPS
|
152.7 FPS
|
107.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 5.6 | 115.3 FPS
|
143.7 FPS
|
101.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 7 | 113.9 FPS
|
144 FPS
|
107.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 6.1 | 113.9 FPS
|
141.1 FPS
|
101.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 5.4 | 110 FPS
|
137.7 FPS
|
103.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 6.1 | 97.7 FPS
|
122.1 FPS
|
89.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 6.3 | 91.3 FPS
|
113.8 FPS
|
80.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.7 | 87.1 FPS
|
108 FPS
|
77.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 31.2 | 80 FPS
|
102.4 FPS
|
73.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 16.7 | 77.9 FPS
|
99.7 FPS
|
71.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 6.2 | 76.9 FPS
|
96.5 FPS
|
67.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.3 | 75.6 FPS
|
96 FPS
|
71 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.6 | 71.4 FPS
|
90.8 FPS
|
66.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 9.9 | 70.7 FPS
|
89.6 FPS
|
64.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.9 | 68.2 FPS
|
86 FPS
|
61 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 44.3 | 67.7 FPS
|
86.7 FPS
|
63.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 4.4 | 67.7 FPS
|
86.4 FPS
|
63.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 4 | 67.7 FPS
|
85.4 FPS
|
60.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 10.5 | 66.8 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
59.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 5.9 | 64 FPS
|
80.3 FPS
|
56.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 12.1 | 62.6 FPS
|
79.9 FPS
|
57.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8 | 62.2 FPS
|
77.1 FPS
|
55.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 11.4 | 61.4 FPS
|
76.6 FPS
|
54 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 19.5 | 61.4 FPS
|
77.1 FPS
|
56.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.7 | 59.8 FPS
|
74.5 FPS
|
52.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.5 | 59 FPS
|
72.1 FPS
|
52.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 3.4 | 59 FPS
|
74.5 FPS
|
55.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 5.6 | 58.6 FPS
|
72.8 FPS
|
52.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 7.2 | 55.8 FPS
|
67.1 FPS
|
47.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 6.4 | 54.8 FPS
|
68.4 FPS
|
48.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.4 | 53.2 FPS
|
65.3 FPS
|
46.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 6.7 | 52.5 FPS
|
61.7 FPS
|
43.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 5.4 | 51.7 FPS
|
63.9 FPS
|
44.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 30.1 | 49.8 FPS
|
60.4 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10 | 49.7 FPS
|
62 FPS
|
43.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 8.3 | 49.3 FPS
|
60.5 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 5.2 | 48.2 FPS
|
58.8 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 20.9 | 47.9 FPS
|
58.1 FPS
|
41 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 5.9 | 46.9 FPS
|
57.6 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 8.6 | 46.6 FPS
|
58 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 8.8 | 45.4 FPS
|
55.2 FPS
|
38.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 5.2 | 44.2 FPS
|
54.3 FPS
|
38.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 15.6 | 41.7 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
35.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 5.3 | 41.6 FPS
|
51.1 FPS
|
36 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 7.1 | 39.5 FPS
|
47.1 FPS
|
32.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 17.1 | 37.9 FPS
|
48.4 FPS
|
35 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 4.4 | 36.2 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
31.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 5.5 | 35.9 FPS
|
42.8 FPS
|
29.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 15.3 | 35.8 FPS
|
43.2 FPS
|
30.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 6.5 | 35 FPS
|
41.7 FPS
|
28.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 18.9 | 34.4 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
31.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 29.9 | 33.4 FPS
|
40 FPS
|
29.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 16.8 | 32.6 FPS
|
40.7 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 7.8 | 32.5 FPS
|
39 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.2 | 32.2 FPS
|
38.4 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 13.7 | 31.3 FPS
|
39.1 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 5.5 | 30.8 FPS
|
37.1 FPS
|
26.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 10.9 | 30.3 FPS
|
36.1 FPS
|
26.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 13.6 | 29.4 FPS
|
36.4 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 11.2 | 29.3 FPS
|
35.7 FPS
|
24 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.8 | 28.9 FPS
|
35.2 FPS
|
24.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 5.4 | 27.6 FPS
|
33.6 FPS
|
23.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 6.9 | 25.8 FPS
|
31.6 FPS
|
22.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 10.6 | 21.7 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
18.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 12.8 | 19.5 FPS
|
23.7 FPS
|
16 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 10.3 | 19.3 FPS
|
23.4 FPS
|
16 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 8.9 | 19 FPS
|
23.2 FPS
|
16.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 14.8 | 18.8 FPS
|
23.1 FPS
|
15.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 10.7 | 18.6 FPS
|
22.5 FPS
|
15.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 10.4 | 16.2 FPS
|
19.5 FPS
|
13.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 6.6 | 15 FPS
|
17.9 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 10.8 | 14.7 FPS
|
17.5 FPS
|
12.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 10.3 | 14.4 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
11.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 10.4 | 14.3 FPS
|
15.9 FPS
|
11.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 10.6 | 13.2 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
11 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.6 | 12.8 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
9.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 7.5 | 10.5 FPS
|
12.6 FPS
|
8.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 7.9 | 10 FPS
|
11.9 FPS
|
8 FPS
|
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.