Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | entry-level | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | AM4 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | Radeon R5 (on die) | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2016 Model | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Price | 64 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Number of Cores | 2 Cores | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 2 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 3.5 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 3.8 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 3.8 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 65 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 28 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 0 MB | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Price-Value Score | 89 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Speed Score | 52 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 27 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 69 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 61.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 30.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 15.5 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 30/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The A6-9500 is one of AMD's entry-level Desktop processors. It was released in 2016 with 2 cores and 2 threads. With base clock at 3.5GHz, max speed at 3.8GHz, and a 65W power rating. The A6-9500 is based on the Bristol Ridge 28nm family and is part of the A6 series.
AMD's Excavator+ series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.
As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.
Moving beyond games, it’s an easy win for the Core i3-7350K. The Core i3 upgrade path on B150, B250, B360, B365, C232, C236, C246, H110, H170, H270, H310, H370, Q170, Q270, Q370, Z170, Z270, Z370, Z390 motherboards, all support upcoming Kaby Lake-S processors. So if you buy a nice B150, B250, B360, B365, C232, C236, C246, H110, H170, H270, H310, H370, Q170, Q270, Q370, Z170, Z270, Z370, Z390 board now with the Core i3-7350K, you’ll be able to slap a Bristol Ridge processor on there later in the year, or whenever you deem it necessary.
One of the nice things about the AMD A6-9500 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the AMD A6-9500 up for $64 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The AMD A6-9500 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 65W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
The AMD A6-9500 seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $64 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Core i3-7350K 2-Core unlocked desktop processor with Intel HD Graphics 630 graphics ($179 shipped).
Bottom Line, the AMD A6-9500 does not get much media attention since it is entry-level 7 Gen Core Bristol Ridge processor, but it is a very capable processor that still delivers a good computing experience for entry-level users.
The A6-9500 clocks up to 3.8Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 3.9GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
That said, to squeeze out all the potential of this surprisingly potent entry-level chip, you’ll want (and need) to splurge on an enthusiast-grade X370, X470, X570 motherboard.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream A6 CPUs, AMD's attack on Intel now extends down into the entry-level with its A6-9500 processors, which the company is making available as of Dec 2016.
AMD arms A6-9500 with a 3.5 GHz base frequency that jumps as high as 3.8 GHz under lightly-threaded tasks. The A6-9500 also offers a 3.5 GHz clock rate with all cores active. Meanwhile, Intel keeps its Core i3-7350K operating at a static 4.2 GHz clock rate.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD A6-9500.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 10.6 | 150.7 FPS
|
209.2 FPS
|
162.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.7 | 140.7 FPS
|
195.2 FPS
|
151.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 7.3 | 136.1 FPS
|
185.3 FPS
|
130.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 9.2 | 130.6 FPS
|
181.2 FPS
|
140.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 6.4 | 125.5 FPS
|
174.1 FPS
|
134.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 7.3 | 123.7 FPS
|
168.5 FPS
|
118.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 12.8 | 117.4 FPS
|
157.2 FPS
|
114.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 9.8 | 112.4 FPS
|
153.2 FPS
|
108 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 18.1 | 110.5 FPS
|
153.3 FPS
|
118.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 9.1 | 110.1 FPS
|
148.2 FPS
|
106.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 6.3 | 103.6 FPS
|
139.5 FPS
|
100.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 7.8 | 102.4 FPS
|
139.7 FPS
|
105.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 6.8 | 102.3 FPS
|
137 FPS
|
99.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 6.1 | 98.8 FPS
|
133.7 FPS
|
102.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 6.8 | 87.8 FPS
|
118.5 FPS
|
88 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 7.1 | 82.1 FPS
|
110.5 FPS
|
79.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.4 | 78.3 FPS
|
104.8 FPS
|
76.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 34.8 | 71.9 FPS
|
99.4 FPS
|
73 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 18.6 | 70 FPS
|
96.7 FPS
|
71 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 6.9 | 69.1 FPS
|
93.7 FPS
|
66.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.9 | 67.9 FPS
|
93.1 FPS
|
70 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.2 | 64.1 FPS
|
88.1 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 11 | 63.5 FPS
|
86.9 FPS
|
63.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.5 | 61.3 FPS
|
83.5 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 49.2 | 60.9 FPS
|
84.1 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 4.9 | 60.8 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 4.4 | 60.8 FPS
|
82.9 FPS
|
59.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 11.7 | 60 FPS
|
81.3 FPS
|
58.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 6.6 | 57.5 FPS
|
77.9 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 13.5 | 56.3 FPS
|
77.5 FPS
|
56.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.9 | 55.9 FPS
|
74.9 FPS
|
54.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 21.7 | 55.2 FPS
|
74.9 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 12.7 | 55.2 FPS
|
74.3 FPS
|
53.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.4 | 53.7 FPS
|
72.3 FPS
|
51.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.4 | 53 FPS
|
69.9 FPS
|
51.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 3.8 | 53 FPS
|
72.3 FPS
|
54.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 6.3 | 52.6 FPS
|
70.6 FPS
|
52 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8 | 50.2 FPS
|
65.1 FPS
|
47.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 7.1 | 49.2 FPS
|
66.3 FPS
|
47.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10.4 | 47.8 FPS
|
63.4 FPS
|
45.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 7.4 | 47.2 FPS
|
59.9 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6 | 46.4 FPS
|
62 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 33.5 | 44.8 FPS
|
58.6 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 11.2 | 44.7 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
43 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 9.2 | 44.3 FPS
|
58.7 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 5.8 | 43.3 FPS
|
57 FPS
|
41.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 23.2 | 43.1 FPS
|
56.4 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6.6 | 42.1 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
40 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.5 | 41.9 FPS
|
56.3 FPS
|
40.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.8 | 40.8 FPS
|
53.6 FPS
|
38.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 5.8 | 39.7 FPS
|
52.7 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 17.3 | 37.5 FPS
|
49.4 FPS
|
35.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 5.9 | 37.4 FPS
|
49.6 FPS
|
35.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 7.9 | 35.5 FPS
|
45.7 FPS
|
32 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 19.1 | 34 FPS
|
47 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 4.9 | 32.6 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 6.2 | 32.3 FPS
|
41.5 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 17.1 | 32.1 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
30.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 7.3 | 31.5 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
28.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 21 | 30.9 FPS
|
42 FPS
|
30.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 33.3 | 30 FPS
|
38.8 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 18.7 | 29.3 FPS
|
39.5 FPS
|
28.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 8.7 | 29.2 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
27.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.8 | 28.9 FPS
|
37.3 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 15.2 | 28.2 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 6.1 | 27.7 FPS
|
36 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 12.1 | 27.2 FPS
|
35 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 15.1 | 26.5 FPS
|
35.3 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 12.5 | 26.3 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
23.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.5 | 26 FPS
|
34.2 FPS
|
23.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 6 | 24.8 FPS
|
32.6 FPS
|
23.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 7.7 | 23.2 FPS
|
30.6 FPS
|
21.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 11.7 | 19.5 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
18.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 14.2 | 17.5 FPS
|
23 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.4 | 17.4 FPS
|
22.7 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 9.9 | 17.1 FPS
|
22.5 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 16.5 | 16.9 FPS
|
22.4 FPS
|
15.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.9 | 16.7 FPS
|
21.8 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 11.6 | 14.6 FPS
|
19 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 7.3 | 13.5 FPS
|
17.4 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 12 | 13.2 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.5 | 13 FPS
|
16 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.6 | 12.9 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
11.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 11.8 | 11.9 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 13 | 11.5 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
9.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.4 | 9.4 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
8.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.8 | 9 FPS
|
11.6 FPS
|
7.9 FPS
|
The 13 and 15 has completely different processors. The 13 is the lower power version.
As for size, I'd prioritize your use case. I have a desktop so I got the 13 for the portability. If your laptop is going to be your day to day system, I'd personally say the 15 is a must. Little difference in portability between the 7590 and 9500.
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
AMD A6-9500. vs. AMD A6-9500E. vs. Intel Core i5-9400. vs. AMD A6-9500E. vs. AMD A10-9700. vs. AMD A6-9500E. vs. Intel Core i3-7100. Price comparison. General info. 1. semiconductor size. 28nm. Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of ...
AMD A6-9500 ⭐ review. Discover the key facts and see how AMD A6-9500 performs in the CPU ranking.
PRO A6-9500E processor released by AMD; release date: 3 October 2016. The processor is designed for desktop-computers. CPU is unlocked for overclocking.
A6-9500 processor released by AMD; release date: 27 July 2017. At the time of release, the processor cost $64. The processor is designed for desktop-computers and based on Bristol Ridge microarchitecture.
A6-9500 all Tests: https://bit.ly/2BtRxkD 00:01 - Dirt Rally 01:44 - Dead Or Alive 5 02:29 - Rocket League 03:34 - Overwatch 04:30 - Counter-strike: Global Offensive CS:GO 06:07 - Dota 2 07:32 ...
Help me choose. Xps 9500 vs xps 9300 vs xps 7590 (specs below)
Xps 9500: 10th gen i5, 16gb ram, 256gb ssd. $1800
Xps 9300: 10th gen i5, 16gb ram, 256gb ssd. $1700
Xps 7590: 9th gen i7, 16gb, 512gb, gtx 1650. $1830
Edit: just noticed the i5 in the 9300 and 9500 aren't exactly the same. The one in 9500 is 8mb cache, up to 4.5ghz, and the one in 9300 is 6mb cache, up to 3.6ghz
Canadian here going into first year of university studying cs. Looking for something that will get me through my 4 years.
I know the xps 9500 might come with quality control issues like the trackpad but it's not a dealbreaker for me as I'm willing to take chances.
I really prefer the 16:10 aspect ratio. I once saw my friend's old xps 13 and it was just too damn short for my liking.
As for the size, I'm not sure if I'm gonna find the 13 big enough. Like i said my friends xps 13 was too small and i don't know if the new aspect ratio is gonna help it that much. But I will be carrying it in a backpack almost everyday so is there a significant difference between the 3 devices in portability?
The graphics card on the 7590 is a plus which I can use to do some gaming but I really don't "need" it to be honest.
How do these devices compare in battery life?
Please let me know what you guys think and what would you do in this situation