AMD A12-9800 Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | AM4 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 (on-die) | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2016 Model | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 139 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.8 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 4.2 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.2 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 65 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 28 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 0 MB | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 74 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 56 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 35 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 70 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 59.5 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 29.7 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 14.9 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 33/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The A12-9800 is one of AMD's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2016 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.8GHz, max speed at 4.2GHz, and a 65W power rating. The A12-9800 is based on the Bristol Ridge 28nm family and is part of the A12 series.
AMD's Excavator+ series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.
As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.
One of the nice things about the AMD A12-9800 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the AMD A12-9800 up for $139 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The AMD A12-9800 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 65W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
Our look today at the AMD A12-9800 showed that it is a very capable processor. A 4-core processor sounds like it would be really under-powered these days, but we were pleasantly surprised with a snappy and very capable system. Having just 4 cores had this processor coming in at the back of the pack for heavily threaded workloads, but it performed better than some of its more expensive siblings in lightly threaded workloads where it shined thanks to its high base clocks.
The A12-9800 clocks up to 4.2Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 4.3GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream A12 CPUs, AMD's attack on Intel now extends down into the mid-range with its A12-9800 processors, which the company is making available as of Oct 2016.
Which GPU to Pick for AMD A12-9800
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD A12-9800.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 10 | 160.2 FPS
|
212.9 FPS
|
163.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.3 | 149.5 FPS
|
198.6 FPS
|
152.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 6.9 | 144.6 FPS
|
188.6 FPS
|
131.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 8.6 | 138.9 FPS
|
184.3 FPS
|
141.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 6 | 133.4 FPS
|
177.1 FPS
|
135.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 6.8 | 131.5 FPS
|
171.5 FPS
|
119.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 12 | 124.8 FPS
|
159.9 FPS
|
115.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 9.2 | 119.5 FPS
|
155.8 FPS
|
108.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 17 | 117.5 FPS
|
156 FPS
|
119.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 8.5 | 117 FPS
|
150.8 FPS
|
107 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 5.9 | 110.2 FPS
|
141.9 FPS
|
100.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 7.3 | 108.8 FPS
|
142.2 FPS
|
106.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 6.4 | 108.8 FPS
|
139.4 FPS
|
100.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 5.7 | 105 FPS
|
136 FPS
|
103.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 6.4 | 93.3 FPS
|
120.5 FPS
|
88.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 6.6 | 87.3 FPS
|
112.4 FPS
|
79.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6 | 83.2 FPS
|
106.6 FPS
|
77 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 32.7 | 76.4 FPS
|
101.1 FPS
|
73.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 17.5 | 74.4 FPS
|
98.4 FPS
|
71.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 6.5 | 73.4 FPS
|
95.3 FPS
|
66.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.5 | 72.2 FPS
|
94.7 FPS
|
70.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.9 | 68.2 FPS
|
89.7 FPS
|
66 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 10.4 | 67.5 FPS
|
88.4 FPS
|
63.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.1 | 65.1 FPS
|
84.9 FPS
|
60.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 46.4 | 64.7 FPS
|
85.6 FPS
|
63.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 4.6 | 64.7 FPS
|
85.3 FPS
|
63.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 4.2 | 64.6 FPS
|
84.4 FPS
|
60 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 11 | 63.8 FPS
|
82.7 FPS
|
59.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 6.2 | 61.1 FPS
|
79.3 FPS
|
56.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 12.7 | 59.8 FPS
|
78.9 FPS
|
57 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.4 | 59.4 FPS
|
76.2 FPS
|
54.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 20.5 | 58.6 FPS
|
76.2 FPS
|
56.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 11.9 | 58.6 FPS
|
75.6 FPS
|
53.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7 | 57.1 FPS
|
73.6 FPS
|
52.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.9 | 56.3 FPS
|
71.2 FPS
|
52 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 3.6 | 56.3 FPS
|
73.6 FPS
|
54.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 5.9 | 55.9 FPS
|
71.9 FPS
|
52.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 7.5 | 53.3 FPS
|
66.2 FPS
|
47.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 6.7 | 52.3 FPS
|
67.5 FPS
|
47.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.8 | 50.8 FPS
|
64.5 FPS
|
45.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 7 | 50.2 FPS
|
60.9 FPS
|
42.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 5.6 | 49.4 FPS
|
63.1 FPS
|
44.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 31.5 | 47.6 FPS
|
59.6 FPS
|
45.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10.5 | 47.5 FPS
|
61.2 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 8.7 | 47.1 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
42.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 5.4 | 46 FPS
|
58 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 21.8 | 45.8 FPS
|
57.4 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6.2 | 44.8 FPS
|
56.9 FPS
|
40.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9 | 44.5 FPS
|
57.3 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.2 | 43.3 FPS
|
54.5 FPS
|
38.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 5.4 | 42.2 FPS
|
53.7 FPS
|
38.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 16.3 | 39.8 FPS
|
50.3 FPS
|
35.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 5.5 | 39.7 FPS
|
50.5 FPS
|
35.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 7.4 | 37.7 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
32.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 17.9 | 36.2 FPS
|
47.8 FPS
|
34.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 4.6 | 34.6 FPS
|
43.8 FPS
|
31 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 5.8 | 34.3 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 16.1 | 34.2 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 6.9 | 33.4 FPS
|
41.2 FPS
|
28.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 19.7 | 32.9 FPS
|
42.7 FPS
|
30.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 31.3 | 31.9 FPS
|
39.5 FPS
|
29.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 17.7 | 31.1 FPS
|
40.2 FPS
|
28.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 8.2 | 31 FPS
|
38.5 FPS
|
27.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.5 | 30.7 FPS
|
38 FPS
|
26.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 14.3 | 29.9 FPS
|
38.6 FPS
|
27.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 5.8 | 29.4 FPS
|
36.6 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 11.4 | 28.9 FPS
|
35.6 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 14.2 | 28.1 FPS
|
35.9 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 11.8 | 27.9 FPS
|
35.2 FPS
|
23.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.1 | 27.6 FPS
|
34.8 FPS
|
24.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 5.6 | 26.4 FPS
|
33.2 FPS
|
23.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 7.3 | 24.6 FPS
|
31.2 FPS
|
22 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 11.1 | 20.7 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
18.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 13.4 | 18.6 FPS
|
23.4 FPS
|
15.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 10.8 | 18.5 FPS
|
23.1 FPS
|
15.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 9.3 | 18.2 FPS
|
22.9 FPS
|
16.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 15.5 | 18 FPS
|
22.8 FPS
|
15.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.2 | 17.8 FPS
|
22.2 FPS
|
15.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 10.9 | 15.5 FPS
|
19.3 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 6.9 | 14.3 FPS
|
17.7 FPS
|
12.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 11.4 | 14 FPS
|
17.3 FPS
|
12.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 10.8 | 13.8 FPS
|
16.2 FPS
|
11.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 10.9 | 13.7 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
11.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 11.1 | 12.6 FPS
|
15.6 FPS
|
11 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 12.2 | 12.2 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
9.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 7.9 | 10 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
8.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.3 | 9.5 FPS
|
11.8 FPS
|
7.9 FPS
|
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Critics Reviews
The A12-9800 also took 46% longer than the G4560 in the Corona benchmark and 52% longer than the R3 1200. The A12-9800's Blender results aren't actually that bad as it beat the G4560, though it ...
AMD A12-9800 ⭐ review. Discover the key facts and see how AMD A12-9800 performs in the CPU ranking.
The A12-9800’s integrated GPU does to quite well in Rocket League and since this game uses very little CPU power the APU does quite well. The G4560 using the Intel HD graphics is still a pile of ...
AMD A12-9800, These aren't the APUs you're looking for! - Duration: 11:58. Hardware Unboxed 129,701 views. 11:58. Crazy things you can do in Call of Duty Warzone #6 - Duration: 11:27.
AMD A12-9800 Test / AMD A12 9800 Test / AMD A12 9800 Review / Review AMD A12-9800 Gameplay Benchmark Frame-rate test Amd Ryzen, Zen, Bristol Ridge AM4 Ultra cheap budget PC gaming!
A12-9800 processor released by AMD; release date: 27 July 2017. At the time of release, the processor cost $139. The processor is designed for desktop-computers and based on Bristol Ridge microarchitecture.
PRO A12-9800 processor released by AMD; release date: 3 October 2016. The processor is designed for desktop-computers. CPU is unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores - 4. Maximum CPU clock speed - 4.2 GHz. Maximum operating temperature - 90°C. Manufacturing process technology - 28 nm. Cache size: L2 - 2 MB. Supported socket types: AM4.
A12-9800 is based on the dreaded Bulldozer cores but with major improvements, and it's the best AMD can do. We have to respect that. You can't fight what's inferior architecture in first place. The original FX-4100 was a piece of junk at launch, it feels slower than my Phenom 570 at 4.3GHz in some occasions.
Notebookcheck tested the new HP EliteBook 755 G4. This business device is run by an AMD processor, and the business package is rounded by many security features. In connection with the integrated ...