Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
---|---|---|
Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Socket Compatibility | AM4 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 (on-die) | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Year | 2016 Model | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Price | 90 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Core Frequency | 3.5 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Boost Frequency | 3.8 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max Stable Overclock | 3.8 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Power Consumption | 65 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Manufacturing Process | 28 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
L3 Cache | 0 MB | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Price-Value Score | 85 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
Speed Score | 52 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Productivity Score | 33 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Gaming Score | 69 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 62 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 31 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 15.5 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Overall Score | 31/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The A10-9700 is one of AMD's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2016 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.5GHz, max speed at 3.8GHz, and a 65W power rating. The A10-9700 is based on the Bristol Ridge 28nm family and is part of the A10 series.
A10-9700 is also the successor of AMD's last gen A10-7700K processor that was based on the Steamroller and 28nm process and was released in 2014.
AMD's Excavator+ series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.
As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.
Bear in mind, however, that if you already have something like the A10-7700K, this generation doesn't offer the biggest boost in performance. You might want to wait another year or so before dropping a few hundred bucks, or even opt to splurge on a higher-end but pricier chip.
One of the nice things about the AMD A10-9700 processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the AMD A10-9700 up for $90 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The AMD A10-9700 retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 65W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
The A10-9700 clocks up to 3.8Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 3.9GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
Fresh from a successful roll-out of mainstream A10 CPUs, AMD's attack on Intel now extends down into the mid-range with its A10-9700 processors, which the company is making available as of Dec 2016.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD A10-9700.
Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 10.6 | 150.4 FPS
|
208.9 FPS
|
162.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.7 | 140.3 FPS
|
195 FPS
|
151.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 7.4 | 135.7 FPS
|
185.1 FPS
|
130.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 9.2 | 130.3 FPS
|
180.9 FPS
|
140.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 6.4 | 125.2 FPS
|
173.8 FPS
|
134.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 7.3 | 123.4 FPS
|
168.3 FPS
|
118.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 12.8 | 117.1 FPS
|
156.9 FPS
|
114.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 9.8 | 112.1 FPS
|
153 FPS
|
108 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 18.1 | 110.2 FPS
|
153.1 FPS
|
118.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 9.1 | 109.8 FPS
|
148 FPS
|
106.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 6.3 | 103.4 FPS
|
139.3 FPS
|
100.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 7.8 | 102.1 FPS
|
139.5 FPS
|
105.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 6.8 | 102.1 FPS
|
136.8 FPS
|
99.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 6.1 | 98.5 FPS
|
133.5 FPS
|
102.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 6.8 | 87.6 FPS
|
118.3 FPS
|
88 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 7.1 | 81.9 FPS
|
110.3 FPS
|
79.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.4 | 78.1 FPS
|
104.7 FPS
|
76.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 34.9 | 71.7 FPS
|
99.2 FPS
|
73 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 18.6 | 69.8 FPS
|
96.6 FPS
|
71 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 7 | 68.9 FPS
|
93.5 FPS
|
66.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.9 | 67.8 FPS
|
93 FPS
|
70 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.2 | 64 FPS
|
88 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 11 | 63.3 FPS
|
86.8 FPS
|
63.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.5 | 61.1 FPS
|
83.3 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 49.4 | 60.7 FPS
|
84 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 4.9 | 60.7 FPS
|
83.7 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 4.4 | 60.6 FPS
|
82.8 FPS
|
59.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 11.7 | 59.9 FPS
|
81.2 FPS
|
58.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 6.6 | 57.3 FPS
|
77.8 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 13.5 | 56.1 FPS
|
77.4 FPS
|
56.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.9 | 55.8 FPS
|
74.8 FPS
|
54.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 12.7 | 55 FPS
|
74.2 FPS
|
53.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 21.8 | 55 FPS
|
74.8 FPS
|
55.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.4 | 53.6 FPS
|
72.2 FPS
|
51.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.4 | 52.9 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
51.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 3.8 | 52.9 FPS
|
72.2 FPS
|
54.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 6.3 | 52.5 FPS
|
70.5 FPS
|
52 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8 | 50 FPS
|
65 FPS
|
47.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 7.1 | 49.1 FPS
|
66.2 FPS
|
47.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10.5 | 47.7 FPS
|
63.3 FPS
|
45.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 7.4 | 47.1 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6 | 46.3 FPS
|
61.9 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 33.5 | 44.7 FPS
|
58.5 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 11.2 | 44.5 FPS
|
60.1 FPS
|
43 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 9.3 | 44.2 FPS
|
58.7 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 5.8 | 43.2 FPS
|
57 FPS
|
41.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 23.3 | 42.9 FPS
|
56.4 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6.6 | 42 FPS
|
55.8 FPS
|
40 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.5 | 41.8 FPS
|
56.2 FPS
|
40.3 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.8 | 40.7 FPS
|
53.5 FPS
|
38.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 5.8 | 39.6 FPS
|
52.7 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 17.4 | 37.4 FPS
|
49.4 FPS
|
35.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 5.9 | 37.3 FPS
|
49.5 FPS
|
35.5 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 7.9 | 35.4 FPS
|
45.6 FPS
|
32 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 19.1 | 33.9 FPS
|
46.9 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 4.9 | 32.5 FPS
|
43 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 6.2 | 32.2 FPS
|
41.5 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 17.2 | 32 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
30.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 7.3 | 31.4 FPS
|
40.4 FPS
|
28.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 21 | 30.9 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
30.7 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 33.4 | 29.9 FPS
|
38.8 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 18.8 | 29.2 FPS
|
39.5 FPS
|
28.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 8.7 | 29.1 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
27.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.9 | 28.8 FPS
|
37.3 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 15.3 | 28.1 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
27.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 6.2 | 27.6 FPS
|
36 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 12.1 | 27.1 FPS
|
35 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 15.2 | 26.4 FPS
|
35.3 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 12.6 | 26.2 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
23.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.5 | 25.9 FPS
|
34.1 FPS
|
23.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 6 | 24.7 FPS
|
32.6 FPS
|
23.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 7.7 | 23.1 FPS
|
30.6 FPS
|
21.9 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 11.8 | 19.4 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
18.6 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 14.3 | 17.4 FPS
|
22.9 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.5 | 17.3 FPS
|
22.7 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 9.9 | 17.1 FPS
|
22.5 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 16.5 | 16.9 FPS
|
22.4 FPS
|
15.1 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.9 | 16.7 FPS
|
21.8 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 11.7 | 14.5 FPS
|
18.9 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 7.4 | 13.4 FPS
|
17.3 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 12 | 13.2 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.6 | 12.9 FPS
|
15.9 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.6 | 12.8 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
11.4 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 11.8 | 11.9 FPS
|
15.3 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 13.1 | 11.4 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
9.8 FPS
|
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.4 | 9.4 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
8.5 FPS
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.8 | 9 FPS
|
11.6 FPS
|
7.9 FPS
|
Will this work?
https://smile.amazon.com/dp/B07FQBZYJ6/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_HDkcFb5YX6PB4
Thanks u/sthsthsthbatman !
This would be perfect except for the weight and size. Your suggestion made me realize that weight should also be a criteria. XPS 17 plus charger is already a beast to lug around. Ideally, I was looking for a stand that is light and tiny footprint for my minimalist computer bag.
Thanks everyone. Particularly u/sthsthsthbatman . Went with your suggestion.
I went with these two. Will try them both and return one:
https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B083VT6P7W/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=A211DMKAY2ZGJK&psc=1
https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B07PFSZBRZ/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?smid=A274D3MDM9QRV5&psc=1
this probably doesn't fit all the criteria, but
https://smile.amazon.com/dp/B07T8P9XCG/?coliid=I32IL4A1JKGE56&colid=3K1PVX23PFCJ7&psc=1&ref_=lv_ov_lig_dp_it
or
https://smile.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-Ventilated-Adjustable-Laptop-Stand/dp/B00WRDS8H0/ref=sr_1_7?dchild=1&keywords=laptop+stand&qid=1594412504&s=office-products&sr=1-7
Thanks u/jonsonsama . I really appreciate the tip. You're right. Not ideal but helpful. Thanks!
The stickers are innovative but I don't want to ruin the good look of the XPS 17 laptop. :)
The AmazonBasics is actually not bad. I might do this one. Though a bit concerned about the weight/portability and the two notches where laptop's base sits (they would come in the way of typing. Let me read reviews more. Thanks!
One of these may be the best fit for me. :)
https://www.amazon.com/Stopper-Easily-Wedges-Protector-Flexible/dp/B019T28OG6/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8&th=1
https://www.amazon.com/BearMoo-Stackable-Slip-Resistant-Design-100-Non-Toxic/dp/B071H2GWQJ/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8&th=1
Thanks again. I kept https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B07PFSZBRZ/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?smid=A274D3MDM9QRV5&psc=1 . And I love it! Thanks again for your help.
Stand is very sturdy. Large enough so XPS 17 doesn't wobble. Not very tall so it keeps laptop stable, yet solves heat/noise issue. Well-built. great traction so doesn't slide much.
I also bought this: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07DGC75B4?ref=ppx_pt2_dt_b_prod_image for bed/sofa use, since the weight of XPS is rather heavy for my legs. :)
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
AMD A10-9700 ⭐ review. Discover the key facts and see how AMD A10-9700 performs in the CPU ranking.
PRO A10-9700 processor released by AMD; release date: 3 October 2016. The processor is designed for desktop-computers. CPU is unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores - 4. Maximum CPU clock speed - 3.8 GHz. Maximum operating temperature - 90°C. Manufacturing process technology - 28 nm. Cache size: L2 - 2 MB. Supported socket types: AM4.
A10-9700 processor released by AMD; release date: 27 July 2017. At the time of release, the processor cost $90. The processor is designed for desktop-computers and based on Bristol Ridge microarchitecture. CPU is unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores - 4. Maximum CPU clock speed - 3.8 GHz. Maximum operating temperature - 90°C.
Atari VCS APU (it seems) - Settings & Infos below: All A10-9700 integrated Graphics Tests: http://bit.ly/2EiaSlX 00:01 - Dead Or Alive 5 01:17 - Battlefield ...
Buy AMD 7th Gen A10 9700 processors Online at best price in India on VPLAK. Check AMD 7th Gen A10 9700 processors price, specifications, reviews and more
Laptop Stand Help (for any XPS or my XPS 17 9700): Need vented top, flat base, portability, adjustable
Now that I own an XPS 17 (which i love), the only issue is that it seems the laptop needs more circulation than designed. I think the best solution would be a laptop stand, but here is how I was thinking through this. It should have:
Flat base: Meaning flat surface on bottom (see Image 1 below) so that it can sit on a bed/sofa as well as a desk. Image 2 below i would guess doesn't work well on a bed/sofa.
Vented for XPS fans on bottom. I found that by raising my XPS 17 a tad (allowing it to breath) stops the fans from coming on and keeping the machine cooler. So the stand's top part must allow the laptop's bottom to breath.
Portability: I plan to use this on a desk, on my bed and sofa, and travel with me for business trips. So Image 1 wont work. So the footprint should be small so it fits in my minimalist computer bag.
Weight: It should be light given that my XPS 17 plus charger is already a beast to lug around.
Adjustable: Ideally, it would be nice (though not a deal breaker) if the stand has adjustable height so i can raise it or lower it depending on if i am using laptop by itself, on a desk or bed.
Anything else I should be considering?
Thanks for the help!!!
Image 1: This is probably closest I found but it is not portable. nor is it adjustable
Image 2: This type of base may not work well on a bed/sofa