AMD A10-7850K Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | FM2+ | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 (on-die) | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 12 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2014 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 173 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.7 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 4 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.5 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 95 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 28 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 63 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 53 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 32 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 66 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 65 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 32.5 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 16.2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 29/100 | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The A10-7850K is one of AMD's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2014 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 3.7GHz, max speed at 4GHz, and a 95W power rating. The A10-7850K is based on the Kaveri 28nm family and is part of the A10 series.
A10-7850K is also the successor of AMD's last gen A10-6800B processor that was based on the Piledriver and 32nm process and was released in 2013.
AMD A10 5th Generation, and the Steamroller architecture itself, is notable because it leads 28nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But, there’s a lot more going on under the hood than just a smaller manufacturing node.
Unfortunately, this doesn’t quite translate to as strong of a single-core performance, even if AMD is closer than it’s ever been to matching Intel core for core. In our single-core GeekBench and Cinebench tests, the A10-7850K scored a 2072 and 64, respectively. This is definitely a huge leap over the A10-6800B, but it’s slower than the Core i5-4690K, which scored a 3597 and 152 in the same tests. But, that’s still not a huge difference, so the multi-core gains generally outweigh them.
AMD's Steamroller series has landed, upping the ante with Intel in its high-stakes game for desktop PC market dominance with a well-rounded lineup of new chips that push mainstream platforms to higher core counts and more raw compute than we've ever seen. As a result, Intel's commanding presence in the enthusiast space is threatened in a way we haven't seen in over a decade.
That something is the A10-7850K. AMD cranks the TDP dial up to 95W on this 4-core 4-thread chip, making it the high-performance counterpart to the 65W A10-7800, which is basically the same 28nm chip built with the Steamroller microarchitecture, but with a lower TDP rating. That chip came away from our first look at the Steamroller series with an Editor's Choice award, going toe-to-toe with Intel's Core i5-4690K, so it's fair to say we have high hopes for the higher-performance model. AMD still hasn't sampled the chip to the press, so we bought one at retail to put it under the microscope.
As the higher-priced version of the A10-7800, the A10-7850K has higher base and Boost frequencies of 3.7 and 4 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The A10-7800's PPT tops out at 65W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the A10-7850K at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
As we've seen, gaming remains an advantage for Intel, so if squeezing out every last frame is all you care about, Intel's processors are a good choice. Much of that performance advantage will be less noticeable when gaming at higher resolutions, or if you pair the processors with a lesser graphics card.
Value seekers who aren't afraid to press the Precision Boost Overdrive button and have sufficient cooling should look to the A10-7800 for roughly equivalent performance to the A10-7850K, particularly if gaming factors heavily into the buying decision. That could save you money, reinforcing our decision to give the A10-7800 an Editor's Choice award.
AMD A10 5 Generation is finally here, and the AMD A10-7850K might just be the poster child for what this generation of processors has in store for consumers. Sure, it might have stuck with the 4-core, 4-thread setup, which it inherited from its predecessor, the A10-6800B. However, with the new 28nm manufacturing process, it delivers a far better performance at lower power consumption.
This decision to 28nm has brought a beefy 15% boost to IPC (instructions per clock) performance. Effectively, compared to a A10 4-Generation processor at the same clock speed, you will get a straight 15% increase in performance. That’s not big enough to be evident in day-to-day workloads, but it does still mean something.
Our look today at the AMD A10-7850K showed that it is a very capable processor. A 4-core processor sounds like it would be really under-powered these days, but we were pleasantly surprised with a snappy and very capable system. Having just 4 cores had this processor coming in at the back of the pack for heavily threaded workloads, but it performed better than some of its more expensive siblings in lightly threaded workloads where it shined thanks to its high base clocks.
The AMD A10-7850K seems to be a decent performing chip that is readily available for $173 at your favorite retailer. The main competition for this processor is the Core i5-4690K 4-Core unlocked desktop processor with Intel HD Graphics 4600 graphics ($300 shipped).
If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, AMD also offers the A10-7800 at $248.93. It’s still outfitted with 4-cores and 4-threads, but clocks in at a slower 3.5GHz and maxes out at only 3.9GHz.
The A10-7850K clocks up to 4Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 4.1GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
Which GPU to Pick for AMD A10-7850K
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD A10-7850K.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 11.5 | 138.5 FPS
|
204.4 FPS
|
160.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 6.2 | 129.2 FPS
|
190.7 FPS
|
150.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 8 | 125 FPS
|
181.1 FPS
|
129.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 10 | 120 FPS
|
177 FPS
|
139.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 6.9 | 115.3 FPS
|
170 FPS
|
133.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 7.9 | 113.6 FPS
|
164.6 FPS
|
117.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 13.9 | 107.9 FPS
|
153.5 FPS
|
113.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 10.6 | 103.2 FPS
|
149.6 FPS
|
107.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 19.7 | 101.5 FPS
|
149.8 FPS
|
117.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 9.9 | 101.1 FPS
|
144.8 FPS
|
105.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 6.8 | 95.2 FPS
|
136.3 FPS
|
99.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 8.5 | 94 FPS
|
136.5 FPS
|
104.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 7.4 | 94 FPS
|
133.8 FPS
|
99.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 6.6 | 90.8 FPS
|
130.6 FPS
|
101.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 7.4 | 80.7 FPS
|
115.7 FPS
|
87.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 7.7 | 75.4 FPS
|
107.9 FPS
|
78.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.9 | 71.9 FPS
|
102.4 FPS
|
75.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 37.9 | 66 FPS
|
97.1 FPS
|
72.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 20.2 | 64.3 FPS
|
94.5 FPS
|
70.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 7.5 | 63.5 FPS
|
91.5 FPS
|
65.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.4 | 62.4 FPS
|
91 FPS
|
69.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.8 | 58.9 FPS
|
86.1 FPS
|
65 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 12 | 58.3 FPS
|
84.9 FPS
|
62.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.1 | 56.3 FPS
|
81.5 FPS
|
59.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 53.6 | 55.9 FPS
|
82.2 FPS
|
62.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 5.3 | 55.9 FPS
|
81.9 FPS
|
62.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 4.8 | 55.8 FPS
|
81 FPS
|
59.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 12.7 | 55.1 FPS
|
79.4 FPS
|
58.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 7.2 | 52.8 FPS
|
76.1 FPS
|
55.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 14.7 | 51.7 FPS
|
75.8 FPS
|
56.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.7 | 51.4 FPS
|
73.1 FPS
|
54.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 23.6 | 50.7 FPS
|
73.1 FPS
|
55.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 13.8 | 50.7 FPS
|
72.6 FPS
|
52.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 8.1 | 49.3 FPS
|
70.7 FPS
|
51.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10.2 | 48.7 FPS
|
68.3 FPS
|
51.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 4.1 | 48.7 FPS
|
70.7 FPS
|
53.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 6.8 | 48.3 FPS
|
69 FPS
|
51.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8.7 | 46.1 FPS
|
63.6 FPS
|
46.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 7.7 | 45.2 FPS
|
64.8 FPS
|
47.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 11.4 | 43.9 FPS
|
61.9 FPS
|
45.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 8.1 | 43.4 FPS
|
58.5 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6.5 | 42.7 FPS
|
60.6 FPS
|
43.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 36.5 | 41.1 FPS
|
57.2 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 12.2 | 41 FPS
|
58.8 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 10 | 40.7 FPS
|
57.4 FPS
|
41.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 6.3 | 39.8 FPS
|
55.7 FPS
|
41.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 25.3 | 39.5 FPS
|
55.1 FPS
|
40.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 7.2 | 38.7 FPS
|
54.6 FPS
|
39.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 10.4 | 38.5 FPS
|
55 FPS
|
39.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 10.7 | 37.4 FPS
|
52.3 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 6.3 | 36.5 FPS
|
51.5 FPS
|
37.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 18.9 | 34.4 FPS
|
48.3 FPS
|
35.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 6.4 | 34.3 FPS
|
48.4 FPS
|
35.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 8.6 | 32.6 FPS
|
44.6 FPS
|
31.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 20.7 | 31.3 FPS
|
45.9 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 5.4 | 29.9 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
30.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 6.7 | 29.6 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 18.6 | 29.5 FPS
|
40.9 FPS
|
30 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 7.9 | 28.9 FPS
|
39.5 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 22.9 | 28.4 FPS
|
41 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 36.2 | 27.6 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 20.4 | 26.9 FPS
|
38.6 FPS
|
28.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 9.5 | 26.8 FPS
|
37 FPS
|
26.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.4 | 26.6 FPS
|
36.4 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 16.6 | 25.9 FPS
|
37 FPS
|
27.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 6.7 | 25.4 FPS
|
35.2 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 13.2 | 25 FPS
|
34.2 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 16.5 | 24.3 FPS
|
34.5 FPS
|
25.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 13.7 | 24.1 FPS
|
33.8 FPS
|
23.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 7.1 | 23.8 FPS
|
33.4 FPS
|
23.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 6.5 | 22.8 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
23.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 8.4 | 21.3 FPS
|
29.9 FPS
|
21.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 12.8 | 17.9 FPS
|
24.9 FPS
|
18.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 15.5 | 16.1 FPS
|
22.4 FPS
|
15.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 12.5 | 15.9 FPS
|
22.2 FPS
|
15.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 10.8 | 15.7 FPS
|
22 FPS
|
15.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 17.9 | 15.6 FPS
|
21.9 FPS
|
15 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 12.9 | 15.4 FPS
|
21.3 FPS
|
15.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 12.6 | 13.4 FPS
|
18.5 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 8 | 12.4 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
12.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 13.1 | 12.1 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
12.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 12.5 | 11.9 FPS
|
15.6 FPS
|
11.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 12.6 | 11.8 FPS
|
15.1 FPS
|
11.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 12.8 | 10.9 FPS
|
15 FPS
|
10.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 14.2 | 10.5 FPS
|
12.9 FPS
|
9.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 9.2 | 8.6 FPS
|
11.9 FPS
|
8.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 9.6 | 8.2 FPS
|
11.3 FPS
|
7.8 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
[build help] An a10 7850k or an FX-8320k?
Which one is better for games.
The a10 has a higher IPC and supports PCI-E 3.
I'm not going to get into any Intel vs. AMD stuff, but between the two, the FX-8320 is going to demolish the A10.
The price, but now I am considering getting an i5.
[Build Help] What gpu will an amd a10 7850k bottleneck? What's the strongest one I can get that won't be bottlenecked?
I'd say 270 / 270x is about the max. (depends on the game obviously though.)
Hmm. Is better to buy a 270, or buy a 250 to crossfire?
I gave my cousin a R9 280 to go with his 7850k build and it seems to be doing pretty good for him. You could probably go higher as CPU bottlenecks tend to be game dependent.
It will vary wildly from game to game, you will also probably get better results (oddly you may think) with an nvidia card.
750k with r270 and gtx750ti review here from last April. The two cards are very close, when you might expect the 270 to easily win.
Whatever you do avoid crossfire.
A decent overclock on the cpu will help too.
Honestly you cpuld go up to a r9 290 and still get over 60 fps. Its a modern quadcore CPU and when the igpu is turned off it should give you more OC room.
This is kinda sorta bullshit, as turned off you would still have the standard processing power of roughly a 860K, which runs into a bottleneck at around a 270X/280.
[Build Help] Want to build a starter gaming PC for my 9 year old brother. Should I just start out with an A10-7850k APU and then soon upgrade to a dedicated GPU when I have the money?
I should also mention I'm building him a mini-ITX console-like rig. I'm at work but if I get the time I can provide a pcpartpicker list for it so far.
I'd go with an i3 build with a 260x. Should be plenty to max out 900p and play 1080p on medium. And if you drop a new GPU in you'll have no issue with 1080p on high for most games and will work with games requiring 4 cores/threads unlike a g3258.
I would try to hunt a used 7950 or 7970 for 90-120 on eBay.
what's your budget for the starter build? It's always important to choose a Platform that is easily upgradeable in your case. So i would go for something with an AM3+ socket so you can easily upgrade the CPU once the old one isn't enough anymore.
Around $450-500 including controller and some extra cables probably. I don't want to skimp on the case and I'm thinking of getting a RVZ01 or maybe wait and get a RVZ02 if it comes out soon. Give me a few minutes and I'll find the part list.
I've heard AMD is developing better FM2+ CPUs/APUs, and the current FM2+ motherboards seem excellent for console-like builds to me.
EDIT: Got it:
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant
Type Item Price CPU AMD A10-7850K 3.7GHz Quad-Core Processor $139.95 @ SuperBiiz Motherboard ASRock FM2A88X-ITX+ Mini ITX FM2+ Motherboard $96.98 @ Newegg Memory G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-2133 Memory $66.99 @ Newegg Storage Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive $53.99 @ NCIX US Case Silverstone RVZ01B Mini ITX Desktop Case $79.99 @ Directron Power Supply Silverstone 450W 80+ Bronze Certified SFX Power Supply $59.99 @ Directron Total Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available $497.89 Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-02-03 09:42 EST-0500[Build Help] A10-7850K vs A10-6800K gpu
does A10-7850K worth the price deference? the GPU is very important to me as i am not using any discrete gpu card
[Build Help] What GPU to upgrade to from an APU A10-7850K?
My A10-7850K has worked for a long time and has served me well. However I can now get more time to play games and so I have about $250 ready to buy a GPU. HOWEVER, is there any difference between buying an Nvidia GPU for an AMD APU vs buying an AMD GPU for an AMD APU? Cards that are available at my local store are the R9-280 and the GTX 960 which are both close to the $250 price range. Thank you for replying :)
EDIT: Forgot to mention, my prices are Australian and so more expensive.
I would just get the cheapest performing card. I am a little biased towards the 280 since I have one though.
[Build help/ready] A10 7850k + F2A78M-D3H - Fractal Design 1000
Ok so, this is my first build. I will be using it for mostly streaming via my elgato hd and ps4. I would also like to do some video editing (nothing intense but maybe rendering at 720p or 1080p). I'm a console scrub XD I know nothing about pc's. Please let me know if this build will work for me.
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant
Type Item Price CPU AMD A10-7850K 3.7GHz Quad-Core Processor $192.09 Motherboard Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H Micro ATX FM2+ Motherboard $79.09 Memory G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1600 Memory $67.79 Storage Seagate Barracuda 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive $65.53 Case Fractal Design Core 1000 USB 3.0 MicroATX Mid Tower Case $67.79 Power Supply Corsair CX 500W 80+ Bronze Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply $90.39 Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts Total $562.68 Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-10-07 10:23 EDT-0400Keep in mind this is $CAD - ive sourced my prices at my local Canada Computers as I live right beside one and it is easy to pick the parts up there.
Before I can comment on the build itself, I need to know what you plan on streaming. Video's/Music? Games? You will need to change the build in order to focus it a bit better, but will fit pretty close to this budget. (or maybe even less)
The build you posted is a good bit overpriced for the performance, so if you can explain what you plan on streaming a bit better, than we can work on focusing what you need. Also, if you know what you plan on using to stream, that would help as well (Plex, DLNA, Steam, etc)
I'll be streaming using OBS using an Elgato HD and my PS4. right now its 1080p 30fps scaled to 720p 30fps.
Broadcasting via twitch.tv. This PC will be running the broadcasting software and taking a feed from his PS4 using a capture card.
Giving away my AMD A10-7850k HTPC to my brother. Need help on the GPU.
Hello fellow PC builders, need help here.
I am giving away my AMD 7850k HTPC to my brother since we will be planning to play Monster Hunter World once released. The system doesn't have any GPU and I am planning to buy one for it so he can play the game.
What GPU would be the best? Should I buy the R7 250 and go fpr Hybrid Crossfire route? Or buy a RX 560/GTX 1050?
Budget is around 100-120 USD and the GPU should be low profile since I am using HTPC case.
Current Specs:
AMD A10-7850k 3.7Ghz
MSI A68HM-E33 V2
Noctua NH-L9a CPU Cooler
Kingston Savage 2x8GB DDR3-2133
Silverstone GD09 HTPC Case
He is not really a hardcore gamer so running the game on 720p resolution will be fine.
You can get him an rx560. It will do 1080p as well on high in most games, 720p without a sweat.
A 1050ti will be adequate if you only want 720. It'll probably do 1080 pretty well too.
Thanks for the tips. I am going to get the 1050ti.
PSU Help Needed (Please)
I recently bought a new PSU (EVGA 1000 T2) because i wanted to replace my previous Cooler Master RS-500-PCAR-A3. I installed everything correctly and my motherboard was lit up along with the light indicator on my GPU. The new PSU was most likely previously owned, so there’s a chance something happened to it.
However, when I started it it light up as normal, than dimmed down (and turned back off) and i was unable to retry starting the PC unless I had switched the actual power supply off then back on.
I tried reseating my RAM, let it sit out for a bit or wipe it with a cloth, I dusted everything and made sure it was clean, still nothing.
I would greatly appreciate any help, and even if it is something small, I’ll post a video depicting what is happening and I’ll leave my computer specs here, thank you.
Specs: New PSU: EVGA 1000 T2 Old PSU: Cooler Master RS-500-PCAR-A3 Mobo: Asus A78MA CPU: AMD A10-7850K GPU: Asus GeForce GTX 1660 Super RAM: Team Group 8GB DDR3 2400 (2x8GB) Case: Corsair Carbide 275R
Specific tech support subreddits haven't helped, so I'm looking for an answer here. My new build is working mostly flawlessly, but I'm having serious issues in XCOM: Enemy Unknown
Edit: Problem now solved, a completely clean reinstall of my gpu driver worked.
Hi everyone, my new PC has a 3600, paired with a 5600xt and 16GB of 3200mhz ddr4 RAM. Most of the time it's been perfect, running everything at 1080p 60fps, with every setting absolutely maxed out. However there's one or two exceptions, and I can't pin down what's causing issues at all. In Dark Souls 2 I've had some strange stuttering, even though the fps counter says it holds steady at 60, but this doesn't seem to happen constantly. More prominently, when playing XCOM: Enemy Unknown, I'm getting really bad visual bugs. Flickering menus that don't move properly, some textures showing through other objects, messed up face textures, stuff like that.
What I've tried so far:
Switching between fullscreen and borderless windowed - this seems to fix the problem but it comes back a minute later
Uninstalling the long war mod, which I thought might be causing it - No dice, happens in vanilla and long war
Turning vsync off - No effect
Reverting my radeon settings profile to having all optional graphic settings off - No effect.
If any of you know what could be causing this I'd really appreciate the help, I haven't had much luck googling for people with similar issues. It's annoying because it ran flawlessly on my previous PC, which had an A10-7850k and an r9 290.
Have you ddu the gpu drivers and tried other versions?
I haven't clean installed, but it is an issue with only this one game, and I did redownload and repair the driver with the auto detect tool. I'll give a clean install a go though, just to be sure.
Clean reinstall actually fixed it! So weird it was causing issues in literally just that one game, but it worked, thanks for the advice.
Just switched to PC for gaming and am having some frame-rate drops and other issues I need help with.
Just purchased the GeForce RTX 2060 Super and installed it and it's up and running. This is my first GPU. Here's the rest of the specs:
CPU: AMD A10-7850K Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C + 8G 3.7 GHz
16GB RAM
Windows 10 is installed on Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB.
Steam and Destiny 2 are installed on Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB
For some reason I've been dropping a ton of frames, especially when I'm dealing with a lots of action on screen. This is even happening on low graphic settings. Loading times are slower than my Xbox One X and when I view my PC's performance, my CPU is hitting 100% while my GPU is in the 40% range (not sure if this is normal).
Anyone have any ideas? For reverence, my CPU is 4 years old
Usually I don’t agree with bottlenecks, but in this case. It is quite the big one.
What are the RAM speeds/timings and is it 2x8G or 1x16G DDR3 or 4 ? Your CPU is actually like, 6 years old now give or take. When you try to play Destiny 2, open up a monitoring software (MSI afterburner for example) or just ctrl+alt+del to task manager and see if your CPU is at 100 or 98% (which I believe it probably is) and your GPU at like 60% as this sounds like a bottlenecking issue.
Also ensure you have the GPU in the correct (top/first) PCIE slot pushed in firmly (usually hear a click) as well as updating GPU drivers (wouldn't hurt to do a DDU and clean install either).
What sort of temps is your CPU and GPU reaching ?
Lol so I didn't completely read your post as you can probably tell. I see you have Infact stated 100% CPU usage. The takeaway now is your bottlenecking, your CPU is unable to handle the game and GPU etc etc
Bad pairing. That’s a current gpu with a 6 year old quad core with no hyper threading. Definitely a cpu bottle neck and to fix it your going to have to switch you mobo, cpu, and ram if you want to get the most out of it. Your probably running ddr3 right now. You could switch to like a 7890k to keep the same mobo but it will still bottleneck your 2060
Okay, the consensus is the CPU is bottlenecked. Will definitely upgrade it.
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Critics Reviews
The A10-7850K is a quad-core chip with 512 GPU cores based on AMD's GCN architecture. This is a significant step forward compared with the AMD A10-6800K, which integrated just 384 cores (though it ...
The new A10-7850K is a 245mm 2 die with 2.41 billion total transistors. According to AMD, quad-core Piledriver and Richland APUs were 246 sq mm and 1.3 billion transistors. While it’s true that ...
The GPU performance gains and promises of more to come are impressive, but the A10-7850K’s overall software stack clearly could’ve used a week or two more to bake.
How well can the AMD APU A10-7850K Quad-Core CPU run PC game system requirements? Compare APU A10-7850K Quad-Core performance to game specs
The AMD A10-7850K’s market price currently ranges between Php7,000 – 7,500 and for roughly the same price (or less) users can opt for a more capable processor in the form of AMD FX-8320 Black Edition. That being said, we’ll end this review by saying that it all boils down to your budget. If you can afford to shell out five to seven grand ...
The A10-7850K is a quad-core chip with 512 GPU cores based on AMD's GCN architecture. This is a significant step forward compared with the AMD A10-6800K, which integrated just 384 cores (though it ...
Help (noob) Kevari A10-7850K FPS very low
Hey I'm not very savvy with computer, parts, and building a computer so I do apologize in advance... A friend of mine helped me build a computer for light gaming and day to day use I have AMD Kevari A10-7850K APU with msi mobo, 8gb RAM. I don't really play games on my computer (trying to get into a habit that this computer is for work not play) but I gave in and downloaded LoL on it.. League of Legends isn't too demanding graphically (I don't think) and I've seen some reviews on youtube like this -> ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYV_Oj3sE70 ) but the fps is very low when I play. It's newly downloaded and updated LoL, I even deleted AMD Catalyst control and installed the most up to date (none beta) driver. It increased the fps a little bit but it's still averaging at 14-18 sometimes 12 or even lower. I have my settings (in game) to Medium Low just so it's somewhat smooth and playable. I read some suggestions on disabling all the startup drives and etc. and it didn't help... Can anyone please help me? Will I be able to play in High/Ultra mode??