AMD A10-6800K Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | FM2 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 8670D | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2013 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 142 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 4.1 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 4.4 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.8 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 100 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 32 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 72 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 58 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 33 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 67 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 63.6 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 31.8 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 15.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 32/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
The A10-6800K is one of AMD's mid-range Desktop processors. It was released in 2013 with 4 cores and 4 threads. With base clock at 4.1GHz, max speed at 4.4GHz, and a 100W power rating. The A10-6800K is based on the Richland 32nm family and is part of the A10 series.
A10-6800K is also the successor of AMD's last gen A10-5800K processor that was based on the Piledriver and 32nm process and was released in 2012.
Increased IPC improvements, along with the massive turbo boost of 4.4GHz mean that even in single core performance – long a weak link of AMD’s processors – comes within reaching distance of rival chips.
As the higher-priced version of the A10-6790B, the A10-6800K has higher base and Boost frequencies of 4.1 and 4.4 GHz, respectively. That's an increase in base frequency and a bump to boost clocks, but the real advantage should lay in the higher Package Power Tracking (PPT) envelope, which is a measurement of the maximum amount of power delivered to the socket. The A10-6790B's PPT tops out at 100W, while the motherboard can pump up to 142W to the A10-6800K at peak performance. That opens up much more aggressive boost behavior, on both single and multiple cores, that could widen the performance gap beyond what we see on the spec sheet.
Value seekers who aren't afraid to press the Precision Boost Overdrive button and have sufficient cooling should look to the A10-6790B for roughly equivalent performance to the A10-6800K, particularly if gaming factors heavily into the buying decision. That could save you money, reinforcing our decision to give the A10-6790B an Editor's Choice award.
One of the nice things about the AMD A10-6800K processors is that the retail boxed models come with a CPU cooler. So, you can pick something like the AMD A10-6800K up for $142 and don’t need to spend any extra money on CPU cooling.
The AMD A10-6800K retail boxed processor comes with the traditional ‘pancake’ CPU cooler. Nothing fancy, but it gets the job done on this processor which is rated at 100W TDP. You do not need to have an aftermarket cooling solution unless you want to.
Our look today at the AMD A10-6800K showed that it is a very capable processor. A 4-core processor sounds like it would be really under-powered these days, but we were pleasantly surprised with a snappy and very capable system. Having just 4 cores had this processor coming in at the back of the pack for heavily threaded workloads, but it performed better than some of its more expensive siblings in lightly threaded workloads where it shined thanks to its high base clocks.
If extended overclocking and boost frequencies are trivial matters to you, AMD also offers the A10-6790B at $259.79. It’s still outfitted with 4-cores and 4-threads, but clocks in at a slower 4GHz and maxes out at only 4GHz.
The A10-6800K clocks up to 4.4Ghz just as it promises on the box, and with AMD’s software you can take one of the cores all the way up to 4.5GHz. However, don’t expect to get much beyond that without seriously upgrading your cooling solution and manually tweaking voltages behind the operating system level.
Which GPU to Pick for AMD A10-6800K
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD A10-6800K.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 11.1 | 144 FPS
|
206.5 FPS
|
161.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.9 | 134.4 FPS
|
192.7 FPS
|
150.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 7.7 | 130 FPS
|
182.9 FPS
|
130.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 9.6 | 124.8 FPS
|
178.8 FPS
|
139.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 6.7 | 119.9 FPS
|
171.8 FPS
|
134.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 7.6 | 118.2 FPS
|
166.3 FPS
|
118.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 13.4 | 112.2 FPS
|
155.1 FPS
|
114.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 10.2 | 107.4 FPS
|
151.2 FPS
|
107.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 18.9 | 105.6 FPS
|
151.3 FPS
|
118.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 9.5 | 105.2 FPS
|
146.3 FPS
|
105.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 6.6 | 99 FPS
|
137.7 FPS
|
99.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 8.2 | 97.8 FPS
|
137.9 FPS
|
105.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 7.1 | 97.8 FPS
|
135.2 FPS
|
99.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 6.3 | 94.4 FPS
|
131.9 FPS
|
101.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 7.1 | 83.9 FPS
|
116.9 FPS
|
87.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 7.4 | 78.4 FPS
|
109 FPS
|
78.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.7 | 74.8 FPS
|
103.4 FPS
|
76.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 36.4 | 68.7 FPS
|
98.1 FPS
|
72.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 19.4 | 66.9 FPS
|
95.5 FPS
|
70.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 7.3 | 66 FPS
|
92.4 FPS
|
66 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.1 | 64.9 FPS
|
91.9 FPS
|
69.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.5 | 61.3 FPS
|
87 FPS
|
65.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 11.5 | 60.7 FPS
|
85.8 FPS
|
63.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.8 | 58.5 FPS
|
82.4 FPS
|
59.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 51.5 | 58.2 FPS
|
83.1 FPS
|
62.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 5.1 | 58.1 FPS
|
82.7 FPS
|
62.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 4.6 | 58.1 FPS
|
81.8 FPS
|
59.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 12.2 | 57.4 FPS
|
80.2 FPS
|
58.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 6.9 | 54.9 FPS
|
76.9 FPS
|
55.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 14.1 | 53.8 FPS
|
76.5 FPS
|
56.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.3 | 53.4 FPS
|
73.9 FPS
|
54.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 22.8 | 52.7 FPS
|
73.9 FPS
|
55.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 13.3 | 52.7 FPS
|
73.4 FPS
|
53.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.8 | 51.3 FPS
|
71.4 FPS
|
51.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.9 | 50.6 FPS
|
69 FPS
|
51.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 4 | 50.6 FPS
|
71.4 FPS
|
54.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 6.5 | 50.3 FPS
|
69.7 FPS
|
51.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8.4 | 47.9 FPS
|
64.3 FPS
|
47 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 7.4 | 47 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
47.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10.9 | 45.7 FPS
|
62.6 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 7.8 | 45.1 FPS
|
59.1 FPS
|
42.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6.3 | 44.4 FPS
|
61.2 FPS
|
44.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 35 | 42.8 FPS
|
57.8 FPS
|
44.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 11.7 | 42.7 FPS
|
59.4 FPS
|
42.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 9.7 | 42.3 FPS
|
58 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 6 | 41.4 FPS
|
56.3 FPS
|
41.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 24.3 | 41.1 FPS
|
55.7 FPS
|
40.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6.9 | 40.2 FPS
|
55.2 FPS
|
39.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 10 | 40 FPS
|
55.5 FPS
|
40.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 10.3 | 38.9 FPS
|
52.9 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 6 | 37.9 FPS
|
52.1 FPS
|
37.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 18.1 | 35.8 FPS
|
48.8 FPS
|
35.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 6.2 | 35.7 FPS
|
49 FPS
|
35.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 8.2 | 33.9 FPS
|
45.1 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 20 | 32.5 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
34.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 5.1 | 31.1 FPS
|
42.5 FPS
|
30.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 6.5 | 30.8 FPS
|
41 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 17.9 | 30.7 FPS
|
41.4 FPS
|
30.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 7.6 | 30.1 FPS
|
39.9 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 21.9 | 29.6 FPS
|
41.5 FPS
|
30.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 34.8 | 28.7 FPS
|
38.3 FPS
|
29.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 19.7 | 27.9 FPS
|
39 FPS
|
28.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 9.1 | 27.9 FPS
|
37.4 FPS
|
27 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.1 | 27.6 FPS
|
36.8 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 15.9 | 26.9 FPS
|
37.4 FPS
|
27.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 6.4 | 26.5 FPS
|
35.5 FPS
|
25.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 12.7 | 26 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 15.8 | 25.3 FPS
|
34.9 FPS
|
25.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 13.1 | 25.1 FPS
|
34.2 FPS
|
23.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.8 | 24.8 FPS
|
33.7 FPS
|
23.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 6.3 | 23.7 FPS
|
32.2 FPS
|
23.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 8.1 | 22.1 FPS
|
30.2 FPS
|
21.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 12.3 | 18.6 FPS
|
25.2 FPS
|
18.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 14.9 | 16.7 FPS
|
22.7 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 12 | 16.6 FPS
|
22.4 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 10.4 | 16.3 FPS
|
22.2 FPS
|
16 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 17.2 | 16.2 FPS
|
22.1 FPS
|
15 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 12.4 | 16 FPS
|
21.5 FPS
|
15.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 12.2 | 13.9 FPS
|
18.7 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 7.7 | 12.9 FPS
|
17.1 FPS
|
12.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 12.6 | 12.6 FPS
|
16.7 FPS
|
12.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 12 | 12.4 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 12.1 | 12.3 FPS
|
15.2 FPS
|
11.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 12.3 | 11.4 FPS
|
15.2 FPS
|
10.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 13.5 | 11 FPS
|
13 FPS
|
9.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.8 | 9 FPS
|
12 FPS
|
8.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 9.2 | 8.6 FPS
|
11.4 FPS
|
7.8 FPS
|
Related Discussions and Issues
You mention using the AIO for CPU cooling.
What I suspect happened was when you cleaned the whole thing you must've wiggled things around or changed the orientation of the case. In an AIO you have bubbles sometimes and they can prevent adequate cooling
It's also possible that the pump didn't run the first time you booted it up but after a while it picked up the pace.
Check the pump speed using HWinfo and keep an eye on it
Idle temps at 65 is very high, it should not be more than 40 especially on an AIO
You might have to change the thermal paste as well if you haven't done it in a long while
I have a Corsair H100i V2 for my cpu cooler, and feeling the intake and outtake lines I can certainly say the cooler is taking the heat out and putting cooler water back in.
Either it's not pumping quickly enough and your pump is failing, or you should re-apply your paste.
I'm currently trying to mad out a Trinity 6800k's performance, any help would be appreciated.
I started out with the memory first, 2400 right off the bat. But i could only seem to get ~20GB/s for the bandwidth, which was fixed after uppping the FSB speed.
What is the max sustainable FSB with this APU?
And what kind of core OC should i expect?
https://hwbot.org/submission/2783620_siouxx_cpu_frequency_a10_6800k_6867.23_mhz/
You got guys hitting like 7ghz with dry ice on 4 cores. You are basically limited by cooling.
I need help with overlocking a i7 6800k
I have a i7 6800k CPU running on a Asus x99 a II mobo. I have some overclock settings applied but HWmonitor and CPUZ is only showing overclock being applied to 1 of 6 cores. https://gyazo.com/3cb5ecb407ad1156a15533451651d085
Please advise
Did you set it for all cores ?
is there a load on the CPU ?
yes, even during benching the results are the same
i7 8700k vs i7 6800K.... CPU SHOWDOWN HELP
So the 6800k is £200 whereas the 8700k is £300.
What should I go for as they are both 6c/12t cpu's BUT on different platforms (x99 vs z370)
Help appreciated !>
Gaming, little bit of streaming, school work and maybe light video editing but honestly gaming 95% of the time
If it’s gaming then the 8700k is a clear winner. Avoid the x99 chipset tax.
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-8700K-vs-Intel-Core-i7-6800K/3937vs3607
8700k will be slightly better for gaming. However that being said, using the £100 difference on a better GPU will be wayyyyyy better for gaming
(dont forget to factor in mobo costs too though)
Buy a THREAD RIPPER 1900X for around the same price maybe cheaper and has a better upgrade path now that's to THREAD RIPPER 2 is out
-
que thrash metal * !,,,,,!
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
13900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.
Help 6800k Overheating!
Just today I cleaned all the dust out of my computer, which has been functioning normally for months now, and after I blew out all the dust I reassembled the side panels and let the computer sit for a while cause I didn’t need to use it right at that moment. Just now I plug it all in, open up Netflix, and start watching a show. After about 20-30min of being plugged in and running since I cleaned the computer, I got a blue screen and my computer shut down, and when it started back up a logo screen popped up that said “cpu overheating” and directed me to the bios. Initially, the cpu temp in bios was around 88 degrees, but after letting it run for a while it has balanced out to 75. I’ve never really had to look into cpu temps before, so I’m very uneducated in this regard, but from my brief research online I should be expecting around 60 degrees max for idle temp, but I also read that bios temps will be higher than normal temp. I have a Corsair H100i V2 for my cpu cooler, and feeling the intake and outtake lines I can certainly say the cooler is taking the heat out and putting cooler water back in. I’m just afraid of running the computer and damaging anything from over heating. If anyone can offer advice that would be great, for all I know 75 is normal for bios temp and the first overheating was just a fluke.
Edit: I downloaded “Open Hardware Monitor” and my cpu core temp is bouncing between 55 and 65 while watching shows now, so if anyone has any insight as to why it got really hot just once before cooling back down again, it would be appreciated!