Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X: 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

Core i9-10900K
RTX 2080 Ti
32GB 3600MHz
1440p ultra

Enthusiast Desktop processor released in 2020 with 10 cores and 20 threads. With base clock at 3.7GHz, max speed at 5.3GHz, and a 125W power rating. Core i9-10900K is based on the Comet Lake 14nm family and part of the Core i9 series.

Ryzen 9 3900X
RTX 2080 Ti
32GB 3600MHz
1440p ultra

Enthusiast Desktop processor released in 2019 with 12 cores and 24 threads. With base clock at 3.8GHz, max speed at 4.6GHz, and a 105W power rating. Ryzen 9 3900X is based on the Matisse 7nm family and part of the Ryzen 9 series.
Core i9-10900K
RTX 2080 Ti
32GB 3600MHz
1440p ultra
Ryzen 9 3900X
RTX 2080 Ti
32GB 3600MHz
1440p ultra
Category Desktop Desktop
Target enthusiast enthusiast
Socket Compatibility LGA1200 AM4
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 None
Cooler Included No Yes
Overclock Potential 1 % 1 %
Year 2020 2019
[summary-gpu_year] 2018 2018
Price 488 USD 420 USD
[summary-gpu_price] 1299 USD 1299 USD
Number of Cores 10 Cores 12 Cores
Number of Threads 20 Threads 24 Threads
Core Frequency 3.7 GHz 3.8 GHz
Boost Frequency 5.3 GHz 4.6 GHz
Power Consumption 125 W 105 W
[summary-gpu_tdp] 250 W 250 W
Price-Value Score 61.3 % 93.3 %
Speed Score 98 % 88 %
Productivity Score 93 % 96 %
Gaming Score 99 % 95 %
[summary-ram_bottleneck] 0 % 0 %
[summary-ramspeed_bottleneck] 2 % 2 %
Max 1080p Bottleneck 0 % 12.3 %
Max 1440p Bottleneck 0 % 6.2 %
Max 4K Bottleneck 0 % 3.1 %
[summary-gpu_avg_1080p_fps] 175.3 FPS 160.3 FPS
[summary-gpu_avg_1440p_fps] 128.8 FPS 123.1 FPS
[summary-gpu_avg_2160p_fps] 75.9 FPS 74.2 FPS

The Ryzen 9 3900X is superior in multi-tasking performance against the Core i9-10900K. Having an excellent base clock speed of 3.8GHz helps the Ryzen 9 3900X achieve better performance in most applications. The Core i9-10900K comes with an excellent boost clock speed for gaming and single-thread tasks. Ryzen 9 3900X consumes less power at 105W. With an efficient 7nm manufacturing process, the Ryzen 9 3900X has better thermals. The Core i9-10900K is relatively newer.

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Specifications

The Intel Core i9-10900K is a Desktop processor with 10 cores, launched in 2020. It is part of the Core i9 lineup, using the Comet Lake architecture with Socket LGA1200. The core-count is effectively doubled, to 20 threads. Core i9-10900K has 20.00MB of L3 cache and operates at 3.7 GHz by default, but can boost up to 5.3 GHz, depending on the workload. Intel is building the Core i9-10900K on a 14 nm production process. You may freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on Core i9-10900K, which simplifies overclocking greatly, as you can dial in any overclocking frequency up to 5.4GHz. With a TDP of 125 W, the Core i9-10900K consumes a lot of power, so good cooling is definitely needed. Intel's processor supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel interface. This processor features the (Intel UHD Graphics 630) integrated graphics solution. This processor can run on motherboards with the following chipsets: B460, H410, 4470, Z490.

The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X is a Desktop processor with 12 cores, launched in 2019. It is part of the Ryzen 9 lineup, using the Zen 2 architecture with Socket AM4. The core-count is effectively doubled, to 24 threads. Ryzen 9 3900X has 64MB of L3 cache and operates at 3.8 GHz by default, but can boost up to 4.6 GHz, depending on the workload. AMD is building the Ryzen 9 3900X on a 7 nm production process. You may freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on Ryzen 9 3900X, which simplifies overclocking greatly, as you can dial in any overclocking frequency up to 4.6GHz. With a TDP of 105 W, the Ryzen 9 3900X consumes a lot of power, so good cooling is definitely needed. AMD's processor supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel interface. It is worth noting that this processor does not have integrated graphics. This processor can run on motherboards with the following chipsets: A320, B350, B450, X370, X470, X570.

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X General

Core i9-10900K Ryzen 9 3900X
Architecture Comet Lake Zen 2
Market price $ 488 $ 440
Release date Q2/2020 Q3/2019

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Performance

Core i9-10900K Ryzen 9 3900X
CPU Cores 10 12
CPU Threads 20 24
Frequency 3.70 GHz 3.8 GHz
Hyperthreading Yes Yes
L3-Cache 20.00 MB 64.00 MB
TDP 125 W 105 W
TDP down 95 W --
TDP up -- --
Turbo (1 Core) 5.30 GHz 4.60 GHz
Turbo (10 Cores) 4.90 GHz -

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Memory Specifications

Core i9-10900K Ryzen 9 3900X
ECC No Yes
Memory channels 2 2
Memory type DDR4-2933 DDR4-3200
Max. Memory 128 GB 128 GB

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Technical Specs

Core i9-10900K Ryzen 9 3900X
Overclocking Yes Yes
Technology 14 nm 7 nm
Tjunction max. 100 °C 95 °C

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Integrated Graphics

Core i9-10900K Ryzen 9 3900X
DirectX Version 12.0
Execution units 24
GPU (Turbo) 1.20 GHz No turbo
GPU frequency 0.35 GHz
Generation 10.5 Ryzen 9 (Zen 2)
Max. displays 3 0

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Compatibility

Core i9-10900K Ryzen 9 3900X
PCIe lanes 16 20
PCIe version 3.0 4.0
Socket LGA 1200 AMD Socket AM4

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Technologies and Extensions

Core i9-10900K Ryzen 9 3900X
AES-NI Yes Yes

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Virtualization Technologies

Core i9-10900K Ryzen 9 3900X
Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d AMD-V, SEV

Bottleneck Analysis

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X: 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis based on the benchmark of 6 games:

CPU GPU RAM [resolution] Quality Settings Average Bottleneck (Lower is better)
Intel Core i9-10900K NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 32GB DDR4 3600MHz 1440p ultra 1.7%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 32GB DDR4 3600MHz 1440p ultra 5.3%

Grand Theft Auto V

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Grand Theft Auto V
Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Grand Theft Auto V Stuttering and Bottleneck Analysis

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Shadow of the Tomb Raider Stuttering and Bottleneck Analysis

Battlefield V

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Battlefield V
Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Battlefield V Stuttering and Bottleneck Analysis

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds Stuttering and Bottleneck Analysis

Forza Horizon 4

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Forza Horizon 4
Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Forza Horizon 4 Stuttering and Bottleneck Analysis

Apex Legends

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Apex Legends
Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Apex Legends Stuttering and Bottleneck Analysis

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Streaming Analysis

Performance depends entirely on what game you plan to stream.

Streaming Summary of Core i9-10900K, Ryzen 9 3900X based on the benchmark of 9 games:

CPU GPU RAM [resolution] Quality Settings Average Bottleneck (Lower is better)
Intel Core i9-10900K NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 32GB DDR4 3600MHz 1440p ultra 41.9%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 32GB DDR4 3600MHz 1440p ultra 38.6%

Battlefield V

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Streaming Performance

Destiny 2

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Streaming Performance

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Streaming Performance

Fortnite Battle Royale

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Streaming Performance

Overwatch

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Streaming Performance

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Streaming Performance

Apex Legends

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Streaming Performance

Rainbow Six Siege

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Streaming Performance

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X Streaming Performance

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X: 80+ Gaming Benchmarks

CPU GPU RAM [resolution] Quality Settings 80+ Game Average FPS Average FPS Relative Performance 80+ Game Average Low 1% FPS Low 1% FPS Relative Performance
Intel Core i9-10900K NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 32GB DDR4 3600MHz 1440p ultra 183.7 FPS 100 % 155.1 FPS 100 %
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 32GB DDR4 3600MHz 1440p ultra 178.6 FPS 97.2 % 151.9 FPS 97.9 %

Average FPS

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X 80+ Game Benchmark Average FPS

Low 1% FPS

Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X 80+ Game Benchmark - Low 1% FPS
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?

Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?

Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Performance

Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.

Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?

Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.

Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?

Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.

How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU

Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.

RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison

Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?

10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs

May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.

10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.

10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.

2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?

May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.

Critics Reviews

The Core i9-10900K's ten cores and 20 threads operate at a 3.7 GHz base frequency when all cores are loaded, but that can improve to 4.8 GHz via the normal Turbo Boost, and up to 4.9 GHz via Intel ...
The Core i9-10900K does bring a few changes. Intel officials said the chip uses a thinner die and thinner solder thermal interface material (STIM) to improve thermal dissipation.
The Core i9-10900K is a 10-core, 20-thread processor sporting a base frequency of 3.7 GHz and a single core turbo of 5.3 GHz using Intel’s new Thermal Velocity Boost. When compared to its ...
For your delight and delectation, I present to you the Intel Core i9 10900K. This is the top desktop CPU in the 10th Gen Intel Comet Lake lineup and represents the first time the company has ...
The Intel Core i9-10900K comes at a time when Intel has gone from its position as the de facto desktop CPU leader to the underdog. Thanks to processors from its direct rival, like the AMD Ryzen 9 ...
The Core i9-10900K costs a hefty £530, and the price of the CPU isn’t the only cost involved here. For starters, Comet Lake has a new socket – it’s called LGA 1200. That means a new chipset ...
The Core i9-10900K is the tip of Intel's spear in its newest 10th Generation Core ("Comet Lake-S") lineup of desktop CPUs.As a top-of-the-line 10-core processor (the estimated selling price is ...
The Core i9-10900K is a beast of a gaming CPU; it’s also rapid in content creation, closely following the Ryzen 9 3900X in many tests, despite having fewer cores. AMD’s 3rd-gen Ryzen CPUs offer better value when it comes to content creation, but they lack the all-round chart-topping gaming performance of the Core i9-10900K.
For the case of the Core i9 parts, Intel’s Thermal Velocity Boost (TVB) limits for the i9-10900K are 5.3 GHz single core, 4.9 GHz all-core, and after the turbo budget is used, the CPU will ...
The Ryzen 9 3900X's base clock is actually 100MHz lower than the Ryzen 7 2700X's, for example. (The 2700X was the highest-end AM4 chip before the current generation rolled out.)
The Ryzen 9 3900XT is a great chip, but it doesn't make much sense compared to the 3900X, which can be picked up for a lot less and performs almost as well. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X was released ...
The Ryzen 9 3900XT is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop CPU with a base clock of 3.8GHz and a maximum boost clock of 4.7GHz (up from 4.6GHz in the original Ryzen 9 3900X), 6MB of L2 cache and 64MB of L3.
El Ryzen 9 3900X con sus 12 cores y 24 threats doblado el número de threads, y cada core es unas 5 veces más rápido. Ahora las máquinas virtuales (una mezcla de Linux, Windows Server 2012 y Windows Server 2019) se levantan en 5 segundos.
The Ryzen 9 3900XT managed an all-core overclock frequency of 4.3GHz at just 1,325V, which is reasonable but not outside the realms of something I've achieved with my 3900X sample, albeit with ...
The Ryzen 9 3900XT is the flagship of the new AMD Ryzen XT series. It comes with higher boost clocks and can sustain them better, which helps with single-threaded workloads. In our Ryzen 9 3900XT review, we also saw better overclocking and lower temperatures than on the original Ryzen 9 3900X.
The Ryzen 9 3900X redefines our expectations for the mainstream desktop with 12 cores and 24 threads for roughly the same price as Intel’s eight-core Core i9-9900K. The extra cores deliver big ...
The Ryzen 9 3900XT is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop CPU with a base clock of 3.8GHz and a maximum boost clock of 4.7GHz (up from 4.6GHz in the original Ryzen 9 3900X), 6MB of L2 cache and 64MB of L3.
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 3.8 GHz 12-Core AM4 Processor is a powerful 12-core processor with 24 threads, designed for socket AM4 motherboards. Built with Zen 2 architecture, the third-generation 7nm Ryzen processor offers increased performance compared to its predecessor. It has a base clock speed of 3.8 GHz and can reach a max boost clock speed of 4.6 GHz.
The stock Ryzen 9 3900 gives you significantly more performance-per-watt than the eight-core 3700X in these tests, but you gain some thermal headroom compared to the standard Ryzen 9 3900X.

Related Comments

H
halo35boy July 24, 2020
How to Have Dynamic CPU Speed on MSI Z490?
Hi guys,

I just got an MSI MPG Z490 Gaming Plus mobo with BIOS Ver: E7C75IMS.A00 (I think it's the "BIOS click 5"?). I have an i9-10900K in this thing and I'm trying to get it to turbo boost to Intel's advertised 5.3 GHz on all cores. It won't even reach 5 GHz normally - it just caps at 4.9 GHz instead.

I've gotten it to run at 5.3 GHz now, but the problem is that it's always at 5.3 GHz. What settings do I have to change in the BIOS to have it run at the stock 3.7 GHz when idle/no load, and boost up to 5.3 GHz at load?
D
Darkbreeze June 24, 2014
Reset the BIOS to the stock, default settings.

Disable Speed shift.

Enable speed step.

In Windows, find the Windows power plan settings either in the control panel by typing "control" without the quotes into the search box on the start menu and hitting enter, or in the Settings. Make sure Performance is enabled. Then, click on "Change plan settings". Click on "Change advanced power settings". Scroll down to Processor power management and make sure that the min processor power state is set to 5% and the max is set to 100%. Save settings and exit. CPU should operate throughout the full power envelope now.

Also, make sure, before you do any of that, that you have the latest BIOS version installed for your motherboard AND the latest chipset driver from your motherboard product page. If there are other relevant drivers on your motherboard product page which you have not installed yet, it would be wise to install them. Audio, network adapters, chipset, etc. Do not rely on the native Windows drivers, always use the drivers supplied by the motherboard manufacturer.
S
Subayyal July 15, 2020
i9 10900k higher clock speed on fresh install
I recently built a new PC.

ROG STRIX Z490-E Gaming
Intel i9 10900K 3.7ghz
NZXT Kraken X63
2080 Ti
etc.

I just noticed that all cores on my CPU are running at max!

https://ibb.co/WkVXxzB

https://ibb.co/WkVXxzBhttps://ibb.co/dK407Zz

I am not sure what is happening. Any idea?
P
Phaaze88 December 30, 2016
2nd link broken.

https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/199332/intel-core-i9-10900k-processor-20m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz.html
Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost Frequency

Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost (Intel® TVB) is a feature that opportunistically and automatically increases clock frequency above single-core and multi-core Intel® Turbo Boost Technology frequencies based on how much the processor is operating below its maximum temperature and whether turbo power budget is available. The frequency gain and duration is dependent on the workload, capabilities of the processor and the processor cooling solution.

^Exclusive to the 10900K.
O
Osirith July 12, 2020
Which cooling solution for I9-10900K ?
Hi all,
I plan to buy an 10900K (or KF) to replace my old PC. I use some programs (mostly flight sims) that rely heavily on core frequency,

What would be a good cooling solution for a 10900K/KF ? I already have a Noctua DH15 but did read that it was not enough for the 10900. Also I would like to overclock it slightly.

I never tried watercooling before, but it seems to be the way to go ? what type if system would you recommend, I have no problem fitting any size and numer of fans inside my new PC case. Would like to have a system which is silent when not gaming, too.

Thanks for your help
H
Hellfire13 April 20, 2016
This review has been done with the D15 installed on the test bench. Although it does not show a relative temp graph, all other charts are consistent with prime results...
https://bit-tech.net/reviews/tech/cpus/intel-core-i9-10900k-review/2/

Also it is recommended as one of the best air coolers for 10900k...
https://levvvel.com/best-cpu-cooler-for-i9-10900k/

Unless you are pushing the clocks too hard, the D15 should keep you fine.
V
Viocristi July 11, 2020
VCCIO VCCSA auto absurd values - 10900k
Hi there,

I am running a 10900k on a z490 asus strix gaming E motherboard, got 32 gb ram 4400 MHz cl19 Patriot Viper.
I did a manual oc to 5.1 ghz on the board (bios), and adjusted the timings of the ram because the system won't boot with xmp profile (see attached).

The problem is, the reported VCCIO and VCCSA are absurd at 1.424 and 1.504 V. These are on auto. Running 15-15-36 on the ram at 1.45 V @ 3800 mhz.

Questions: do you agree that those values are super high and need to be lowered ASAP? Should I return this ram? Asking because the motherboard is on the list of supported motherboards for this ram, also tried on a z490 aorus elite AC motherboard which had sooo many bugs that after a week I changed it with this Asus. The point is, that one was also on the supported list for this ram and also couldn't do 4400 xmp1, or even 4200 @ 1.35v xmp 2. I was also on a 3800 mhz profile at cl15.

Please see my OC profile here and results
UPDATE:

Manually adjusted in the bios and now the reported values by the asus software in windows are:
VCCIO 1.136
VCCSA: 1.152

Should I try to lower them even more? What about the ram kit? Seems bit disappointing.
V
Viocristi July 01, 2020
Manually adjusted in the bios and now the reported values by the asus software in windows are:
VCCIO 1.136
VCCSA: 1.152
C
connor.j2000 July 02, 2020
Ryzen vs Intel
Hi all,

I'm putting together a high budget build for a friend and simply not make my mind up on the CPU. After doing some research, I am leaning towards AMD's Ryzen 9 3900x - this is partly due to reports that Intel's 1200 socket is only going to be used for two generations, meaning AMD may be a more future proof option. But also, price vs performance seems better with AMD.

However, this is a gaming pc and from what I can tell, Intel is still king when it comes to gaming performance.

Current prices are as follows:

Ryzen 9 3900x - £433.98
Ryzen 9 3950x - £689.99 (not ideal)

Intel i9-9900k - £449.99
Intel i9-10900k - £529.98

These chips will be cooled by a Corsair H150i Pro XT and partnered with an ASUS RTX 2080 SUPER STRIX GAMING and 32GB of DDR4-3600MHz memory.

The idea behind the build is to be as good as it can be right now, with the option to upgrade going forward.

Yes, I know the new 3080 cards are coming out soon but my friend doesn't want to wait unfortunately.

Any suggestions? Would be massively appreciated!
R
Rdslw August 01, 2017
3900x will not be suported for very long, its platofrm that will be replaced in 2021 so you will get 1 or 2 more cpu gens that fits the socket and new board, and that's it. Then we will get am5 with ddr5 support.
so if you would try go get on am4 3 years ago, it would still can take 3900x now, but soon support for this socket will end.

its by few %. If all she want is pure gaming fps intel will be stronger.
if you want either good price to performance or she will stream, amd will do better.

going for ryzen9 for gaming is an overkill, very little games benefit from this.
I would go for 3700x/3800x as its already plenty for games (unless she streams, then 3900x)
and use cash for more storage.
also ryzen really likes fast ram, so consider 4200 if they are not more than 25% pricier than 3600
V
Viocristi July 02, 2020
Screen is black until windows starts - no bios
I have built a new PC. The problem is that I can't get into the bios unless I overclock the ram memory to something I know for sure it will crash and then after few restarts which the PC does automatically, it will show that the bios has been reset due to an issue and if I want to enter the bios.

What I have done: while the bios was running, I made sure the fast boost is disabled (was already disabled)
I disabled the integrated GPU
I tried all the display ports (3) my GPU has, I tried a HDMI cable from the GPU to the monitor and I tried to plug in the HDMI into the IGPU too (before I disabled it and even after...was desperate, so worth a try)

I would very much to be able to enter the bios because I suspect that my ram memory has an issue too (random restarts, more frequently if I let it on the advertised xmp profile for 4400 mhz cl19), I set it to 4266 mhz and the restarts are less frequent.

What else can I try?

Specs:
10900K
z490 aorus elite ac
32 gb ram 4400 mhz cl19 patriot viper
1080ti g1 gaming gigabyte
850 w corsair psu
monitor is an lg 3440*1440 @160 hz
V
Viocristi July 01, 2020
I solved it, it was the ram at fault.
Turns out Patriot was a little bit sneaky and 4400 mhz isn't really supported, or at least a gamble. I downclocked it to 3800 mhz cl15 and it's been running great + i can see the bios screen everytime.
V
Viocristi July 01, 2020
Power button doesn’t do anything
Hi,
I built a new pc. Didn’t do much cable management in the back of the pc because i wanted to test it first. I installed windows and few benchmarks and 2 games, the pc was running.

today i got a fan splitter for the aio fans and installed that. Powered on the pc was in windows, keep it open for few min and everything was normal. Checked few temps and they were ok too, cpu temp 36 degrees C and gpu 53 (fans off)

Now the issue: powered off my pc, and then unplugged it from the wall socket. Did bit of cable management, closed the psu shroud, and closed the back lid/panel.

Plugged the power back into the socket and pressed the power button. Now nothing happens, no leds are on, no fans are spinning, no lights on the motherboard.

All the connectors seemed plugged in ok, did a check to see if something got unplugged by mistake.

what can I do?

specs:
10900k
32 gb 4400 mhz cl19
Z490 aorus elite ac
1080ti (from the old build)
2tb evo 860 ssd (from the old build)
500 gb m2 960 pro ssd
Nzxt kraken x73 aio
Psu corsair rmx 850 gold

the monitor is an lg 3440*1440 @ 160 hz
Running windows 10 pro

i’m going crazy, if anyone has an idea, please feel free
R
rgd1101 November 07, 2011
power to the motherboard? front panel connected to the motherboard?
N
nguyencongthienvu June 21, 2020
Psu 650w enough for i9 10900k or i7 10700k ?
Hi currently I have
  • Z490 i9 10900k or i7 10700k
  • 3 fan case (1 back, 2 top)
  • 1 AIO 360 (At front)
  • 1 RTX 2080ti
  • 1 samsung ssd 256 gb and 3 TB HDD black
  • Ram 8GB DDR4 (4x8)
  • 1 Headphone USB, 1 keyboard, 1 mouse
  • My PSU: Seasonic focus gold 650w
Is it enough i9 10900k or i7 10700k ? I don't OC use stock and use only single card.Thank you.
P
Phaaze88 December 30, 2016
Well, if you're REALLY not going to overclock:
View: https://imgur.com/YwqWtBb


320w on Founders Edition models - aftermarket models will typically have higher power limits.
https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/203753/nvidia-rtx2080ti-11264-180829

That's 549-570w from the cpu(full load) and the gpu(founders edition).
Add up some of the other stuff... that's gotta be over 600w, full system load.

I'd say a 650w isn't enough. A 750w would be.
I
imaqls June 18, 2020
gpu water block temps running identical to stock
Beginner liquid cooler here. Just bought a PC that came with a cpu Liquid cooler pre installed with a 2080 ti MSI gaming X trio. stock temp for GPU while gaming then was between 70-73. Just installed the waterblock on my GPU, idle temps are sitting at 42 C, opened up call of duty, temps started out mid 50s then slowly kept going up. Saw a high of 77-78 C before I shut the game off because I wasn't seeing an improvement. Since I just got the full loop with the GPU waterblock installed running a few hours ago, should I just continue to let it run for the next day or so and see if temps change? Also, looking on the bottom of my GPU, I see what looks to be like a bit of an air bubble on one of the middle part that goes over the gpu core, but I could be wrong and thats how the waterblock is designed to make it flow over the core? It's the msi gaming vector trio from EKWB.

GPU stock under load: 70-73 C
GPU Waterblock idle: 41-43 C (Doesn't change with side glass panel removed)
GPU Waterblock under load: 78 C ( was slowly climbing before Load was relieved)
update: ran call of duty again, temp got as high as 85-86 C

Specs:
mobo: msi z490 meg godlike
2080 ti
10900k Processor
360mm rad mounted on top
three fans on top, 1 on left side ((exhaust?), three fans on the right (intake?)
Case: be quiet darkbase pro 900

I've tried running dragon center to monitor and change my fan speeds, but it shows all of my fans at 0 rpm even though they are all spinning. Was going to try and edit fan speeds to run at max, but don't know exactly how to do that. Removing the side panel doesn't change idle temps, so I don't know what my next course of action should be logically aside from re applying thermal paste onto the GPU, but I wanted to see if there was another option that was more viable before I jump to that.

Edit: Images
https://ibb.co/vVNfVC9
IMG-1468 Image IMG-1468 hosted in ImgBB ibb.co
P
Phaaze88 December 30, 2016
Now, I'm no liquid cooling expert - the actual experts here should show up later - but isn't a single 360mm rad a bit low for BOTH a 10900K and a 2080Ti:
10900K: 250w max power limit, assuming stock operation.
Msi's 2080Ti Gaming X Trio - depending on the bios version, is between 330w - 406w! A list of validated vbioses can be found here: https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/?architecture=NVIDIA&manufacturer=MSI&model=RTX+2080+Ti&version=&interface=&memType=&memSize=&since=
A 360mm rad around 30mm thick is good for about 350w of heat, with thicker ones having even higher thermal capacity.

If you're sure you see air bubbles elsewhere in the loop, I'd suggest trying to tilt the chassis around gently to try and flush it out from that spot.
P
Piotr_Rosto June 16, 2020
Which z490 to pick
Hi

I am currently trying to find components for a pc build.
But at the moment I am stuck at which motherboard to pick.
I am planning to get the Intel i9 10900k with a geforce ti 2080 super and will therefor need one of the new z490.

So my question is if you guys could give me your recommendation of a mother board for around 300$ max?
I do not have many criteria other than it should be an ATX board

Searching around I found these 2 boards that might be interesting:

  • ASRock Z490 PG Velocita
  • Gigabyte Z490 Aorus master
They both score the same on this review site, but I am not sure which one is better in performance.
Thank you
T
tennis2 November 12, 2018
I wouldn't recommend the Velocita.

T
Thatoli June 11, 2020
New gaming build 4k , Any improvements needed ?
Hello there,

The time has come to buy a new Rig and this time i want to go for a 4k gaming system. My plan is to wait for the 3080 or 3080ti to release for the GPU and in the meantime just use my 1070 gaming x to put me on @1440p on my ASUS ROG XG279Q. Then in 12 months time order the GPU and a 4k monitor. How do you rate the build i've put together ?

Component Selection Base Promo Shipping Tax Price Where CPU Intel Core i9-10900K 3.7 GHz 10-Core Processor £529.98 £1.99 £531.97 Buy
J
jeremyj_83 August 23, 2017
CPU: While the 10900K is the fastest CPU around right now, it uses A LOT of power and at 4K there will be no difference between it and a 3700X or 3900X. That will save you money on both the CPU cost and the power & cooler cost. If you do decide to keep the 10900K you will need a 360mm AIO as the H100i is too small to cool the 10900K.

SSD: The 970 Evo/Plus are the fastest SSDs out right now, but they are a waste of money. You can get similar performance from a lot of other companies without the 25-50% Samsung task.

RAM: At this point in time 16GB would be the typical for a gaming system. Since this is a high end gaming system I would go with a 2x16GB just so I wouldn't have to add RAM later on.

Here is an example of a similar build using AMD instead.
PCPartPicker Part List

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 3.8 GHz 12-Core Processor (£404.00 @ Amazon UK)
CPU Cooler: ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 280 72.8 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler (£105.43 @ Overclockers.co.uk)
Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX AM4 Motherboard (£335.78 @ Amazon UK)
Memory: Team T-FORCE DARK Za 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 Memory (£133.16 @ Amazon UK)
Storage: Western Digital Blue SN550 500 GB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive (£71.98 @ Amazon UK)
Storage: ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1 TB M.2-2280 NVME Solid State Drive (£129.99 @ Amazon UK)
Case: Thermaltake View 71 TG Snow ATX Full Tower Case (£189.98 @ Amazon UK)
Power Supply: Corsair RMx White 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply
Total: £1370.32
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-06-11 20:20 BST+0100
You are actually getting a bit more for your money here.
N
nguyencongthienvu May 29, 2020
Noctua-DH15 with i7 10700k or i9 10900k
I have questions, currently I have noctua DH-15 CH-Black, it can cool well i7 10700k or i9 10900k stock at default setting ? and temperature it can reach when gaming ?
P
Phaaze88 December 30, 2016
Responding to the thread title:
10700K: at stock, yes. Overclocked - in case you change your mind regarding it - no.
10900K: no, and no. This one demands liquid cooling - 280mm or greater.
H
Huypho May 28, 2020
Need to reseat ram everytime PC power is completely shut off
I just recently upgraded my system to an Asus z490-e motherboard with a 10900k. The first few days, the computer was working fine other than a few blue screens due to me messing with overclocking.

Today, I booted up my computer and it went straight into bios and it doesn’t even recognize my Intel 660p m.2 in there. After some trouble shooting, I reseated my m.2 and it finally worked again.

Everything was working fine for a little until I shut it off normally and switched off the power supply. Same issue again. I reseated the m.2 and it started working fine again.

After some testing I realized that whenever power to my system is completely cut (hard reset/power supply switched off/Unplugging the machine) I need to reseat my m.2 for it to work again.

Im at a loss as to what is the reason for this issue. I’ve searched over the internet for this but have found nothing. Is this an issue with the motherboard? M.2? Bios issue? Or what?
Please help

CPU- i9 10900k
Motherboard- Asus Strix z490e
Power supply- Evga 850 gq
GPU- Asus Strix 2080
Ram- 48 Gigs Corsair Vengeance rgb 3200mhz
Storage- Intel 660p 1tb
OS- Windows 10 build 18362
F
Furzumz July 31, 2020
How long will this build "last" for gaming?
"Last" as in will this at least let me run games semi-decently for the next 2 or 3 years hopefully? I get you'd need a magical crystal ball for such a prediction but I'm just looking for a rough assumption

I was getting tired of having to upgrade every year and a half with budget parts for gaming so I saved up and went with the following (please go easy on me, I made the mistake of not asking here first before buying these a month ago)

ryzen 9 3900x
2070 super 8GB
DDR4 16GB 2666mhz ram (from a older build but seems to get the job done)
B350M PRO-VDH motherboard (same as above)
750w power supply
Monitor resolution is 1680 x 1050 so I'm not doing anything crazy like 10k gaming
P
Phaaze88 December 30, 2016
A) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d9_E3h8bLp-TXr-0zTJFqqVxdCR9daIVNyMatydkpFA/htmlview#
Looks like it's fine if you stick to an air cooler.

B)As for the futureproof thing: I don't believe in it, so I'm staying out of that part. Can't give a 'rough estimation'; that's still going to be a guess based on past and current events.
I'd trust advice from a terminator or someone with a TARDIS, though.

C)A 2070 Super at that resolution?

Well, as long as you're happy with it...

D)At that res, you're also more cpu bound in games. The memory speed matters more with higher end gpus as well - but since you're on a lower res - about 18% fewer pixels than standard 1080p - to begin with, a bump to 3200-3600mhz probably won't do all that much.
F
Furzumz July 30, 2020
NH-U12S for a 3900x?
Please forgive my barrage of questions lately, I'm in a bit of a pickle and can't make up my mind.

My situation is my current cooler is a corsair h55 and I'd like to go with a NH-D14 to replace it but moneys gotten a bit tight recently and probably for the foreseeable future, life and all that.

So I took a look at the NH-U12S and it seems to be more affordable by comparison but will it be enough to keep my processor at a safe level under heavy / full load? I'm not looking to manually overclock, I just want something that will keep it at safe levels during games that will put it under really heavy loads.

Their site says it will provide 'medium turbo/overclock headroom' but I'm not exactly sure what that means or if that translates to safe temperature under heavier loads.
M
madmatt30 January 01, 2013
I'm going to throw the fortis 3 at you as an option.

Its a little known cooler but has sublime performance for the cost.

Up their in the top tier imo when it comes to 140mm towers.

Running a ryzen 7 with this and its never touched 60c even under stress testing and that's at fan speeds of a little over 1000rpm.

https://www.amazon.com/SilentiumPC-Fortis-HE1425-Cooler-500-1400/dp/B081TRFTSJ/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=He1425&qid=1596089800&sr=8-1
K
KiwiBlitz July 29, 2020
Which fan would be the best for the AMD Ryzen 9 3900x (also no temps in Speccy?)
Hey


So my new desktop has a AMD Ryzen 9 3600X and which it is a really nice cpu if you ask me (at least compared to my old i5) i managed to allow myself to be convinced to keep the stock cooler the wraith prism and i deeply regret this. The freaking thing sounds like a jet engine at seemingly ANY load so is there a more quiet cpu cooler that does not tank the cpu with poor cooling?


Also why does speccy not show the temp of the cpu? Do i need another program?
R
Ralsei October 01, 2018
Fractal Design Meshify C is a perfect case for airflow and my personal recommendation to many.

However, airflow still depends on your case fan placements. The most efficient placement is 2x 140mm/3x 120mm intakes and one 120mm or 140mm rear exhaust. No fans on top. Cool air from the outside goes into the CPU cooler, and hot air from the CPU/GPU leaves out the back. Streamlined front to back airflow.

I personally use 2x 140mm intakes and 1x 140mm exhaust, quieter and moves the same amount of air as 3x 120mm intakes on the front.

Anyhow, the Dark Rock Pro 4 can definitely keep a 3900X cool, it's a high end CPU cooler which is on par with the Noctua NH-D15/NH-D15S. I am recommending against it because of the installation, and the fan clips which are a nightmare to remove.

I am recommending the Noctua coolers mentioned above because they have an extended warranty of 6 years compared to the Dark Rock Pro 4's 3 years (which means that Noctua sends you fan replacements free of charge if one of them happens to die out, which is extremely rare with Noctua fans), Noctua provides you with free mounting kit upgrades in case you want to keep using the cooler on another motherboard, and the coolers come with an entire tube of high-end NT-H1 thermal paste, compared to the measly amount of paste the Dark Rock Pro 4 gives you.

But, this is just a recommendation. You can still go with the Dark Rock Pro 4 if you want. If you DO go with any of the Noctua coolers, be sure to check motherboard compatibility and case clearance on Noctua's website.

Lastly, RPM barely matters on a fan. What matters is the static pressure (if mounted on a CPU cooler heatsink) and the CFM (amount of air it moves). My Noctua fans are so efficient I don't even need to bring them past 1000 RPM even under load.
F
Furzumz July 24, 2020
Tower cooler clearance
I was looking to pick up this cooler and use on this motherboard in this case

I know the case itself can fit it, but I'm confused when it comes to clearance for things like RAM, PCI slots, or anything else on the motherboard itself that may cause tower cooler installation to be a problem. Is there anything I need to keep in mind in those regards or are motherboards more or less the same in regards to PCI slot and RAM slot placement?

I wanted to measure the distances on the motherboard but I'm not entirely sure the best way to go about that such as where I need to measure from exactly

Am I better off just getting a 240mm aio for my 3900x?
P
Phaaze88 December 30, 2016
The cooler is thin enough for ram clearance to be irrelevant.
Motherboard clearance: https://noctua.at/en/nh-u14s/comp#socket_8273_manuf_8361
L
luckyace9999 July 20, 2020
95º with Ryzen 9 3900X and Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II 240
Hello all,

I recently built a new desktop with Ryzen 9 3900X and Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II 240.
I suspect something is not right, because when i stress test with Ryzen Master for 30 seconds, the temperature will jump to 95º, and when i run 12 memtest with 2GB each (24GB) CPU will lock at 94-95 too...
In idle the temperature is around 45-52º with room temperature of about 25º...

Is this normal? :/

Thanks in advance
D
Deicidium369 March 04, 2020
F
did you remove any plastic that may have been protecting the cold plate?
R
Ralsei July 20, 2020
CX 650 enough for Ryzen 9 3900x?
Planning to get a Ryzen 9 3900x, is a 2017 Corsair CX 650 (with a gray "CX") enough for this CPU?

My current CPU takes about 95W under full load with Prime95, idk about the 3900x's power draw.
M
madmatt30 January 01, 2013
The cx650 is absolutely fine for those components, the 3900z can actually hit around 130w power draw at full pbo speed under stress testing

You are never going to pull over 400w at full tilt with that system realistically, and that's going to be a very rare occasion.
And when I say very rare I actually mean never.
R
Ralsei July 20, 2020
How much of a performance decrease will I see?
I have 2x 16 GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200 MHz CL16 sticks. I want to get a Ryzen 9 3900x and a B550 Aorus Pro motherboard. The memory I have is on the QVL list of that mobo.

Is my current RAM too "slow" for Zen 2 (considering I see everyone mentioning how 3600 MHz is the "sweet spot")? Will I see drastic performance decreases?
P
punkncat April 03, 2018
Lol, yup, typo.

The CPU of that gen "wants" 3200+, so you should be fine. I wouldn't personally set 32GB of RAM aside for a couple of possible frames in some titles. On the desktop and from your chair you would never be able to tell.
F
Furzumz July 20, 2020
Looking for (relatively cheap) case recommendations
I made the mistake of not asking here before buying new stuff so I'm gonna try to kick that bad habit

Could anyone recommend me some cases? My motherboard form factor is "M-ATX" for size reference and I was looking to get one of those big tower coolers like a noctua nh-d15 because my current cooler is a 120mm aio trying to cool a 3900x which isn't going to well so I need something a bit more roomy

I don't care much for RGB because I'm one of those cave goblins that lives in their pitch black room that would melt at the sight of light. Other than that the only other thing I'd like is a case that has a port near the front for headphones

My hard drive setup is two 3.5 inch drives and I was looking to add a third eventually

I appreciate any and all help
M
Math Geek October 15, 2014
i went with a fractal design focus g. around $50 and very roomy. hdd cage has room for 2 .5" drives but the top optical drive area can hold more if you wish. i have a 2.5" adapter installed there myself with 2 ssd's in it. but 3.5" drives will also fit there of course. and it fits a tall cooler like you are thinking. 165mm total height i believe it is.

again budget case but it is nice looking and easy to work with.
F
Furzumz July 20, 2020
Looking for second opinions on this cooler for a 3900x
Hello, I was gonna pick up this cooler in particular for a 3900x. It says it can handle CPUs up to 200W TDP and is surprisingly cheap. Is it too good to be true for the price or does it look like it would work?

I'm not looking to do any overclocking and have no plan on ever doing so. The only overclocking going on is the automatic "boost" feature that's enabled by default. I'm just looking for something that will help run my processor at a lower temperature because my current cooler is a corsair h55 left over from a older build that runs things a bit on the toasty side.

Think this would work for a 3900x?
P
Phaaze88 December 30, 2016
In other words, basically the same class as the Arctic Freezer in the link.
NH-U14S or better.
R
Ralsei July 20, 2020
NH-D15 method of installation.
I'm having doubts about how should I go with installing the cooler for my next upgrade in a few weeks, which is as follows:

Motherboard: Z390 Aorus Pro => B550 Aorus Pro
Cooler: Thermaltake UX200 => Noctua NH-D15 Chromax Black
CPU: i7-8700 => Ryzen 9 3900x
Case: be quiet! Pure Base 500DX
RAM: low profile Corsair Vengeance LPX

Obviously, I'll install the RAM and CPU outside of the case first. Here are my options regarding the cooler:

1. Install the AM4 mounting brackets outside of the case, then putting the motherboard in, get it screwed into the standoffs easily and wiring everything up, and only then installing the heatsink and fans of the NH-D15. I'm thinking to go with this because getting the CPU power connector in afterwards is going to be a huge pain. I also don't want the beautiful beast of a cooler to get in the way of my workflow while I'm wiring things. Don't get me started on the standoffs...

My current air cooler (Thermaltake UX200) has the most godawful mounting mechanism I've experienced so far, the cooler is sagging too. From what I've seen in the installation videos, this cooler is a hundred times more easier to install even when inside the case.

OR

2. Install the entire cooler outside of the case, then place the motherboard in and painstakinly screw in the standoffs and wire everything up.

What do you think?

Few more questions about the NH-D15 for the Noctua enthusiasts out there (Looking at you, Phaaze):

  • Do I receive an allen key for the screws in the NH-D15 Chromax Black package from Noctua so I don't have to worry about my current screwdriver not being "practical" enough?
  • Does the NH-D15 Chromax Black (sold on Amazon) come with AM4 mounting kits? I see a warning on Noctua's website when checking CPU compatibility about "coolers purchased before 2019 need to buy AM4 mounting kit separately".
My other option is the Dark Rock Pro 4 but honestly after seeing how it wobbles after installation and how hard it is to install, I'd rather go Noctua and be done with it.
P
Phaaze88 December 30, 2016
I actually can't help you with the first 2 points, because of my motherboard; X299 already has a backplate, so 1/3rd of the process is done for me...

I think I understand where you're coming from here. Several months ago, I bought this cooler , looking to possible replace the NH-D15S.
Big ol' 320w TDP VS the D15S' 250w, and it's Thermalright... *sigh, was I disappointed afterwards...

I tried different paste applications, I tried various fan setups and speeds - going through an entire tube of thermal paste - but no matter what I did, the D15S got better thermals overall. WHAT THE FUDGE.
There were some test samples where the IB-E was able to match it, but did so while being significantly louder - not quite IPPC 3000 loud though.
I wanted to like this cooler too;
-the mounting hardware is just as good as Noctua's, except for the very last step
-the fan clips for the center fan are a bit more tedious to use
-the TY-143 fans are on par with the NF-A15s at the same speed(1500rpm), but the higher rpms don't seem to help.

I may still use it anyway, IDK...

Chromax Black was introduced in 2019, so they should already have it.

I've only got experience using the Dark Rock 4. I found the fan a little difficult to install and I managed to cut myself on the thing a couple times...
R
Ralsei July 20, 2020
Question for Dark Rock Pro 4 owners
I heard a few complaints from people that this cooler "wobbles" even when installed to the AM4 mounting kit. Is this true? Does it lean down when the PC sits upright? That's kinda a problem I have with my current air cooler.

I really want to go for this cooler to cool my future 3900x but if these things are true then I don't know if the $80 is a good investment.

This video is what I mean: View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqSs_JgH64Q
R
rochismo July 19, 2020
Corsair A500 vs Corsair h100i Platinum RGB
Hello, i am going to buy a new cooling solution for my pc and i am a bit doubtful. My setup is the following:

  • CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
  • CPU Cooler: AMD Wraith Prism
  • Motherboard: ASUS ROG Strix Gaming B550-F
  • RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 16x2gb 3200mhz CL16
  • GPU: Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT
  • PSU: Corsair RM750 80 Plus Gold
  • Case: Corsair 465X
  • HDD 1: Seagate BarraCuda 3.5" 2TB SATA 3
  • HDD 2: Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB
  • SSD: Samsung QVO 860 1TB
  • SSD M.2 NVMe: PNY CS2130 1TB SSD
  • Monitor: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27WQ 165Hz Quad HD Curved
I am unsure about if i buy the h100i it will fit at the top of the case or not, i will be overclocking (not too hard). And i am also doubtful on the prices, is it really worth it to go for an AIO, specifically that one? Also, if i choose to go for the Corsair A500, will it fit on my case? Also, will there be any noticeable difference (besides of RGB) between the air cooler and the AIO? Thank you in advance
S
siaan312 June 15, 2017
Air coolers that are not the a500.
R
Ralsei July 19, 2020
Dark Rock Pro 4 enough for Ryzen 9 3900x?
Planning to get a Ryzen build with a monster 3900x in there and wanted to pair the be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 with it.

Is it enough? I don't plan to overclock the CPU. But, if I were to overclock it, would this cooler still be enough?

Will it be compatible with Corsair Vengeance LPX RAM?

I want the motherboard to be a B550 Aorus Pro as my current one is Z390 Aorus Pro and I'm familiar with them.

My case is a be quiet! Pure Base 500DX with a high airflow intake mesh front panel, three Pure Wings 2 140mm, two as front intakes and one as rear exhaust. No top fans.
I
Isokolon July 24, 2016
yes and yes